Regarding Zuma Dogg's Endorsement of Any of the 15 City Council Members
We have all heard the talk of voting out all 15 Councilmembers, and whatnot. And people have repeatedly aksed me, "Zuma, do you support ANY of the 15 Councilmembers? And, who are the best ones, if any?"
And now that we are approaching election season, R is a factor in deciding whether "termed-out" Councilmembers like Eric Garcetti will be allowed to run for an additional term. And who do I think is good and bad for the City?
So, I pulled out the list of 15 Councilmembers, and it ends up, as I post this story, this moment in time, it is a 33% split:
I feel there are a third of the Councilmemebers who I feel, today, are decent people, out to do good, in their heart of hearts. Who, I, with a little one-on-one time, to confirm my instincts after my nearly six months at City Hall, may actually publicly endorse (those up for re-election in March, and otherwise).
Then, there is a third, in the middle, who the jury is still out on. Could these Councilmembers be won over by the Force, if there was political pressure to suddenly make "Ethics" En Vouge?
And, we can make it easier for the "Upper 66%" (of CC, in which there may STILL be hope for), if we can all band together and VOTE OUT, the bottom third of corrupt, shady Councilmembers who bring down the City and the reputations/re-election chances of the other 66% Councilmembers, automatically due to the un-written "Law of 15". (You don't vote "against" a Councilmember's Agenda item, in their own backyard, like any gang.)
The 15 Councilmembers KNOW I have an open door policy to let me know what they support and are against. And Herb, Tom and Josh/Cecillia (Eric's Spokesperson/Legislative Executive) can tell you that ZD is interested in being corrected/clarified on the complex information that I am providing, when necessary --and clarifies these details to the People. (Whether it's MY info, or others.)
And luckily, my biggest error to date was regarding CC's "term lengthening to three terms" meaning "a life time pension" for those who go the distance, when it is actually means "a life time of 'Health Care' benefits". (Care to pay for that, plus the additioal perks?)
But, thanks to Councilmember Herb Wesson for taking the time to reaearch it, contact ZD, and clarify. And Herb, I WILL be checking up on your clarification but I will roll with your clarification, without my further scrutiny. (But I may as well admit Herb is #1, in my Upper 33% countdown, today!)
So try and spin/discredit/investigate me Mayor...You got nothing! And hopefully, we can vote out the bottom third, and the upper third can sway the other 33% of Councilmembers, who like a young Anniken Skywalker, could still go either way.
Zuma
And now that we are approaching election season, R is a factor in deciding whether "termed-out" Councilmembers like Eric Garcetti will be allowed to run for an additional term. And who do I think is good and bad for the City?
So, I pulled out the list of 15 Councilmembers, and it ends up, as I post this story, this moment in time, it is a 33% split:
I feel there are a third of the Councilmemebers who I feel, today, are decent people, out to do good, in their heart of hearts. Who, I, with a little one-on-one time, to confirm my instincts after my nearly six months at City Hall, may actually publicly endorse (those up for re-election in March, and otherwise).
Then, there is a third, in the middle, who the jury is still out on. Could these Councilmembers be won over by the Force, if there was political pressure to suddenly make "Ethics" En Vouge?
And, we can make it easier for the "Upper 66%" (of CC, in which there may STILL be hope for), if we can all band together and VOTE OUT, the bottom third of corrupt, shady Councilmembers who bring down the City and the reputations/re-election chances of the other 66% Councilmembers, automatically due to the un-written "Law of 15". (You don't vote "against" a Councilmember's Agenda item, in their own backyard, like any gang.)
The 15 Councilmembers KNOW I have an open door policy to let me know what they support and are against. And Herb, Tom and Josh/Cecillia (Eric's Spokesperson/Legislative Executive) can tell you that ZD is interested in being corrected/clarified on the complex information that I am providing, when necessary --and clarifies these details to the People. (Whether it's MY info, or others.)
And luckily, my biggest error to date was regarding CC's "term lengthening to three terms" meaning "a life time pension" for those who go the distance, when it is actually means "a life time of 'Health Care' benefits". (Care to pay for that, plus the additioal perks?)
But, thanks to Councilmember Herb Wesson for taking the time to reaearch it, contact ZD, and clarify. And Herb, I WILL be checking up on your clarification but I will roll with your clarification, without my further scrutiny. (But I may as well admit Herb is #1, in my Upper 33% countdown, today!)
So try and spin/discredit/investigate me Mayor...You got nothing! And hopefully, we can vote out the bottom third, and the upper third can sway the other 33% of Councilmembers, who like a young Anniken Skywalker, could still go either way.
Zuma
Posted by Zuma Dogg @ 9/17/2006 05:52:00 PM
12 Comments:
Zuma, you going to endorse any candidates?
Does anyone think it actually matters if ZD endorses anyone?
Zuma endorsed in the Venice Neighborhood Council. His partner Matt Dowd lost. He pulled in a total of 16 votes.
Even Zuma couldn't have saved Dowd. He's an arrogant, illegal alien freak!
9:21PM, Please find, copy and paste my the "endorsement" of my "partner" Matt Dowd.
Is telling people that there was an election with seven seats open, and one of the people running is someone who these readers know from TV 35 Public Comment an endorsement?
So again, please copy and paste my words that state an endorsement.
ZD
Zuma, seriously dude who do you think you are? Give it a rest already NOONE and I mean NOONE gives a shit who you endorse or don't because you aren't an "insider", you DON'T have "inside" info. You play a rapper with delusions of grandeur and you carry those delusions to this blog.
You never endorse this early anyway, even if someone gave a shit which seriously we don't.
Your turning this blog, and everyone associated with it, into a joke.
Problem with Zuma's endorsement in the Venice Neighborhood Council election was that he urged everyone to vote against Linda Luchs (sic) when she wasn't even on the ballot.
Gotta be more on top of things, Dogg!
"Is telling people that there was an election with seven seats open, and one of the people running is someone who these readers know from TV 35 Public Comment an endorsement?"
Maybe not, but it wouldn't have mattered, as this proves, you don't matter, either.
You may get a few dozen e-mails from homebound 35-wankers, but that don't mean jackrabbit-droppings.
Richard Ramirez still gets marriage proposals, too.
Now that city council has figured out they can limit you to public comment on the SPECIFICS of agenda items, your little performance platform is crumbling fast too.
But you've always got Mayor Spam's. . .
Ooooh, like i'm really going to follow Zuma's endorsement. Get real. The only folks that believe in Zuma are you fools on this blog.
September 18, 2006 7:28 AM SAID
"oooh, like i'm really going to follow Zuma's endorsement. Get real. The only folks that believe in Zuma are you fools on this blog."
Don't you mean "We fools on this blog."?
Who cares what Zuma Dogg thinks, it is called illusions of granduer!You must have hit your head on the surf board dude! Your brain must have fallen out! Whoops left it in the ocean, shark ate it!
Great comeback Troll. Why are your feet so big? From swimming with sharks?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home