Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098
mayorsam@mayorsam.org

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Mother Loved Tommy Best

PBS is currently running a fascinating retrospective on the cutting edge series The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour. Tom and Dick Smothers were, and still are, an extremely articulate and talented pair of folksingers/comedians to which CBS innocently gave a television voice in 1967. The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour featured the duos' music, comedy sets and vignettes interspersed with other 'Sullivan'esque performers' and guest stars' appearances. The likes of Steve Martin, Glen Campbell, Mason Williams, and Rob Reiner were, in turn, writers for the show.

What's fascinating about this variety show is that Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, and Dennis Miller arguably owe their current livelihood to Tommy and Dick. Although their show started out as a direct descendant of Ed Sullivan, Red Skelton, and Milton Burle, the frighteningly familiar political climate at the time quickly seeped into the production. In 1967, mainstream television satire addressing current events did not exist. Tommy and Mason Williams were the driving forces that moved the Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour from above-average Vaudeville homage to cutting-edge, political satire prototype. That in itself is an incredible accomplishment, but that it happened for more than one season during an era where the White House habitually had political censors on-site during production is even more astounding.

Comedian Pat Paulsen was a regular on the show. Mason Williams and Tom Smothers cleverly realized they could educate what was still a fairly innocent viewing public on the sordid details of the political process by running Paulsen for President in 1968. One gag had Dick Smothers interviewing Paulsen on the big issues of the time. Dick was off camera, and the close shot was of just Paulsen's head cut straight down the middle in vertical split-screen. Whenever Dick would ask Paulsen a question, the right half of the candidate's face answered one way, the left half in a completely different way.

The 'talking out of both sides of the mouth' piece was hilarious. Paulsen always had a utterly brilliant delivery. What smacked me upside the head while watching this was that Paulsen was somehow foreshadowing .... TOM LEBONG!

To wit, let's look at the vote earlier this week on the Cyclists Bill of Rights --



(quotes from LAStreetsblog.org)

July 2008 LeBong: "What we need to do first is get more people out of their cars and onto a bike. They need to feel confident that they are safe."

December 2008 ...However, Councilman Tom LaBonge had some changes he wanted to see. First, he found the Third Amendment which states, Cyclists have the right to the full support of educated law enforcement. While he didn't have a problem with the basic idea, he was worried that the language was inflammatory to the local police by implying that they were uneducated. LaBonge was also worried that children would get the wrong idea about cycling because the document fails to cover the responsibilities of cyclists as well as their rights.

Wow - and all that without a split-screen special effect, too! Amazing!


...Hey Tommy LeBong! Mother always loved you best!

CYCLISTS' BILL OF RIGHTS

WHEREAS, cyclists have the right to ride the streets of our communities and this right is formally articulated in the California Vehicle Code; and

WHEREAS, cyclists are considered to be the “indicator species” of a healthy community; and

WHEREAS, cyclists are both environmental and traffic congestion solutions; and
WHEREAS, cyclists are, first and foremost, people - with all of the rights and privileges that come from being members of this great society; and


NOW, THEREFORE, WE THE CYCLING COMMUNITY, do hereby claim the following rights:

1) Cyclists have the right to travel safely and free of fear.

2) Cyclists have the right to equal access to our public streets and to sufficient and significant road space.

3) Cyclists have the right to the full support of educated law enforcement.

4) Cyclists have the right to the full support of our judicial system and the right to expect that those who endanger, injure or kill cyclists be dealt with to the full extent of the law.

5) Cyclists have the right to routine accommodations in all roadway projects and improvements.

6) Cyclists have the right to urban and roadway planning, development and design that enable and support safe cycling.

7) Cyclists have the right to traffic signals, signage and maintenance standards that enable and support safe cycling.

8) Cyclists have the right to be actively engaged as a constituent group in the organization and administration of our communities.

9) Cyclists have the right to full access for themselves and their bicycles on all mass transit with no limitations.

10) Cyclists have the right to end-of-trip amenities that include safe and secure opportunities to park their bicycles.

11) Cyclists have the right to be secure in their persons and property, and be free from unreasonable search and seizure, as guaranteed by the 4th Amendment.

12) Cyclists have the right to peaceably assemble in the public space, as guaranteed by the 1st Amendment.

And further, we claim and assert these rights by taking to the streets and riding our bicycles, all in an expression of our inalienable right to ride!

Labels: , , , , , ,

12 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Like every other issue, when it comes to the Bicyclists Bill of Rights, City Council is just pandering for votes. The only reason LaBonge supports cyclists is that he gets a group of grateful constituents that will love him for his support. Cyclists have been so abused and ignored in this city that they are jumping up and down with joy over the Bill of Rights. Yes, it's a first step but please....Los Angeles is the most bicycle-unfriendly place in the country. For example, the recent backpeddling done on the Sepulveda Blvd widening project. The bids just went out and the cycling portion of the project got wittled down to an insulting level. There are no safe routes from the Valley to the Westside. None. Sepulveda Blvd is the main route and it is an official bike route and it is DANGEROUS. The proposed project here:

http://eng.lacity.org/projects/sepulveda/pdf/Sep_Map_final.pdf

only makes it more dangerous. I ride this stretch to work in the mornings so I have a very educated point of reference. I have written many times to many city officials that the city is putting itself at risk (for litigation) by designating Sepulveda an official Bike Route. I could go on and on why this is an unsafe route (and I have in the past), but I now know when I am wasting my time.

If you want to see what a cycling friendly city looks like, check this out:

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/12/boulder-platinum-bike.php

And before some genius tells me to move to Boulder, let me just say I wish I could.

December 11, 2008 11:15 AM  

Blogger Michael Higby said:

Wow!! Great post. I loved the Smothers Brothers growing up. Mason Williams' Classical Gas was really like one of the first music videos and is a great song. You can find it on YouTube.

December 11, 2008 11:38 AM  

Blogger Unknown said:

And the Smothers Brothers grew up
in Sunland-Tujunga and graduated from Verdugo Hills High.

December 11, 2008 11:52 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

No mention of Jamiel's Law only garnering 18,000 signatures?

COME ON PEOPLE!

December 11, 2008 12:26 PM  

Blogger Petra Fried in the City said:

The Cyclist's Bill of Rights is vitally important. And LeBong just had to **** with it. It's just like him. I mean, geez - it's a BILL OF RIGHTS, Tom. Not a RULES AND REGULATIONS doc, idiot. Clue phone's ringing... please please answer it for once.

Somehow, watching "Smothered: the Censorship struggles of the Smothers Brothers", everything seemed so.... familiar! All of their satire was completely relevant today.

I love those guys too. Sadly I wasn't nearly old enough to understand their show at an adult level when it was on, and the full series has never been released. Wish they were more public nowadays. Almost always a sane port in a political storm.

MS, how do I embed YouTube stuff? We need some Smos Bros/Paulsen for President on this site!

December 11, 2008 12:37 PM  

Blogger Michael Higby said:

12:26 - stay tuned; we're confirming something.

December 11, 2008 1:19 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Jamiel's law fails to get enough signatures
Jamiels law

December 11, 2008 2:00 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

NO CHECKS AND BALANCES

Olympic West – Pico East

Increased trash fees

Increased DWP rates

More taxes – phone tax

TERM EXTENSION - Proposition R

December 11, 2008 2:01 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

What about The Cyclists Bill of Responsibility?

What about the legal responsibility to stop at stop signs and red lights?

What about obeying all the laws they believe it is their right to ignore?

What about their beliefs that they are victims of traffic and not cohorts in creating traffic?

We have mandated that two-wheeled vehicles powered by motors follow all laws. Why don't the operators of two-wheel motorless vehicles believe they should not have to follow those laws?

Sidewalks are for pedestrians and not bicycle riders.

Bicyclists should be afforded the same rights and responsibilities drivers of other types of vehicles must live with, no more, no less.

"Los Angeles is the most bicycle-unfriendly place in the country."

That statement may be true but that doesn't mean we have to bend over and take any more from bicycle riders that other operators of moving creations have to deal with.

December 11, 2008 2:31 PM  

Blogger Petra Fried in the City said:

I agree that cyclists have responsibilities. They are supposed to follow the rules of the road, and many don't. Those that don't follow the rules piss me off to no end.

However, in a car-bike collision, it doesn't really matter to the cyclist who was right.

Anyway...

December 11, 2008 3:12 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

2:31 - took a break from making maps to spin for Tom LeBong on Mayor Sam?

December 11, 2008 5:45 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Horses have the same rights as bike riders; yet the police will stop a horsesman faster than stop a bike rider. Again, equality under the laws of the State, County and City.

December 11, 2008 6:25 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Advertisement

Advertisement