Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098
mayorsam@mayorsam.org

Thursday, November 09, 2006

Ralphie, Baby, You're Kidding, Right?

I just received a somewhat bizarre e-mail from Ralph Nader.

Seems he wants to have a bake sale to "save" the L.A. Times.

What?!

The L.A. Times, which, as we've demonstrated repeatedly here, is merely a press release reprinting service for special interests, may soon be purchased by a couple of local billionaires -- as if that would make any difference in terms of journalistic "integrity."

Ralph, how can I put this delicately? It's a fishwrapper, my friend. There's no journalistic integrity left to protect. They print stories -- and I do mean "stories" -- merely to have something to place in between the advertisements. So forget it.

Now, can we please have tailfins back? Every time I go to the Petersen, I long for an updated version of the '59 Caddy convertible, something with antilock brakes, airbags, and style. And I can live with a six-cylinder or hybrid. But give us those beautiful fins back, would you, Ralphie?

Here's the text of his touching missive:

******************************************************************

Tribune Fires LA Times Editor - FAX Back!


Dear Walter Moore,

Please join me in fighting back against the Tribune Company's threat of crippling cuts in the LA Times's editorial department. The fight is being led by California's top consumer advocacy organization, The Foundation for Taxpayer & Consumer Rights.

The Tribune company has forced out popular Los Angeles Times editor Dean Baquet hoping the disturbing news would be lost in the shadow of the mid-term election.

Read the New York Times article here.

Baquet leaves a month after Tribune ousted the newspaper's publisher, Jeff Johnson, over his refusal to cut editorial staff. Baquet was seen as the last line of defense for the newspaper's editorial integrity. His removal is a sign that the Chicago owners will be slashing jobs in the newsroom of Los Angeles's major newspaper, even as local suitors seek to purchase the newspaper from the company at a fair price.

It's time for readers of the Los Angeles Times to unite and take their newspaper back. Fax the Tribune company here. Demand that Baquet be reinstated and the planned editorial cuts rescinded or that the newspaper be sold to local owners before the end of the year. Warn you'll cancel your subscription.

Here's Baquet's memo to staff: "By now you've seen the Wall Street Journal story on L.A. Observed that I'll be leaving the paper. Believe me, I didn't want it to come out this way..."

This election season, unelect the Tribune management of the LA Times. A news organization should not hide such serious news for Los Angeles in the maelstrom of election day coverage.

One alternative to distant corporate ownership is management by a nonprofit foundation or trust, which demands far less in profits than the Tribune Company, such as the St. Petersburg Times in Florida. This is the type of management LA Times subscribers deserve. Chime in with the Tribune now, it's as vital as voting!

Thanks very much for your time and efforts.

The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights is a non-profit, non-partisan consumer protection organization.

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said:

It's funny but not surprising that Nader would characterize the effort to save the Times by describing the problem as "crippling cuts in the LA Times's editorial department" as if the rest of the paper didn't matter.

Well maybe it doesn't, but it does shows the reader that opinion, rather than news, matters most to Nader.

November 09, 2006 8:44 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Westchesterkids, opinion is news. That's what the blogosphere is all about. News is always filtered through the eyes of reporters and editorial staff...that's not a bad thing.

A myraid group is coming to the defense of the LA Times with players ranging from billionaries Broad and Burkle to populists like Moore and Nader; the paper's voice, its opinion, is what these folks want to protect. Opinions shape democracy...without a variety of perspectives, we're lost.

November 09, 2006 10:16 PM  

Blogger Walter Moore said:

You're right, Glam11, that we need a diversity of opinions. However, the L.A. Times has no diversity of opinions whatsoever. It has become a PR tool for wealthy special interests, period.

November 10, 2006 8:04 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Let's welcome the LA Times Editorial Staff to the Free Market. Newspapers like the LA Times are having trouble competing in the new age media market. Buggy whips are no longer in demand because of automobile and maybe Newspapers are not as important as they once were because of the internet and cable news.

November 10, 2006 8:25 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Print is dead.

November 10, 2006 10:45 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

November 10, 2006 10:47 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

;lNo one can save the Times. They blew it along time ago. They stopped being the neutral party in elections putting out stories before they researched both sides showed it wasn't a paper worth reading...therefore they lost their readership. Now because of that they have lost advertisers and without the large following they are minus the money to continue to support the staff. It's sad but true.

The internet has taken over as the hub of news (we all knew it was happening) but it doesn't mean the Times, or other print media, couldn't have become a major player on the net...they were smug when the public caught them with their pants down putting out lies in their stories, and just haven't kept up with the times...

It's sad though they have a few reporters who are good journalists and have really worked hard to educate the public and written award winning stories. It's tough because those stories were already known by the residents after years of complaints...

The Times is just not cutting edge enough...The Times tried to control our politics instead of telling the truth...you get what you...

November 10, 2006 4:52 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Nader is the devil. He is why Bush won back in 2000 and he will rot in hell because of that selfish egotistical fact.

November 10, 2006 7:51 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Advertisement

Advertisement