Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098
mayorsam@mayorsam.org

Sunday, January 20, 2008

Former Fishwrap of Record Screws Yet Another Pooch


Another pleasant Sunday in the newsroom...


Joseph Mailander
a guy in laelsewhereemail

I thought we did this story eighteen months ago. No, we did, but...it's true again!

Times' top editor takes a push, likely a soon-to-be paid one, off a short but deep pier.

The top editor of The Los Angeles Times has been forced out for resisting newsroom budget cuts, executives at the paper said Sunday, marking the fourth time in less than three years that the highest-ranking editor or the publisher has left for that reason.

That would be editor James O'Shea. Joker Publisher David Hiller says in the fishwrap's own cover:

In an interview, Hiller disputed that O'Shea had been fired, saying that his exit was part of a plan involving senior level and organizational changes to be enacted after Zell took control of the company. "Think of it as the changes made at the start of a new presidential term," Hiller said. "In the context of these changes, Jim and I decided we no longer saw things the same way about how to take the company forward."

For his part, O'Shea said, "It is true that we did not share a common vision for the future of the LA Times. From my perspective he made the decision to terminate me. I cannot comment further without talking to my attorney."

Well, doesn't that just sound like a velvet divorce? Four successive editors have now left your Los Angeles Times, former fishwrap of record to the City of Los Angeles, over budget cuts, and this one feels he can't even talk without legal representation.

The NYTimes says that weekday circ at the paper has dropped to around 800,000, but true circ is widely rumored to be far below that. The paper's circ appeared to hold steady last year, but at what level, nobody really knows.

O'Shea had come from the Chicago Tribune, and was of retirement age anyway. Next!

Labels: ,

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Are you capable of writing about anything else besides criticism of the former fishwrap of record?

Who cares if they fired someone else? The new editor still isn't going to hire you.

January 20, 2008 9:51 PM  

Blogger Debbie said:

The new editor couldn't afford him.

And yeah, it is a story when editors aren't even there long enough to warm the seat. What the hell? What next, ads on the front page?

xoxo

January 20, 2008 10:01 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

9:51, if circulation goes any lower, you may lose your paper route.

January 20, 2008 10:01 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Talking about news…
Ron Paul continues to be ignored by Fox News. He is one of the GOP Presidential candidates and Fox accidentally forgot to mention him as the second candidate. Does Fox have a political agenda? Today’s article on PrisonPlanet.com “We Omit; You Decide”

January 20, 2008 11:03 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Ron Paul is an asterisk.

He has some good ideas, but he is as electable as Huckabee. Not.

Should they push Ross Perot or Bloomberg? Why?

All it does is help the Demoncrats elect Hillary. Doesn't that make you feel good?

January 21, 2008 2:00 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I didn't know the Ayatollah was behind the firing of O'Shea! Was he the mastermind behind Dean Basquet's demise, too? Only this blog could've broken the story that an eccentric Jewish billionaire and Iran's Chief Mullah could be in cahoots like this.

News before it happens, again!

January 21, 2008 12:44 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I don't even think the idea of losing a newspaper is funny. I can't imagine losing a paper that you can touch and see, mark your place easily by leaving the paper open to the page you're on as opposed to having the computer go black and logging back on to go find it again.

I don't want to see the demise of the newspaper.

On the other hand, those legitimate newspapers will still pay their reporters, so it won't be exactly like blogging where anybody can write anything, true or not.

But it will be a sad day for sure.

January 22, 2008 8:40 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

The LA Times is circling the drain and that is absolutely AWESOME!!!

This is what you get when you publish last-minute hatchet jobs, push extreme liberal bias, and ignore local political corruption.

We are forced to read that crappy Daily News, whose proper usage should be as toilet paper.

January 22, 2008 11:51 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Advertisement

Advertisement