Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098
mayorsam@mayorsam.org

Friday, June 29, 2007

Garshady's Council LOSES Legal Battle To Keep Zuma Dogg Out Of City Hall For One Year & ZD Figured Out The LAST Thing Council Wants Me To Discuss

Man, is that Mitch Englander a loser...I just thought I would say that...I knew it all along. You have never had one solid point on the issues...you have helped build my image on this blog with your weak-ass arguments...Don't worry Council Staffer who so reluctantly testified against ZD...Sure seemed like your defeated Chief of Staff/SHADY JAYCEE OPERATOR boss put you up to it:

Bitch Dicklander...YOU LOSE BITCH...SEE YOU TUESDAY, AND EVERY DAY, FOR A LONG, LONG, LONG, LONG, TIME LOSER! Anyway...you may have forgotten, but the shadiest bunch of crybabies, who just can't take the words of Zuma Dogg, as used against them in the court of public opinion, took their shot, sent out the goon squad, snatched me out of the bleachers, arrested me and tried to beat me in court, in order to try for a "one year stay away" (that may not have even been able to be enforced anyway...but who knows how long it would have taken me to prove that.)

AND I WOULD LIKE TO SEE BICH DICKLANDER UNDER A POLYGRAPH TO ANSWER THE QUESTION: "DID YOU FORCE YOUR STAFFER TO TESTIFY AGAINST ZD, AND COACH HIM ON WHAT TO SAY. (Cause bro, I was there, and he sure didn't have his facts down.) And if you were put up to it, FILE A LAWSUIT, or don't ever say, "hello" again to me please. (Won't hate you, just can't respect you anymore.)

AND, I can tell you one thing...something interesting happened in my trial, after ZD snuck over to City Hall for public comment during lunch:

Saw UNION construction workers protesting a Downtown construction project for using NON-UNION workers (and i was told they were non-documented) So I mentioned this is unsafe; no accountability; any terrorist can fly off the plane and be working on the site minutes later, cause they don't check documentation. And I asked Council to make a motion that ALL building projects approved by Planning and the City be required to use UNION workers. Because after all, besides safety issues, here' you raise taxes on these documented UNION workers with your bulky item fees, trash collection fees, whatever other taxes...then THEY can't get work, cause the non-union/non-documented are getting the work. (I'm told by an insider in the area, it happens all over!!!)

So when the court came back from lunch, the City Attorney says to the judge, "Your honor, The City has three to five new witnesses that would like to testify, as well." (Hey guess who one of them was??? Jan "Nose In The Air" Perry: HEY THE CM WHERE ALL THOSE NON-UNION BUILDINGS ARE POPPING UP!?!? HEY, NO AGENDA THERE POMPOUS ASS!!!

SO, THE CITY WINS...CITY COUNCIL LOSES: ZD IS NOT BANNED FROM SHITTY HALL...And now, the real work begins, cause Eric...quite a few flaws with your current "code of conduct" policy --- and NOW, the City has to start all over again and try to throw the cuffs on ZD, and try for that ONE YEAR STAY AWAY ORDER, ONE MORE TIME.

AND JAN...UNTIL IT'S ALL UNION WORK IN YOUR DISTRICT...I WILL BE COMMENTING ON THIS ISSUE ON RADIO AND TV EVERYTIME! NOW GO GET SOME DISCIPLINE IN YOUR LIFE...IT'S OBVILOUSLY LACKING IN ALL AREAS!

AND WATCH THIS BLOG FOR ALL THE HILARIOUS AND COMPELLING DETAILS FROM THE JURY SELECTION OVER THIS FIRST AMENDMENT CASE AND ALL THE INSIDE DETAILS. (Jury was AMAZING focus group.)

UPDATE: SEE COMMENT SECTION FOR ADDED DETAILS. AND WAY MORE TO COME.
Official Zuma Website

Labels:

51 Comments:

Blogger Walter Moore said:

The City Council tried to get a court order to keep you out of City Hall for a year? Did they even give you any notice? This is pretty amazing and disturbing stuff!

As for the City using non-union -- and illegal alien -- labor, they better watch out. I believe the City Charter requires that companies doing business with the City have to pay an above-minimum wage. Query how well that gets documented.

June 29, 2007 11:31 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I heard ZD pleaded guilty today.

June 29, 2007 11:41 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

Walter, I was arrested last November. Jury trial just started today. It's an extremely compelling case, based on the jury selection alone, and the questioning process the master Judge Carter practitioned from the bench. Basically, a focus group on people's opinions of the first amendment, and whatnot.

DEFINITLEY, more than one comment from jurors who said, "Based on what I've heard so far, I just don't see where this rises to the level of a criminal violation."

And someone else mentioned, "It just seems like a lot of effort being put in over this."

And some people felt that you simply cannot disrupt a public meeting. (Which even ZD does not agree with.)

AND all the other juicy stuff, cause I really don't think the Councilmembers were too happy with having to take time out to testify, and again, the cross examination, on public record, wouldn't of been a very comfortable situation. SO, OVERALL, EVEN THOUGH ZD CAN COME BACK ON TUESDAY...I think both parties are happy enough and pissed enough.

AND...ZD HAS ALREADY BEEN BOOKED ON LOCAL AM TALK RADIO SHOW NEXT WEEK. WILL ANNOUNCE ON MONDAY.

June 29, 2007 11:45 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

And just a little side note to all you aspiring future political activist defendants before a Superior Court judge...

DEFINITELY...DO NOT...walk up and down the hallway where the jurors are waiting with a shirt that says, "Speak Out Against Politician 'Fraud, Waste & Abuse'"...Become a Political Target (aka: The Defendant).

Then DEFINITLEY, DEFINITLEY DO NOT WALK INTO THE JUDGE'S COURT ROOM WITH THAT SHIRT. AND WHEN HE TELLS YOU TO PUT ON YOUR JACKET OVER THE SHIRT...DO NOT TRY TO ENGAGE HIM OVER A DISCUSSION OVER FIRST AMEMNDMENT POLITICAL EXPRESSION RIGHTS, WHEN A JURY IS OUTSIDE WAITING.

THEN...

When the judge says, "And I order you not to wear that shirt ANYWHERE in the building...

DO NOT...walk across to city hall for public comment, during your court's lunch break, WEARING THE SHIRT ON TV...IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, WHERE YOU ARE MIXED IN WITH A BUNCH OF WITNESSES AGAINST YOU.

ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU SAW YOUR PROSECUTING ATTORNEY IN CHAMBERS, WHO SAW YOU WEARING THE SHIRT.

THEN DON'T SAY, "Well Gee, you said INSIDE the building, I was outside..."

These are just some of the things you can do, if you feel like pissing off an otherwise, fantastically fair judge, until even the prosecuting City Attorney has to go to bat for you.

And, NO..ZD did not plead guilty.

June 29, 2007 11:54 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

F*ck Dude,you blow my mind!
Props and more! Keep up the good work!

June 29, 2007 11:55 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

You know, I didn't want to blog his name and the details on the main thread, cause you know what...maybe I'm the biggest sucker in the world, and hopefully someone will tell me if I am...

But I think Greig Smith's Legislative Deputy Doug Tripp is such a good guy...MAN, was he conflicted over this.

Doug, if ZD is correct in the assumption that Englander put you up to this...I DO hope you pull a Ruby De Vera. I know you won't, cause you don't wanna blow the gig...BUT, that's the difference between ZD and a politician. DOUG, I think they set you up for pergery. And folks, no offense to Mr. Tripp, cause they sent him in with CRAP.

My little public champ defender, had him, "Hummana, Hummana, Hummana". She totally poked holes in the story, completely discredited him, in the mind of the jury I am sure. I mean, seriously, basically a disaster.

But that's ok, bro, cause the rules WERE NOT posted, indeed...But besides what my PD was able to discredit simply on what was evident was this...DOUG...when I was snatched up by Landry, I was sitting in my seat. YOU SAY I WAS WALKING TO THE PODIUM AGAIN. So I guess you either didn't see the arrest, or don't remember. And it is pretty interesting that so many people have such perfectly aligned recollections of something that happened in a couple second timeframe, eight months ago. (Every detail leading up, remebered perfectly, as if the entire chambers is focused on me sitting in the benches, every second.

And then, TODAY...ALL OF THE SUDDEN, A BUNCH OF OTHER PEOPLE SUDDENLY REMEBER WHAT HAPPENED TOO, ALMOST EIGHT MONTHS LATER, WHEN THEY COULD HAVE SAID SOMETHING IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Mr. Rogers Voice: Can you say shady politicians willing to lie and say anything to keep someone from talking about non-union workers builing City approved skyscrapers, that any international terrorist can work on and sabatoge?

ZUMA DOGG CAN!

June 30, 2007 12:22 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

ZUMA DOGG,

Before I ramble my way into a rather useless missive, I must warn you. I HAVE A GIFT FOR YOU!!

I can't gaurantee that you'll want it, but I bet it will make you smile. I will keep you posted.

Anyway, I recently completed a j-school fellowship run by some giants in the print news industry. Since then I've been rejected the LA Times and another local dinosaur. (Me thinks, they looked rather askance at my views on convergence, citizen journalism and web-based business models.)

Needless to say, I am a big fan of Mayor Sam, Mr. Dogg, et al. This site epitomizes the paradigm shift that is turning the industry inside out.

Though a bit disheveled, you guys seem to have a knack for hard news. Your coverage is civic-minded and unapologetic. Thank you for annoying and agitating your way to some interesting scoops.

I've written some pieces for a mid-size metro paper and done some freelance magazine work. So feel free to pretend that my opinion matters.

Respectfully submitted,
Anonymous Negro

God Bless the First Amendment.

June 30, 2007 12:44 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hey, ZD: See 12:47 under Mayor Sam Hotsheet for Friday/Weiss: "Karma is a bitch," right? Not that he had anything to do with it, from what I can tell, any more than anyone/ everyone you insulted... when you get out of this, grow up, for YOUR sake.

June 30, 2007 12:53 AM  

Anonymous Phil Krakover said:

You are the Mother of All Losers.

June 30, 2007 3:28 AM  

Blogger Walter Moore said:

Good for you, Zuma! Wow!

If you want 'em, here's some trial tips:

Please be ultra respectful to the Judge. If he talks, for example, you STOP talking until it's your turn. Also, never interrupt your opponent. Wait till it's your turn.

Juries are much, much smarter than people give them credit for. Lawyers, for some reason, talk down to them. I don't, and they appreciate it.

Juries do NOT want their time wasted. So don't put on a big show, or crack a bunch of jokes. Get to the point, then stop.

You may also want to try to introduce several of your more serious essays from Mayor Sam and/or your blog, where you criticize City Hall, and ask CM's if they are aware, directly, or indirectly from their staffers, of your writings. Ditto re your videos. This would help the jury understand that you're being prosecuted not because of your conduct, but because they want to silence an opponent.

Now, I wasn't there when you were arrested, so I don't know what you did, but I find this trial very disturbing. A citizen who takes the time to attend City Council meetings, and who, as shown by his writings, sets forth serious criticism of city policy, is sued / prosecuted to prevent him from attending public meetings? Is this the Soviet Union For A New Century?

June 30, 2007 6:48 AM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

Walter,

It's over...case closed. ZD STAYS, WEISSASS LOSES...And there IS a serious problem with the enforcement of NON-rules/laws. For whatever ZD has done inside City Hall...all this was, was a case of a burnt out cop, one month away from retriement, who simply lost his cool, was really hot, cause someone else just flipped out, minuted before, who got away, so Landry, after 3:45 minutes, betrayed the badge and society, and snatched me up and crushed my wrist. (Maybe Jack Weiss can defend the City in my Civil case.)

SO LET'S BE CLEAR GARSHADY AND THE PEOPLE OF LOS ANGELES....IF YOU WANNA GET ME...MAKE SURE YOU REALLY GET ME...CAUSE NOW YOU JUST WASTED EIGHT MONTHS, CAUSE YOU HAD NO CASE, SO YOU HAD TO BEND OVER BACKWARDS TO KEEP ZD FROM CROSS EXAMINING YOUR RICO/RACKETEERING DEFENDANT ASSES.

June 30, 2007 8:52 AM  

Anonymous Jack Hoff said:

Tiresome, Zuma, you are only tiresome.

Of course, you have a right to act like a horse's ass wherever you go -- that is your constitutional guarantee, but you do not have the right to waste the taxpayer's time.

You still have not effected any positive change in government.

But that was never the goal, was it?

Your real goal is simply to get attention; positive or negative, it really doesn't matter.

When you actually start fighting for a real cause other than your own, please let the rest of us activists know -- better yet, let us just find out through the media -- you know, the media you don't continually create for yourself.

Then, and only then, will you be on anybody's radar as a person who really cares and does good for this city.

June 30, 2007 9:12 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

The Council has rules of decorum for public speakers? Are they posted somewhere?

June 30, 2007 9:16 AM  

Blogger Walter Moore said:

Zuma:
Forgive my being dense, but I can't tell how it ended from your posting. Acquitted? Case dismissed? What happened?

9:12:
I respectfully disagree. Here's why:

First of all, Zuma has highlighted some real issues (e.g., density, water, City Hall's violation of an ordinance preventing condo conversions unless apartments had a certain vacancy rate, etc.).

Secondly, his theatrics are precisely what got the media to pay attention to him, thereby getting him an audience. If he showed up in a suit and tie, and presented his points in a more standard fashion, he would be completely ignored, just like all the other people who take time out of their busy day to try to influence policy by speaking to the City Council.

You know the expressions, "crazy like a fox," and "there's a method to his madness?" Well, ZD is the poster child for those expressions. He figured out how to get his message across, and did so with a budget of zero, and backing from no special interest groups. He's remarkable. And I'm not just saying that because he's my brother-in-law.

June 30, 2007 9:28 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

First of all the fact that a citizen who speaks out was even arrested is a red flag to all of us. Secondly, why weren't any of the South LA Farmers, Nation of Islam etc. who have spoken at public comment and have threatened, been volatile and hostile ever arrested. Walter makes good points as to the real reason Zuma was arrested was to silence him. To the haters I say at least Zuma has the guts to speak the truth. He has never made up crap against council members. He does all of us a service by posting the corruption within city hall that we may not have known because of the LA Slimes afraid to report. Here's Rule 12, Los Angeles City Council Rule 12

a. Rules of Decorum. During a meeting of the Los Angeles City Council, there is the need for civility and expedition in the carrying out of public business in order to ensure that the public has a full opportunity to be heard and that the deliberative process of the council is retained at all times. While any meeting of the City Council is in session, the following rules of decorum shall be observed. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a whole and not to any single member thereof, unless in response to a question from such member. Persons addressing the Council shall not make personal, impertinent, unduly repetitive, slanderous or profane remarks to the Council, any member of the council, staff or general public, nor utter loud, threatening, personal or abusive language, nor engage in any other disorderly conduct that disrupts, disturbs or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of any Council meeting. No person in the Audience at a Council meeting shall engage in disorderly or boisterous conduct, including the utterance of loud, threatening or abusive language, whistling, stamping of feet or other acts which disturb, disrupt or otherwise impede the orderly conduct of any Council meeting. Signs, placards banners, or similar items shall not be permitted at any time in the Council chamber. Unless addressing the Council or entering or leaving the Council Chambers, all persons in the audience shall remain sitting in the seats provided. No person shall stand or sit in the center aisle, nor shall the doorways be blocked.

b. Enforcement of Decorum. The rules of decorum set forth above shall be enforced in the following manner. The presiding officer of the Council shall be responsible for maintaining the order and decorum of meetings. The presiding officer may request that a person who is violating the rules of decorum as set forth in Rule 12 a., comply immediately. If, after receiving a warning from the presiding officer, a person persists in violating the rules of decorum, the presiding officer shall order him or her to leave the Council meeting. Any person so ordered removed shall be excluded from further attendance at the meeting from which he or she has been removed, unless permission to attend is granted upon motion adopted by a majority vote of the Council. If such person does not remove himself or herself, the presiding officer may order the sergeant-at-arms of the Council to remove that person from the Council chambers. Any person who resists removal by the sergeant-at-arms shall be charged with a violation of Penal Code Section 403. The City reserves the right to seek further legal remedies should a member of the public engage in disruptive conduct during multiple meetings.
Adopted August 8, 2006
Code of Conduct.

June 30, 2007 9:45 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Anonymous 9:45, just found the Council Rules here: http://cityclerk.lacity.org/cps/pdf/CouncilRules.pdf

Wonder if they've been updated? I see more sections, and a different penalty than what you posted.

Penalties. Any person who has been ordered removed from a meeting may be charged with a
violation of Penal Code Section 403, or other appropriate Penal Code or Los Angeles Municipal
Code sections. The Council by majority vote may prohibit a person removed on the basis of
disruptive conduct from addressing the Council for up to 30 days. The length of time of the
prohibition shall be based on the number and severity of prior incidents of disruptive conduct.

June 30, 2007 9:59 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

The City Attorney's office says that ZD pleaded guilty to a charge of disturbing the peace and got one year probation.

June 30, 2007 10:01 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hmmmmm loud and disruptive? Sounds like Zuma Dogg

And who is the bigger loser...the Chief of Staff...or the bum who posts online about the Chief of Staff at midnight on a Friday?

June 30, 2007 10:02 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Wow...so Zuma lied and bowed down before "the man"

June 30, 2007 10:03 AM  

Anonymous Jack Hoff said:

Walter, "highlighting" an issue and actually doing something about it are two completely different things. The question on ZD has always been whether he can effect change.

We already know he can blab endlessly about it.

Zuma Dogg's approach, if replicated by all speakers who seek public redress, would mean that absolutely nothing would ever get done in government -- AND the message would never be heard.

How about a city council or mayor that sit around all day saying, "Yo yo yo! On the downlow, y'all! Howdy Hoo!"

Is this what we can expect from your admin?

If, when you are elected Mayor, please put Zuma on your staff in charge of communications.

June 30, 2007 10:32 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Walter, here's how Zuma does it:

1) Acts out continually until public officials (and activist officials like Mitch Englander) grow very tired of his antics and complete waste of public resources -- specifically, council and committee meeting time;

2) Goes to court, again wastes the public's time, a judge's time, taxpayer money, etc., etc.;

3) Pleads out;

4) Then, in an attempt to make himself look heroic instead of self-centered, calls Mitch Englander and everyone else an asshole.

Brother-in-law or not, his behavior is cowardly at best.

June 30, 2007 10:54 AM  

Anonymous fred c said:

To Jack Hoff,

You are critical of Zumma Dog for being an activist who does not “affect change”, well he is just one man who attends city council meetings and reports/rants about it on the internet. He is not a large corporation like the Los Angeles times who have many investigative reporters who rarely investigate anything.

But he is one individual who has affected a change in me I now attend city council meetings when I can and read his blog and educate myself about Los Angeles city politics.

So what if he a little loud and quirky, he is more civic minded than 99.9% of the general public who do absolutely nothing resembling civic duty.

So Zumma Dog keep doing what you are doing because I am sure there are other readers of yours who are also motivated to become more active in their communities.

If you want to learn about Paris Hilton read the Los Angeles Times if you want to know how city government is wasting tax dollars then read Zumma Dog’s blog.

Fred C.

June 30, 2007 11:06 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I think Elliot finally cracked. He's a fucking nutjob!

June 30, 2007 11:53 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

ZD -

We all owe you a big debt of gratitude for watching what the rest of us can't, down at city hall. Keep it up!

June 30, 2007 1:00 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Even Walter Moore can't make sense of what exactly happened, but you're so unhinged that that is the point: you admit you should have been thrown out like garbage but quietly...regardless of what you have to say, a smelly, dirty wacko going in and screaming about everything and everyone appeals to a certain lower element, but makes a mockery of the democratic system.

June 30, 2007 1:52 PM  

Anonymous Christians said:

Okay, Zuma, we are now begging you to go away.

June 30, 2007 2:17 PM  

Anonymous Jews said:

Yes, please go away!

June 30, 2007 2:18 PM  

Anonymous The Nation of Islam said:

We agree!

June 30, 2007 2:19 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

Is Walter really your brother-in-law?

June 30, 2007 7:36 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

Is Walter really your brother-in-law?

REALLY: NO! Sorry Walter, I would be happy to say, "yes", just for some fun, but I don't think that's quite the reflection you are looking for, this election season, so no...I am not his brother-in-law and have no relation to him, other than being a fan of his articles and a fellow-Mayor Sam blogger. We DID coincidentally meet once at the same community meeting last year. He was moderating a forum, so we only got to say, "Hello" and take a quick picture for the blog."

CONNECT THE DOTS!!! Maybe it's just possible more than one person can feel the City has a few issues that need a public hearing.

June 30, 2007 7:41 PM  

Anonymous moderator dogg said:

i took down the comment where I say, "I hope BLANK doesn't hire any BLANKS." Even though I DO think it is an issue worthy of my concern, there are enough other bigger fiscal imprudencies in the City, so I deleted it, since it was more personal. AND, it was a long as hell comment, that I already reposted on the other thread. SO DON'T COMPLAIN THAT I TOOK IT DOWN, AFTER YOU COMPLAINED THAT I PUT IT UP...CAPISHE? Otherwise, you are a full of sh*t hypocrite.

June 30, 2007 9:28 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

MORE POSTS DELETED BY ZUMA DOGG!

Amazing hypocrite.

June 30, 2007 9:44 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Zuma rewriting the history books with shady edits.

Well, at least THIS thread isn't about freedom of speech!

lol

June 30, 2007 9:55 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

So Zuma, you are now a proven chicken and a proven liar, who makes remarks you're afraid to back up but anything goes when you're hurling s-t and think you can get away with it cuz you're "just" a smelly, dirty bum... but then you puff yourself up about self-importance, and delete posts about you not nearly as bad as the stuff you fling at elected leaders...
You are the worst kind of pondscum, and you think anyone wants to pay to hear your rants instead of real business? Was City Hall built to hear the lunatic ravings and self- delusions of one mentally ill bum? Is that what city government is all about? But do keep going and being yourself -- you'll make my day.

Clint Eastwood

June 30, 2007 10:05 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Zuma, you really should put the posts you deleted back in on both threads.

I've always been a fan, but this is a real disappointment.

June 30, 2007 10:13 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

10:13pm,

Don't give me that bullshit. If someone post graphic, sexual sh*t, of course I am going to delete it, then you say, "Zuma deletes all criticism." So why don't you just go right to the "Zuma deleted my posts, boo hoo hoo, now no one will know who I think his gay lover is? Oh no! What am I going to do? Maybe have a brain hemmorage over it.

June 30, 2007 10:17 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

10:13pm,

I hope you are no longer a "fan" if that's what you call it. I don't want stupid dumb "fans" like you. Please don't ever read my comments again. Go to the Howard Stern site, or some porno site, loser.

June 30, 2007 10:18 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Sad that you now have to make a shady claim that people were being pornographic while deleting posts that were critical of your continued lame behavior.

You are not worthy.

June 30, 2007 10:21 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

....and still MORE posts get deleted by the Dogg!

June 30, 2007 10:27 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hey, Zuma deleted my 10:34pm post that I didn't leave yet?

June 30, 2007 10:33 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

Hey! What happened to my 10:35pm post? I think ZD deleted it.

June 30, 2007 10:34 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hey, isn't it funny that the two biggest losers on this blog that attack ZD, are the two people who also hate each other the most. (Bitch and Jack)

So I guess it's true that a losers enemy is another loser.

June 30, 2007 10:36 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Shady Dogg.

No credibility.

June 30, 2007 10:40 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

Yep, it's over, I guess I should hang it up now...

Everything I said is all wrong now, cause you keep posting sex shiz...but good, now no one will post any, to look like none was posted, so now, feel free to post away about how the city is NOT allowing buildings to be constructed with any Joe Blow off the street (non-union).

I guess there was nothing wrong with:

AB 1381
LAX Wage Increase
Air Rights (the biggest LOL!)
No shirts & incense at Venice
Prop H being a shady dud, loser.
Prop R being shadier than a CM.
Vacancy rates being ignored
Tenant relocation money outdated
MASSIVE Brown Act violations
Special Event Fee Waiver Abuse
All Skyscrapers, no infrastructure
Illegal Dumping (Yes, covered it MONTHS before it was reported)
WATER ALERT PROBLEMS
Dirt Burnell Complaint
Wyvenwood Historic Demolish Plans
NC Conflict of interests/Bradley
Semilla/Charter Board Conflicts
Non-profit shadiness (Council agreed with audit motion)

So anyway, some loser who went away is back, and I'm afraid they are a sexual deviant, as well as a do nothing loser who is more caught up with ZD, than ZD was with Gene Simmons in 6th grade!

June 30, 2007 11:01 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hey, ZD: I see you've got Sun Tzu giving you free strategy advice, and Walter Moore resorting to posting his same old advice anon., and you editing and cutting comments so fast your greasy cap must be spinning, and you "accidentally" delete yourself.

Moore/ Dogg for President/ V. P.!!!

June 30, 2007 11:08 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

11:08pm,

Pretty insightful. You probably think Clinton still has a shot at this point with her high favorability numbers with non-latinos. Just kidding, she doesn't have any. No one can tolerate her vocal tonality, and they don't believe a word she says, but I think she's got a hell of a chance know that she has attached her cart to Antonio. That guy just SCREAMS winner. (See Washington trip, and AB 1381.) What has he ACTUALLLY done, besides break campaign promises and piss off every human supporter, excpet this one guy who pays him?

June 30, 2007 11:31 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Zuma, why don't you just shut down the comments on this thread and delete them all, just like Walter did on Friday? Neither one of you seem to be capable of taking criticism.

July 01, 2007 4:21 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

CARDINAL MAHONEY, mi hombre: como estan los hombres diablos? Poco no es posible, destruar el diablos de estas paginas? A donde es su mujer, la senora de Mahoney? Nosotros no tenemos much tiemp!!!

July 01, 2007 5:34 AM  

Anonymous Patriot said:

Yesterday I made a joke about Zuma being a fascist and it got deleted.

Now I'm not joking.

July 01, 2007 11:20 AM  

Anonymous Obviousman said:

Hey 4:21 am, it looks like Walter's not allowing comments on his new post.

Punchline:

And it's about COMMUNISM!

July 01, 2007 11:49 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

yawn .....

July 01, 2007 2:03 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Advertisement

Advertisement