Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098
mayorsam@mayorsam.org

Tuesday, July 12, 2005

The Pacheco Crying Game




In response to Mayor Frank's post I thought I'd elevate a post from our comments section.

Shop & Compare BEFORE you buy said...

Why Returning From the Dead Will Be a Test of Character for Pacheco By Tony Castro Political Columnist -Nick Pacheco is hurting, and he doesn't understand not really why he was booted out of office after being the new kid on City Halls political block just four years ago. You tell me, do you really think I have a political future left?he asks. After losing this race? Or do you think I still have a political future because I lost to Antonio [Villaraigosa], the political messiah? The doesn't seem to sit well. But Pacheco is hurting. He is still trying to come to grips with becoming the first incumbent Los Angeles City Councilman ousted in a primary election in modern history. He chafes at reading the post-mortems, especially those that report Villaraigosa's election triumph claims of having overcome what he has called the sleaziest campaign ever in Los Angeles and also boasting that he did it without ever having gotten down in the political gutter himself.Pacheco doesn't believe any of that. He denies that his campaign engaged in any dirty politics and asserts that it was Villaraigosa's campaign that indulged in last-minute attack mailers. Why don't you [in the new media] call him on that? Why do you allow him to get away saying that? he demands to know. Mostly, though, Pacheco can't understand how it came down to this: Getting not even 40 per cent of the vote and losing in what, for primary election purposes, wound up a 56 percent of the vote landslide for Villaraigosa, the former Assembly speaker and now the prince of not only the Eastside but of the city as well. Nick Pacheco is hurting, and he is looking for some kind of political Ben-Gay to salve his wounds. Last week, he wrote United Farm Workers co-founder Dolores Huerta, demanding an apology for a political mailer sent out by the UFW on Villaraigosa's behalf that accused Pacheco of a long laundry list of sleazy politics. I am writing because my family, especially my parents, were extremely hurt by your personal attacks against me during my recent re-election campaign, he wrote.Unfortunately for Pacheco, he is just now perhaps realizing the depth of the resentment he incurred for the controversial political mailers sent to voters last November by his longtime friend Ricardo A. Torres II that attacked Villaraigosa and his family in a manner that was roundly decried as some of the dirtiest tactics in the history of Los Angeles politics.Those mailers cornered Pacheco into a niche of the city's political consciousness from which he may never escape, no matter how much he protests as he did in the letter to Huerta.In the letter, Pacheco replies to a handful of allegations with denials that hide behind cleverly used buffers, such as laying the blame for the November attack mailers purely on Torres when few doubt that Pacheco was completely blameless.But Pacheco insists. He also blamed the infamous Gloria Morina telephone scam on another friend, Martin GutieRuiz. That was the 2001 mayoral campaign prank in which a woman pretending to be Supervisor Gloria Molina placed calls to Latino voters criticizing Villaraigosa and urging votes instead for Rep. Xavier Becerra, another Latino primary opponent. The calls were traced to a phone bank owned by Pacheco, though a district attorney's investigation failed to turn up enough evidence for charges. But then when are politicians, except the inept as well as corrupt ones in suburban cities, ever charged with any kind of crimes? Pacheco protests with the innocence of the Boy Scout handle that was given to him during his 1999 election. He may well still be the Boy Scout, but his pals Torres and GutieRuiz sure as heck aren't. He should know that former prosecutors have no business hanging out with high-tech gang-bangers in business suits.Mostly, though, Pacheco fails to realize that the unspoken retort from anyone hearing his complaints is that perhaps he reaped what he sowed.Besides, no one wants to hear it now. The only thing more pitiful than a loser's wails and moaning are a sore losers wails and moaning...

15 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said:

i think mayor frank is learning that you don't mess or push chief parker's buttons.

July 12, 2005 1:30 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

aren't these guys friends? i don't get how can two bloggers be enemies yet create a website together -- i am confused/

July 12, 2005 1:31 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

There you go deleting my comment, you must have issues!

July 12, 2005 1:51 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Mayor Sam is going to lose even more traffic on this site with junk like this. You can see how much the traffic has decreased by the posts on each article.

I remember the days when a good article would get over 60 posts in 1/2 day. Now, he's lucky if he gets 10.

July 12, 2005 2:44 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

That's funny -- this is the first time I've been tempted to post. It was long and took a while, but the column was a good read that took me back to where we left off with Nick. (I barely heard about his other candidacy last year and the recall. Can somebody clue me in?) And that baby picture! Looks just like Nick!

July 12, 2005 2:55 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Pacheco doesn't lie? Come on, MF! How quickly we forget.

And the first thing to understand about MAV's election is that losing gracefully the first time was fundamental to his consistent positives the second time around. Nick, on the other hand, was even more graceless than Hahn.

Show us some political smarts, mayor.

July 12, 2005 3:04 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

The best the Pachuecos and Mayor Frank can do is say that everything about Nick is two years old. Wow. That and that he was never indicted. They sure would like us to forget all the entertainment Nick and co. brought us in '99, '01, and '03, but it ain't gonna happen.

July 12, 2005 3:14 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Nicky's Baby snap: Two thumbs up!

"Little Huizer" - great handle (from the other discussion)! Being about LA, this site needs more movie literacy. Take it from a dead critic from Chicago.

BTW, Sen. Gloria Romero once said she'd never heard of the movie 'Sunset Boulevard.' They shoudda asked her about 'Chinatown.'

July 12, 2005 3:31 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Pacheco is done. He will never work in this town again. I can't believe he thought he could run and win the D.A.'s seat. He is a super loser. He goes down in history with names like....farrell...snyder..he's done.

July 12, 2005 4:54 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

...correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that while both Farrell and Snyder left office with controversy swirling about them, they both were returned to office for more than one term, and neither lost a bid for reelection.

July 12, 2005 5:46 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I don't know about some of you, but I have been called at least 5 times by various staffers, but never by Nick.

Does he know how to run a campaign?

July 12, 2005 5:58 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

folks, Nick is running a good campaign. doing events and sending press releases and emails. opening up satellite offices all around the district. i still think huizar is likely to win because people like new better than old, but if nick keeps it up, he's got a good shot...

July 12, 2005 6:01 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

In fundraising, it seems to me, that those who can contribute the maximum and perhaps raise some additional ought to be called by the candidate.

Nick apparently doesn't agree, so who am I to argue with unmitigated success?

Sorry Nick, no personal call, no money.

Read my lips.

July 12, 2005 7:27 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

7:27

So I guess AV called u personally when you donated to his crappy ass campaign.

July 12, 2005 7:50 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Have you seen Huizee's flyer in our neighborhood?

The Flyer

"Necesitamos un Consejal nuevo que pueda trabajar junto con el Alcalde..."

----Is Huizee trying to tell us that AV will not work with other politicians that are not on his pay for play book? AV is not a team player for the good of the people, but selfish, who wrote this crap on the flyer?

"JH Y AV son socios que estan...mejorar nuestras escuelas"

---What good did JH do for LAUSD? NADA, ABSOLUTELY NADA. What is he going to do with AV? BROKER MORE LAND DEALS....KEEP THE MONEY MACHINE RUNNING, THIS IS WHAT IS TAUGHT BACK IN MEXICO, PAY FOR PLAY.


The school comments on the flyer are bullshit! This school system is at its worse shape with dropouts, supplies, shortage of qualified teachers, and teacher pay.

"Un miembro de la Comunidad"

---Yea right Huizee, come to my neighborhood and talk to the veteranos and active gang members in the area, let us see what they think of you...your full of shit. All I hear in the neighborhood is about Huizar and high dropout rate. You have let the community down, down, down, into a third world mentality.

I do not want you to represent our district and many, many more feel the same way.

Go back to Berkely, Princeton, UCLA and get a degree in ethics, and if there is no such degree, they should think of having one. All of you crooked politicians came to America for your own American dream---to rip off your fellow man.

July 12, 2005 8:17 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Advertisement

Advertisement