Remember this guy?
Yeah, him—he’s our mayor, remember? Antonio Villaraigosa; the guy we hired to run our city more than three years ago. Anyway, he’s in town for a few days and wanted you all to know that he’s focused on the job at hand:…when you focus on the job at hand and don't look so far ahead, it's when you kinda build the foundation for whatever you're gonna do in the future. Right now this focus is, on the job, being mayor, having a great time...
Listen below to our absentee mayor in his own words on the Ryan Seacrest Show*:
More: LAT, LAO
*Audio courtesy of KFI’s The John and Ken Show
Labels: Barack Obama, high comedy, hillary clinton campaign co-chair, Israel Junket, mayor antonio villaraigosa
Posted by solomon @ 7/17/2008 09:30:00 AM
49 Comments:
"Being mayor and having a good time"....I can see the second part. I think all he cares about is having a good time, at our expense...literally!! Throw the midget out, along with his lackey Bratton.
He's a fu-king clown and the entire city knows it, no wait, the entire nation knows it. Anyone who supports this loser has to go to a therapist. He's been out of the city 15 out of 30 days last month and continues to waste our tax dollars so he can parade around and not do his job.
....Among large, comprehensive L.A. high schools, the highest dropout rates were recorded at Jefferson, 58%; Belmont, 56%; Locke, 50.9%; Crenshaw, 50%; and Roosevelt, 49.6%
ROOSEVELT is in CD14 where both the village idiot Antonio and Huizar were/are coucilmen. They haven't done SHIT TO HELP THE SITUTAION OF THOSE STUDENTS. Not one damn thing have these Latino politicans done to help the Latino students. Goes to show unless you're a developer and have money these guys don't care. Actions speak louder then words and they are a bunch of assholes!!!
Ryan must know the Mayor is a clown, because Ryan laughed the ay through out the interview.
REASON WHY PARKS NEEDS TO NOT BE VOTED IN AS SUPERVISOR.
Rampart revisited A legal victory for three officers is a reminder that much of the scandal remains a costly mystery.
The decision of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold a jury award of $15 million to three Los Angeles police officers investigated and prosecuted -- and acquitted -- as part of the Rampart police abuse scandal is a reminder that the aftermath of that wrenching episode is with us still, costing taxpayers years after the events at issue and enriching criminals and cops alike. Given the magnitude of the city's budget troubles these days, that's cause enough for woe.
What makes matters worse is the basis for the court's decision, which turns in part on the actions of then-Police Chief BERNARD PARKS,, now a member of the City Council and candidate for county supervisor, and his then-counterpart, Dist. Atty. Gil Garcetti. According to the court, when Garcetti expressed reservations about prosecuting Rampart cases without thorough investigations, Parks replied: "I DON'T CARE. LET'S GET THE CASE BEHIND US. If we prosecute the case, even if you lose the case, it's over. It's done."
That's a troubling remark and one that understandably caught the attention of the 9th Circuit, which cited it to support the claim by the officers that they were victims of an overzealous investigation.
PLEASE GO TO "WHICH WAY LA" AND LISTEN TO WARREN OLNEY LAY INTO VILLARAIGOSA.
DEFINITELY NOT LIKE SEACREAST.
OUT!
Antonio Villaraigosa. YES, I do remember him.
And I recall that the blog owners and co-hosts here all heartily endorsed him just three years ago, especially Mayor Sam Higby.
So, who's the bigger sap in the long run - the "sapper" or the "sappee"?
Seriously -- he wasn't supported here at MS back then because he'd done a good job in his last well-paid city job (for which he was also on-record as being mostly absent), or that he had a track record as a fixer of problems, or that he surrounded himself with capable people, or that he was bringing forward a list of workable plans to address problems, or that he was intellectually capable of ever coming up with any . . .
Or, or, or. He was promoted here then as being the guy who should be L.A.'s next mayor, simply because of what or who he WASN'T. (Then) he wasn't the sitting mayor. Now. he is, so -- predictably, now you attack. (Why? Because he hasn't "delivered" -- he never even SAID he would DO anything. In THAT anyway, he's KEPT his promises). Or wasn't anyone paying attention then?
He was never capable of being an effective mayor of a major city, and anyone who said he was, was on his payroll, decluded, or certifiable.
Who's word should you trust that he's now doing a BAD job? The same citics who once said he would do a GOOD one? Based on NO evidence that he could, ever, possibly rise to the challenge?
Not on your tintype, Junior.
This blog's collective judgement sucks as bad when attacking as it does when supporting.
PLEASE, don't bother endorsing anyone here this time around. A person would have to be a HUGE idiot to take this blog's advice - on ANYTHING more important than whether or not Britney Spears should wear a bikini or a one-piece!
1135 are you out of your effing mind?
You mean he did a great job during the city council term that he SAID he'd complete, but didn't?
Is that the same half-assed job he'd do if re-elected, then dump it to run for Governor?
Are you talking about leaving the city with more than a half billion dollars in debt?
OH, and what about the 700+ jobs he was going to cut OR ELSE WE'D LOSE SERVICES, and then not a single person gets fired?
That great job?
Is that the great job you mean?
Or is there more great work? Like traveling around with Clinton forever.
Or traveling around with Obama forever.
Or going to Israel with THIRTY others during a budget crisis, under the guise of security? What security work does AV do? Remind us?
Or, the great job of distracting 100% of the city with his family problems?
Or his waiving a toilet brush in the air and acting like a FOOL.
That great job?
That one?
Huh?
Tell us.
10:19am, the jurisdiction of the council over operations of LAUSD schools is only incidental, if at all. Huizar might be more blameworthy for what happened during his tenure on the LAUSD Bd. of Education, before reaching the council.
Mayor Tony has Roosevelt squarely within his control now that the dust has settled over control of schools, so let's see if anything works.
Most of the mentioned schools- as with LAUSD overall- have a lot of "ELLs", English Language Learners, who don't have English as their first language. This fact is rarely brought out as a factor affecting school performance which really is the key to improvement in most things other than math.
BTW, it's not developers with money who get the attention, it's the developers who "SHARE" the money with the occupants of City Hall.
12:13
Calm down, take a deep breath, and remember elementary school reading skills, if you got that far.
Then, maybe with some help from an adult, you can re-read the post you're ranting against.
You'll hopefully then discover that we're on the same page when it comes to the view that Villaraigosa hasn't done of "great" job (your word - no one else ever said "great," even sarcastically . . . more evidence you missed the message).
But, even though we may be on that same page, I can read it, and you can't.
It's VERY important to read EVERY word, and not pull a phrase out of context before you drop a 300-word rant in anger.
For example, when someone says:
"he wasn't supported here at MS back then because he'd done a good job in his last well-paid city job..."
That means (stick with me, special ed) "he DIDN'T do a good job, but you (Mayor Sam and his little saps) supported him anyway'
The POINT of the post was to condemn Mayor Sam and his minions for endorsing Tony V. three years ago when he had no history of doing a good job in city government and no stated plans to make the city better. (I know, still too many big words - sorry!)
As I said, we're on the same page -- only your lips are moving when you try to read it, and your comprehension level is on par with Mayor Sam's political insight.
(Your other big clue should have been the more simple statement "He was never capable of being an effective mayor of a major city, and anyone who said he was, was on his payroll, decluded, or certifiable.")
Keep going to that tutor, tiger. Someday you may be up to Zuma Dog's level of intellectual discourse. That response you posted sounded like something he would have come up with for a 2-minute "I'm ready for my closeup, Channel 35" moment.
If you live long enough.
"Remember this guy?"
No, I don't remember him... who is he?
Of course we remember him. He did a lot for us.
11:35 = Janice Hahn
still bitter about antonio's crappy speeches
Hey Janice!!!
Fatboy Higby did not support Antonio you twit.
He is a Bob Hertzberg lover.
You stupid!
Jim Hahn sucks.
Remember Mike Trujillo?
In other news:
Loser Zuma Dogg begging for cash again on his blog.
Loser Joseph Mailander becomes the Catholic Jesse Jackson
Loser Kevin Roderick gets another woody
Loser Mayor Higby eats another Danish
Loser Valley Dull still LUVS YA!
Loser Wet Spot craps in his pants.
Loser Wacko Walter is still confused.
HEY EVERYBODY !!
IM PROUD TO SAY I DID NOT VOTE FOR THE LOWLIFE,SCUMBAG,BAD BREATH,WRINKLED FACE,OILY FACE,GANGBAGGER,CHLO,PENDEJO,
MARICON,BORACHO,THONG WEARING,MIDGET MAYOR OF LA!!!
YES YES I AM PROUD TO SAY!!!!
Wouldn't it have been freaking hilarious had Ryan Seacrest asked Tony Villar about the 80 fake neighborhood watches? Imagine the reply,
"Ahhh... ahhh... ahhh... "
1:54 I hate you but you're so eff-ing funny!!!
2:29pm That would have been HILARIOUS.
Who does Ryan Seacrest think he's fooling? He's as gay and flaming as they come. And to the poster who keeps going after Higby stop. You're an idot. At least he like thousands in this city know better now and are giving us an outlet to spread the word.
Two weeks ago Schwarzenegger was on Meet the Press with Tom Brokaw. Brokaw excoriated him and told him 'if you were the CEO of a publicly held Company, you would have been FIRED!"
Schwarzenegger said..."But Tom...I'm having a great Time"!!!
The first week after he was mayor, Villar told a reporter: "I feel like a kid in a candy store"!
You bet this effing, effing idiot is having a
'GOOD TIME"...AND IT'S ALL ON US!!!
THE JOKE'S ON US!!!!
BUT THE BEST ONE WAS SOMETHING i HEARD ON JOHN AND KEN:
WE CAN'T BE DEPENDENT ON DOMESTIC OIL"!!!
CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT THIS FUCK DOESN'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 'DOMESTIC' AND 'FOREIGN' OIL????
And I am proud to say that I NEVER voted for this idiot...going back to the first time he ran.
The reason he's here is because half of this city is illiterate and Mexican. He is the Tijuana mayor!
His IQ is the same number as his age! What a stupid, stupid, ignorant cholo!
"AL A"...drives me crazy! He can't even pronounce the name of this city..."AL A"! Cholo speak!
T\
1256, i did not vote for him.
I voted for Huggy Boy, who, if it weren't for Hahn's meltdown on election day, would've beaten Antonio big-time in the runoff.
So, to answer the question of the post, NO I DON'T REMEMBER WHO THIS GUY IS! HE'S NEVER HERE IN LA!!!
And while you're at it, maybe you can explain why he's fundraising in NY and Chicago instead of here?
Developers perhaps?
Yes, developers for sure.
And 1:54 has all the time and interest to keep up on it all.
THIS IS MUCH FUNNIER PHOTO PLS PUT IT UP
http://www.laweekly.com/news/news/antonio-pinocchiosa-and-his-police-tax/19265/
Antonio Pinocchiosa and His Police Tax, The mayor gets caught with his hands in a $137 million cookie jar
By DAVID FERRELL
Wednesday, July 16, 2008 - 7:00 pm
1:47 = arrested development adolescent (thinks city council members "blog" here).
1:48
You fell asleep after the primary, right?
Mayor Sam Higby supported Hertzberg until he failed to make the cut in March, THEN he switched to Tony Villar (because he's a sheep, and his-then blogger buddies were shilling for Tony V - some for pay).
Now he's anti-Tony, because that the majority of the blog writers here.
Higby don't got a soul of his own - he just adapts to whoever blogs with him at the moment.
HELL, he even VOUCHED for the historic
80 FAKE NEIGHBORHOOD WATCHES
and said he also had SEEN proof they were REAL (but, pssssst . . . he couldn't reveal the names of the organizations, because killer thug gangbanging stalkers could figure out who they were run by and greenlight hits on the people behind all FAKE 80 OF THEM.
Hey 2:55, you gonna call somebody an "idot" at least spell it right, you mron -- you graduate of the Red Spot Remedial Artz Akadummy.
So. were you elected to defend Higby by the other kids on the block? (And, who is it that's "gay and flaming"????)
Dude, Higby -- bless his out-of-touch wanna-be politican heart -- has always given people a chance to trash Tony V. here. I've been doing it for ages - long before he even started.
It just took him FOUR F-CKING YEARS to figure out what anybody with half a brain knew when he was NOT working for CD14. That's a two-week lesson at best, so if you take FOUR YEARS to figure out Antonio is scum, you get to wear the dunce cap in RED SPOT's classroom, because your political IQ is measured in negative numbers.
Dude's, right, this blog heartily endorsed Tony V. and even talked down his grotesque lack of accomplishments.
It was 'Anyone But Hahn,' regardless of the crap in store for L.A. under the midget mayor's traveling circus act.
Oh, and anywho who thinks Hertzberg would have beaten Hahn OR Villaraigosa has fecal matter for brains, and belongs on Ron Kay's SLAP stearing committee (and no, I did not spell "stearing" wrong, because the whole thing IS BULLsh*t).
Kaye will horse around for a few months to get his own name recognition up and then run for some vacant council seat in the Valley - maybe Wendy Gruel's when she becomes the new Laura Chick - and claim his $200K salary, then become just another back-slapping council "good-old-boy" who never once attempts to change anything in the city. All this after leading you angry old men around by the nose as the leader of your "revolt".
Yes, we all know that Higby makes predictions that he feels will make him look like a guru.
We get that.
But YOU'RE here, too. If HE's a sheep, and you're on HIS blog, what does that make YOU?
Either a weaker sheep or a coyote.
For those who come here for no other reason than to read the tea leaves, watch and see how often Ron Kaye is criticized when he has nothing to do with the subject of the thread. Then ask yourself why? Who would be threatened by the respected former editor of a local newspaper who might run for office not because he wants the job, but because he wants his opponent to do his job? The most dangerous foe is one who has nothing to lose.
524, you're clearly out of touch.
Greuel is going for Chick's job.
And Chick is going to carpetbag and take Greuel's.
For such a smartass, you didn't seem to know that.
AnonyMouse writes.........
In other news:
Loser Zuma Dogg begging for cash again on his blog.
Loser Joseph Mailander becomes the Catholic Jesse Jackson
Loser Kevin Roderick gets another woody
Loser Mayor Higby eats another Danish
Loser Valley Dull still LUVS YA!
Loser Wet Spot craps in his pants.
Loser Wacko Walter is still confused.
*************************************
You forgot the Biggest Loser of all
Don Quixote, he's still still kissing ass (Besando Culo) over at Joe Mailander's blog, they dont call D.Q., Don BesaCulo for nothing.
How can a mayor focus on city business when he’s MISSING IN ACTION!
Call me a therapist then because he can't do jack compared to what the 15 councilmembers can do.
You know 10:20, far be it from me to question your intelligence but it did clearly state that it was Courtesy of John and Ken. Ryan Seacrest would never treat the mayor rudely or laugh through an interview. And weren't you wondering why the mayor kept talking while the interviewer was laughing?
No, because the rude assholes are John and Ken. They laugh through the playback of Ryan's interview. Like we all think they're hilarious.
11:35--
You go girl.
The dumb asses here won't get your sarcasm though.
Even if you disagree with Mayor Sam, you have to like the fact that he will post negative comments such as the comment at 1:54. Joe Mailhandler on the other hand is a weak sensitive pussy who wil only posts comments by ass-kissing lackeys such as Don Quackers.
Joe Mailhandler posted many, many comments critical of L.A. Times satff, but Joe is a weak nobody who writes a blog, read by three people including his family members.
So Mayor Sam and Red Spot get a kudo, for being able to handle the heat.
I can see the haters posting. Instead of being productive and stating an opinion all they do is post personal attacks on anyone but the Mayor. No doubt Antonio has his spinners monitoring this blog because they know everyone in the city reads it. Let's ask Ace Smith, Antonio's guy to give us those poll numbers on his approval rating. You can bet they are in the very low 20's is the word.
7:11 p.m.
I got another, more appropriate theory about that (vs. the old "someone must be threatened" straw man argument that's used here ENDlessly -- and poorly anytime someone makes a valid point against a blog "hero").
The alternate "theory" is when a concerned citizen, who also has his beefs with city government, sees a posturing demogague like Kaye leading a pack of probably well-meaning lemmings off a cliff just to boost his own name recognition -- to feed an ego, or whatever.
Does that mean the critic is jealous that HE'S not leading the pack of lemmings in useless, laughable "revolts" (even a small pack), and their efforts off a cliff?
Only in your warped mind.
As far as being a "respected" former editor of a local newspaper . . . PLEASE, I've lived in L.A. all my life, stay very much in touch with civic lie, and I never heard Kaye's name before he decided to SLAP someone to finally gain some recognition.
Please don't try and foist your Valley-centric prejudices on the whole city. Most of L.A. would use the Daily News for trashcan liners before they ever read it, and that includes people in the Valley, as evidenced by it's miniscule circulation for being an "L.A." newspaper.
More people read the New York Times throughout L.A. than the Daily News. It would be better named "The Valley Curmudgeon".
This week's SLAP was a silly posturing of mostly angry, out-of-touch middle agers who are still bitter over not being able to secede from the city years ago.
Get over it, already, and stop letting false political profits (no 'sic') like Kaye "lead" you with promises of ANOTHER chance.
After enduring that Podcast, one must ask this.
When did we elect Richard Alatorre as Mayor?
July 18, 2008 9:11 AM
The LA Partnership Schools under the control of the Mayor has done almost nothing to help schools like Roosevelt High School. After 18 meetings and 6 months, the Partnership has planted about 100 trees throughout the campus at Roosevelt High School and the Partnership is also refurbishing the Roosevelt swimming pool. How this will improve student achievement is anybody's guess. The real reform plan is that the Partnership will break up Roosevelt into 8 small schools of 500 and convert it into a charter school. What an idiotic idea. The administration at Roosevelt can't even run one school, how are they going to run 8 schools? All the years of Roosevelt's great tradition and history will be destroyed by outsiders. Today the Mayor held a news conference at Roosevelt High School calling for the public to support another bond measure to build small charter schools. Caprice young, "Ms. Charter School" herself was there, as well as Steve "Green Dot" Barr, and representatives for Eli Broad and Dick Riordan were also on hand. "La Gorda" Monica Garcia and Vice Admiral Brewer were on hand to lend support to this new scheme. No teachers, no parents from Roosevelt, no community members, or union officials were invited. This is but another move to privatize and and destroy public education so that people like Steve Barr and Eli Broad and their corporate buddies can make a profit at the expense of public education. The sad fact is that with all the previous monies and bond measures , no high school has yet to be built in Boyle Heights. And now they are asking for more money. By the way,I was surprized not to see Fabian Nunez there. He loves the corporate sector and their money. He is such a lovable shyster.
Someone mentioned, that because many students are not fluent in English, they are bringing the achievement level down. Instead of blaming immigrant students, the District should offer vocational and high technical jobs and training to these students. It does not take a rocket scientist to know that the high drop-out rate is because students have to work. 75% of the LAUD population is now Mexican/Latino. Their needs on an educational and cultural level must be met or these students will only have options: prision, gangs, or working at Walmart.
8:28 i realy liked j.m.'s blog at first but he has fell for don quixote's bs, its a shame its making him look like a fool and his blog is worthless but the good thing is you can come here and have a opinion.
3:21: "All the years of Roosevelt's tradition and great history will be destroyed by outsiders." Please -- the school isn't graduating half the kids there, and your rambling on and on about how we "shouldn't blame the illegal immigrants for not speaking English and ruining the schools" but should provide more money for more programs etc., shows you're one of THEM.
The Mayor went to Roosevelt, so he's not an "outsider," and while I think it's stupid that he's putting all his eggs in a few baskets, that of a few failing schools full of immigrants and mostly Anchor Babies or illegal kids themselves, your arguments are truly stupid.
You also don't get the point of what he and his "new Board Pres" Monica Garcia and Yolie Flores are trying to push through: they're not supporting real Charters (which have some independence from LAUSD and UTLA, that's the whole point), but trying to compete with them by building similarly small schools with OUR bond money. So I agree we should vote NO for more bond money for buildings -- LAUSD has more than enough of those, in all the wrong places, plus that monstrously expensive and ugly Broad Performing Arts School downtown, requiring all the kids to be bused there -- but for opposite reasons. WE SHOULD BUST UP LAUSD INTO MANY DISTRICTS.
I don't want my tax dollars going to these experiments and illegals, while our kids are neglected for crazy, socialist, ethno-centric PC reasons.
Good for Tamar Galatzan, not being as stupid as Garcia and Flores -- she points out in LAUSD meetings that even if the buildings are smaller, if nothing else changes about how they teach and run the schools, all the money will be wasted, so why blow billions more on buildings?
Instead, LAUSD and UTLA must allow real parental choice and stop trying to prevent charters from opening up to make up for the lack of decent LAUSD schools in most of the city -- middle class people are fed up with subsidizing illegals and getting nothing back for themselves. (HOWEVER, Charters are also successful in South L A, and any area where parents work with teachers and Administrators to pull them together.)
While you fools all sit around here in a circle jerk, Antonio Villaraigosa is the Mayor of Los Angeles, and is headed toward a primary victory against virtual unknowns.
Why?
Because he has done things that lots of people like, such as:
1) Gotten cranes all over Los Angeles, constructing new buuldings and providing jobs for thousands of otherwise unemeployed workers.
2) Caused real change in the schools, and got people to support that change.
3) Changed the dead wood at Los Angeles World Airports by bringing on a world class General Manager, Gina Marie Lindsey, who is cleaning house and making the place work properly. While you fools blog, she has launched a $10 Billion midfield terminal project and is undeway.
4) Cleaned house at Los Angeles Harbor by getting a world class General Manager in Geraldine Knatz who is doing a great job turning the harbor green and increasing buisiness at the same time.
5) Got rid of Ron Deaton at LADWP and installed David Nahai who, despite the foolishness over his personal water and electric bills at his hoome is doing a great job making the utility green and run properly while weaning us off coal.
6) Changed most Commissioners, including Police, Public Works, CRA, and just about everywhere else you can imagine to get rid of the wholesale corruption and influence peddling that were mostly attributed to the Hahn Administration and included such folks as Leland Wong (now on trial) and difficult folks like Ted Stein, Bill Wardlaw and a host of other minor players controlled by Troy Edwards and person or persons unnamed.
Your memories are short and you deserve whatever happens to you, but know that Mayor Villaraigosa, whether everyone who reads this blog votes for him or not, will be reelected in the primary election, so get used to it for another four and a half years.
I agree wholeheartedly with 3:35 (yesterday). Unfortunately I go over To JM's more than needed if only to see how Don Quackers is humiliating himself with his subserviant diatribes. It's a shame I do that because in so doing it bumps JM's "hit count", most likely giving him the false impression that anyone is actually interested in his weak posts. I say that only because they are generally topics snatched off some other blog. And then there's Don Quixote himself, a most unique example of low self-esteem with an untiring need to be recognized, acknowledged and yes, cared about. People I've known that display these characteristics usually self destruct, but I've followed DQ for a few years and have to marvel at his resilience. I imagine the fact that he splits his identities between DQ, Drinking with Tony, Santiago, and a miriad of others serves to extend what he conceives as credibility. Who knows? But it is an interesting case of a tweaked ego.
Get used to the fact that so-called "illegal aliens" (12 million) and "anchor babies" are here to stay. And by nights end, there will be many more. I would suggest you read the US Constitution and/or the Declaration of Independence. You might want to include the Torah as well. On the the other hand, start a White charter school. Your arguments are truely racist and unamerican.
Get used to the fact that so-called "illegal aliens" (12 million) and "anchor babies" are here to stay.
One very well HAS to get used to the fact, because its for damned sure their birth country isn't going to "reclaim" them. Mexico is smarter than that. Why should they attempt to cure the "disease" that hampers their silent enemy? Face it Mexico is run by, consumed by the essence of their being: greed. I see it in many ways comparable to Fidel Castro's Mariel Boatlift, but on a far grander scale. This grand caper is bringing our once great country to her knees, and these traitorous "reconquistas" are fully culpable and need to be shoveled back across the border just like their undocumented cousins.
Of course this will never happen because we are a kinder and gentler nation. Our sensitivities exceed our ability to see clearly, and we will be all but consumed by the starving rabble. It's almost a foregone end, and it is fitting that those who brought her down will complain and cry the loudest when she shudders and sinks.
Keep your balls in their sack and your powder dry. there may be a chance that one can put a bead on the scoundrels who facilitated our demise.
And your response is TRULY (that's the correct spelling)Quixote-istic. You decry "racism" at the drop of a sombrero, and exhort all the benefits of an open border policy. Illegal aliens doesn't belong in parenthesis. It is a fact not a theory. Mexico is oozing people like a wound oozes pus. It's likely though that the nasty influx will eventually denigrate the desirability of coming here and the rabble will migrate elsewhere. I suggest the Pacific, but that's just me.
no one will run against tony because the times and roderick still love him, and the fact that he's gone more than "travelin' sam" yorty or tom bradley combined, hasn't done anything but raise trash fees to the legal maximum because he doesn't know how to balance budgets
(remember he was in charge of the assembly in sacramento, and made a fool of himself while making fools of everybody who supported him won't matter. On with the show.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home