Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

1st Amendment Challenge: Zuma Dogg vs Eric Garshadybaby (Witness The Hypocrisy)

What a shady crybaby. Watch Lil' Eric's "shady-partner" (and fellow winy-crybaby, "Boo-hoo-hoo" Shitty Attorney) Dion O'Crybaby tell ZD during one public comment that "IT'S NOT A QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION" (even though I can ask anything I want, you just are not required to answer, perhaps. But of COURSE question asking is allowed. Like a rhetorical question. Or to say, "Council, can you please vote for a new Council President, because the Council has become the laughing stock of the City and a big JOKE with all the talk radio stations...and that's when the shady crybaby told me I was talking too loud. OH REALLY, NOT ACCORDING THE FEDERAL LAW...BUT YOU WOULDN'T KNOW ABOUT THAT, "Mr. Ethics". Now go take campaign contributions from some more people that come up, "shady" on ZD's Batcomputer.

The guy has a history of having ordinances overturned by judges for being illegal in violation of the constitution like LAX LIVING WAGE...BOY did he blow that one with his shadiness by not changing it enough, trying to be decietful...and oh speaking of decietful, PROP R ballot language...couldn't get away with air-rights, either...MAN ERIC, you must hate judges! Oh yeah, ethics violations over campaign contrinutions from the other president (of ethics).

What about all he stuff ZD can't catch...like 99% of it. Man, I think Council should re-elect Garshady for President. It's like when Bush got re-elected...Leno & Letterman were stoked! (4 more years of material.)

Hey Garshady...read the U.S.Constitution...you might learn something...like EVERYTHING...You obviously know nothing about it.

"ANYONE BUT GARCETTI 4 PRESIDENT!" (How's that for a campain slogan!) He should team up with Jack Weiss and start a "project expiditor" business together. They seem to like to do that!

AND...HERE'S THE VIDEO FROM ZD vs Garcetti from Tuesday Click here. Type "conversations going on" in KEYWORD search box, and click Tuesday June 26th top link to see the crybaby-liars tell me it's not a question and answer session, HERE...

Click and type "we can all laugh in harmony" in keyword box to see them GLADY answer a question here, when they WANT to say, "Yes".

BONUS AS HELL LINK: THE RED SEA PARTS!!! Plus hear Richard Alarcon say, "It brings me great sadness to say that I absolutley agree with Zuma Dogg. I have an amending motion to do just that....And my intent is exactly what Mr. Zuma Dogg says." Click and type "46 Zuma Dogg"




Anonymous Anonymous said:

talk about cry babies oh davie elliot...they wont let me sell incense boohoo...i cant make millions from my lucrative tshirt business...boohoo...the city clowncil are keeping the white man down..boohoo...cry me a river vanilla ice...word to your mother..now go take a bath you stinky mutt

June 27, 2007 9:38 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

9:38pm...And there's Mr. "Best In the Biz" Crybaby spinfly with the first post again. I know it says, "7:30pm" as the post time, but I gutted and reposted, and this loser HAD to chime in within seconds. I am still revising the story online, which is how I already caught his compulsive loserness.

June 27, 2007 10:02 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Zuma, no other legislative body would put up with all your rantings at all: upto five mins a day of some self- described copy of DeNiro on his worst day in Taxi Driver, before he let loose w/ the guns and killed them all so you should be glad they let you in at all! If anyone else in the world is watching you at Council meetings, they'd be stunned at how polite they are to you, calling you "Mr. Dogg," puhleeze! You do you think you are, demanding answers from the Council like schoolkids, sounding and looking like you are, no less.

Civilized people go in respectfully and maybe get riled up about one specific issue near and dear to their hearts, but you just waste time and make our city look bad.

June 27, 2007 10:31 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:


No spin. No joke. You want to investigate something on Garcetti?

How about that his father was involved in an accident, perhaps while DUI, and tried to hit and run?

Happened in the hills in Eric's district.

With Rocky getting so much press for his automotive snafus, would this be a big story?

President of the Ethics Commission?

You betcha.

Come clean Gil.

June 27, 2007 10:49 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

I can think of no finer, more upstanding and ethical individual with nothing to hide, to be the ONE person in charge of being the gatekeeper of the first amendment, protecting the fraud, waste and abuse they they are trying to steamroll through, any which way but loose. I think HE'S the PERFECT person to pass judgement and criticize me, ethics violations and racketeering charges, and all!

June 27, 2007 11:37 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:


I know you are busy...but could you please sit down with Dion o'CONnel and read him the brown act, nice and slowly. Show him the constitution. Do some of that training and re-educating (or in his case, educating) on the first amendment. I mean the guy shoots his mouth off and interupts me -- AND GOES ON TV 35 AND PUBLICLY ADMONISHES ME, WHICH LEADS TO WARNINGS THAT ENDS MY TIME EARLY...

BUT ZUMA DOGG WOULD LIKE TO CHALLENGE MR. O'LOSER to please show me the legal documentation that supports all these civil right violating, crybaby "suggestions" that Mr. Ethics (I didn't know my own dad, President of the Ethics Commission, sent me check) Garcetti feels so compelled to interupt???

DION??? WHERE'S THE RULES??? WHERE'S THE LEGALEASE ON THIS BS YOU ARE TRYING TO ENFORCE. IT'S LIKE TOM LEBONG'S Griffith Park Expansion, Jan Perry's Downtown revitalization plans, Greg Smith's chances of staying awake during a meeting, Wendy Greuel's chances of a contractor in her district NOT using Frontier Supply, Eric Garcetti's chances not violating ETHICS LAW and the US CONSTITUTION, and Rocky DelDilldo's chances of ANYTHING...

just an illusion, y'all.

June 27, 2007 11:47 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Dude! You are, like, so baked!
Wha' chu talkin' 'bout? Nate Holden made more sense than you.

Maybe if we were stoned too, we'd like pick up on what you're laying down, man!

You're trippin'!

June 27, 2007 11:54 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Walter, we all know you are getting contributions from developers. Why else would you say you "support" them (6/27/07 3:29am). While we're at it, why were you still awake and blogging at 3:29am anyway?

If you're not taking contributions from developers, we'd like some proof. Please share who has been giving you that $7000 each month.

June 28, 2007 12:05 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Mr. Dogg, you are the dumbest mutt in the litter.

Eric Garcetti is a Rhoades Scholar and one of the smartest people around, and you are a yipping little lapdog, who keeps nipping at people's heels and cannot understand why people kick him halfway across the room.

Why don't you go look at yourself in a mirror and smell under your arms a bit?

You might actually grow up and quit whining all the time at everything.

My English 101 Professor taught me that if you underline or capitalize everything, the effect is lost. You are a perfect example of someone who never had an English Professor.

You are nothing but a loudmouthed gadfly who wastes everyone's time and lives on the edge of society like a scavenger.

Please don't think you are anything useful; all you are is a walking caricature of Eminem or Snoop. Both would be disgusted by you, as is everyone else including that dunce Councilmember Alarcon who got you to starfuck him by being a facetious courteous supporter for a nanosecond. Tomorrow he will be some other pejoritive that you can summon up from your now trite and foggy rapidly disappearing brain cells.

Why don't you give it a rest and let your useless existance just fade away?

Go get a job, you bum.

June 28, 2007 3:20 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Council has a Rule 12 Code of Conduct for a reason. Zuma you've been holding to it but I think you got a little out of hand the other day. Add to that you've become the thorn in council. You give good arguments and should stick to the way you've been giving them without the antics.

June 28, 2007 6:45 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Are you nuts? The guy is a ham and cannot hold on to it.

The professionals get their point across without the histronics AND people listen!

You, they may look at yuo, but they are dreaming of something far, far away.

You are a three minute intermission in the show of life.

When will you tire of being a jerk and sleeping in your stinky van?

We hope it is soon, because we are all a little tired of yuo.

June 28, 2007 6:54 AM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:


Thanks! I hear ya...but sometimes I gotta get like that when that shady fuck pulls that shit.

The fact that I haven't been as combative and more calm these past several months demonstrates that. He was wrong as fuck, he is enforcing his own sissy ass standards to the US constitution. IT SCARY STUFF, KIDDIES...MY VOICE A LITTTLE LOUD IS THE LEAST OF THE PROBLEMS.

June 28, 2007 6:57 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Few want to hear nonsense; no one wants to hear LOUD nonsense.

You are wearing oout your welcome; soon the rules will start being enforced and you will step over the line. Then, who will drive y9uor van home, or will it be impounded and the cost to bail it out exceed its value?

Walk carefully dum-dum, you are up against a force you cannot best.

June 28, 2007 8:08 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Good, ZD is moving from plain paranoia to obsession with Garcetti. Next he'll be stalking council members at their homes and sticking pins in voodoo dolls that look like them.

Then he'll just scream at invisible people on the street.

We're making progress.

June 28, 2007 9:11 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I at least give Zuma credit for taking the time to speak out on many issues many of us are against. Thanks to him more people in the city know about the corruption and BS council wants to rush through without community input. All you haters, when was the last time you spoke out or did anything instead whine and complain on an issue. You can't personally attack Zuma unless you can say you actually have done something that matter in your community. Zuma has for many in the city.

June 28, 2007 10:43 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:


Name one! Name one thing he's addressed that "matters" in any community that ended up having a different outcome than it would have if the microphone had been given to someone who had a clue.

Screaming in public meetings has the exact opposite affect on 99 percent of the clear thinking people who have real concerns about how the city handles issues.

For viewers of Channel 35, it "bathroom break" time. I'm surprised the city's water supply doesn't dip at the end of those 2 excruciatingly PAINFUL (for logical minds) minutes.

I do more, quietly, behind the scenes, little missie, working WITH public officials to improve life FOR my neighbors in any given week than a years worth of ranting a raving by someone like ZD could ever accomplish. Council can and DOES easily dismiss him as a lunatic. That makes it even more harmful if he does actually, occasionally have a point. If he does luck out, and get the details of a problem correct (BIG if), his histrionics work again council ever feeling like they have to address the issue.

I pray to GOD every time he goes to the mike at council that he's NOT on MY "side" in a critical issue that he's just pulled ignorantly from the agenda or referrals. With supporters liek THAT, you don't need opposition.

"Oh, him? You actually believe, him? Hee Haw, get back to me when some SERIIOUS critic makes a point.".

Rule #1 in public debate -- the spokesperson has to be credible, and appear serious-minded, or only other near-crazies will ever pay attention to any problem addressed.

June 28, 2007 11:39 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

So, to summarize 11:39, you are saying that people who yell "fire" in a crowded theater-even if there does happen to be a fire-have nothing to do with either putting it out or getting the moviegoers to safety.

June 28, 2007 3:47 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home