Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098
mayorsam@mayorsam.org

Saturday, June 30, 2007

FIRST AMENDMENT WATCH: WILL CITY COUNCIL VOTE ZUMA DOGG OUT OF CITY HALL ON TUESDAY?

It's turning into the "cliffhanger ending" of a Batman episode:

Announcer: Wiiiiiiiill City Council take a vote to BAN Zuma Dogg from City Hall for a month? Will anyone besides Jackass Weiss want to be seen voting against the beloved First Amendment advocate on TV 35? (After all, he has slammed on the breaks on the much of the antics, and toned down the delivery, most of the time, in a calculated PR move. So the public will be wondering why?] Wiiiiiiiiiiiil they be making Zuma Dogg the political martyr that will blow this whole City Council First Amedment Challenge up to a much wider NATIONAL media LEVEL??? [Already booked for Kevin James on Friday!!!]

Caaaaan they even get away with this, even if the rest of Council finally decides they don't mind looking like a Jackass being re-called?

Tune in Tuesday...same Zuma Time...same Zuma Channel. (ZD-TV 35)

CLOWNCIL LAW: Any person who has been ordered removed from a meeting may be charged with a violation of Penal Code Section 403, or other appropriate Penal Code or Los Angeles Municipal Code sections. The Council by majority vote may prohibit a person removed on the basis of disruptive conduct from addressing the Council for up to 30 days. The length of time of the prohibition shall be based on the number and severity of prior incidents of disruptive conduct.

* First of all, it says, "from addressing" the Jackass Weiss run Clowncil. [Hey Eric, why not just vote to make him President.] Anyway, "from addressing" means I can still show up an sit in the front row. And what if I want to show up to address the public? Is someone allowed to address the public at a public meeting? If not, I guess they are not part of the meeting?

* What if I want to address City Attorney Dion O'Connell? Or The Mayor. Are you telling me there is no public forum to address the Mayor? Because if anyone is allowed to address the Mayor from the poduim, then you will have to make a major amendment to this "whatever it is." And since the mayor signs off on these ordinances, I'm sure he is allowed to be addressed for the record, as well. So ZD will be showing up to address Dion and the Mayor.

* Some people feel you cannot ban an international hip-hip rapper/choreographer from a public meeting. (Check the Constitution...I know it's something you have never heard of. It's pretty cool. You should check it out someday.) What's next, Parks and Recs saying I can't go to McArthur Park for 30 days? How else am I going to be able to watch people buy crack and attack people?

* If the Superior Court already punished me (time served), then how many OTHER people get to decide THEY get to punish me, too? Maybe Baskin and Robbins can decide they won't serve me ice cream for 30 days.

* You see, if someone breaks the law at the Park, you can be arrested and then you will be punished. You cannot ban the public from the public. It's the public. However, if they show up next time, and break the law again, they will be arrested again. Eventually, a judge can issue a stay away order from a location. But a gang of 15 gentrifying, public fund bilking desparate, greedy, fear-based cause they have something to hide -- CAN'T.

* I mean what kind of crybaby, sissy stuff is this???

* And remember, once you take the vote, make sure you keep Weiss' goon squad away from ZD until you;

a) Vote on it a week later, because remember, anything you vote on must be "unanymous", or it has to come back.

b) THEN, Mayor Antonio has to sign off on it. (Even if it passes on first vote.) And he'll NEVER sign off on that...HE LOVES ME!

* City Clowncil, you know you pulled that unconstitutional Venice Beach bullsh*t, that brought me into City Hall, and you WERE wrong, as you now know, after this week's closed door session. (Judge ordered incense and T shirts back, plus no noise restrictions. So that's a clean victory of all the "Venice Outlaws" issues!!! Official word, soon.) So please do me this ONE favor. Let's test this whole thing out. I can live with 30 days sitting there looking at you, without takin' my time to educate and inform your asses. (Hey, you're busy doing so many things...ZD is a specialist, so he works 16 hours on an issue, while you are doing other things, then I let you know, "What's up wit it." There's no shame in that. Be glad you're not a loser with no life, who has way too much time to research a bunch of sh*t that doesn't even affect me anyway. [DO YOU THINK IT MATTERS TO ME IF THEY USE UNION OR NON-UNION WORKERS TO BUILD SOME BUILDING I'M NEVER GONNA STEP FOOT IN?]

RELATED ISSUE: IS ZD BEING TARGETED FOR MY FIRST AMENDMENT FREE SPEECH? After my public comment during my lunch break at trial...after lunch, City Council decides they have some new witnesses that suddenly remember everything from a two second incident, eight months ago and want to testify against me. Then I am issued this statement from a City representative: "WE DON'T KNOW WHO ELSE WILL WANT TO TESTIFY. IF THE DOGG KEEPS GOING BACK TO COUNCIL, HE MIGHT END UP PISSING OFF MORE PEOPLE."

Really Shitty Council? I wasn't at all loud or disruptive on Friday. As mild mannered as could be. Must have been the issue: So how about not letting non-documented terrorists be allowed to enter the City, one day --- and be sabatoging a project the next day. Plus some of the union workers who you are taxing out of the State would like a job or two. (You said the illegals took jobs no one else wanted to do?)

So tune in Tuesday to see if they have the guts to try a move like this!!! THE SUSPENSE OF IT ALL, Y'ALL!!! HEEEEEEEEEELP I NEED A VACATION...VOTE ME OUT FOR A MONTH!!! And if there are any good civil attorneys, call me, my wrist is killing me, and it's time for that, y'all.

57 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hell yeah Zuma Dogg is a waste of time!
Were in the World did this looser come from anyways.
Who is he, is he college educated, what is his backround, how does he make a financial living?

Is he heterolsexual or homosexeual? Rumor is homo.
Why should we the public have to deal with this clown who is just like the city clowncil.

Time for change get rid of loosers like the wroof wroof Zuma Perro.

June 30, 2007 2:47 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Wowee! You have to be straight, college educated, pass a background check, and have the right occupation to speak at public comment periods of the council? Well, if you go, make sure your misuse of words won't disqualify you. "Loosers"?? lol

June 30, 2007 3:10 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hey 2:47pm!

Do you know who's a l-o-s-e-r?

You are, since you don't even know how to spell the word. If YOU are a college grad, you should ask for your tuition back. You made this mistake TWICE, so don't blame it on a typo. You're just stupid.

Also, there is only one "l" in heterosexual, you dope.

June 30, 2007 3:16 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Dear ZD,
The Clowncil is clearly wrong...I'm not a fan of yours or your rhetoric...BUT, you are free to say whatever you want at a Council meeting...Good luck! I'm afraid your "story" won't grow legs since people don't care enough about you and your message...they should care more about your right, and all of our right, to speak at Council meetings.....

June 30, 2007 3:20 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

What is this, a spelling bee? What I want to know is, why do you people keep pushing Zuma to do what he does, since it's clearly made him unhinged and he himself wants to stop. Admits it's an addiction, keeps him from even the possibility of real work, and is losing him what mainstream support he might have had. Is someone paying him to do their dirty work, their hatchett jobs? I don't agree with a thing the guy says, but it's just plain cruel to push someone into the mentally ill homeless population.
Or jail -- maybe he can check into the facilities Paris sampled.

June 30, 2007 3:22 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

2:47pm-

What matters about your misspelling is that you made derogatory, ignorant comments about Zuma Dogg and his education, while your own educational failings are self-evident in your inability to spell the simplest words.

You throw stones, but live in a glass house.

How dare you comment about the education of another, while demonstrating your own educational failings.

There's no escaping this one, my friend. You are self-evidently ignorant.

June 30, 2007 3:57 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

3:20 PM said..."I'm not a fan of yours or your rhetoric...BUT, you are free to say whatever you want at a Council meeting." See, that's why I think this story has some longer legs. Even people that hate me, will hate Clowncil for being crybabies over the words of ZD.

I think if Clowncil tries to ban someone from a public meeting, it will grow some longer legs, than an arrest. Everyone KNOWS you can be arrested. People didn't know 15 racketeering defendants can make up their own rules in violation of the FEDS. (This ain't the first.)

3:22pm said..."and is losing what mainstream support he might have had." (Bro, I think you are holding your research ranker stats upside down. MORE people are commenting on how they like the '07 ZD, better than the '06. And what's funny, after hearing the Shitty Attorney argue the complaint...I heard all the crybaby stuff Clowncil is upset with. (And it isn't about breaking the law...it's about the legal stuff, like showing up, and taking my time. (Bro, I'm allowed to talk on EVERY agenda item that has not had public hearing. I am just cordially entertaining the polite 6 minute limit that I am chosing to stick to. SO GET READY FOR ZD TO START PUTTING IN FOR EVERY AGENDA ITEM THAT HAS NOT HAD A HEARING (or one's that have, that have been called special with new info added). A FIRST AMENDEMENT WATCHDOGG CALLED ME TODAY TO TELL ME...AND THEIR PEOPLE WILL BE MONITORING ALL THE MEETINGS AND EVEN SENDING SOME PEOPLE IN TO OBSERVE IN THE BLEACHERS.

June 30, 2007 4:08 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

To 3:16 and 57: It's clear who you are, and why you're so self-righteous in coming to his "defense." You're one of those who has been using him to do your slimy dirty-work that has no substance, so you send in the one person who will do anything, anytime, to anyone, however slanderous (if you want to worry about that, you'd better advise him to stop libeling and slandering city officials and employees, that's serious stuff).

So now you're feeling a little guilty that you pushed him into this situation, over the mental and quite possibly legal, abyss.

June 30, 2007 4:10 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

RE: stop libeling and slandering city officials.

Please post some samples (without the names of course) so I can see an example of what you consider libel and slander?

MEANWHILE...THIS DAY IS GOING TERRIBLY...I LOGGED ON TO CHECK MY EMAIL FOR TWO SECONDS AND IT'S 4:44...but let's see some of the crybaby slander you are talking about. SERIOUSLY...I certainly hope I am not slandering or libeling anyone...let me see what you are talking about, and I'll try and be more careful, Bitch. But first, let's see it. (KEEP THE NAMES OFF.)

June 30, 2007 4:47 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

gabby ortiz is screwing our midget mayor. you heard it on mayor sam so it must be true.

June 30, 2007 4:54 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

(Like the Batman Announcer) SHOULD the City of Los Angeles BAN somebody for just being an asshole????!

June 30, 2007 4:57 PM  

Anonymous spinfly operative alert said:

3:22 PM

June 30, 2007 5:05 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I think Zuma will win. He will beat the City Clowncil and then they'll have to create "The Zuma Law"!

THE ZUMA LAW: It is illegal to act like a major asshole in front of the City Council.

That will be great!

June 30, 2007 5:47 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

yo why you deliting my post yo. you trippin cuzz. all i said was they should let you in aslong as you take a bath and kick back on the ebeonics vanilla spice. whats wrong wit dat my wigga? word to ya mother yo

June 30, 2007 8:26 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

ok uli.

June 30, 2007 8:28 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

man its lyke communist china up in herya. wiggas be trippin tryin to censor a brutha man. that be wickedy wack son.peace and hair grease

June 30, 2007 8:28 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

ok trubandillo

June 30, 2007 8:28 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Note to City Council:

Please post all the rules and laws for everything on all the buildings in Los Angeles so Zuma Dogg can learn how to behave and finally gain the respect of others.

June 30, 2007 8:48 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

A serious question: Who draws the line at what is allowed speech and what is not?

Isn't that a slippery slope?

Agree or not with ZDs position, everyone should defend his right to speak.

Having said that, being ALLOWED to speak is different from being EFFECTIVE.

I think what some are saying ZD is that if you want to be EFFECTIVE you might want to adjust your tactics a little bit.

June 30, 2007 8:48 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

8:48pm said..."I think what some are saying ZD is that if you want to be EFFECTIVE you might want to adjust your tactics a little bit."

Yeah bro, I'm interested in your advice on how to be more effective.

Please list here, I'll be sure to pay close attention. I'm pretty concerned about that.

Maybe you can call in and tell Kevin James' listeners how ZD can be more effective, when I am in studio with him on Friday. Thanks!
Hope to speak with you then. Make sure you stay anonymous!

June 30, 2007 9:09 PM  

Anonymous LA City Attorney said:

Rules and Elections Committee Meeting. December 2006

In order for someone to know they are causing a willful disruption, first they would have to know what constitutes a willful disruption, and for that to happen, the rules have to be posted. Currently they are not posted anywhere online, or in the building.

And I think what Zuma is suggesting, is perhaps a compliant posting right in the corridor, before you walk in the door, like before you enter the set of a TV show.

NOT ON THE PODIUM, THAT MOST PEOPLE DON'T WALK UP TO UNTIL THE CLOCK IS STARTING. UNLESS YOU WANT TO GIVE EACH AND EVERY SPEAKER A CHANCE TO READ THEM, FIRST, BEFORE YOU START THE CLOCK, POST THEM RIGHT BEFORE YOU WALK IN THE DOOR, YOU BIG DUMMIES!!!

I AM GOING TO START SENDING YOU INVOICES FOR DOING ALL OF YOUR THINKING FOR YOU!!! I MEAN, ZUMA IS!

June 30, 2007 9:17 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

anyone know how to spell h-y-p-o-c-r-i-t-e?

June 30, 2007 9:49 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Where is the Mayor Sam Ethics Committee?

They need to investigate the moderator of this blog.

June 30, 2007 10:08 PM  

Anonymous moderator dogg said:

I admit, for all mayor sam readers to now know the big scandlous secret. If you post stupid, graphic comments of a sexual nature and body parts and sheer Howard Stern stupidity, I'll delete it. These losers must really be pissed they didn't keep me away for a year, Mr. "You Know Who" is back. And he's a degenerate sexual deviant, so good luck kiddies.

June 30, 2007 10:12 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

If you "post stupid, graphic comments of a sexual nature and body parts and sheer Howard Stern stupidity, I'll delete it."

....what about the ones that contained none of the above? Why were those also deleted?

June 30, 2007 10:18 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Seriously, Zuma, you should just hang it up and go work on your own site. You've worn out your welcome here.

June 30, 2007 10:23 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

You only post stupid comments of a graphic sexual nature if they're by you and about someone else, not about you. Great poster-boy for the ACLU.

How do you spell h-y-p-o-c-r-i-t-e?

We want you to keep doing what you do, getting crazier and more paranoid by the second, can't wait to see what you do next. What are the visiting hours at Lynwood mental facility?

June 30, 2007 10:23 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

DID ANYONE COPY AND SAVE THE COMMENTS...PLEASE, REPOST THEM ALL, IT WAS REAL IMPORTANT STUFF:

And if you feel ZD deleted something critical, that you didn't save...just repost it. I wouldn't want your feelings to be hurt.

NOW COMMON LOSERS, IT'S THE SAME THREE PEOPLE, IF NOT TWO...GET A FUCKING LIFE. WHAT ARE YOU LOSERS POSSIBLY GOING TO SAY THAT YOU HAVEN'T ALREADY...IF IT INCLUDES GRAPHIC SEX SH*T, I'M TAKING IT DOWN...OR IF YOU PRINT OBVIOUS FLAT OUT LIES & BULLSHIT, LIKE JIM HOFF, or whatever his name is.

Anyway, let ZD proclaim this a "free loser skate zone", so all the losers who played dudgeons and dragons and listened to Leif Garrett can have some fun tonight.

Feel good about yourselves. When you add up all your comments, basically, the world won't change 0.00000000000000000000000000001%. Have fun in your little black hole of loserness zone. And make sure to speculate who is having sex with whom, and say anything else you'd like. You are an anonymous loser.

June 30, 2007 10:30 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hahahahaha I think the "cliffhanger" is how many comments Zuma is going to delete!

June 30, 2007 10:32 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Ironic that the same guy who is fighting for his first amendment rights has now taken it upon himself to censor other people's "pornographic" language.

June 30, 2007 10:35 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hey, Zuma at 10:30: reread your own last paragraph: you're talking about yourself. But these people sure have you running and cutting...not that it makes any difference. -- Who's the one who has no life, exactly? Spends hours busing in from the beach to get arrested and become the city pariah?
-- Zuma Dogg for Mayor, everybody!

June 30, 2007 10:40 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

"Wiiiiiiiiiiiil they be making Zuma Dogg the political martyr that will blow this whole City Council First Amedment Challenge up to a much wider NATIONAL media LEVEL??? [Already booked for Kevin James on Friday!!!]"

OMG! Are you [porno word]in' kidding??! Who would possibly care about this?

"Zuma, it's Katie Couric on line one!"

June 30, 2007 10:47 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Ok. Remember that all advice is provided with respect and is likely worth exactly what you are paying for it.

1. Appearance is important. No one is saying get suited up, but an upgrade might be in order.

2. Moderate your volume. There is a difference between persuasiveness and loudness.

3. You are not really speaking to the council. You are speaking to the media who happens to be listening and can amplify your message and questions.

4. Focus each two-minute segment on one or two points and hammer them home. Cite some backup. Speak in sound bites so that the media can pick it up easily.

5. Encourage people to contact their council office if they agree with you. If a council office is hit with calls from constituents, it actually make a difference (with some anyway).

6. Encourage people to contact the media and demand that they cover your issue(s).

7. Ask tough questions and demand answers. Challenge the media to follow up on the story.

8. This one is tough: Though they may not sometimes deserve it, always be (somewhat) respectful of elected officials. This does NOT mean that you should not be highly critical. This does NOT mean that you cannot call them on misstatements. If you think one of them (or more) needs to go, say it, but for professional reasons, not personal reasons. If you think the City is collapsing under the weight of pay-for-play, say it. Just don’t call them names or say anything that will let them write you off as a nutcase.

9. Make your comments and activism about improving the City, not promoting yourself. If you are talking about real issues and are making good points (which you do often), then recognition will come.

You can do a great service to the community. You owe it to the community to be as effective as you can be.

June 30, 2007 10:50 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

10:50: We all know it's you, WALTER MOORE -- YOU MADE THESE SAME COMMENTS TO YOUR BUD ZD EARLIER. So why hide it now, under anon? Ashamed to be hangin' with this luminous lightning rod for free speech, the nut job who rants and raves and recants and cuts?

June 30, 2007 11:01 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

FYI: Earlier today, I posted a comment saying, "I HOPE (blank) doesn't have any call girls on staff." I didn't say that the person did. However, after someone complained about the comment, I decided I was not comfortable even putting out the concern. SO NOW, some loser is using that as an opportunity to say, ZD took down the comment...then they repeat the comment, but state it as though I had said it as fact.

Nice trick. So from here on in, if you see that comment, it's just because someone wants you to keep seeing it.

June 30, 2007 11:07 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

10:50pm,

AWESOME, thanks! I don't promote myself on TV anymore, do I? I mean to say, read more at ZumaTimes.com isn't a big deal. It's just a place where they can read more than I can cover in two minutes. And I NEVER call them names in person. This blog is different. It's an insider thing. Not being broadcast to the general public. So I just wanted to let you know that I know the difference on that one. And yeah, I try and control the level of my voice, but when Garshady or o'CONnel (just kidding Dion, you know I love ya), start chimin' in for no other reason than being two crybabies who can't take my words...the level seems to increase. I think yesterday's public comment was a good level. (loud enough to cut through, but not too loud to make Eric cry.)

ANYWAY, thanks for some actual good criticism. I thought it was gonna be another list from Jim.

June 30, 2007 11:15 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

You know what is sad? No one commented on the validity of Council's claim that they have the authority to prevent someone from speaking.

June 30, 2007 11:19 PM  

Anonymous matt dowd said:

Bill Rosendahl bought a $1 pack of incense from me at venice beach today.

to quote the dogg:

hooooody hoooooooooo

June 30, 2007 11:27 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

11:19: of course they have a right to control and decide the nature of the public comment periods, or else there would be mayhem if there were more Zumas. I'm pretty sure Arnold and George Dubya wouldn't allow this for a minute, for security reasons, as well as for decorum, etc. -- I'm afraid that the city will go their way, and be forced to make decisions that will hurt legitimate citizens.

June 30, 2007 11:58 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

You have deleted virtually all of the comments made here tonight -- does that tell you which way the wind is blowing -- and deleted your own nasty allegations about numerous employees and officials, caught red-handed. But what are you going to do all night? Now you know why Kim Jong Il never sleeps: being a dictator is a 24/7 job, and you have no minions.

July 01, 2007 12:12 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

3:10 PM & 3:16 PM

I am so glad you boneheads are spelling word cops.

I am also glad you can spell check for me.

The bottom line is you are just a no good, weak and useless just like ZD.

You all need to get a life and stop wasting your time.
The taxpayers and citizens of this city do not give a shit on what ZD says or how good of a spell checker you are.

July 01, 2007 1:25 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I think Kim Jong Il is sleeping now, since he doesn't have any minions, unlike his namesake, to stay up 24/7 deleting blogs which are against him, which seem pretty much all of them...

Being a dictator/censor is a b'ch, isn't it, Zuma? No rest for the weary, and it goes on and on...then you'll be on the bus going downtown to waste taxpayer dollars as the city pariah, and what will be happening behind your back...? Not as much fun as slinging B S, huh?

July 01, 2007 2:36 AM  

Anonymous Professor Deming said:

Seeing as how ZD gives everyone a name that he thinks describes him, here is my name for his real loser persona, Dave Elliott:

"Rave Yell-a-Lot"

Cut it any way you like, a loser is a loser is a loser.

July 01, 2007 3:02 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Wake up, Zuma! People are talking and posting about you, and you have to be ready to delete them all...

What time does the sun rise over homeless vans in Venice, anyway?

Who will lay odds as to what time he will get around to deleting the first (and only) anti-Zuma-pariah blog?

As the last guy says, ZD gives ev/one pet names: how about Kim Jong, for his bud in Korea, or maybe the paranoid in Iran, or what about his good bud Chavez in Peru, who he claims to hate -- now, there you will find a real affinity!

July 01, 2007 3:45 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Zuma, why don't you just shut down the comments on this thread and delete them all, just like Walter did on Friday? Neither one of you seem to be capable of taking criticism.

July 01, 2007 4:21 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Last post: so right! Mayor Sam, Walter Moore (who's taken to hiding under anon.) can't "take it," but they can dish it out anon., or get the "lunatic" zd to do it...

Go to Peru, a-hole... or maybe Cuba, somewhere scum like you don't make a blip on my radar screen: "director of communications?"

Make my day--

Clint Eastwood

July 01, 2007 4:40 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

konichiwa, doko des ka'?

Toideiwa, do ko deska/

Harley Davidson, "beat the elements, a bit like Russian roulette, beat the odds.. " HELLO, DENNIS, MI AMOR!

July 01, 2007 5:08 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Isu- kudemuwa... phonetic pronunciation of 'I would like ice cream" in Japanese.

SiVOUZ plez, Msr. Dirty Dogg: por quo noi? Avec Msnr. Mahoney (DON'T TELL HIM YOU'RE SCREWING UP ON THIS, HE ATTENDED MY LAST BUD'S gf CUZ THEY GAVE HIM 50k TOWARDS THE WEDDING....)

July 01, 2007 5:25 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Ok this have been a little obsessive and over the top. Tuesday should be interesting. Let's put up a thread about Greg Smith putting in a motion to have all city cars audited. He wants to know how many cars each council member has. Who uses the 26 city cars the Mayor's staff has?

July 01, 2007 7:27 AM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

12:12am said..."You have deleted virtually all of the comments made here tonight."

Take a look...what the "F" are you talking about.

Here's the deal people...Now that Jim Alger was disqualified from the upcoming NC elections, he can no longer serve on the board. And that means he will no longer be a "CONGRESSMAN" (as he likes refer to himself).

Which is probably the best thing for the community, cause he was dumb enough to go on camera a propose some stupid idea to promise to buy things at a certain store, if they kick money into a fund that reverts back to Congress any left over funds. (Or some nuts racket like that).

So he has waaaaaaaay too much time on his hands...

So here's the new deal, just start saying Zuma is deleting virtually every post (which doesn't really appear to be the case).

Some loser was posting a bunch of graphic sex stuff about who was having sex with whom, so I deleted that. Then the sexual deviant, got upset, so now it's, "Zuma's deleting posts."

Plus I made a comment asking that someone not hire call girls for clients, AND, even though it is relevant if this is happening...I wasn't comfortable "going there" (even though I may like reading that stuff when others post it, I didn't like having it up there, AND I SAID IT (And it was a question, not a statement).

So there's the big dictatorship.
Hope you had fun at 3,4,5, in the morning. (Man, hope you don't have any plans with your kids today?)

And hopefully, I'll be taking the day off, and enjoying the outdoors, so go ahead and post all that criticism I can't take and delete so much of in massive volumes. I don't seem to see much criticism, so I must have deleted it all.

JIM ALGER...YOU ARE A FUCKING LOSER WHO WAS DISQUALIFIED FROM THE NC ELECTIONS AND NOW CONGRESS...AND YOU KNOW WHAT JIM, I KNEW IT THE DAY IT HAPPENED, AND I EMAILED SAM, SOMETIME THEREAFTER AND TOLD HIM I WASN"T GOING TO MENTION IT CAUSE I FELT SORRY FOR YOU...BUT SYMPATY OVER LOSER...The only one more pathetic than you is BITCH DICKLANDER cause he's all caught up with you. (And someone caught up with a loser is loser "squared".)

JIM I WAS BEING NICE NOT CALLING ATTENTION TO YOUR DISQUALIFICATION. After all, if you're disqualified, there's no shady, corrupt deals being set up to filter money back to your own congress...HAD YOU NOT been disqualified, then that may have been worth mentioning, out of concern over fraud and abuse.

SO CALL MAYOR SAM, COMPLAIN THAT ZUMA DOGG IS SAYING THAT JIM ALGER'S NC CAREER IS OVER, OUTSIDE SHOWING UP LIKE ANY OTHER STAKEHOLDER. So let's see how much Jim continues to participate in NC, when he isn't in "POWER".

AND YOU CAN COME ON HERE NOW AND PRETEND THAT YOU HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ANYTHING THAT WENT ON HERE...SORRY JIM, I GAVE YOU THAT ONE LAST TIME...BUT YOUR PATTERNS HAVE REVEALED YOU ONCE AGAIN...

And Alger, remember, the fact that I haven't posted sh*t about your disqualification, until now, means I was giving you a break...AND NOW THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO TO KEEP YOUR NAME OFF THIS BLOG!!!

SO PEOPLE...JIM ALGER WAS DISQUALIFIED FROM THE NC ELECTIONS, HOPEFULLY OVER HIS Do-It-Center KICKBACK scheme that NO ONE could understand how he could even THINK of proposing with cameras rolling.

AND TO THE REST OF THE READERS, GET READY FOR A LONG DAY OF PEOPLE SAYING THEIR POSTS WERE DELETED.

O.K., virtually all comments from last night were deleted. I deleted them. I deleted them because I cannot take criticism. And I don't allow criticism to remain of this blog. AND REMEMBER, I am also a complete fraud and everything I said about the City isn't happening, and Jim Alger is making a HUGE impact, Bitch Dicklander doesn't run a shady Jaycees (political schill) and didn't coerse a staffer to testify against me and Hillary Clinton is going to be the next President of the United States.

And to the guy who saw me walking down the street a couple weeks ago, you're cool!

July 01, 2007 7:30 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Was that necessary?

July 01, 2007 10:48 AM  

Anonymous Jack Hoff said:

Yesterday, someone said "Jack Hoff is Jim Alger."

Zuma deleted it because it was pornographic. Interesting definition of porn....

Now, Alger may be a j*ck*ff, but he's no Jack Hoff!

And Zuma is no longer the Mayor Sam Moderator, he is the Mayor Sam Censor.

All ye who believe in freedom of speech, beware...

July 01, 2007 11:11 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Okay, then, Buh-bye!

R.I.P. Zuma Beeyotch (Rant in Privacy, that is).

When the history of "free speech" struggles is finally written, you won't EVEN be a on-line footnote.

That is, unless someone writes a small chapter on "how to abuse it."

July 01, 2007 12:03 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

(Applause)

July 01, 2007 12:04 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

we can only hope - what ever happened to back in the day when this blog wasn't used as a platform for some idiot - vote him out!

July 01, 2007 1:06 PM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

I just thought of something...I THOUGHT I was going to have to go down to council on tuesday, so they could vote me off Survivor Island...but I just realized; I don't have to even BE there for them to make the motion.

Jack Weiss can stand up, first thing Tuesday, and make the motion to ban Zuma Dogg for (up to a month). Then it will take seven more, which even though a few make actually LOVE ME, personally, keeping ZD out of City Hall is just a buisness decison. I might attack the concept of trying to pull it off, but I wouldn't go slamming any of my pueblo-friendly CMs (any more, or less) over that! And even some of my political opponents, here on this blog know I can respect a strategic move. (Like when Eric interrupted presentations on Friday, to call the agenda, when he saw ZD unexpectedly stroll into chambers on Friday. TOUCHE Garshady! Smart move. I respect that. Enforcing non-law, well that's a different story. But I distinguish between the two, a couple of the smart ZD spinners. (Even though, still ineffective!)

And I would remind Council that still gets to "address" council, until the Mayor signs the motion (however many day/days that usually takes. Maybe he can run right over and sign it on camera on-the-spot.) HEY MAYOR, DON'T SIGN IT AND I'LL SHOW UP EVERY DAY AND SLAM EVERYONE ON COUNCIL WHO ISN'T YOUR MUPPET!

AND 12:03pm said..."That is, unless someone writes a small chapter on "how to abuse it."

NOW PEOPLE SEE...THAT'S HOW YOU DO IT...He had a funny twist at the end that made it clever.

That's why I said he was cool. The rest of you are just sad.

AND REMEMBER A WARNING FROM YOUR MODERATOR THAT YOU ARE AT THE MERCY OF...I WILL DELETE ANY POSTS CONTAINING ANY GRAPHIC LANGUAGE, SLANDEROUS LIES (ZD & CHUCK ARE LOVERS), OR ANYTHING ELSE THAT JUST RUBS ME THE WRONG WAY AT THAT MOMENT! [Hey, kinda like the CRA eminent domain policy.]

So try and stick to posting mostly good stuff about me, because I don't like critical ones as much.

July 01, 2007 2:04 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Who is Jim Alger?

July 01, 2007 2:27 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Advertisement

Advertisement