Juan Johnny Jay Jimenez Release
Bringing you the Spam, first sent from Downtown Central City East BloggerHOT PRESS RELEASE HOT PRESS RELEASE
Monday, October 24, 2005
Contact Person: Tony (213) 276-9387 and O.G (213)
On Tuesday, October 25, 2005 there is a candidate forum for the Council District 14 at 6:30 PM. at Casa Mexicano 2900 Pedro Infante at Euclid Street. Los Angeles, CA (Boyle Heights). We the Skid-row CD14 Brigade/homeless Coalition will be attending to carry the voice of the people of Skid-row. Ten candidates are competing for the seat as our CD14 Councilman which none of them have no clue but only one candidate who has come to Skid-row at dangerous hours and we see no other candidate taking that risk! The Skid-row problems are greater than the eye can see that not even our local Missions are not able to come together and address the homeless problems as it should be but rather are more worried about generating the mighty dollar for their own selfish reasons without asking us what we are in need of to better our own lives! There does not even exist a collaborativeness among themselves not even with local merchant support.
We will be going to this forum to educate the voters including the other nine candidates because one candidate has taken the lead in trying to help out our community. We are in need for our MAN to win this Election before it is to late for everyone living in CD14 because those neighborhoods the residents will face us camping in front of their yards and vacant land with our humble belongings placing our cold bodies there at night! Our humble Mayor Villaraigosa brought more homeless to our neighborhood without taking care of the existing problem plus spending the funds our city is short of in helping the homeless issue! Reporters are not telling you all the truth because they say it as they see it not like we see it.
-END-
Happy blogging...
Posted by Anonymous @ 10/24/2005 07:10:00 AM
54 Comments:
Who ever goes to the debate ask Jose Huizar why if he cares so much about CD14 no NEW HIGH SCHOOLS WERE BUILT IN HIS DISTRICT. Ask him why 2 new high schools were built in South LA this year.
There's one in that is set for construction at First Street near Mission Street. That's in his district.
You past two posters aren't reading each other... "no schools -- WERE built" and one is "SET for constructions.'
Not the same things considering the candidate in questions does plan to stay around long enough to see that it happens. There's one "Set" for Taylor Yard nearby, too.
SET don't mean BUILT, ask Richard Murelo.
That should be does NOT plan on staying around long enough. . .
What! You're not going to report on the new Targeted Communications poll in CD 14 that shows Huizar kicking Pacheco's ass by more than 10 points?
This is, after all, the same firm's polling that Pacheco so proudly touted way back in June when it showed him leading by 24%.
But guess what, things change. Campaigns happen. And Nick loses. Once again.
Here's the link.
http://www.targetedcommunications.org/polls/cd14octoberpoll.pdf
Sure as hell didn't call my neighborhood.
WHO-zar?
That's ALL I hear.
It's the Walter Moore syndrome, all over again -- thanks Ruby, thanks Byron, thanks Juanny.
Big difference in the structure of the two polls, alomost to the point of not being able to compare the two side-by-side.
First one was Pacheco vs. Huizar; second added several other candidates/options. Almost like a reverse of the real siuation developing (from primary to runoff).
12:53 -- can't compare the two Targeted Communications polls? Let me help.
The June survey was 39.3% Pacheco, 12.1% Huizar.
The October survey, using the same methodology - live callers, was 35.1% Huizar to 22.3% Pacheco.
That's Pacheco's margin moving from +27.1 to -12.8 -- a whopping negative 39.9% move for Nick.
The only question now is, does Huizar win this without a runoff?
Who is targeted communications? Who is behind them? Does anyone know?
WRONG, read it again. NOT the same questions, NOT the same candidiate matchups, NOT the same terminology used in the questioning. NOT, NOT, NOT...
Wishing don't make it so, go back and look at it through less star-struck eyes.
If by "same methodlogy" you mean telephoning people, well DUH! Most polls DO do that.
Moron!
Huizar get's pretty much every endorsment possible and rides heavily on the mayor's coattails, PLUS spends HALF a million bucks in less than three months (inc. IE's and he's still barely at one-third of the electorate.
If he's got another $500K to through out in the next week or so, he MIGHT pull it off without a runoff - but he won't. Then, after everyone KNOWS who he is, and how LITTLE he's done at LAUSD, and all the silly also-rans are gone, it's just "what can each one do for CD14" in a short period of time.
And THAT's too much bad news for AV's little boy to deal with.
The only sense I can make of these rabid AV/Huizar partisans each time is that they actually want someone in office who can't get anything done. Can someone explain the obstructionist undercurrent here? As long as we're paying them, and they're using taxpayer money to run the city -- wouldn't making some headway make sense?
Apparently some people will be satisfied with just another 40 or 50 fake neighborhood watches being set up between now and 2007. It's all about winning the election and then screwing the district after all the votes are counted -- until the next election.
Hey, I just saw the internal Huizar rolling track from the last three days. 400 sample.
36% Huizar, 24% Pacheco. 30% undecided. The remaining 10% split among the other 8 candidates.
The head-to-head numbers (just Jose and Nick) were 45% to 32% Huizar.
Matches the other poll pretty closely.
Wow. Even Pacheco partisans like 1:42 are conceding that Huizar will beat Pacheco on 11/8. Pretty amazing turnaround for someone who started the race 25 to 30 points down.
Internal tracking poll from Huizar? The guy spends $21,000 and does not release the numbers? There is no tracking going on in his camp. Huizar's own field numbers do not validate any of the crap numbers that are being posted here.
To take any of these numbers serious, we need to see Huizars poll from early September. It had Nick at 41% and Jose at 20%.
No shit with the side-by-side polls. I can CALL you and ask if your want a Ford or a Chevy, or CALL you and ask it you want a Ford, Chevy, Mazda, Hyundai, or 78 Yugo, or something else.
That's NOT the same poll.
Especially if there are only going to be two choices in the end
Huizar is lucky if he is at 30% right now. The only way he passes Pacheco in the primary is to go negative.
You have two weeks to close the gap.
1:49?
Huizar DROPS four points (from 36 to 32) and Pacheco nearly doubles (from 24 to 45) when it shifts into a two way?
Did you mistype that, or is that your conscious making you tell the truth for a chance?
(Or are you simply on of the few recent CD14 graduates from LAUSD?)
Punctuation and sentence structure are our friends, assuming we really want to be understood. Pass that along to AV re: his Spanish, as well.
2:09,
The phrase: "45% to 32% Huizar" means that Huizar is leading 45 to 32 -- much as you would say "the score is 7 to 5 Dodgers." That means the Dodgers are leading. Get it?
2:09 -- oh, and if you are going to play grammarian, you would do well to avoid knee-slapping orthographical and syntatic errors like:
"Did you mistype that, or is that your conscious making you tell the truth for a chance?"
2:30
The main difference there, if you check back to your own messages, is that YOU understood what I was saying - even with a couple typos -- well enough to both respond and deride.
Your message, however, had to be explained, because there's no way it was clear to anyone reading that that didn't already know the meaning.
You won't find a single sports reporter (following your example there) in the city that will PRINT "the score is 7 to 5 Dodgers" -- any more than you would see them PRINT "look over there" even though you might hear it on the air. Because in PRINT (like this blog), it reads just the opposite of what you apparently meant.
Know your medium, or go play in the sandbox, junior.
STFU! Bitching about typos. Bitch about something more important.
You're right, bitch about something important, 3:45 p.m.
So where the hell is the proof that AV started 80 FAKE NEIGHBORHOOD WATCHES as CD14 CM and didn't just embezzle two years city salary ($300K) while running as mayor on our money?
I recall the Hahn cut and paste crew saying that it was all about timing, timing, timing.
Now they were right -- Villaraigosa proved its about timing during that campaign, and now Huizar is proving the same thing.
Winning - and he hasn't even gone negative, can't say that about Pacheco though, the NEGATIVE KING.
4:30, That's a big FAT lie.
Huizar STARTED this race, day one, on the phone to key activists in the Eastside, saying he was running because "Pacheco" had run a "negative campaign" against AV, and so he withdrew his support, and now wanted the job himself.
Not ONLY negative from DAY ONE, but multiple lies... blaming Pacheco for the actions of others (AV has LOTS of enemies), Huizar did NOT withdraw his support (read the LA Weekly's latest on that bullshit claim).
Since then HUIZAR's added even MORE AV-concocted NEGATIVE lies like: "Pacheco didn't FUND this or that" (when AV's people just LOST the damn money, and recently FOUND it again); "Pacheco didn't do enough to stop this or that BAD thing" (when AV did even LESS).
What you horn-dogs keep calling "Negative" is Pacheco saying things like "Huizar said he'll raise new fees on you" (which he DID say...). If THAT's negative against Huizar, then MAYBE JOSE shouldn't have SAID it.
You're not preaching to the punch-drunk AV-loving choir here. Homies know better.
The problem with Pacheco supporters is that they can't accept the truth.
Who cares if you cannot compare the Targeted Communications' polls?
Look at the results.
While you guys spend your time refuting the accuracy of the polls, instead of trying to figure out why the voters are leaning towards Huizar, Huizar's campaign gains even more ground.
The fact is that Antonio rules this city now, and Huizar is riding the AV Wave.
My prediction: Huizar wins without a run-off.
If I were Pacheco I would be hoping for a coup de grace in November.
Imagine, after having blown a 30 point lead in the primary, having to trudge through a 2 month run-off - over the holidays - with absolutely no capacity to raise money and no one believing you have any chance to win. No donors, no volunteers, no endorsers. No hope. How humiliating.
You people keep insisting that the Huizar campaign show you the numbers from their base survey back in the siummer. OK, here's one:
Who do you believe did a better job as City Council member, Antonio Villaraigosa or Nick Pacheco.
The results were: Villaraigosa 59% -- Pacheco 25%.
Go ahead, idiots, keep attacking Antonio.
The truth about the Huizar poll conducted in late summer is it had Pacheco in a double digit lead. Pacheco at low forty's and Huizar in low 20's or high teens.
With no volunteer support, with Antonio's endorsement unable to bump up where it was expected and spending all their money the campaign was hurting. The needed this poll by Targeted to be in their favor. They did what they needed to get ahead.
If they ever let anyone see that poll, the community will know he is in trouble.
Newsflash: Huizar has no volunteers. He only has paid walkers and paid union walkers.
He says he is one of us but he needs people from Washington and everywhere but from CD14 to get him elected.
Sounds like special interests vs. community interests at play here.
Jose you can run but you can't hide. On Nov. 8th that stupid Joker smile will be no more. Dropping out is still an option.
Throw your support behind Paul Gonzalez, at least he will fight for the community and not for only special interests.
Nick Pacheco Support History:
June 40%
August 33%
September 27%
October 22%
November 18%
Post-December -- Nick Who?
5:35
No, I can't imagine that.
I never drank the AV kool-aid, like you children and I've been in SRO rooms packed full of Pacheco volunteers on several occasions now.
Imagine away. Say hello to Victor Griego for me while you're visiting Fantasy Land.
(One good thing about the poll, though -- now the Huizar-heads feel free to come and make their own blogging team outing here, after months of hiding out waiting for some "good news" that actually involved people in CD14. BLOG -Aweigh, Head cases, keeps you off MY street. And DAMN was I getting tiring of having those children tell me I should vote for Jose because... UM, UM, UM, because Tony SAID so!).
There is no way Jose Huizar can be winning this campaign.
Huizar's Campaing people are getting desperate. They must have hired this Targeted group to put out this biased poll to try to shift momentum.
It wont happen.
P.S. Huizar is a moron.
Sounds like the Huizar team is going desperate. Let's see if Jose has the guts to show up to the debate tomorrow at Casa Mexicano and gets BOOED. They'll be asking him where's the new high school for Roosevelt? Jose has no balls, no guts and has proved to the community he's a scared puppy unless he mentions AV's name. Pacheco's grass root support is spreading fast. Parents associate Jose with LAUSD and they don't want him. ACCEPT IT!!!!
Nick....
Once..Twice..Three times a loser...
Music to my ears
Hey I hear there's a jumper on top of county building in downtown LA. Wouldn't surprise me if Antonio goes up there just to get on cameras.
Interesting all of a sudden Jose's campaigners are posting on this blog this late in election. Gee, could it be they're running scared??? Yup, I think so
MEDIA WATCH: After several weeks of negotiations, all-news radio station KFWB-AM (980) has finally reached an agreement with Villaraigosa to resume its popular "Ask the Mayor" call-in show.
The first one will air at 9 a.m. Nov. 1, when the mayor will be questioned by anchor Jack Popejoy and listeners on various issues.
One difference now, however, is that Villaraigosa said he wants to do the show every three months instead of every month.
Wow wasn't Targeted communications hired by the Pacheco Camp?
After looking at the poll it seems that the pollster focused disproportionately on areas where Huizar is doing better. I know this wasn't the case, but it seems as if the pollster was given a list of Huizar "yesses" to call. That would certainly help - but obviously neither Targeted nor any other reputable pollster would do such a thing.
Actually, if you read through the Targeted crosstabs, you will see that there is a group of 227 voters they spoke to in both June and in October.
In June the result among that sub-sample was 36.1% Pacheco, 12.8% Huizar. That very same group of voters in October was 37.4% Huizar, 26.4% Pacheco.
Pacheco drops 10 point and Huizar gains 24.
Amazing.
No what's amazing is the only poll that counts is the one on election day. Let's wait till then to see which pollster will get hired after that...
The poll should have asked the exact questions if the two polls were done by the same company...l was called by the latest poll, and it was clearly pushing Huizar. The caller didn't say Pacheco correctly. And it totally ignored the other candidates...It asked about the Mayor and how you felt about him, if I new he supported Huizar, etc.
This guy needs to see a dentist real bad...no way is he representing anyone at city hall with that mouth...he can send out all the press releases he wants to but, no one is sending him to city hall.
You know what's interesting, Huizar how come Tokofky isn't in your bag?
Someone should check to see if the developers who gave to Huizar for the LAUSD board seat he ran unopposed for, gave to AV during the mayoral campaign.
The poll was conducted by a firm owned or controlled by one Mario Marich, who now calls himself "Mario Solis." Footnote: is this to establish more eastside creds? I hear Jim Hahn is changing him name to "Jim Solis."
Anyway, Mario worked for Nick in 1999 and 2003. Since then, rumor has it, the two have had a massive falling out. Some people speculate it was due to Mario Marich trying to make out like a bandit from Nick's contacts, efforts and even his misfortunes.
At any rate, this "poll" just cannot be taken seriously.
Anon. 10:15: you cannot be taken seriously.
My reaction to the poll was: Duh! what does Pacheco expect?
Rumor has it:
that all of his campaign workers have either quit or been fired.
That his campaign office is bereft of volunteers (newspaper articles have contrasted the utter lack of energy in 2005 to even his 2003 losing effort).
That he takes advice from known charlatans (this has been reported on this site).
That Huizar has put out something like 20 unanswered mail pieces because Pacheco is out of money.
So, again, what does Pacheco expect? Should we in the 14th vote in someone so obviously out of touch with reality? Is there no one out there to give this poor man some good advice?
Anon 10:20, dont believe rumors - and certainly don't spread them.
If the Targeted Communications poll is not to be taken seriously, why did Pacheco send out a press release touting tis numbers when it showe Nick ahead?
Hmmmm, okay, I'll BITE, 11:54 p.m. (but I thought Jose told all his high school "volunteers" to be in bed by 10 p.m. on school nights?).
Let's take YOUR logic and apply it in reverse (pay attention), because that SHOULD mean its not a partisan spin:
1) If the Targeted Communications poll IS to be taken seriously (this time), why hasn't Huizar sent out a press release of his OWN touting these numbers now that they "supposedly" show Jose ahead -- just BS anonymous postings about it, here (see link... NO media releases in nearly 3 weeks):
http://www.huizar4la.com/mediaroom.htm
AND, 2) If the Targeted Communications poll IS to be taken seriously (NOW), they why did Huizar's people (last time) say it was bogus when Pacheco sent out a press release touting the numbers that showed HIM ahead.
Only "valid" when your boy's up?? So maybe it wasn't REALLY valid either time, and the only people that REALLY have a clue are the one's with their finger on the pulse of the district.
Much more likely that Huizar's people have known better all along (as a result of their own internal polling that shows them trailing... that they refuse to "share".
Huizar's people couldn't even arrange for Green of LA Weekly to precinct "walk" with them in a district where he could get a couple people to say they would vote for Jose, and not embarrass in the town he was raised in.
Pacheco's in VILLARAIGOSA's community getting treated like a celebrity, in that piece, while Huizar's getting ignored in his OWN hood.
At LEAST AV could manufacture some chearleaders when he fake walked precintcs.
I personally love how the Pacheco cut and paste crew along with the Hahn cut and paste crew have the same logic. The loser logic.
Hey Pacheco -- FYI - the ethics commission finally got the all the paperwork from Eliseo on his FAKE RECALL.
Guess what it shows......
Guess what $$$ is in common....
HIT PIECE****HIT PIECE****HIT PIECE****
Nick Pacheco is at it again, back in 2003 and now trying to recall Antonio Villaraigosa.
LA Times (graphic) -2003
LA Opinion (graphic)-2003
Ethics Commission Recall Villaraigosa comt(graphic) 2005
Eagle Rock/ Boyle Heights/ El Sereno - (cut and paste the community here) CAN'T TRUST NICK PACHECO TO LEAD.
The question NIck is -- do you want it NOW or LATER?
November or January -- because what Huizar doesn't know is this...there are ACTUALLY SOME AV PEOPLE WHO LIKE PLAYING WITH A SEMI-DEAD RAT (you!). I personally want you to go into a run-off so i can keep you up at nights and play with you like the ICU RAT you are. Almost dead with an iron lung, gasping for your last hurrah.
Some of us are "pacing" ourselves, actually holding ourselves back would be the better term. So you haveto go back to your contributors, and canvass those neighborhoods once more -- and come home late to your wife. Sick isn't it....and yet here i am, holding it back.
Waiting.
It's sort like licking a melting ice-cream, why bite?, when it tastes better melting in your hand.
Melt Nick -- melt slowly away.
1:36am in definitely a case for DR. PHIL. AV and Jose supporters are in denial. The fact is Pacheco has a lot of AV terrority hands down. Antonio is so hated in his former land that even those who voted for AV in 2003 have turned to Pacheco cause of the horrible job AV did as CM. Jose is guilt by association and he's a little kid on a bike on training wheels. Cd14 meetings are Jay Leno-esque jokes about AV and Jose. What a cute couple they are but definitely not leadership material.
Can wedding bells be far off? Inquiring minds want to know. Maybe it could be staged on Jay Leno's show.
Yes, 1:36 a.m. shows the true hate-riddled mentality (and guilt-ridden insomnia) of those who love fluff and promises and are jealous of real accomplishments and achievements.
Good for CD14 we've reached the end of the do-nothing era on the Eastside that AV was the poster child for.
He's your problem now, L.A. as a whole. "Watch" him often, but "see" him finish nothing.
THE TARGETED POLL WAS CONDUCTED BY AN EX-EMPLOYEE OF NICK PACHECO. I WILL NOT RELEASE HIS NAME BUT HE IS GOOD FRIENDS WITH JOSE. REMEMBER NICK BEAT A HAND PICK CANDIDATE IN '99. DON'T EVER UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF GRASSROOTS CAMPAINING. BECAUSE AS YOU CAN SEE, VILLARRAIGOZA USED CD14 TO LAUNCH HIS BID FOR MAYOR AND CD 14 GOT SCREWED, LIKE IT GOT SCREWED BY HUIZAR IN NOT BUILDING SCHOOLS IN CD14. PACHECO MAY NOT BE PERFECT BUT WAS ALWAYS, I MEANT ALWAYS ACCESIBLE
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home