What to Expect in '09: Taking It To Our (New) Leader
January 20th, 2009. The swearing in of the United States' first (sorta) African-American POTUS is imminent. The world is heralding the new dawn. Enjoy while it lasts everyone... because 2009 is going to be a bitch!
The President-elect may hail from a half-African heritage, but he is far from 'the black guy,' that mere conversation raising the specter of Colin Powell, circa 1988, who, despite appearances, is not sorta-black, but actually, completely 100% African-American... from Harlem! Surprise! And really, doesn't anyone else consider 'Bubba' Clinton the first black president anyway? Obama's really led at least a semi-charmed life compared to either of them.
As that relates to our current financial mess: don't expect (as a shocking number of people seem to) that Obama will push for slave reparations, welfare, or any of those other cliched, poverty perpetuating implied-substitutes for '40 acres and a mule.' Expect the more naturally centrist Obama to justify the Bill Clinton and JFK comparisons while taking heed of the Jimmy Carter warnings. Expect accountability as well as user fees and other forward-thinking measures in lieu of increased taxes. Expect a renewed national dialogue about free trade agreements and the North American Union. Expect his economic team, comprised of mostly moderate, non-partisan global tycoons, to run America as if she were a business, and with any luck, a very profitable one.
Taxes are always a sticky issue whenever a Democrat is elected to the executive, and fear and paranoia run rampant. Contrary to the plentiful selective interpretations in circulation, only those making over $250,000 a year potentially have to pay a little more, and probably only temporarily. To those very lucky few who make this kind of coin, this will likely not necessitate a change in lifestyle, but will likely go to help a working single mom pay for day care - so they can come to work for you!
And remember, unemployment is still rising. Is it because taxes are too high as so many cry? Of course not: thanks to Dubya, the tax climate for business has been highly favorable for years, not to mention that some companies (oil companies come immediately to mind) have been seeing record profits. If you think Obama is a monster for considering higher taxes on the rich, remember that the only thing worse than Robin Hood is Uncle Scrooge, especially in a time of an ever-widening class-gap.
The Dow is hovering around 8500 points, a level unseen since the dawn of the Bush era. What will Obama do about it? I suspect nothing. Yeah, that's right. Nada. The memory of the American people is short indeed as we collectively forget every 4-8 years that the market regularly holds its breath in the downtime between administrations, just as it did after 9/11 (prompting Shopper-in-Chief Bush to encourage the American people to blow money at the mall in defiance of terrorism... ahh, sayonara Bushisms - I hardly knew ye!). It's natural and normal. Expect the new president to take a hands-off approach to the markets. It might be a bit of a cold war between business and policymakers for the first month or so, and what happens next will depend on who strikes first. Will energy speculators and other market bullies run rampant again or will the administration stare them down once and for all? Will policy turn against business and cause investor panic or will consumer confidence somehow rise? Stay tuned on this one. Only time will tell.
Integrity, honor, and habeus corpus will all be making plenty of appearances in 2009 as Leon Panetta takes over at the CIA and Eric Holder, a Deputy Attorney General under President Clinton, fights for, and ultimately wins, the big job at Justice. Gone are the days when torture is used arbitrarily to determine whether or not a foreign detainee even has any intel. I mean, isn't taking soldiers out of terrorist networks in and of itself an effective way to disrupt them? Remember, we don't need to do the impossible and kill all of the world's bad guys to win the War on Terror, we simply have to keep them running, and that's really all we can do. Coincidentally, this reasonable strategy was ignored in the brouhaha leading up to the invasion of Iraq, and ultimately the recent resurgence of the Taliban in Afghanistan and hostilities between India and supposed anti-terror ally Pakistan.
What of Israel and Palestine? Remember when the so-called 'conventional wisdom' predicted that Obama would bail on Israel? Well he won't... at least no moreso than Bush 43, who, like many of his Republican predecessors, made no real major commitments to the cause, acting more like a steward of the status quo only to dump the problem on 'the next guy.' Obama is the next guy, and I'm inclined to believe that the President-elect isn't particularly happy about the flaming pile of dog shit that's been dumped on his front lawn. Prediction? On Israel, Obama will 'stay the course' in the face of a probable prodding to defend Israel by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Will Obama be a good president? I think we'll know the answer to that within 100 days as his ideals and mettle will be put to the test - the efficacy of many of his proposals realized or at least moving towards becoming so. With all the talk of hope, justice, and the American way (which is what in 2009?) throughout the campaign, Obama has set the bar particularly high in the direst of circumstances. Is it better to burn out or to fade away?
That was a question I've been asking myself a lot during my self-imposed blog silence of the last 6 weeks. I've decided against both... and here I am again. Welcome to 2009.
SMS
Labels: 2009, Barack Obama
10 Comments:
Anonymous said:
Obama will take a hands off approach to the economy? Are you kidding? Maybe you didn't notice the $1 billion stimulus package or the past week of stumping.
Listen, you guys do a great job covering LA and even California. Stick to that.
Sarah Michelle Spinosa said:
AS -
Good point, albeit anecdotal. I should have been more clear that I measure Obama's plans against the status quo of Bush 43.
And you act like a billion dollars is a lot of money. The government spent $1.4 billion just on subsidies for the Digital Television transition, and they still haven't even covered anyone. In fact, Obama is asking the FCC and TV stations to postpone the switch.
A billion dollars? Bush's bank bailout cost $700 billion. Now they want to give the money to you and you complain? Oh yeah, Obama is such a socialist.
SMS
Unknown said:
Excellent post Sarah, welcome back!
Anonymous said:
HUH??? Obama has already spent 2 Trillion (on paper).
You must remember...Obama is just a front for the CFR and Goldman Sachs. He is polite and respectful...well spoken and articulate - but he is NOT running this country! The Treasury calls ALL the shots!
His CAbinet picks all suck, expecially Hillary, Panetta, Biden, and Solis. Geitner is Paulson's lapdog...no change there. What was he thinking? We'll never know because Obama is very tight-lipped! I just want to know what he meant by CHANGE!
On a personal note, I can't figure out why I keep falling asleep every time he gives a press conference! He just bores me, I guess!
Anonymous said:
Yeah, since we're already in debt for a trillion, let's spend another trillion we don't have, i.e, take on more debt, to "fix it" by giving everyone maybe $1000. Wow. And NOT just those who are taxpayers but to everyone, you know, to "make it fair." With bonuses for more kids. You know where that's leading. Oh yeah, and forgiveness of loans on homes you shouldn't have bought.
Truth is the media's playing up what bad shape we're in, and how Obama's going to have to clean it all up, helping fuel the recession -- but watch as soon as he gets in, they'll point to all sorts of "turnarounds" like a miracle.
Wonder how they'll spin the war? We're finally seeing some improvement thanks to the surge, and today's LAT International section has a heartening profile of a youngish pol running there who's using Facebook and genuine democratic tactics to try to get elected instead of bribes and threats -- a huge change.
Meanwhile, Afghanistan, where Obama wants to take us in deeper, is still a quaqmire; he wants to find some "moderate Talibans" to negotiate with, but there is NO such thing: they'll tell you right out, "you're either a practicing Muslim or you're not, there's no such thing as a moderate Arab."
Meanwhile, Al Qaeda and the rest who thought he'd be more radical (like his mentor Rev. "Goddamn America" WRight) are disappointed, and may increase hostilities to show him just how mad they are. (Funny, I don't recall taking the radical Muslim extremists' views into account when we voted.)
I wish Obama well, for our country's sake, but don't expect much to change except MORE debt.
Anonymous said:
The transition back to some semblance of solvency is going to be painful. Maybe "putting us to sleep" is a GOOD THING during the whole operation.
Anonymous said:
Nobody cares about this subject anymore.
Go back to posting recipes young lady.
Sarah Michelle Spinosa said:
Tired of what subject? I bought up a half-dozen here.
And 'posting recipes?' Really now?! It's 2009. Time to get with it.
Do you want to club me over the head and have your way with me now, Captain Caveman?
Ooga Booga!
SMS
Anonymous said:
You're off about Bush and Isreal.
Suicide bombers were wreaking havoc in Isreali cities in 2003 through 2005, killing scores of innocent civilians and injuring the doctors that tried to treat them.
Bush gave very crucial political cover to Isreal's plan to build a wall between themselves and the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank. He stood by Isreal WHEN NO ONE ELSE WOULD, and threatened to veto any UN resolution condemning the wall.
Once the wall was built, the suicide bombings STOPPPED COLD. That gave then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon the political leverage to reopen talks with the Palestinians.
You may remember that meeting and photo op with Bush, Sharon, Mahmoud Abbas, and King Abdullah of Jordan.
There was real optimism for movement towards peace. Sadly, this was derailed with Ariel Sharon's stroke.
Isreal then got a corrupt, incompetent interim goverment of Ehud Olmert. It lost the mini-war with Hezbollah in Lebanon. Now it's losing the PR war with Hamas in Gaza.
Unfortunately, this conflict between the Jews and Arabs goes back to Cain and Abel, and no one president can solve it in his two terms.
The test for Obama is: will he stand by the Isrealis when the unfair and hostile international opinion is against them?
George W. Bush did.
Sarah Michelle Spinosa said:
Anon 10:20 -
Excellent analysis. I didn't consider the incident of which you speak. In fact, I'm actually the one that's guilty of short-term memory loss this time.
However, while I have to admit that Bush has defended Israel over the past 8 years, his has always been a reactive position as opposed to a proactive. Remember Bill Clinton's 'Road Map?' Where's Bush's version?
Bush has really been the 6th man on this and I'm sure his squandering of the world's goodwill after 9/11 which led to the nearly unilateral and poorly planned occupation of Iraq had a lot to do with it.
SMS
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home