Everybody is accountable in the new education army
By Jennifer Solis
We may never learn what happened in the back room in Sacramento to get the teachers’ unions, both Los Angeles and state, to switch their position and endorse Mayor Villaraigosa’s plan to take over control of the Los Angeles Unified School District.
Fortunately, we received some insight when KPCC reporter Larry Mantle interviewed United Teachers of Los Angeles president A.J. Duffy, during which the union president revealed the new concept of responsibility that will become district policy under the mayor’s supervision.
Rather than try to make an interpretation of the proposed paradigm, I’ll allow you to make your own conclusion from the partial transcript of the conversation.
Mantle: “I understood that Mayor Villaraigosa’s efforts to take over governance of the school district was to make it clear with whom the buck stops. Who is the individual held accountable for the performance of the district? It would seem that under this compromise plan, that’s less clear than it is right now. Is it the school board that is responsible? Is it a superintendent, who has considerably more powers under this? Is it the principal or the teachers who also gain more authority at the school site? With whom do parents interact to make their concerns known?”
Duffy: “The answer, Larry, is yes – it’s everybody!”
Mantle: “Well, then it’s nobody, isn’t it?”
Duffy: “No, that’s not true – now hear me out, Larry. From the very beginning of this debate about mayoral control, we have said that we are opposed to mayoral control because it doesn’t work. We are in favor of partnership between UTLA, administrators, the mayor, the district, parent community groups, business and industry – everybody is accountable, and that’s what needs to happen in public education. The whole model of one person being accountable is nonsense. What we want to see is everybody working together – and everybody is accountable. And everybody buys into the process, because it’s going to take everybody’s efforts and passion and abilities and desire to make public education work. We don’t believe in the one person is responsible model. We believe in the partnership model.”
Mantle: “But the question is, who ultimately has responsibility? If it’s human nature that there are going to be some individuals, who, if it’s not clear to whom they are responsible, then where do you go to raise the level of that person’s performance?”
Duffy: “You know, let me say it again, Larry – we need to start thinking globally. Everybody has to take responsibility for improving public education. We want to get away from the one person is accountable model because it doesn’t work. Again, we have to change the paradigm. We have to stop thinking about the principal is in charge, the superintendent is in charge, the board is in charge. We all have to take responsibility. We all have to be generals and we all have to be soldiers.”
Well, folks, there you have it. We are all being recruited to join the education army. I’m not familiar enough with the military chain of command to guess how things work if we are all both generals and soldiers, but I’m sure it will be explained when we start boot camp.
I wonder if they’ll give me a smart looking uniform?
We may never learn what happened in the back room in Sacramento to get the teachers’ unions, both Los Angeles and state, to switch their position and endorse Mayor Villaraigosa’s plan to take over control of the Los Angeles Unified School District.
Fortunately, we received some insight when KPCC reporter Larry Mantle interviewed United Teachers of Los Angeles president A.J. Duffy, during which the union president revealed the new concept of responsibility that will become district policy under the mayor’s supervision.
Rather than try to make an interpretation of the proposed paradigm, I’ll allow you to make your own conclusion from the partial transcript of the conversation.
Mantle: “I understood that Mayor Villaraigosa’s efforts to take over governance of the school district was to make it clear with whom the buck stops. Who is the individual held accountable for the performance of the district? It would seem that under this compromise plan, that’s less clear than it is right now. Is it the school board that is responsible? Is it a superintendent, who has considerably more powers under this? Is it the principal or the teachers who also gain more authority at the school site? With whom do parents interact to make their concerns known?”
Duffy: “The answer, Larry, is yes – it’s everybody!”
Mantle: “Well, then it’s nobody, isn’t it?”
Duffy: “No, that’s not true – now hear me out, Larry. From the very beginning of this debate about mayoral control, we have said that we are opposed to mayoral control because it doesn’t work. We are in favor of partnership between UTLA, administrators, the mayor, the district, parent community groups, business and industry – everybody is accountable, and that’s what needs to happen in public education. The whole model of one person being accountable is nonsense. What we want to see is everybody working together – and everybody is accountable. And everybody buys into the process, because it’s going to take everybody’s efforts and passion and abilities and desire to make public education work. We don’t believe in the one person is responsible model. We believe in the partnership model.”
Mantle: “But the question is, who ultimately has responsibility? If it’s human nature that there are going to be some individuals, who, if it’s not clear to whom they are responsible, then where do you go to raise the level of that person’s performance?”
Duffy: “You know, let me say it again, Larry – we need to start thinking globally. Everybody has to take responsibility for improving public education. We want to get away from the one person is accountable model because it doesn’t work. Again, we have to change the paradigm. We have to stop thinking about the principal is in charge, the superintendent is in charge, the board is in charge. We all have to take responsibility. We all have to be generals and we all have to be soldiers.”
Well, folks, there you have it. We are all being recruited to join the education army. I’m not familiar enough with the military chain of command to guess how things work if we are all both generals and soldiers, but I’m sure it will be explained when we start boot camp.
I wonder if they’ll give me a smart looking uniform?
12 Comments:
Anonymous said:
Hell No! I'm not responsible for LAUSD ignorance!
Walter Moore said:
Sign on Truman's desk: "The buck stops here."
Sign on Mayor's desk: "The buck doesn't stop here. But let us speak of my vision of the buck."
Anonymous said:
Thankfully my kids are out of school! Even the papers in Europe are talking about how horrible LAUSD is, and that the Mexican mayor has ulterior motives and doesn't know what he's doing!!!!
Wow...LA is now an international topic of conversation!!!!
When is this asshole going ro realize he wasn't elected to run the schools? He was elected to run the city and he hasn't done ONE DAMN THING!!!!
He is washed up!!! Thank God his derelict reputation will follow him wherever he goes! We have so much grist for the political mill, he will be run out of town! Three more years will seem like a lifetime, but it will be over for the Mechista...permanently!
Anonymous said:
Can I have some fries with that?
Anonymous said:
Where ya been Jenni? Don't let da man tell ya what to do!
Anonymous said:
No clear line of authority and accountability = failure.
Importing waves of impoverished people from our neighbor and dumping them into our public schools does not help either.
Anonymous said:
This is just bad writing, Jennifer.
The lede is inaccurate.
Anonymous said:
I hate generals and soldiers both.
Anonymous said:
I hate mecha driven extremist and their mentors
Anonymous said:
Villaraigosa wants Academia Semillas to succeed. He then has Marcos aguilar and peoples of El Sereno claim to sovereignty. Guess what happens next? City of Los Angeles can pimp off tourism and Casinos in El Sereno. What better way to replicate other leading gambling $$$$ states. And we can say it all started with one WACKO called Marcos Aguilar. Breed hatred and nationalism=claim to sovereignty.
Are you ready LA32 NC?
Ready to be called Reservation El Sereno Council?
Anonymous said:
Bustamante Villaraigosa Cedillo Nunez want Casinos in Los Angeles.
Mexica uprising set in place
Marcos Aguilar easily funded by NCLR, American Indian Movement. It's all about Money!
Villaraigosa control of schools, control of gambling, control of $$$$. Can we say si se puede with a smile.
Anonymous said:
Jennifer you a bought and paid for puta for the teachers union and Marcos Aguilar
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home