ALARCON'S "SONCHA" ISSUES (BOTH IN POLITICAL AND PRIVATE LIFE)
The last that I remember the "TRAVELING POLITICO", known as Richard Alarcon. He was running a "CAMPAIGN OF SELF" for mayor. Who can forget those 15 seconds commercials ? They were the definitive in the art of self promotion. Of course the electorate felt other wise, relegating Alarcon to fifth place. We won't say who was sixth.
Now the "TRAVELING POLITICO" is looking on to the "GOLDEN YEARS" by seeking to regain his old City Council seat in District 7. If Alarcon was to win, then he would, with his new term, be eligible for a city pension, but I digress.
What has peak my interest in this race is the battle of "LATINA vs. LATINO" and the role of ethnic values. The LA Weekly in two stories this week were highly critical of Alarcon's past dealings with females and issues. In the theme of Alarcon's past mayoral commercials, here are some quick hits.
DING !!, ROUND 1
Alarcon uses current girlfriends apartment to meet residency requirement.
DING!!, ROUND 2
Alarcon gives ex. wife a $5oo.00 donation for shelter fund raising.
DING !!, ROUND 3
Alarcon gives ex. girlfriend $70,000 for fund raising effort in Assembly campaign.
DING !! ROUND 4
Alarcon forces Cindy Montanez to quit run for CD 7 council seat. Later gets taken care of by "HIS POLLONESS", the mayor, and Speaker "FLABIAN" Nunez.
With this pattern of behavior, what effect will Alarcon's past dealings with females have on the vote this Tuesday? Will "LATINAS" vote to be "ENABLERS" of this type of behavior. Or will Latinas assert a form of retribution to the likes of Richard Alarcon? Latinas and other women, plus men give your take.
Now the "TRAVELING POLITICO" is looking on to the "GOLDEN YEARS" by seeking to regain his old City Council seat in District 7. If Alarcon was to win, then he would, with his new term, be eligible for a city pension, but I digress.
What has peak my interest in this race is the battle of "LATINA vs. LATINO" and the role of ethnic values. The LA Weekly in two stories this week were highly critical of Alarcon's past dealings with females and issues. In the theme of Alarcon's past mayoral commercials, here are some quick hits.
DING !!, ROUND 1
Alarcon uses current girlfriends apartment to meet residency requirement.
DING!!, ROUND 2
Alarcon gives ex. wife a $5oo.00 donation for shelter fund raising.
DING !!, ROUND 3
Alarcon gives ex. girlfriend $70,000 for fund raising effort in Assembly campaign.
DING !! ROUND 4
Alarcon forces Cindy Montanez to quit run for CD 7 council seat. Later gets taken care of by "HIS POLLONESS", the mayor, and Speaker "FLABIAN" Nunez.
With this pattern of behavior, what effect will Alarcon's past dealings with females have on the vote this Tuesday? Will "LATINAS" vote to be "ENABLERS" of this type of behavior. Or will Latinas assert a form of retribution to the likes of Richard Alarcon? Latinas and other women, plus men give your take.
Posted by Red Spot in CD 14 @ 3/04/2007 04:16:00 PM
14 Comments:
Sixth and proud of it, baby! Thirty-eight votes for every $100 spent, vs. four votes per $100 spent by the other fellows.
PROUD OF YOU WALTER !! Plus you had the most sense.
Interesting post RS. These musical chair pols are so mediocre it's pathetic.
BTW what does "Red Spot" mean...reference to Jupiter?
CHECK OUT THE TYPES OF QUESTIONS I AM ASKED TO RESPOND TO... WHICH STATEMENT IS MORE ACCURATE?
~~ MALES AND FEMALES ARE CREATED EQUAL.
~~ MALES ARE A MORE DOMINANT SPECIES.
NOW OF COURSE I AM STANDING HERE BLINDFOLDED IN FRONT OF THE POLITICAL SQUADRANT OF "SHOOT 'EM DOWNS". I CAN STAND FIRM THAT WE ARE NOT CREATED EQUAL SINSE MALES CAN NOT BREAST FEED OR BEAR CHILDREN. IF THEY WHERE CREATED EQUAL THEN THEY SHOULD PARTICIPATE AS OPPONENTS IN (NBA, BOXING, STRONGMAN COMPETITIONS, OLYMPICS, OR SOCCOR.)
NOW IF YOU CONSIDER THE WHOLE TERM OF 'BEING' AS IN HUMANS, INSECTS, REPTILES, OR OTHER MAMMALS, THE MALE IS USUALLY THE MORE ASSERTIVE IN THE GROUP THEY RELATE TO AS APPLYING THE DOMINANT ROLE.
I AM NOT A SCIENCE MAJOR NOR AN EXPERT IN SOCIAL ACITIVITIES, BUT I CAN SAY THIS, WHETHER YOU ARE THE NEIGHBOR DOWN THE STREET OR THE (SUBJECT OF THIS TOPIC) YOU CAN NEVER DISREGARD THE BEAUTY A FEMALE HAS OVER A MAN. CHECK OUT THE DAMES ON MY ..... MYSPACE.
ROSE HILLS REVIEW,
ANTHONY MANZANO
Red Spot:
I am not a big Alarcon fan...buuuuuut
1- His house where he was living for the past X amount of years (including his time in CD7) was redistricted out of his old district
2- Is it bad that he now lives with his fiancee?
3- $500.00 donation for shelters is a bad thing?
Red Spot:
I am not a big Alarcon fan...buuuuuut
1- His house where he was living for the past X amount of years (including his time in CD7) was redistricted out of his old district
2- Is it bad that he now lives with his fiancee?
3- $500.00 donation for shelters is a bad thing?
Have you noticed? Each time Red Spot posts-----
Who shows up? Anthony-Rose Hill Guy
7:10
1. so
2. which one ?
3. and....
what I am getting at here is how latinas and the community view Alarcon actions. I want your view points. That simple.
Red Spot:
Thanks for this informative post. I actually read both of the LA Weekly articles this morning, but I didn't look at them the way you just described a while ago.
Rose Hills is the biggest idiot on this blog since Video Louis.
7:19
No groupies allowed at the Red Spot Institute. So disregard your thought.
Dont hit the player, hit the game or should i said political game.
With Alarcon, it's always just about Richard, and what's in it for Richard.
But, how does that differ from any other politician in the City of LA?
The thing is, he's a reliable vote for ME, so I am endorsing him.
Game Over.
But, hey, folks, it appears that Richard does take care of his women. From either political contributions or the public payroll....
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home