Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098
mayorsam@mayorsam.org

Monday, August 24, 2009

Times Reportedly Investigating Controversial Galatzan Mailer

Following our scoop over the weekend that City Council candidate and School Board Member Tamar Galatzan may have spent LAUSD taxpayer funds on a mailer designed to raise her profile among CD2 voters just as absentee ballots were hitting mailboxes, we hear the LA Times is looking into the matter at the request of an opponent.

Much remains to be known about Tamar's mailer such as did LAUSD pay for it, did it only go to addresses in the CD2 portion of Galatzan's board member district and did the mailer comply with state law as to the use of public official postage requirements around the time of an election.

Sources are telling the Sister City that representatives of Galatzan opponent Chris Essel have allegedly shopped this weekend's revelation here at Mayor Sam to the LA Times and that the paper is currently investigating.  It will be interesting to see what the former fishwrap of record comes up with.  Stay tuned.

Labels: , , ,

54 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I live in CD2 and today I got my 2nd mailer from LAUSD Board Member Tamar Galatzan.

The first one was the red puzzle piece. The second one has a blue ethernet cable one it. Both have the questionnaire.

August 24, 2009 2:29 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Does the Times have any reporters left on the payroll?

C;mon, is this another ZD BS tip?

August 24, 2009 2:36 PM  

Blogger Michael Higby said:

Though just about every tip Zuma has ever given me has been accurate this one did not come from him. You'd be impressed if I told you who but I can't.

August 24, 2009 2:49 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Unbelievably corrupt. Don't see how she gets away with this.

August 24, 2009 2:54 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Speaking of mailers: didn't the LA Times also report last Wednesday (19th) that Candidate Krekorian, the Assemblyman from Burbank, also had a mailer that implied the City Council should NOT have used $30 Million for Cirque du Soleil, but rather for Firefighter salaries? Knowing and it's been reported in the paper, channel 35, etc., that Federal funds could not be used in place of public safety funds.

Wasn't this just another ethical rip-off of the Public, using an image that he is all for the citizens and property owners. So when a home owner opens their mail box he/she will say: "see, Paul would have used that money on something important! Not the already wealthy Hollywood entertainers."

Couldn't Krekorian have called his buddy Koretz, who endorsed him before day one, and asked: "Hey Paul, you voted Aye for the Cirque, could have we also pay fire and police salaries from the same money?" Another form of bait and switch, but a picture is worth a thousand words. I'm sorry, I mean 30 million words.

August 24, 2009 3:08 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Higby why haven't you reported on the calls Tamar made to principals in the Valley trying to get the Mommy bloggers to stop criticizing Tamar.

August 24, 2009 3:24 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

“Businesses need an advocate in City Council,” said Krekorian. Like the other candidates, he said streamlining permitting processes is crucial to make the city more business friendly.

“One of the biggest problems that pushes businesses out of Los Angeles is having to deal with the faceless, grey bureaucracy that is City Hall, and not being able to penetrate through the byzantine permitting process that our neighboring cities don’t have," Krekorian said. "It’s just a lot easier to get things done in Burbank or Glendale or Santa Monica, or Santa Clarita. What we need is a Council that will fight to get through the bureaucratic red tape on behalf of businesses.”

August 24, 2009 3:27 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

3:08, yes Krekorian did.

Dumbest thing about it is that the funding for that stupid Cirque venue refurb cannot be used for firefighters or firefighter salaries. This is a loan from HUD.

August 24, 2009 3:40 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Can the LA Times issue an indictment?

August 24, 2009 3:44 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I'm with everyone on this Tamar thing, but we have to keep our eyes on the prize. Tamar isn't winning this. It's going to be E$$el and Krekorian...and we don't want E$$el.

August 24, 2009 3:46 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Now you're working for Krekorian just like before you worked for Trutanich, why don't you just stop the pretense that this is a political blog instead of just a way to attack people you don't like and campaign for those you do.

Your guy Trutanich is in the papers today by the way for his latest make-work project for civil rights lawyers and the prison guard's union, what a tool.

HE and Cooley are the ones the feds are interested in for various downright criminal dealings and collusions to commit perjury, other misconduct that are felonies.

August 24, 2009 4:22 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

More Shallman dirty tricks like what he did for Nuch? Playing dirty and calling the kettle black?

August 24, 2009 4:30 PM  

Anonymous Jim Algore said:

Its a Crackwhorian-Zuma run-off.

August 24, 2009 4:33 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Looks like Nuch is going to endorse Essel.

August 24, 2009 4:34 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Krekorian, the Assemblyman from Burbank, also had a mailer that implied the City Council should NOT have used $30 Million for Cirque du Soleil, but rather for Firefighter salaries?

Krackwhorian is an idiot if he made that statement because everyone knows that was HUD money that had to be used for a project, even if it is a bad use of HUD money.

Wow, for a seasoned politician that's the most ignorant mistake ever and he used it in a flier. In other words, HES'S GOT NADA! What a loser.

No wonder the State is in big trouble, people like Krackwhorian don't even know what the hell is going on. I thought he was the Richard Alarcon/Garcetti type, but looks like he's more the LaBonge type.

And NO, this is NOT Zuma Dogg, but merely a concerned anonymous poster.

August 24, 2009 4:55 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

The mailer still looks pathetic- like it was designed to harm her.
Right off it says she's been a "trustee" less than 3 years, then boasts about getting computers- pretty lame. The piece is harmful just as it stands.

But since no one has denied that it came from her, I'm thinking there is a double agent somewhere in her campaign who has orchestrated a double-whammy here.

August 24, 2009 4:56 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Yes, thanks for reminding Higby about Tamar telling a principal to tell a parent/blogger to back off criticism of Tamar. Sounds kinda retaliatory and vindictive and controlling against a mom with a kid in the classroom. When Tamar tells a principal to drag the parent into the office to "ask" them to "stop" blogging against Tamar...well, that's not a very good precedent.

August 24, 2009 5:00 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

wonder if the gang banger Mayor would be stupid enough to show up.

A wax figure of Michael Jackson will be unveiled at Madame Tussauds Hollywood on Thursday, with an afternoon of activities planned to welcome the likeness of the late pop superstar.

August 24, 2009 5:05 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Essel is spinning this as the issue that will put Tamar out of this race.

They pushed the LAT to this story slamming Tamar.

August 24, 2009 5:23 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

4:34 PM. If that`s true, Nuch has sold out to the establishment before he could find the toilets.

August 24, 2009 6:10 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Jack Weiss told Tamar that her unethical behavior is fine. Now that he's no longer on the council, somebody has to fill his shoes.

Of Course Nuch is going to endorse "Essel the empty vessel." She's the insider candidate.

August 24, 2009 6:11 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Really? Nuch is gonna endorse Essel?

What in the world is Zuma dogg gonna say? Hee hee!

August 24, 2009 6:23 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

OMG Trutanich endorsed Essel?

That officially proves that Zuma can't negotiate a deal even when his life depends on it.

What a dickhead for believing that nuch would give him a job and endorse him after being fooled into mentioning his name for months on end. Sheeeet, datz funnay!

August 24, 2009 6:27 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

city hall nows there is no more repoters left on los angeles times keeping and eye on city hall
thats why they keep on braking the law's
if the news papers where doing there job
we had all redy send more that one crook to jail from city hall
when we depend on cnn, fox news ,for local news there is somthing wrong
evry day los angeles city hall brakes the law and they get alway doing so

August 24, 2009 6:36 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

It's no longer, "reportedly" investigating. The story will be coming out in the LA Times.

Detail will not reflect well on Tamar. I don't think she will be making the runoff as of tomorrow.

August 24, 2009 7:58 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Tamar Galtzan's Decietful LAUSD Mailer is MORE Than Shady

ALRIGHT, it's official...time to wave your finger in front of you and say, "SHAME ON YOU, TAMAR GALATZAN!" YOU HURT KIDS! And not only that, your LAUSD mailers, are indeed...PURPOSEFULLY DECEIVING IN MY OPINION. Here's the scenario on the mailers as seen through the bamboozle-busting eye of L.A. City Council Candidate David Saltsburg, better-known in the community as, "Zuma Dogg."

First of all, the LAUSD mailers that Tamar Galatzan sent out to people in CD 2 over the weekend WAS NOT paid for with taxpayer money. IT WAS, HOWEVER, paid for out of her LAUSD Officeholder's Account.

The money was transferred into that account from her Tamar Galatzan for Boardmember Campaign Contribution account when she ran for LAUSD school board, which you all remember because it was not that long ago that she was running for school board. (Yes, she's walking away from her committment from schools and kids and parents if she gets her wishes of leaving the school board in favor of the bigger and longer pay-day as L.A. City Councilgoeralonger. (And yes, when asked at the Sunland-Tujunga candidate forum about how she felt if voter approved a pay cut from $180,000 to $90,000, how she felt. She shook her head "no" and said, as someone with a family of five (was it five?) she couldn't afford the pay cut. So in other words, she is doing it as a money-gig and snubbed at doing it for only a mere $90,000.)

Anyway, it's all relevant, and here we go:

When Tamar had her LAUSD campaign account, she had two accounts. The infamous campaign account with the approximately $2 million raised privately by Mayor Anotnio Villariagosa.

She also had her own separate Tamar for Member/Shember and it had approximately $150,000, or so in the account.

A WHOPPING $100,000 OF THAT WAS DONATED BY ONE SINGLE PERSON, CASEY WASSERMAN.

You may know Casey Wasserman's name, not only as a relative of MGM mogul Lou Wasserman, but of Casey's own Green Dot Charter School support. Wasserman is also a big supporter of the LAUSD reform motion being voted on tomorrow (Aug 25) by Tamar Galatzan, who is still a school board member. So I expect Tamar to vote, "Yes" on the motion, and I would also expect her to "thank" Casey Wasserman for his contribution to this motion. Maybe she'll use the word, "effort" instead of "contribution" come to think of it.

Now here's the part that hurts kids and schools and will sicken you:

Out of the $150,000-$160,000, (approx) in the LAUSD campaign account, SIXTY THOUSAND OF IT ($60,000) WAS LEFT IN THE CAMPAIGN FUND AND TRANSFERRED INTO HER LAUSD OFFICE HOLDER ACCOUNT!!!!

And what does she use it for? Books, computers, after school programs, another teacher, a tutor for a kid...whatever you could think of to help out in this budget crisis -- what does Tamar Galatzan spend it on?:

SENDING OUT AN LAUSD FLIER THAT SAYS, "There is MUCH, MUCH more to do..." EVEN THOUGH IF SHE GETS HER WAY AND WISH...SHE WILL BE WALKING AWAY FROM ALL THAT "MUCH-MUCH" MORE TO DO!!! In other words, just when the absentee ballots hit the mailboxes, SO DOES TAMAR'S FLIER ABOUT HOW MUCH PROGRESS SHE HAS MADE (laughable comments) AS LAUSD SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER. In other words, she is sending out a flier touting how great she is...AS BALLOTS ARE IN THE SAME MAILBOX AND SHE IS HOPING THEY VOTE HER AWAY FROM LAUSD AND THE COMMITMENTS SHE MAKES IN THE FLIER.

August 24, 2009 8:06 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Trutanich has not endorsed Tamar, E$$el or anyone in the CD2 race. He will not endorse anyone in the CD2 race because his policy is only to endorse candidates for judicial and law enforcement posts. Higby, why don't you email him and confirm this?

So whoever is spreading the "Nuch endorsed..." rumors is just another 4:22PM - a sore loser.

Tamar's mailer will be her downfall.

August 24, 2009 8:41 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

Michael, someone accidentally approved your favorite emotionally unstable, relentless blog clogger's comment at 6:27pm. I pushed for Nuch because I wanted to. I wasn't thinking, "Hmm, maybe if I push him, he'll endorse me for council."

I know who I am and what kind of candidate I am and I am not expecting the City Attorney to endorse "Zuma Dogg."

And when you say, "negotiate" you are right. I don't run around "negotiating" endorsements. And I don't ask people. Maybe I'm not a politician. It would concern me if the City Attorney endorsed E$$el though as you could imagine.

It wouldn't bother me if he endorsed a "good" BIG candidate (there aren't any this time). But there is certainly no "Nuch" in this election. So to simply endorse to endorse...when it's E$$El, I'm not so sure the rumor is true. I MEAN REALLY??? Again, I could understand if Carmen were to endorse some BIG candidate and give ZD the old, "Sorry man, going with the BIG money candidate with a bigger shot." BUT NOT IF IT'S E$$EL??? ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

I DOUBT HE'S GONNA DO THAT. Not cause of my perceived sour grapes, but seriously....DO YOU REALLY THINK HE WANTS TO GET BEHIND CHRIS WHO IS SO UNPOPULAR OUT THERE AND NO SURE WINNER?

August 24, 2009 8:49 PM  

Anonymous lindsay buckingham said:

Here's a classic MTV music video about Tamar's flier fau-paw.

August 24, 2009 9:01 PM  

Anonymous RIDDLE ME THIS/ RIDDLE ME THAT said:

1.)Which of the DEVIANT! "THREE-
AMIGOS", Is throwing LAUSD under
the Charter School Bus???

2.)Which amigo is !FLUNKING LAUSD??

3.)Which amigo ate the LAUSD....
BUDGET?

ANSWERS:
1.) Mayor "I throw man-tantrums,
like a SPOILED BRAT!, when I don't
get my way", Tony Villar!!!("I sell
LAUSD to the BIGGEST BIDDER")


2.) Rat-mamon Cortines.....
(He chants the Mayor T.V.'s mantra
"PUSNISH THE TEACHERS-FLUNK THE...
KIDS! WHO CARES! REVENGE TO ALL!!!)


3.) Monica Garcia.....
(Ok! So I have a ravenous appetite,
& have eclectic taste...for LAUSD
MONEY!, tainted with Mayor T.V.'s,
'Mexican- Loser Taco Sauce'!!!)

August 24, 2009 9:06 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

8:44, you're pathetic and no one wants the Nooch's endorsement - he's made an even bigger fool of himself today with that new law all over the media and blogs today. Civil rights lawyers are going to make a killing against the city if someone doesn't educate that buffoon and stop him.

August 24, 2009 9:15 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

You kids shouldn't play so rough. Somebody's gonna start crying.

August 24, 2009 9:31 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Shallman has some kind of weird close connection to the Times which does whatever he tells them, especially David Zahniser and Maeve Reston. They are also uncannily like this blog in its biases.

If I were working for one of the other candidates I'd raise bloody hell and make sure the Times assigned someone more objective to my candidates.

August 24, 2009 9:48 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-galatzan25-2009aug25,0,5718870.story

LA Times article hit...clearly pushed by shallman, look at his quote.

tamar is going to be raked over the coals for this.

August 24, 2009 9:49 PM  

Anonymous Own Up!!! said:

It's all the BUZZZZZ!!!
Attorney C. Trutanich......
wants to round up all the 'PARASITE
GANG BANGERS'!! (graffiti or not-
they are all game to go)

Trutanich ("nuch") wants to ....
implement this law ASAP!!! & SEND
THEIR RETARDED ASSES TO JAIL!!!

So let's start celebrating folks!
Lets' bring out the !1928-KRUG-
CHAMPAIGNE!!!!

YES! FOLKS! THIS MEANS THAT...L.A.
MAYOR "HOMIE-LOCO" Tony Villar &
his gangbuster -council- hood thugs
are going TO JAIL!!!YES-C.R.A. TOO
SLAMMMM THAT JAIL-DUNGEON DOOR HARD
AND BURN THE KEY!!!!
ADIOS!SEE YOU NEVER!!MOTHER FUCKERS

August 24, 2009 9:53 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Stupid screw up by Tamar's campaign. They got greedy. She's still the best candidate in the race. Sad part is this s just setting up CD2 to be stuck with either Sac hack Krekorian or Carpet bagged Essel.

Get with it people. The fringe candidates aren't going to win. It's going to be one of the big three and you're getting bamboozled into electing someone other than a distric 2 resident!

This just proves that the novices and armchair quartebAcks will get routed by the pros every time. You're bringing it in yourselves!

August 24, 2009 9:59 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

9:15 & 4:22 Ah, the Weiss loser is back. All 8:44 did was clarify the bogus blogs you're posting about Trutanich, as if we cannot see them for what they are. Pathetic people lose. You lost. You are pathetic.

You attack Trutanich's idea to gain control over the taggers, but of course have nothing to offer. The threat of civil rights lawyers is truly a desperate last gasp from the King of Corruption. Clearly you haven't been watching the courts lately, If you had you would have seen civil rights lawyers taking a beating from Trutanich's team - the 'high five' case being the most notable and expensive loss for the plaintiff's attorney. Then there was the black LAPD helicopter pilot crying racial discrimination. Another 'high five,' for common sense and decency that it the bane of you people.

Tamar is going down in flames because of her association with Weiss and the Mayor. Her latest mailer is typical of the culture of corruption that you support. You like your "business as usual" rent-a-pols, and nothing gets you more upset than seeing good triumph over evil.

BTW, seen Jackass recently? He's grown a beard and is looking quite gaunt, almost Charlie Manson-like. Losing sucks, but get used to it. Tamar, Weiss, E$$el and the rest of the phony democrats are over in Los Angeles.

August 24, 2009 10:09 PM  

Anonymous RIDDLE ME THIS/RIDDLE ME THAT said:

9:31 P.M. Ruff! Ruff! Ruff!

Yoooouurs Truly, Mayor "Homie-Dog"
T.V. schillin out with the stray
ruf-retarded-dogs in the hood!!!

August 24, 2009 10:17 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Essel knows the district and the people to contact to get things done in the district. She knows about coalition building and is a neighborhood advocate. You keep paintjing her as a wealthy exec instead of maybe someone who could actually get something done.Personally, I want someone who will actually get stuff done in the seat, rather than failed politians.

August 24, 2009 10:21 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

And the LA Times has the story up.

Foes criticize mailers sent by L.A. council candidate Galatzan

By Maeve Reston

Galatzan's lawyer, Stephen Kaufman, said there was nothing improper about the mailers, which do not mention Galatzan's council candidacy. He said she was merely trying to communicate with her constituents about school issues.

August 24, 2009 10:33 PM  

Blogger Phil Jennerjahn said:

I hope Zuma Dogg will mention the movie "Tropic Thunder" when he talks about these problems causing his rivals campaigns to explode. I always get a kick out of it when he does that.

August 24, 2009 10:34 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

10:21

Essel staffer.

Rule number 1, don't believe your own bullshit.

August 24, 2009 10:45 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Kaufman= Sleaze ball

Just lost my vote sister.

August 24, 2009 10:48 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

Phil, TEAM Galatzan is heading downhill faster than the U.S. Olympic Bobsled Team.

Give them the GOLD medal for political insider shadiness and "corruption, plain and simple" (as quoted in the LA Times.)

Phil, how about this one...At the candidate forum this Wednesday, just as Tamar is giving her little cutesy intro where she talks about baking cookies and running in 10K races...

I JUMP UP OUT OF MY SEAT...

POINT DIRECTLY AT TAMAR AND SHOUT:

"TAMAR GALATZAN HURTS KIDS!!!"
"TAMAR GALATZAN HURTS KIDS!!!"

(She does, when you think that the money she used from her office holder's account could have been used for frivolous stuff like books, tutors, programs, or things that HELP kids. So if you aren't HELPING them, then what are you doing?

Then I can say, "I saw a campaign flier for Tamar Galatzan...Oh no, that was the movie poster for "Tropic Thunder."

August 24, 2009 10:51 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha. Now I have to give it to Shallman.He has balls .
The master architect and perpetrator of corruption of campaigning in this City is quoted in the Times as it relates to Galatzan`s mailer."It`s corruption plain and simple." "..Galatzan is raising unlimited and undisclosed special interest money..." Don`t you think he is confused of whom he is talking about? He is describing his client.The sunken Essel vessel.

August 24, 2009 10:51 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Shallman talking about corruption, and who was Martin Ludlow's consultant?

August 24, 2009 11:35 PM  

Blogger Phil Jennerjahn said:

ZD,

I think a better way to put it would be to say...

"If you vote for Tamar, you're hurting kids.."

Something like that.

But be ready for wicked comebacks because her and Essels staffers read this blog!

August 24, 2009 11:40 PM  

Anonymous Own Up!!! said:

9:31 P.M."somebody is going to cry"

DITTO!!! The kids who are CRYING! &
the teachers in ANGUISH-CRYING
FOUL PLAY are countless!!!

Only Mayor "homie-chillin-like-a-
villain"T.V...is the one NOT CRYING
He's laughin it up, with his SCUM'
LOCO-HOMIES, WHO SIDE WITH HIM!!!..
LIKE you??!!!

ROUGH TIMES FOR LAUSD CHILDREN &
TEACHERS!!!IT'S NO LAUGHING MATTER!

KIDS ARE SUPPOSED TO PLAY & BE....
INNOCENT!!It's the responsibility
of caring & moral adults....to see
that children are defended.....
protected, educated & that they
enjoy their childhood!!!

Sadly it appears, you may have been
a neglected kid?!!IF YOU CAN'T
UNDERSTAND...WHY I SYMPATHISE ALONG
WITH OTHERS HERE(M.Y.S. BLOGGERS),
as to the LAUSD CRISIS!!

If you didn't get a fair shake, to
be a happy kid....then route for
LAUSD KIDS TO BE HAPPY!...SERVE A
PURPOSE FOR A GOOD CAUSE!!

HEY, THEY SAY HAPPINESS IS CON-
TAGIOUS & GOOD FOR YOU!!SO DO GOOD!

August 24, 2009 11:58 PM  

Blogger Michael Higby said:

Who was the dumbass who said that I was completely wrong that the article was going to be about how Tamar and Krekorian conspired on this to take down Essel, etc. Uh, yea, you had it right.

Looks like Krekorian is out walking precincts, making calls, etc. while Team Essel and Team Galatzan continue to play amateur hour.

Boy someone really bamboozled them!

August 25, 2009 12:38 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Galatzan's mailer is STRICTLY prohibited in LA Municipal Code, NO MATTER WHAT STEPHAN KAUFMAN ESQ SAYS.

49.7.12 (a)8. ...no mailing may be produced or sent at officeholder expense between the time the elected City officer has filed a “Declaration of Intent to Become a Candidate” for any elective City office and the date of the election at which the person appears on the ballot."

Kaufman might argue that state law trumps LA law for a school board member, but he argued the exact opposite in court when Pugliese invoked state law against the city clerk accepting a bogus ballot designation for his opponent in the school board race.

August 25, 2009 12:42 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

MS, would you print a nasty about
Kerkorian? Hmmmm...I wonder.

August 25, 2009 12:52 AM  

Anonymous THE THREE WRATHS!!! said:

8/25/09 12:38 A.M. "BAMBOOZELD"
M.H....YUPP!!YOU CALLED IT, ALRIGHT
Them folks, were a tad......too
QUUICK on the trigger, to undermine
you, HEY TRIGGER -HAPPY-FOLKS!!!
M.H. gets the last laugh, here!!!

REALIZE!!RECOGNIZE!! IT'S LOOKING
LIKE....THE TRAIN HAS LEFT THE
STATION!!TO CD-2 COUNCIL WIN-VILL
& OH! PEOPLE! Look who are NOT!....
ABOARD!!! E$$EL & GALATZAN!!!


Why? You dare ask.... too FUCKENLY
SHADY....IT OBVIOUS! THAT IT'S TOO
EARLY IN THE GAME & THEY HAVE
ALREADY STRUCK OUT!!!! GAME OVER!!!

August 25, 2009 1:23 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Maeve Reston and David Z, like Orlov and the rightwing talkshows, sit and read this blog and then write up the biased comments of spinners for other campaigns as though they were grassroots fact. Just as they did with Weiss. Not that there's any connection between Tamar and him beyond that - just that they're both recipients of Shallman's dirty tricks and ability to pull the strings of these Times "reporters."

August 25, 2009 9:44 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Krekorian's guy Hacopian is piling on with Shallman, Higby, so don't pretend he's above this dirty play.
Hacopian accuses Tamar of aiming her mention of the Assembly against him, when all she does is ask voters their general opinion. Even while Krekorian is campaigning as a member of the Assembly. But you're right that his whole hit was probably orchestrated by master of dirty tricks Shallman, using his playbook for Nuch's dirty campaign.

August 25, 2009 9:50 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Advertisement

Advertisement