Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098
mayorsam@mayorsam.org

Monday, March 09, 2009

Public Utility of a Pink Slip

I have been so bogged down by academics and my major job search--I have neglected my posting duties on this blog...

Silver Lake Davine writes about how Friday, the 13th will also coincide with teachers being notified on whether they are fired.

Stuart Goldurs also questions on how cutting budget costs by laying off bureaucrats could be a good thing.

While this may be a good thing in ridding LAUSD and other school districts of incompetent teachers--larger class sizes could impede a student's learning.

From the December 15, New Yorker, Malcolm Gladwell wrote a very explicit essay on what makes a good teacher

The bottom line, from Gladwell's piece and from recent budget cuts is that it is better to award talented teachers with perks [when we can afford to do so] and for the sake of society--to forewarn incompetent teachers they will be laid off so they will have ample time to reevaluate their career. Overcrowded classes may become the norm in the next few years--but with better teachers, less children and adolescents will be neglected or behind. I went to public elementary school for 5 years (until for this very reason and for my mother's peace of mind) I transferred to a nearby private school. I remember that despite my not being allowed to use my emergency inhaler one time, and having experienced a few bad teachers--I remember more clearly the good ones. The ones who do justice to the benefits of public education. Their dedication, patience and love in helping to instill good values in society's future adults. They were about-to-retire 50+ year olds who had an old fashioned mentality when it came to teaching. They were not the ones who made us break fistfuls of sticks in order to teach us the benefits of doing teamwork as a group. They instead disciplined those who acted out, and spent more time teaching us how to behave civilly, orderly, and do our arithmetic and grammar when told to do so. Thanks to these competent teachers, I can balance my checkbook, and be more independent than desired by self esteem promoting teachers who wanted us each to wear a glittery sticker just to know that we were all--special.
Childhood is a fragile state. But it is also a time to learn essential survival skills to prepare for the sometimes painful ascent towards Adulthood. By the way, at the near age of 20--I still do not feel like an Adult. I still see people and circumstances a similar way I did as a child. I remember, feeling many awe-like moments in bed as a 7 year old, looking up at the sky and questioning why was I in Los Angeles, of all places? Why was I supposed to go to school while my mother worked downstairs all day in her little office? Why couldn't I just take a potion and speed up the process so I could soon work like her and be able to spend the day at home, reading and writing, and watching TV instead of dealing with other rowdy children etc. Maybe thats why I was deemed precocious. Or self centered.
I do not think I have encountered any more bad teachers than any one else--but maybe I just spend more time thinking about why per se they were just naive or incompetent. I got chastised by a 7th grade history teacher for my bad attitude--probably because I was cynical and questioned her p.c version of history where white men were always the villains and any minority in question were the noble underdog. No matter how hard she tried, she could not quell the true attitudes her students acted or felt. I remember during a presentation my classmates and I worked on--that was of the Spanish Inquisition, and I played the Jew--my classmates (of a similar underdog group from the Caucasus, notably found in Glendale, CA) seemed a little too enthusiastic about pretending to torture me. They played the Catholic priests. Even while trying to teach us about diversity, and tolerance, and the ugly side of World History--our sweet young perky teacher (I hope she's doing well) could not suppress our so called "racist" politically incorrect attitudes. Maybe my classmates eavesdropped on one too many family tirades. Or maybe they wanted to play the more powerful group. But bottom line--my classmates spent more time learning about who's supposedly racist and a villain and less time studying why the Spanish Inquisition happened, or how the Reformation occurred.
On the bright side--I do remember good teachers. One, most recently who was my AP Economics/Government teacher at a popular LA high school where Heidi Fleiss and Judge Ito attended. He works for his students, and is so invested in them that it pays off. Some students back in the day, returned just to visit him and regale him and his classes of the glamorous experiences of college in order to motivate high school seniors. And that sure worked, at least for me.
While it is a sad state to be jobless and laid off--perhaps these laid off teachers will go on to do bigger and better things not only for themselves but for society. They can become academic researchers, librarians, scientists, mathematicians, or even business owners. Just not teachers!

12 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Mayor Sam, although the elimation of some "bad" teachers- may happen with looming threat of layoffs, that function is only incidental to the layoffs.

If you think that the layoffs will make for a better-teacher environment, it won't. The union seniority system will get the Beaudry HQ admin. whose jobs are cut into teaching roles where they have been away from for years in most cases. Teaching was not the goal for them or they would not have gone to admin work.

Your pink-slipped group are the ones who have least seniority, and often the most passion, going into teaching with the full knowledge of the chaos that is often a part of the educational system.

If you go by "experience" as the main criterion to determine a teacher's value, you've got it with the seniority system, a product of union involvement that protects some workers but not the best ones.

All the teachers pink-slipped will not be laid off, but they have the legal notice given so they are within that group, which Supt. Cortines said will probably be those with less than 2 years of service. Cortines did say that he wanted the classroom teachers to be the last group affected by layoffs, and the mid-semester actions this year were delayed to give some continuity to the semester for everyone. Making a wholesale change in mid-year would have made an already poor system even more of a disaster with changes in teaching personnel.


I am specifically speaking of LAUSD since other districts nearby have more success with their programs, but they will have the same issues of seniority applying to teacher-layoffs, with growing class sizes the more noticeable result than the moving of former teachers back to classrooms.

LAUSD is probably more admin-heavy that other districts, accounting for that difference.

The layoffs will do nothing to improve teaching because that's not the purpose now or when a seniority system was adopted. It's just going to throw out the baby with the bath water for the purpose of financial survival. And that's all.

Any benefit of that action in LAUSD to students will be very much unintended and purely concidental to the action.

from cd-14

March 09, 2009 12:16 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Maia, do you have any idea what you're talking about, or did you just go off on a tangent right in the middle of this post?

Blah, bluh-blah, bluh-blah.

March 09, 2009 12:43 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

March 10, 2009: UTLA members put it all on the line to stop teacher layoffs
On Tuesday, March 10, the School Board will vote on whether to issue close to 6,000 reduction in force (RIF) notices to permanent and nonpermanent teachers and health and human services professionals. We are asking School Board members to VOTE NO on layoffs and use the federal stimulus money to save jobs.

At the meeting, some preidentified UTLA volunteers will engage in civil disobedience and may be arrested. We can't let it be business as usual at LAUSD when School Board members are making make-or-break decisions about our livelihoods.

http://www.utla.net/node/2104

PINK FRIDAY MARCH 13TH...STAND UP FOR SCHOOLS PROTEST AND WEAR PINK

March 09, 2009 4:01 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Sorry UTLA the gravy train is over.

March 09, 2009 4:18 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Why the hell is the Mayor fighting for more money for LAUSD if they are going to layoff thousands of teachers? Didn't Daily News report Saturday Obama is not giving law enforcement money to LA for hiring cops only to places like Santa Clarita and other cities that have more violence? What the hell is the trash fee money for if not hiring cops or was that another LIE from the Mayor?

Daily News....."The mayor is going to D.C. to continue to fight for LA's fair share of stimulus dollars for the city's police hiring plan, gang prevention programs, school reform efforts and renewable energy strategy," spokeswoman Parita Shah said.
The Los Angeles City Council has adopted a $6.8 billion wish list, which includes projects proposed by the Los Angeles Unified School District another other agencies

March 09, 2009 4:52 PM  

Blogger Michael Higby said:

Excellent post, Maia! Glad to have you back!

March 09, 2009 5:03 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Recall Antonio!!

March 09, 2009 6:39 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Riddle me this...

"Good teachers punish children."

vs

"Good teachers don't punish children."

OR "Good teachers sometimes punish children."- (You better explain.)

Where do you stand on punishment?Does it build character?
Does it cause resentment and hatred of school?

Is it a "judgement call" for the tenured? The untenured?

What about your kid?

Should they be punished for being like you?

March 09, 2009 10:30 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Maia,
Welcome back to Mayor Sam. I hope to read more from you. Your account of your 7th grade teacher rings true with my own child's experience with PC history.

Good luck with your job search.

March 09, 2009 10:31 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hey Wonkers, don't confuse discipline with punishment. There is a huge difference. I doubt she meant any teacher hit her with a wooden paddle with holes in it (that's punishment). I'm sure she meant discipline as in guiding, like a shepherd would take his hook and pull the straying sheep back into the flock.

Semantics? Maybe. But the retards on this blog can't always differentiate.

March 10, 2009 12:37 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

The trash fee was a hoax to get people to think they were paying for cops. Instead the money is going directly into the general fund where city council and the mayor has been raiding it. Trash fee money collects MILLIONS yet the city is still in a $472 million deficit and the morons on council are still spending widly as if they have an open check book.

March 10, 2009 7:54 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Prev. poster: ALL fees must by law go into the general fund unless they were designated specific taxes and raised as such by ballot vote. BUT the Mayor and his pro-LAPD allies have made sure that the money goes to LAPD even if not every penny to new hires as was mistakenly promised and the Mayor's been unfairly blamed for -- that includes expenditures related to hiring and retention. AND should include money for rape kits -- which Weiss and Smith and public safety advocates have urged for years but certain others have wanted to reduce lAPD funding even for cops, never mind what they saw as non-essential. (None of them will own up to that now, claiming to be on the bandwagon the whole time.)

This shows the folly of insisting all money go only to hiring and cop salaries: as Weiss and the LAPD top brass have said for years, when detectives lose out on the chance to put away a criminal after getting the DNA evidence because the city doesn't have the foresight to pay for $1000 to test each kit (including hiring the lab scientists required) there is far greater cost involved, financially and emotionally to the victims and potential new victims. (The county sheriff/ Baca's dept. was even more behind on that, despite the County and Supervisors having lots more money because they also include small, wealthier cities.)

Blame rests with short-sighted council members AND with a public that screams only for more cops and blames the mayor and allies for wanting to also spend on OTHER LAPD expenses that are vital too.

March 11, 2009 5:17 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Advertisement

Advertisement