Eastside to the WestsideI hear
Mayor Villaraigosa is going around claiming to have
reduced spending (presumably he’s referring to the elimination of 700+ planned jobs), despite the fact that spending this fiscal year is up 32% over FY 2004–05. This comes as little surprise; Villaraigosa lost all respect for our intelligence somewhere between Measures
R and
S. He knows that if Angelenos can be duped into extending councilmember term limits and levying an 8% phone tax on themselves, he can get away with anything.
You hear it from the policymakers. You see it repeated in the
news and
around the
blogosphere: MTA proposes a
half-cent sales tax increase to fund transit projects. To call this a word game is putting it lightly; in the theater of combat, it’s called
PsyOps. A
recent L.A. Times piece by
Steve Hymon begins:
It may be only half a penny, but from the looks of things on Friday, an effort to raise sales taxes in Los Angeles County to pay for a slew of mass transit projects and road improvements will probably be a heated contest this fall.
Only half a penny. In addition to the other eight and one-quarter pennies—
if the purchase price of the item in question is
only $1.00. There’s a good reason guys like Hymon, Villaraigosa, and Yaroslavsky use
half-cent, and not the accurate and honest
half-percent—and no, it isn’t to conserve a syllable. I don’t know about you, but even when I support something, I feel dirty when it’s sold dishonestly.
City Council
voted 10–2 yesterday urging the County Supervisors to reconsider their
Tuesday vote blocking consolidation of the half-percent sales tax proposal into the November ballot. Unlikely allies
Dennis Zine and
Richard Alarcón stood against the motion, arguing that the Valley would not receive its fair share of new transit funding. Oddly, this is not Alarcón’s philosophy when it comes to, say, police protection.
Los Angeles County Supervisor
Mike Antonovich responded to Mayor Villaraigosa with a well-articulated position against the half-percent MTA sales tax proposal.
Ron Kaye has the
full text. Money quote:
This current measure is steeped in a cynical political calculation that the November presidential election turnout, the tangible Countywide frustration with traffic problems and the desperation to do something would be enough to win a two-thirds majority, even if the proposed sales tax measure was against the best interests of the County voters.
My opposition to the sales tax proposal isn’t based on its inequities; after all, to complete pointless projects for the sole purpose of making things equitable would be even worse for taxpayers. My position is simple: it’s time for the folks in charge to develop some respect for their constituents. Here’s the lesson I hope Mayor Villaraigosa and City Council take away from this: when you ram your trash taxes, your gang tax, your phone tax, and your
phony bond measures down our throats, eventually the important things don’t look worth paying for either.
Call it coincidence or a bow to pressure, but Councilmember
Jack Weiss has
announced October hearings to review the interpretation and implementation of Special Order 40. Dennis Zine is pushing to amend the 29-year-old police directive to include elements of “Jamiel’s Law.” A
press conference and protest are scheduled this morning in front of Weiss’s Robertson Blvd. field office.
In other news today, Mayor Villaraigosa’s culinary faves
have been published again (what, no
foie gras this time?), a couple of political nerds
are promoting Senator
Dianne Feinstein for governor, and if Zev Yaroslavsky gets his way, you’ll start seeing
calorie counts next to the menu items at your favorite eateries.
Labels: dennis zine, jack weiss, Jamiel's Law, mayor antonio villaraigosa, mike antonovich, Richard Alarcon, Ron Kaye, Senator Dianne Feinstein, zev yaroslavsky