Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098
mayorsam@mayorsam.org

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

"SHOCKING NEWS!!, PART TWO" Corina Files For Divorce From "TONY VILLAR"

The "DECONSTRUCTION" of the political figure formerly known as Antonio Villaraigosa, continues with the announcement that Corina Villaraigosa has filed for divorce in Superior Court.

If I recall correctly, the original petition from 1998, resulting from the Mayor's admitted affair at that time, was never withdrawn. "NICKONISTAS" you can clarify this, or "CHIEF FAKER" can swallow his pride and clarify.

Needless to say, we will know in the weeks ahead what cause the demise of the "VILLARAIGOSA" union. I have an "SIXTH SENSE" that Jill Stewart and the "SCRIBES OF RECORD" will have something for our consumption in the near future. Don't wait on the "OLD GREY HAG ON SPRING STREET", aka "LA ANTONIA TIMES", to provide any insight. After all, they help create the "POLITICO FORMERLY KNOWN AS ANTONIO VILLARAIGOSA".

EVENING UPDATE

The LA Weekly's David Zahniser has posted an article on "MAYOR SPINS HIS WRECK MARRIAGE" on the Weekly's Web Page.

The Mayor's Office has stated that the Mayor will continue using the "VILLARAIGOSA" surname.

38 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This come-uppance is so overdue for Villaraigosa.

June 12, 2007 5:46 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Red Spot:

You sir are an interesting figure and i'd like to know who you are -- give me 5 days :)

As for ZHACKISER he will start with a conclusion and write a great script for the SOAP OPERA of a paper the LA MEEKLY. Too bad no one believes his HACK FILES except for SUBSCRIBERS to UFO DAILY and the ELVIS IS ALIVE GAZETTE.

But everyone in City Hall knows that when HACKISER needs an insider source he calls former HAHNISTAS and PACHUECO'S to get his untrue dirt.

LAUSD is floating with nothing but former HAHNISTAS (no wonder they are faliing over there) -- how do think HACKISER was able to write those stories on the LAUSD?

Seriously people -- your reliance on untrue sources and libel is funny.

June 12, 2007 5:46 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Who is more loathesome?

Villar or Jack Weiss?

June 12, 2007 5:46 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hey 5:45pm!

It's funny that you misspelled "faliing."

June 12, 2007 5:48 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Who is more likely to go to hell?

Anon 5:46 or

Anon 5:46

Inquiring minds want to know

June 12, 2007 5:48 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Sorry, I'm an idiot, too. I mean AV defender at 5:46pm.

You misspelled "faliing."

June 12, 2007 5:49 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Senor Red Spot,

Your fascination with Mr. Villaraigosa is borderline homo-erotic.

When the mayor appears on your favorite television channel 7 do you get new and untold feelings -- and the only way you know how to express such new found feelings is to reject them openly?

I mean, come on -- LA Pride was just this weekend -- were you there? Or did you throw stones from your house high in the hills of the eastside?

Just curious.

June 12, 2007 5:53 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Mayor Sam?

Have you noticed that the only public way to express your support or dismay of the Mayor has him with over 60% approval?

http://citywatchla.com/

The folks on this site are like the echo chamber that never knew the world was round.

June 12, 2007 5:56 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hey, Congress! Get a load of this immigration poll
A new Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg News Poll to be released momentarily shows a startling break between what Americans feel about illegal immigrants and what a minority of Congress is saying, or rather shouting.

The new poll reveals that a large majority of Americans--including two-thirds of Republicans--favor allowing illegal immigrants to become citizens under certain conditions. Only 23% of those polled oppose allowing immigrants to legalize their status by paying fines, learning English and meeting other requirements. Such requirements are a central tenet of the controversial compromise legislation stalled in the Senate, suggesting opposition comes

June 12, 2007 6:05 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

here’s a bunch of reasons for checking in with Nick Pacheco, and not just because the Eagle Rock lawyer would be the front-runner to win District 14’s City Council seat should mayoral candidate Antonio Villaraigosa’s poll numbers hold up through Election Day. The 41-year-old Eagle Rock lawyer, who ran unsuccessfully for district attorney after losing a brutal 2003 council campaign against Villaraigosa, wants to return to office. He’s eager to distance himself from an ill-fated alignment with the Thever & Associates law firm as well as disassociate himself from an ethics probe resulting from that last District 14 race.

June 12, 2007 6:08 PM  

Blogger Red Spot in CD 14 said:

MEMO TO "OFF PURPLE NEIGHBOR" and "5:46 PM",

Simply, I and a bunch of others were "DUMB" to vote for this "BABOZO". For all his failings of character, it would be "POETIC JUSTICE" to have to become "TONY VILLAR" again. now for your "HOMO-EROTIC" thoughts....hmm. I can see how your "LUST" for "ANTONIO" can cause you to feel arouse. "TONY" won't have the same effect on you. SO SAD !!

June 12, 2007 6:09 PM  

Blogger Red Spot in CD 14 said:

This comment has been removed by the author.

June 12, 2007 6:09 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

UPDATED - Pacheco's camp says it was a mistake, not intentional spam

So, former CD 14 Councilman Nick Pacheco is making enemies with his latest attempt at coalition-building.

The Pacheco team mass-subscribed quite a few people to the friends@nickpacheco.com listserv without their permission or request (including yours truly).

Here's the content of an email that one of the angry subscribees just sent back to the list:
From: [REMOVED - ed.]
Subject: [Friends] (no subject)
Date: September 28, 2005 6:00:56 PM PDT
To: Friends@nickpacheco.com
Reply-To: [REMOVED - ed.]

Why have I been subscribed to this list without my knowledge or consent?
Who is Nick Pacheco? Why does he think I am his friend? Do friends spam
friends and sign them up for mailing lists without their consent?

Does anyone else wonder how this person got their private e-mail address?
Could it have been stolen from the North East LA list? Isn't that a
violation of the yahoogroups terms of service?

So is Nick Pacheco a spammer and a thief?

Does everyone else think this is just hunky-dory and I'm the only grinch
who thinks this is beyond TACKY.
Yeah, he is a spammer, no it's not hunky-dory, and yes, it's beyond tacky. It's an invasion of privacy, a breach of netiquette and getting emails suddenly on a political race you have minimal interest in is basically as offensive as a sudden flood of blowjob pictures or Viagra spam.

As for me, I'm staying subscribed just to see what happens with the list - and whether any of it hampers his chances at being elected, as it should.

Anyone else out there repulsed by this? Or are [REMOVED] and I the only grinches?

June 12, 2007 6:10 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

To: Dark Pink Spot of Treason


Dear PINKY,

I was merely pointing out what has become glaringly obvious to the SPAMEATERS here at Mayor Sam. You are a one-trick pony in love with TONY.

Admitting you have a problem is the first step to a TWELVE step cure.

Admit you have a problem and we can begin the healing.

June 12, 2007 6:17 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Editorial by Joe Walker
Former City Councilman Nick Pacheco, no doubt still stinging from his defeat last year by Councilman Antonio Villaraigosa, has made a quiet and in many ways, very odd political move. He has thrown his hat into the ring for the Los Angeles County District Attorney's race. He is challenging incumbent D.A. Steve Cooley, who, while not widely known around the county, is expected by all polls and pundits to have an easy re-election race.
I follow county races more carefully than L.A. city races, and part of the reason I do this is that they attract so little attention from the general public. There are only six countywide political office holders, the five Board of Supervisors and the D.A. An elected County Supervisor incumbent hasn't lost their seat since 1980 when the very moody Baxter Ward lost his 5th district seat to the enthusiastic and friendly Mike Antonovich. (Poor Baxter Ward.. when he passed away several years ago, the board of supervisors couldn't even find an address to send flowers to. That's how much he was forgotten)
The D.A. races are another matter. Given the nature of lawyers, and the competitive nature of their jobs as prosecutors, many D.A. races become nasty inter-office battles when the second man in charge gets mad at his boss and decides to get him kicked out. Imagine Colin Powell deciding he had enough of George Bush, and he decides to unseat him. That has happened in just about every District Attorney race in many years, and with a couple of exceptions, most people that have won the D.A. seat did it by knocking out the guy before him. Cooley did this with Garcetti, who did this to Ira Reiner, who did this to Robert Philibosian, and so on.
Indeed, every D.A. going back 40 years has either been appointed to the job by the board of supervisors when the incumbent D.A. died or was elected to higher office. It is not a job that guys retire quietly from.
I'm really not sure why Nick Pacheco decided to run for this seat. He is not well known outside the 14th district. Now, as a caveat, I have never met Mr. Pacheco. I heard he did a lot of good things for Highland Park, Garvanza in particular where I grew up and still have family and friends. However, the stigma of being the only local councilman to lose in several generations, and the long memory of his involvement in phony phone bank calls and nasty mailers still haunt him and his image. Recently, as he announced his campaign staff, he telegraphed the message that more of the same was taking place.
John Edwards, a highly controversial Cypress Park resident, has recently been appointed former councilman Pacheco's campaign manager. As a independent candidate, Pacheco certainly has every right to assemble the staff that he feels can best serve him and get him elected. But Edward's negatives far outweigh his positives. Dozens of local neighborhood council members witnessed him make threatening remarks at a public meeting on September 29, 2003, and the Greater Cypress Park Neighborhood Council that he took control of earlier that year has refused to hold elections or allow itself to be accountable to the many needy stakeholders in the area.
Why did Pacheco choose Edwards? People I know say Edwards is smart and aggressive, qualities that are important when you are running a decidedly uphill race. But it seems that anyone I talk to, and anywhere I go in NELA, the main topic of the Pacheco race is.. "Why did he choose Edwards?" Playing the devils advocate, I pondered as to whether there might be some racism here.
Edwards has a thick English accent, and while he is a voting U.S. citizen, he obviously isn't from "around here". NELA, being a very heterogeneous area, should welcome potential leaders no matter where they are born, whether it is across the Rio Grande, or across the Atlantic.
Just how polarizing John Edwards is to the Pacheco campaign can be seen in the recent Northeast Democratic Club Meeting. Held at its longtime home at the El Arco Iris restaurant, a solid Democrat can pretty much be assured of getting the NE Dems endorsement for local offices. With D.A. Cooley being a Republican, any observer would assume that it would be a cake walk for Pacheco to get the groups endorsement. And that observer would be wrong.
Rather than focus on Pacheco's strong qualifications and his long experience in public life, all attention went right back to, you guessed it, John Edwards.
According to one person who attended the meeting, "After Pacheco's representative confirmed Edwards' role as campaign manager, club members expressed outrage in light of his past behavior in local civic activities, including Edwards' disruption of a September 29th community meeting and threatening to physically harm audience members."
He continued, "One Northeast Democratic Club member identified himself as one of those verbally threatened by Edwards at the September 29th meeting. The club member described Edwards behavior at the September meeting as "thuggish."
With all of Nick Pacheco's experience in politics and public service, what exactly was he thinking when he assigned someone with such high negative feelings to a prominent role? Maybe he thought that people would confuse Edwards with the well known television psychic and host of the now cancelled show, "Crossing Over", also named John Edwards?
Maybe he thought people would confuse him with North Carolina Senator who is running for president?
If I were having a cup of coffee with Mr. Pacheco at Swork or sharing a beer with him at the Kopper Keg, I'd tell him, "Nick, I am going to vote for you because you are a Democrat, a liberal, and you did well for Garvanza. But I have a strong feeling that a lot of local Democrats are going to do something they have never done in their lives.. vote Republican."

June 12, 2007 6:21 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Red Spot:

Are your fingers getting tired?

I mean you must be re-freshing your web browser a lot to be voting on the City Watch poll, over and over and over again.

Right now Villaraigosa has over 60% with this little RED BUDDY voting over and over again.

IP addresses are a bitch.

:) -- you made this faster than i thought.

June 12, 2007 6:35 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Zahniser is the best reporter at City Hall. No doubt about it....

June 12, 2007 6:38 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

The HATERS are almost done clicking "F" over and over again on the citywatchla.com site.

Go and watch as the "F" climbs by the busload.

So sad.

:)

You understand that you are reacting to my posts -- It's like you are my puppets or something.

June 12, 2007 6:39 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Are you on crack? Stop trying to bring Pacheco into this blog...Let's stop copying old blogs under new topics.

No one did anything to Antonio except himself. And by the way, he was elected Mayor, not his wife. She needs to move from the Mayor's House not him. We are not taking sides, but we knew the marriage was in trouble along time ago. She only stayed to get him elected. If you didn't know that, then you were no in and still are not in the loop Mr. Walker!

June 12, 2007 6:42 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Who cares about Nick Pacheco? This is about Antonio: who he is; what he is; how he conducts himself; his respect (or lack of respect) for others, etc...

June 12, 2007 6:42 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

you cant find a person's identity by doing an ip address lookup, the most you can get is the registered address of the owner of the domain, so an ip address lookup would only get you the address of the person's cable/dsl company.

none of these companies release their customer info so stop with the bs

June 12, 2007 6:51 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Can someone tell me why WE are paying for Corina to stay at the mansion? I thought she is supposed to get half of HIS stuff, not OURS.

Is AV going to pay the City back for her stay at the mansion?

June 12, 2007 8:10 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

to 8:10pm

the getty house is a non-profit -- $0 tax money is spent on the house.

June 12, 2007 8:47 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Lots of MEAT on here...

Trujillo U R pathetic!!!!

signed a former girlfriend

June 12, 2007 8:48 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

he has a small penis

June 12, 2007 8:48 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Antonio Villaraigosa... MAS PUUUUUUUUUTO!

June 12, 2007 8:50 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

NICK PACHECO FOR CD1 OR 14!!!

NICK PACHECO FOR CD1 OR 14!!!

NICK PACHECO FOR CD1 OR 14!!!


NICK PACHECO FOR CD1 OR 14!!!

NICK PACHECO FOR CD1 OR 14!!!

June 12, 2007 9:38 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

We probably ought to get a few things straight.

1. Ricardo Torres was right. During the AV-NP council race, he circulated mailers stating that AV was a cheater who hurt his family again, again, again and well, again...

The press lambasted Torres for attacking their Great Brown Hope. But, now, it had become apparent that when you shine the light on cockroaches...

Say it with me folks, "Ricardo was right."

2. People forget that the Pacheco-ites know all the dirt on Villaraigosa because they USED TO BE IN THE SAME CAMP.

I.E., Pacheco's people knew AV's secrets.

AV forced their hand by running against Pacheco, despite no differences on the issues.

Pacheco did what anyone else would do. That is, had Villaraigosa run against anyone else from his own camp: Molina, Gil Cedillo, etc., they would have thrown similar mud.

Treachery is rewarded with treachery.

3. The people defending AV on this blog are clearly Michael Trujillo and some other pathetic idiots sitting in front of their 512k PC-Compatibles in some dumpy El Sereno apartment. Pathetic.

June 12, 2007 9:48 PM  

Blogger Red Spot in CD 14 said:

MEMO TO THE "PURPLE TAINTED PIECE OF MEAT",

Usually, areas of the body that exhibit an purple complexion are suffering from an lack of air. So relax that grip on your "LIL PITO", detach your mind away from "HIS POLLONESS", and return to reality. I do remember some kids who were force to endure "HOT STUFFY AIR" and an "HOT WIND BAG OF RETORIC" from your "STROKE IDOL". That day at Forshay seem like yesterday. I hope that "MRS BILL CLINTON" and her friends at the "CHILDREN DEFENSE FUND" do not find out what you did to those kids at Forshay, for the sake of an "PHOTO OP".

"BACK TO YOUR TWELVE STROKE PLAN"

RED SPOT

June 12, 2007 9:59 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Didn't ADV spank Lil Trujillo for playing anonymous on blogs?

June 12, 2007 10:10 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Was anyone really surprised? I hear he's with Maria Elena and has been for a very long time. I have no respect for Corina for putting up with this. She is a disgrace and he is exaclty what we all knew him to be a loser. What's with the unmentionable daughters all of a sudden showing up to support poor papa at that press conference? That whole f*#$ing family has issues.

June 12, 2007 10:48 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Wow, clearly anyone that actually likes the Mayor must be all one person.

Did you hear that? he coughed, must be trujillo.

huh? i think someone said the mayor is doing a good job -- yup sounds like trujillo.

Hey i heard there is a random person in an apartment in el sereno who is thinking positive things about the mayor -- aheh its that rasically rabbit trujillo again!

Why don't one of you assholes ask him if he blogging on here -- i mean if he has the big mouth you all say he does and a small penis, then he will clearly want to take "man credit" for writing all of the dribble on here.

I mean clearly you all are doing research on him and catalogging his deeds, he must make you quake in your knee-high boots or something.

As for the 9:48pm genious.

Umm so you are admitting that the people pushing stories are the likes of Torres (a pachueco) trying to prove he is right because the Mayor and the stresses of his job are putting a strain on a 20 year relationship. I think YOU just confirmed with your idiotic post that Pacheco and his allies are still on the bitter bus trying to discredit the Mayor.

This Pechivionist version of history you laid out proves that the Pacheco clan is still sore about losing and can't get it out of their minds. So to PROVE they are right they are making up lies about good reporters and any other name they think will harm the mayor.

But guess what PACHEUCO'S if you had anything like "proof" you crack whors would have been the first to call CRACKHISER at the LA CREEPY or TONY "TWO-TONE" CASTRO at the daily news.

Call them --- call them now with your 100& "gotcha" proof, i mean don't you want the world to know "THE TRUTH?"

Doesn't LA deserve your oh so REAL VERSION of events, I mean why are only the prostitutes and lepers who cruise this blog and spout its hate only allowed to view or know your distorted version of events?

and yes i must be trujillo --- truly a blog room full of idiots.

June 12, 2007 11:11 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I'm just mad that he didn't endorse Obama. I'm black and thought we could build a black/brown coalition. Dream on, right?

But I guess it is truly politics as usual with Villaraigosa. We'll have Clintonesque sex scandals and compromising political lobbyists. All in the name of mad rush for power.

I'm not voting for him again. I don't like him.

June 13, 2007 4:44 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

hey, 4:44,

Maybe he didn't endorse Barack because he didn't think Barack was the right person. Maybe...just maybe, it might be about the candidate's qualifications and not the skin color. Crazy idea, right?

June 13, 2007 6:22 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Mayor Pollo didn't endorse Obama for a very simple reason. Clinton is the safe, establishment candidate and he wants in to their Dem establishment money and endorsements when he runs for governor.

I'm sure AV brokered his Hillary endorsement for the Clintons endorsement when he runs for Gov. in 2010 and access to the Clinton donor base and supporters when he runs for governor vs. Newsome in 2010.

The decision was a career move by AV.

June 14, 2007 7:52 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

so pacheco is challenging cooley, along with Rocky now? After reading the hit pieces the LAT has been doing on Rocky last few days, ever since he decided to prove how tough he is by taking on Paris Hilton (and Baca), but forgetting that his own wife's driving record was even worse, he showed himself as a grandstanding hypocrite. And today LAT writes that in a turf war with Cooley, he's been downgrading truly serious crimes to misdemeanors so he can be in charge of prosecuting them. And it was just last week that he realized it might be a good idea to prosecute and deport illegal gangsters, again with ample photo ops. Now Pacheco, who sounds like he belongs on the other side of law enforcement, with his extortion threats etc., against AV, throws his hat in the ring. We have become Mexico already.

June 14, 2007 7:18 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Watch out Antonio Villar!
James Hahn is a lonely white boy who would like to taste a Latina like Corina.

June 14, 2007 9:21 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

The untold story is what happened in Sacramento while AV was Assemblyman and then Speaker. Has anyone followed up with what happened to the young girl Carrie, who literally had a melt down at the Capitol because of her affair with AV? She was taken away by Capitol police when she showed up to AV's office and no one has ever heard from her since. YUP, AV has left a trail of victims along the way -- the latest ones his soon to be ex-wife and children.

Just like the New Yorker article stated -- AV says: "I'm Clinton." Yes, he's Clinton alright re his insatiable sexual appetite. Yes, he's Clinton alright re his stupidity and lack of self control. But he's no Clinton with regard to policies that make a difference in peoples lives. WHY? Because AV has lost his moral center and because he forgot the meaning of representative democracy -- Hey, Bro!!! You're supposed to represent people, not yourself.

June 16, 2007 9:34 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Advertisement

Advertisement