Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098
mayorsam@mayorsam.org

Friday, July 29, 2005

CD 14 Mailers

In case you didn't figure it out yet, education is going to be a very large issue in the CD 14 race.

Here's Pacheco's first mailer...

(click images to enlarge)


41 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Can he actually afford to mail it to anyone or did staff just do one up to make him feel like he is running a real campaign?

July 29, 2005 4:31 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Tricky, tricky, tricky. I have a theme song for your campaign. It is "The Nobodies".

Why "The Nobodies"? Who would use someone else's accomplishments and work and try to claim them for himself? A nobody! What's wrong Tricky? You can't come up with something better than you volunteered at Roosevelt HS? Who would steal someone else's ideas? Only a nobody! The Neighborhood Leadership Institute. Only a somebody could develop that and make it happen. Not a nobody. The Digital/Video Academy. Only a somebody could come up with this original idea. The problem here is that you are constantly accusing others of stealing ideas, playing dirty. Tricky, quit taking credit for someone else's ideas.

Sing along Tricky,

Today I am dirty
I want to be pretty
Tomorrow, I know I'm just dirt...

Tricky, tricky, tricky....what is a boy to do....

July 29, 2005 5:22 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Call it what you want, but it's a good piece. If Nick can focus this race on education, Jose is in big trouble. C'mon Jose, fight back with something. I want a reason to support you.

July 29, 2005 5:29 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Little Sleazy Huizy Jose has been president of LAUSD for how many years now and hasn't done crap. All week the newspapers have been slamming LAUSD. Where's Little Jose been? Even Antonio lost his manhood and backed off of the school issue. Gotta give Pacheco credit for at least having a vision. No one knows what the hell Sleazy Huizy is running on.

July 29, 2005 6:24 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

What, Pacheco having a vision?! His vision has to be in question, when he is using quotes from 2 individuals who are not supporting his candidacy on his own campaign literature. It's campaigning 101: if you use a picture or name of somebody on your material, the community will perceive it as a form of support or endorsement for that candidate.

Definitely out of the Pacheco playbook, but you have to question his use of it since it hasn't worked will for him lately.

July 29, 2005 7:06 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Tricky, tricky, tricky. "The Nobodies" theme song works.

Gotta give Pacheco credit for atleast having a vision???

That's his problem. He doesn't have a vision and never did! Golly gee, we all went to college and we all volunteered and mentored at some school. That doesn't mean that qualified us as having a vision or qualifes us to run for elected office! What do you call people who don't have a vision? All together. A nobody!

July 29, 2005 7:17 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Good mail piece.
From,
CD10 homeowner

July 29, 2005 7:59 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

5:22 PM

As someone who does not live in your district (CD14) or care to vote for that matter for this election, I looked into your allegations. You are incorrect. I will forward your email to the to journalists find out if you are from Huizar's camp provoking havoc in an election that is for the people. This would have been interesting if your posting was true, but it is not and it only makes people like myself think that this CD14 race is a joke.

July 29, 2005 8:01 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

7:06 PM

Are you trying to say that Our mayor and riordan lied? I don't think so. They both said those comments and I found it to be informative.

July 29, 2005 8:04 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Here is a theme song,

Huizar is the name,
I play the drop out game,
my deals are sealed and made,
with meruelo there's no shame,
you people just don't mind,
if I'm here to buy a dime,
the kids know who I am,
the man who stole their dreams,
and made their parents scream,
Huizar is the name,
you will not look at me the same,
this song will have to groove,
until election day and I lose.

This song is dedicated to all the kids the were shortchanged from proper education at LAUSD under Jose Huizar's mismanagement and for having them endure the political bullshit of contamidated sites, ripped off land deals, and incompetent administration.

Adios,
Politico X

July 29, 2005 8:16 PM  

Anonymous Tricky Cy-Nic Pachueco said:

What makes Nick tricky is his -- and his crew's -- relentless will to mislead people. The highlights of his whole career involve misleading people. Tricky Nick is setting the standard for cynical politics. Call him Cy-Nick Pachueco.

July 29, 2005 9:23 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

What makes me laugh is that posters like the previous anon ASSUME very quickly that people who dislike Huizar are Pacheco supporters. YOU ARE WRONG! I will not support either candidate, but I will voice my opinion, if any, of either candidate.

Realize this, Huizar has ROBBED THE KIDS OF A COMPETITIVE OPPORTUNITY WITHIN AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION.

July 29, 2005 10:40 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I can hardly wait for the debates. IF Little Sleazy Huizy Jose does as badly as he has at the meetings I have seen him at speaking he will get clobbered by Pacheco and Antonio won't be there to help him answere the questions. What will Little Jose say when asked why the LAUSD is now asking for another bond from taxpayers when LAUSD has mismanaged millions? Jose looks like a little 10 yr old boy in a man's suit.

July 30, 2005 7:52 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

The best advice for Villaraigosa is NOT to endorse Huizy or Pachueco. They will ruin Villaraigosa's political reputation.

Remember AV---Huizy did not support you for the CD 14 election when you slaughtered Pachueco. And now he wants to hang on your coat tails every where you go. Stay the hell away from Huizy because the truth about his connections with crooked developers and law firms are going to come out.

Stay clean AV!

July 30, 2005 11:39 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Instead of taking the problems at LAUSD Sleazy Huizy is out and about campaigning ignoring his duties. Who does this sound like? There will be a press conf. on Monday where AV will endorse Little Jose. This is all Little Jose could say about being a councilman.
Huizar played up his four years on the school board, saying the LAUSD now has plans to build 160 schools, a far cry from when he joined. He repeatedly touted his relationship with Villaraigosa, and also said he will get the endorsement of Council President Alex Padilla and multiple county supervisors.

Huizar pledged to have "zero tolerance" for nuisance crimes, and to aggressively crack down on illegal DVD vendors as well as their distributors.

GREAT! EXACTLY THE TYPE OF COUNCILMAN THAT IS NEEDED IN CD14. A BRAINLESS IDIOT!!!

July 30, 2005 6:11 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

What a shame, it only takes Pacheco two months to take away the education card from Huizar. He did nothing for four years as a schoolboard member and president.

It will take Huizar four years to get up to speed as a councilmember. That is not what CD14 needs.

July 31, 2005 2:05 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

LA TIMES EDIITORIAL DOESN'T MAKE ANTONIO OR SLEAZY HUIZY LOOK GOOD

Learning from New York
IT'S A GRIM LITANY familiar to too many urban school systems: Failing students who are passed from one grade to the next. Crime-ridden schools frightening to students and teachers alike. An ineffective bureaucracy. A politicized school board. A community fractured between uninvolved parents and others ready to help if only someone asked them.

All these features, to varying degrees, are present in the nation's two largest school districts, Los Angeles and New York City. And though neither district has solved any of these problems, New York has made more progress than Los Angeles, in part because in New York, the mayor controls the schools.

During the mayoral campaign, Antonio Villaraigosa promised to assume "ultimate control and oversight" of the schools. Yet he has been lukewarm to a proposal in Sacramento that would do just that. To overcome his hesitation, he may want to look at the record of his New York counterpart, Michael R. Bloomberg.

Comparisons between New York and Los Angeles are always imperfect. The New York system spends about 50% more per student than L.A. does, and is about half again as large (it has about 1.1 million students to about 760,000 in L.A.). And it would take years, even if the legislation in Sacramento were to pass, for Villaraigosa to get the kind of control Bloomberg has now. That said, it's useful to examine what Bloomberg did once he gained control in January 2002 — and to ask whether mayoral control would allow Villaraigosa to do something similar.

July 31, 2005 8:12 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I don't want to vote for either Pacheco or Huizar. Of the two, I think Huizar is the far worse choice. We need another viable candiate....but whom?

July 31, 2005 8:32 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

We already had a Councilman in CD 14 who got dumped on by the Mayor; why do we need another one?

Do we not learn, or are we just gluttons for punishment?

"ABP" is our motto.

(Anybody but Pacheco)

July 31, 2005 10:27 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Amen Anon. 10:27 AM. I am a proud Eagle Rocker who supported Pacheco when he first ran. We saw all the promise, all the youth and vigor destroyed as he kept company with amoral weirdoes who of course brought him down.

The Bible says we should judge a man by the company he keeps. I was willing to give Pacheco the benefit of the doubt when he initially ran into problems, but my concern is that the man suffers from the affliction of truly poor judgment of character, a necessary quality of a leader.

July 31, 2005 11:59 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Thank you 10:27 and 11:59 for such stimulating and intelligent posts.

July 31, 2005 12:29 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Thank you 10:27 and 11:59 for such stimulating and intelligent posts.

July 31, 2005 12:34 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Dalila Sotelo (Anon 11:59 AM) and Cynthia Ruiz (Anon 10:27am) glad to see you guys are posting on here once again. You represent your boss well. You guys need to get over it and move on. Your guy won. Quit being sore winners.

July 31, 2005 1:09 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Exactly 11:59 am the Bible says we should judge a man by the company he keeps and Pacheco has a closet full of losers who support him.
Martin Gutierrez, Juana Gutierrez, the Latina version of a Ma Parker, and all of her clan. This is a disgrace to CD 14.

La Colectiva
Mothers For Nick
Madres of Santa Isabel
CAL Inc
= Gutierrez & Pacheco scam

Huizar is not any better. He is a good friend to the Gutierrez's. Is Villaraigosa stupid enough to support an idiot like Huizar?

July 31, 2005 1:13 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Don't forget Pacheco's current "company" - a pathetic bunch of losers hated in their communties. Nick Pathetico!

July 31, 2005 2:44 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

4 years ago, Huizar was kissing Pacheco's Ass. In 2005 Huizar is licking Villaraigosa's Ass.

Huizar = #1 Leading Ass Kisser in the White World.
Huizar = #1 Leading Ass Licker in the Brown World.
Huizar = #1 Leading Loser in the Black World.
Huizar = #1 Leading Idiot in the Yellow World.
Huizar = Not Allowed in the Red World.

Do not expect to receive any $$$ from the gaming community fool.

Call Vignali since you want to spend 50 million $$$ on a LAUSD parking lot for administrative fools like yourself.

July 31, 2005 2:57 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I don't think Dalila should be the target of any hatred on this site. She is not a candidate. Equally, neither should Pacheco supporters or staffers.

July 31, 2005 4:34 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Anybody but Huizar.

ABH

July 31, 2005 6:19 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

1:13 PM
You data is incomplete, from what I READ in LEGAL documents, Villaraigosa is/was part of that group, even slept in that house during his early years.

July 31, 2005 6:23 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Will a Sleazy Huizy supporter tell us how is HE going to defend being prez of LAUSD for all these years and allowing it to go down the toliet? Interesting that in the last 6 months every newspaper almost every other day has had a negative story on LAUSD and Little Jose has yet to respond to one story. Where's his pr crisis team?

July 31, 2005 7:02 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

You must be joking. A candidate's staff and his or her supporters are absolutely an issue in a campaign.

If a candidate hires morons, or gets support from morons, I want to know about it.

July 31, 2005 7:32 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Who determines who a moron is? Is somebody a moron simply because you disagree with his or her position? Isn't it subjective?

July 31, 2005 7:34 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Mommy, Whhaaa!

Nicky is still trying to steal my seat.

Antonio stole it from him fair and square; now Antonio wants to give it to me and Nicky is trying to steal it back again.

Make him stop right this very minute.

Whhhaaa.

July 31, 2005 8:38 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Many voters agree with July 31, 2005 8:32am--

We do NEED another VIABLE CANDIDATE FOR CD 14!

NO PACHECO!
NO HUIZAR!

X chromosome sounds good to all of us men and women! More organized, more educated, more classy, more intelligent, more charismatic, more understandiing, more guts, and more knowledgebable in taking care of business besides a work of art who is better to look at and admire as a leader!

It's time for a WOMAN to represent CD 14!

July 31, 2005 8:45 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

8:38 PM blogger must be a Villaraigosa El Sereno/Highland Park staffer who has a job to defend Huizeee on this blogg.


Whaaaa to you too, Mr.Mrs Blogger, are you the one that still cannot afford a car, and bums rides off of the other staff members? Are you the one who has a power trip against Neighborhood councils and acts like your shit don't stink?
Must be Jennie.

July 31, 2005 11:26 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I like the mailer. Plain, simple and to the point. When is Jose coming out with one to compare?

August 01, 2005 1:27 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hey, no one likes Pacheco; he's mean and revengeful.

His allies, Eliseo the incompetent (carrier of the "Impeach Villaraigosa" petition that could not get a signature) and Ricardo Torres, III, tell you everything you need to know about him.

It doesn't take a Villaraigosa staffer (which I am not)to point out that Pacheco is yesterday's news. HIs brief tenure on the Council was marked with bitter exchanges with his peers, and he got nothing done.

Now, he wants to go back and feud with the Mayor? On who's nickel?

CD 14 has suffered enough with a Mayor who oppressed its Councilman; you ain't seen nothing yet if you re-elect this fool.

August 01, 2005 4:03 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Why don't the Sleazy Huizy supporters list some of his accomplishments so we can compare? Jose is yet to say what he would do as councilman. All he's been doing is going around CD14 saying AV is going to endorse him. He doesn't have substance.

Pacheco on the other hand has the grass root support of residents who are angry at Antonio for a horible 2 yrs of nothing. Whether you Jose fans like it or not this will be a good race. Pacheco has been slamming Jose in the meetings they've both attended. Parke you better coach Jose on how to speak and answer the hard questions. He gets red and stumbles and gets angry.

August 01, 2005 8:52 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

4:03 AM

When AV won, Pacheco got 40% of the vote.

Don't be an idiot. That means a ton of people, around 10,000, support Pacheco and ultimately this is where he will start from.

Huizar will have to do a lot of work to catch up and endorsements alone will not do it.

Huizar, what have you done for me lately?

August 01, 2005 9:55 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Huizar, what have you done for me... EVER?

August 01, 2005 10:06 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

The kid next door can't write a complete sentence (in ANY language), Jose, and he was one of the "lucky" ones that graduated from an LAUSD high school under YOUR watch.

So sad... we won't be able to build McDonald fast enough to keep this kids employed (and L.A. "progressives" will NEVER let Walmart move in so they can get even "better" jobs.

August 01, 2005 1:03 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Advertisement

Advertisement