ISN'T ANYBODY ELSE SICK OF SUITS?
The Mayor and his lawyers obviously know nothing about education. One of the most disruptive things to any student’s achievement is inconsistency, shifting gears midstream, instability—in two words chaotic change. And our kids learn much by what they see we adults do. So dragging on the vitriol and the double talk is not going to help the kids grow in their capacities or create the kind of civic character we hope will populate all our new flash downtown LA plazas in the future.
How could these leaders argue that their educational demonstration project should move forward pending the legal challenge’s resolution? That would mean 80,000 kids would very possibly experience one dramatic shift under the Mayor’s plan and then revert back to being run by the district, perhaps in only a few short months. That would be to put the kids on an educational see-saw, increasing the destabilizing effects on them of all this political bullshit for certain. Nobody who argues for this scenario can conceivably care about kids most in all of this. Well, I guess it is always possible they're just not all that swift, but everybody keeps assuring me that they are, so what explanation for their position does that leave us?
Villaraigosa, the wannabe who fudged his name, is trying to temper his delivery while simultaneously sleazing up next to the little guy for street cred, saying he is a man of the people. One day he is making a speech about how the war on drugs is harming communities of color and the next he is meeting with Alberto Gonzales asking for federal money for more crash units. This is a guy who has been in a 6 figure + perks station for the last umpteen years. He says he wants to re-invent the American dream—that if you work hard and plan well you too can rise above the squalor that is life, and in our society, will continue to be life, for a significant number of urban Americans of every stripe. The Mayor does not wish to change this—and if he does, can’t be naïve enough to think that just being a good talker is going to restructure the fundamentals of our economy. It seems, sadly, that he is yet another dog-eat-dog wheeler and dealer. He doesn’t want to transform or even reform the system--maybe back in the day when he was a naïve UTLA hack he might have wanted to improve the system itself--but now it seems he just wants to own it.
How could these leaders argue that their educational demonstration project should move forward pending the legal challenge’s resolution? That would mean 80,000 kids would very possibly experience one dramatic shift under the Mayor’s plan and then revert back to being run by the district, perhaps in only a few short months. That would be to put the kids on an educational see-saw, increasing the destabilizing effects on them of all this political bullshit for certain. Nobody who argues for this scenario can conceivably care about kids most in all of this. Well, I guess it is always possible they're just not all that swift, but everybody keeps assuring me that they are, so what explanation for their position does that leave us?
Villaraigosa, the wannabe who fudged his name, is trying to temper his delivery while simultaneously sleazing up next to the little guy for street cred, saying he is a man of the people. One day he is making a speech about how the war on drugs is harming communities of color and the next he is meeting with Alberto Gonzales asking for federal money for more crash units. This is a guy who has been in a 6 figure + perks station for the last umpteen years. He says he wants to re-invent the American dream—that if you work hard and plan well you too can rise above the squalor that is life, and in our society, will continue to be life, for a significant number of urban Americans of every stripe. The Mayor does not wish to change this—and if he does, can’t be naïve enough to think that just being a good talker is going to restructure the fundamentals of our economy. It seems, sadly, that he is yet another dog-eat-dog wheeler and dealer. He doesn’t want to transform or even reform the system--maybe back in the day when he was a naïve UTLA hack he might have wanted to improve the system itself--but now it seems he just wants to own it.
11 Comments:
Anonymous said:
I'm speechless.
Anonymous said:
http://blogs.mercurynews.com/on_politics/2007/01/inauguration_wa.html#more
Inauguration watch: Velasquez working for Maria?
When last we left Democratic spinmeister Nick Velasquez, he was working the gubernatorial campaign of Controller Steve Westly. Post-June, he joined the camp of L.A. District Attorney Rocky Delgadillo.
So why, we wondered, was he hovering protectively around First Lady Maria Shriver, First Mum Eunice Kennedy Shriver, First Dudes Christopher and Patrick Schwarzenegger and First Consigliere Daniel Zingale at the ""Leading the Green Dream'' inaugural kickoff this afternoon?
Hmmmm. Didn't Shriver's last press secretary, Ryan Jimenez, leave recently? Thinking, thinking....
It had us stumped until Velasquez was spotted running at full speed (in a dashing gray pinstripe suit, one should add) down 12th Street south of the Capitol.
About five minutes later, he re-emerged. Large black coffee in one hand. Wad of napkins, Sweet N' Lows and Equals in the other. For the first lady.
Shriver: ""How has your day been, Nick?"
He says he's having a nice time.
Shriver to Zingale, her chief of staff: "Is he coming back with us?''
Zingale: "Let's talk in the office."
So what gives? ""I thought she might like some coffee,'' Velasquez explained. "It's cold and windy out, so I bought her some coffee.''
Of course. Nice spin.
Anonymous said:
Does anybody know why AV changed his name? Did he think the new hybrid one sounded better? Did his wife insist on keeping her maiden name (a la Maria Robles), and he compromised? What's the story?
Anonymous said:
Ghost, you probably just said what most people are thinking.
I agree he wants to own the system, not control it. But why? I can't figure out why.
Enlighten me.
Anonymous said:
Finally, a Mayor Sam contributor who speaks the truth about LAUSD.
Anonymous said:
Tony Villar changed his name to appeal to the liberal white women that were funding his campaigns - pure and simple. He obviously didn't do it out of love for Corina - his behaviour has proven that. He did it to add the cherry on top of that nuclear family that Parke always wanted. Corina was too docile to stand up for herself during all these affairs - although her court case when she filed for divorce is still open - (filed the day after his primary vicotry of his first campaign in 1994). He changed his name just for himself, not for his family. Corina's mom still can't stand the fact that he took her family name.
Zuma Dogg said:
I'm just about to sit down and read this...Thought some of you may want to as well:
From www.town-hall.la.org on How LAUSD "REALLY" works from July 12, '06.
Enjoy this RARE glimpse into a town hall meeting that few are allowed to actually attend unless you are on the mayor's VIP/nothing bad to say list, and the mayor's gang intervention thug at the door let's you in.
http://townhall-la.org/archives/speeches/12
Anonymous said:
You guys can fudge the facts any way you want to bash MAV, but the reality is that the merger of his and his wife's last names into Villaraigosa took place years before he ever ran for office. And does anyone with at least half a brain think that a name that half of everyone mispronounces is more marketable than a simple one like Villar?
I didn't think so.
Anonymous said:
Tony Villar was thinking of running for office way before he even met Corina. Why do you think he chose Ron Martinez, Mr. Molina, as his best man? Their marriage has been just a marriage of political convenience, Tony's actions have proven this. And a more politically marketable name is a combined name, no matter how difficult it is to pronounce it. This is why he had all those Jewish women at NOW swooning over his ass when they didn't even consider Hahn. Tony hides behind this made up name to show that he is a really progressive man, he hides his victimization of women that has been his MO throughout his whole life - even to present day.
Did Tony combine his name as some personal gesture on women's lib -
I don't think so!
Anonymous said:
Mayor Tony's slick pitchman type of substance-free politics and posturing without actually making positive change reminds me of another Tony - a certain Rt. Honourable Anthony Blair....
Anonymous said:
12:58 PM, so what's the story?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home