Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098

Sunday, October 26, 2008

They Should Just Sequester Joe the Stumbler Until Election Day

Finally an interview with Biden that isn't softballs from the media. However, the most important thing (besides lies about Obama not paying ACORN for services, they did pay $800,000 to the organization).

At 1:02 in this video, the reporter says that Obama was an organizer for ACORN, which Biden not only doesn't rebut the reporter he ACTUALLY CONFIRMS THAT OBAMA DID ORGANIZE for ACORN in making a point that Obama didn't register voters with ACORN.

On the other hand Obama's website says that Obama never was an organizer for ACORN. So is Obama lying or did Joe go off the talking points again? It looks like Obama was lying.

Biden also lies about the impact of Obama's tax plan and efforts to redistribute the wealth of others.

So the problem comes out not that Obama was associated with Ayers, worked for ACORN, etc. but that he won't come clean about it.

Labels: , , , ,


Anonymous Anonymous said:

Gee, where the hell has the gang banger Mayor been during this election. NOt one word out of him for Obama. Word is the power democrats are really pissed at him. He can't take credit if Obama wins at all with Latinos. In fact some are saying HE was intentionally quieted as to not screw it up.

October 26, 2008 7:15 AM  

Anonymous One Who Knows said:

Joe has "no scheduled events" for today.


I figure he is at an "undisclosed ;ocation", most likey the Obama Woodshed.

October 26, 2008 9:49 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Speaking of Acorns I think some Acorns fell on Higby and Haikula's head, if all they can come up with is the same ridiculous terrorist accusations the bimbo from Alaska can keep repeating.

October 26, 2008 10:04 AM  

Blogger haikula said:

No, because Sarah Palin's worst crime is that she disagrees with you on policy.

She is too busy raising a family to go drinking & fundraising with bombers. The drinking would be molotov cocktails.

Anyway, eff you. I'm posting cartoons of both veeps today because unlike you, Haikula has a sense of humor, and my whole world won't come crashing down if either party wins.

That's because some of us have careers and pay the mortgage while others wait for the growing government to send help.

October 26, 2008 10:25 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

You're all bent out of shape about plans that would resdistribute income?

We've been doing this in America since the progressive income tax was created in 1923. That what tax brackets are all about.

Bill Gates pays more in taxes for each dollar earned that you and I do despite the fact that he gets the same service from the military, the same national park system, etc.

Everything is simply a matter of degrees.

Obama's tax plan would tax the rich more and help the middle and lower classes.

McCain's plan would give its breaks to the rich using the old trickle down theory -- if you tax the rich less, the rest of us will benefit because they will use that money to create job instead of hoarding it for themselves, say in the form of lucrative CEO compensation packages.

The trickle down theory only works when the rest of us get wet. Do you at least feel damp?

October 26, 2008 10:37 AM  

Blogger Jim Alger said:

Still publishing discredited stories Michael? I admire the spunk of quoting a source who found his story on the "hidden internet" but here is the FACTS.

Be it Ayeres, ACORN or a litany of other so-called "issues" you HAVE an answer, you just don't like the answer that is given. So, you discard the answer, ASSUME you don't know the "real truth" and then attack the candidate for not "coming clean". Nixon played this game back in 1960.

You know ACORN isn't an issue because ACORN was defrauded NOT the voters. You know Ayeres isn't an issue because Obama cleared multiple background checks by the NSA, FBI, OPR and the NSC leaving you only with innuendo.

Watching McCain on Meet the Press this morning was sad. He denied every poll, forgot who endorsed him and fumbled badly trying to remember reinforcing an existing narrative that his age may be getting the better of him.

At a minimum, he is desperately grasping at straws... much like this ACORN/Ayeres line of attack.

October 26, 2008 12:17 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

7:15 Our mayor is gearing up to turn the shovel on the million pot hole celebration photo
Opportunity this is a gigantic event and all cameras are welcome

October 26, 2008 1:03 PM  

Blogger Michael Higby said:

Well they sent Villar to Nevada today to campaign for Obama.

However I do think that the Clintonistas have not gone out of their way for Obama. Bill and Hillary have done a few appearances but that's about it.

October 26, 2008 1:04 PM  

Blogger Michael Higby said:

Jim you're really spinning good today but you must have had a full can of pickled red herrings for brunch today.

ACORN is an issue because they have been implicated in voter fraud in multiple states. It's laughable they're claiming they are victims of their own employees. Man, that's really standing up for the working man.

Obama's security clearance or lack of is not the issue. The issue is that Ayers is an admitted terrorist (he even mocks that he got away with it) and Obama has not condemned him, but more importantly LIED about his association with him. Obama says "He's some guy who lived in my neighborhood and I might of have served on a board with him." But the truth is that Ayers has been very involved in helping Obama get his political career started, Obama served on multiple projects/committees with Ayers and he wrote a blurb for Ayers' book (which means he read it and agrees with it).

Again, Ayers is not a huge issue in and of itself and no one has ever said Ayers and Obama engaged in terrorism together; if they do, it's incorrect.

The issue is that is yet one of many reasons to question Obama's judgment and character and that's legitimate no matter how you try to spin it.

You know Obama could have said "When I first started out in politics people directed me to Mr. Ayers as someone who could assist me. I did associate with him to that regard and I believe now that was a mistake on my part. I completely repudiate his actions and past and do not wish any further association with him."

At least that would have been somewhat honest.

October 26, 2008 1:11 PM  

Blogger Jim Alger said:

Michael, you are wrong again.

The only ones screaming "voter fraud: is the right wingnuts. (You, by definition don't get voter fraud until SOMEONE VOTES FRAUDULENTLY)

The right is doing what they do best, fabricating controversy. Now, when a coordinated group of fraudulent voters shows up to CAST A VOTE then you can speak of voter fraud. (More importantly, when you are down 14 points the amount if "fraud" it would take to be significant would be enormous. Just to satisfy people and not have any doubt, we'll be sure to win by at least 5 points and 50 electoral votes.

As or the Ayeres issue, you continue to accuse Obama of lying because you don't like his answer. PROVE he had a substantial relationship with the guy AFTER he became aware of his activities. You CAN'T.

The notion that a man as intelligent as Obama would knowingly associate with such a political liability is ridiculous and you know it. If the right had evidence they would be demanding answers, they'd be offering proof.


October 26, 2008 6:51 PM  

Blogger Jim Alger said:

BTW "pickled red herring???"

That was some funny shit :)

October 26, 2008 6:54 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home