Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098
mayorsam@mayorsam.org

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Zen Studies

Or, why the Mayor is in trouble.

OK, nirvana-seeking dum-dums, you have likely already penciled out the fact that the Mayor's office spent about $100 per vote on another unvarnished, thirtysomething, one-photo-op school board candidate, Tamar Galatzan. And yet, after all that tooth and all that jack, $1.2 million in fact, Ms. Tamar still could not quite put away a man 31 years her senior and with a far smaller coffer, Jon Lauritzen.

The koan before you, Zen/Zan masters, is not who will win. It is not the hour to answer that. The koan is, "Why didn't the Mayor's mix of muscle and money already prevail?"

~~~

The answer, dear beloved dum-dum disciple, is that we have this enormous voting block in Los Angeles, one that has controlled most Valley-situated elections since the late 1980s. It is known as "the baby boom."

But when it comes to education, this baby boom---mostly anglo, mostly homeowner, mostly putting their kids in private schools---makes all the noise of one hand clapping in the voting booth. And thus, the Mayor, though still popular with the baby boomers who elected him, fell flat on his face when it came to electing his most critical LAUSD candidate outright.

~~~

If the modelo for electing Mayor-sanctioned school board candidates was the Monica Garcia campaign, it was a virtually untested model. Not even inserting a few extra accent marks into her name, nor placing her in in a crowd of Latino honchos for the one-stop foto-op, could do half as much as the UTLA did itself in electing her. After all, the UTLA ran a man with a lot of baggage: Chris Arellano---not as much as the mostly inattentive media thought, but enough to crush him nonetheless.

It turns out that the Mayor's handlers would have been smarter not to slime Arellano a week before that election---that skewed results, even made them unreadable. It would have been better at that time to see what the Mayor alone, without the backdoor slime, could do for a candidate. Last Tuesday was the more legit test: and we found out that maybe it's not so much, after all.

~~~

Who will win this race between Lauritzen and Galatzan: it's not going to be who gets out their most predictable base best. It's going to be whoever makes the mostly bored-to-tears, mostly anglo, mostly homeowner, mostly private-school-parent baby boomers care more about the election. That's actually a pretty hard task for the Mayor at this point; the City keeps slamming forty-unit condos on their blocks; they don't blame the Teacher's Union for that.

Shanti, dum-dums.

21 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Joseph,

I think you didn't read today's daily news that said the INCUMBENT is ALWAYS expected to win.

The fact that he didn't means he is in a lot of trouble.

And FYI - UTLA spent nearly $1million on Jon Lauritzen 4 years ago and with the county federation and the fact that UTLA can hide their money -- the figure for Lauritzen is likely closer to $900,000.

But why let facts get in the way.

The facts are -- the Mayor will get all 3 candidates he endorsed elected.

It's as simple as that.

March 13, 2007 4:08 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

In all of these Monday morning analyses of outcomes and $ per vote, it's important to keep in mind.

This is now, that was Zen.

March 13, 2007 4:19 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Mayor,

Call my office. We found you head.

March 13, 2007 4:22 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Vladovic (would-be mayoral puppet) is in trouble with Escandon endorsing Kleiner.

March 13, 2007 4:40 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

someone get joseph a job - or does he work for Mr Mayor at some lucky City Dept - DWP? LAWA?

March 13, 2007 4:44 PM  

Blogger Smiley said:

When all is said and done, it's going to come out that the mayor put almost 2.2 million into the Galatzan campaign through 527 monies which do not have to be reported until June. Lauritzen had no 527 and all of his money has been reported.

It all comes down to turnout. How do we go lower than 6.8% turnout? Anyone want to see it at less than 3%? A real possiblility.

March 13, 2007 5:06 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

4:22 - we've also found a couple of toilets in the basement he can clean.

March 13, 2007 5:47 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Doh! You forgot to include the $679,000 of general fund NON-REPORTABLE money spent by UTLA and the LA County Federation of Labor for Lauritzen, dum-dum.

March 13, 2007 6:02 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

408 = Michael :MEAT: Trujillo

DID ROB REINER FIRE HIM?

March 13, 2007 7:20 PM  

Blogger Walter Moore said:

One hundred dollars per vote? Wow!

Might I see your math on this one? I'm not saying a decimal place slid or anything. On the contrary, I want to be able to support this statistic at my website.

For every $100 I spent on my campaign, I got 38 votes. I would love to be able to cite the $100 per vote ratio.

March 13, 2007 7:24 PM  

Blogger Joseph Mailander said:

Might I see your math on this one? I'm not saying a decimal place slid or anything. On the contrary, I want to be able to support this statistic at my website.

Walter, are you really just trying to rub it in? ;-)

Here's $1.2 million to Tamar.

Here's her 12,857 votes.

$1,200,000 / 12,857 = $93.33/vote

Indeed a pleasure to respond.

March 13, 2007 7:43 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hey Walter...

I could spend NOTHING on my campaign and still get more votes than you...

People won't vote for the front runners all the time...they just close their eyes and stab

Who cares how much vote/$ it is...That doesn't fucking matter...the only thing that matters is the final tally.

March 13, 2007 8:14 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Remember folks, Joe Stalin told us that "It is isn't the voters that count, it is the counters that count".

Antonio wins them all and you guys who keep smoking your own shit about him falling apart need to get a life.

March 13, 2007 9:23 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

guess whose campaign manager is bragging about endorsements they do not yet have in hand? might get a kick in the ass.

March 13, 2007 9:30 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

<> 9:23, you are clearly an Antonio backer. And am I the only one who finds it disturbing that you brashly insert a Stalin quote and allude to voter fraud?

There are many many people in CD 14 who believe Antonio won with some degree of ballot box stuffing.

Just one example, not anecdotal: At an old abandoned hospital, Linda Vista, a voter named "Linda Vista" voted... Absentee... And more than likely for Antonio.

Am I seriously the only one troubled by this type of shit?

March 13, 2007 11:04 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

After Doug Dowie, Leland Wong, Ted Stein, James Acevedo and company, you guys are complaining about "ballot box stuffing"? Give me a break.

Did anyone see the returns? Do you have any idea how many illegal votes it would have taken to win by the margins that Antonio won by?

Nope, try something else; Antonio won by the same margins he was leading in the polls. How do you stuff every single poll taken?

March 14, 2007 2:12 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Does anyone think that Jon may withdrawl due to health reasons, following that Daily News article?

March 14, 2007 8:48 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Trujillo is opening his mouth again? WOW what news!

March 14, 2007 8:49 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Is he saying Galtzan got Pugliese endorsement? not sure that is true. Daily News said he has not endorsed.

March 14, 2007 11:07 AM  

Blogger Smiley said:

I saw Jon at the Area Meeting today, he looked good. Rested and ready to go.

He talked about a lot of things, but stepping down wasn't one of them.

March 14, 2007 9:30 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Jon is not going to step down and although I don't believe the "dum dum" who continues to tell us that County Federation and UTLA adds up to MORE money than claimed, it is no where near the million+ that the mayor spent to try, and I do only mean try, to get Tamar elected.

Forget about it Antonio lovers, Jon's experienced campaign people will be draggng people out from every place you can find to get them out to vote. Trujillo is just hoping the money will allow her to make a good showing.

I believe Pugliese will endorse Tamar. He wants something else and the mayor is still on that extended honeymoon.

But uh, okay. It's lasted long enough.

March 15, 2007 3:37 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Advertisement

Advertisement