Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098
mayorsam@mayorsam.org

Wednesday, February 15, 2006

Alger Targets Santa Clarita

Jim Alger, Democratic Candidate for the 38th State Assembly District announced the addition of Mathew Waggner to Team Alger to head a Santa Clarita operations base.

"Matt's entire purpose in life between now and November will be to oversee the ground operation in Santa Clarita" said Campaign spokesman Mike O'Connell, "Matt Waggner brings with him the experience of field operations and the freshness of new ideas... ...of course what makes this newsworthy is that a Democrat has a ground operation in Santa Clarita."

"Jim Alger is a leader who knows how to turn constituent concerns into viable action plans. His work to ensure open government and a healthy relationship between businesses and the community gives me hope for California's future. I'm thrilled that Jim Alger has stood behind Clean Elections and opened his endorsement questionnaires to public review." Waggner said earlier today, "The Democrats have a bright future if our candidates shun pay-to- play, backroom politics and embrace maximum honesty and engagement in our communities -- and the 38th AD has a bright future with a candidate like Jim Alger fighting for us. I'm glad to offer my support to his campaign."

"As I have said from the beginning, this campaign will be one that will take the fight right to the door of our opponents. Given that our opponents door will, in all likelihood, be located in Santa Clarita, Matt will have his work cut out for him." Jim Alger said in a statement issued this morning.

"We will defend a woman's right to choose, we will achieve Universal health care and we will make California the largest Clean Money State in the nation. Democrats will no longer surrender one inch in the 38th District... at least not on my watch" Alger concluded.

46 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Obviously Alger is formulating a thought out ground campaign...what about Alex Padilla's ground operation?

February 15, 2006 12:51 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Westsider, I concur. We also need candidates who come clean about their criminal past.

February 15, 2006 6:04 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

give it up Hilfenhaus or is it Waldman?

February 15, 2006 7:38 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Boys, boys. Look at Alger's 460 (which he has posted online) and you'll see he's spent more than $4000 on goods and services so looks like you boys are - ahem - lying (again).

February 15, 2006 8:49 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Actually, funny thing... It's not posted on line. However, neither is is criminal record!

February 15, 2006 8:58 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Someone with ties to Hilfenhaus is bringing up an old arrest record? A bit of a risky game, isn't it?

Let's talk about issues that matter in the district. Let's talk about what it takes to run a campaign--winning or losing campaign. (Shaw has no intent of running any kind of campaign at all.)

But drop this crap about an arrest 10 years ago.

February 15, 2006 9:32 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I guarantee that every thread between here and election day we will see this 10 year old arrest brought up. Alger expected it, which is why he released the information.

It is safe to say that this moron is related to the "80 Neighborhood Watches" moron of elections past.

Of course they will never discuss issues.

February 15, 2006 9:53 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

February 15, 2006 10:34 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

What's her same-sex marriage position?

Oh, and I don't like Jim and Lyn, but his union isn't very left-wing. They'll hop in bed with anyone -- left or right -- that will push for some big development -- ahem, Schwarzie, ahem -- that results in big Laborers jobs.

February 15, 2006 10:45 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I would settle on knowing where Lyn stood on ANY subject.

She has no record to speak of and refuses to run a campaign of any level so why should any of us take her seriously?

The Algerites are out in force almost daily and he picks up more volunteers at every speech he delivers. He also has the record to support his positions on local control, and standing up for the little guy.

If Lyn's campaign team of 2 1/2 (the 1/2 is Mitchell Englader) think that concentrating on 1 mistake 10 years ago somehow will erase all the good Alger has done SINCE then, they are sadly mistaken.

We have watched Jim take on developers, stop the LAUSD from taking private homes, prevent a 18% rate hike, organize over 40 Councils to forge a contract with DWP, fly to the gulf to help Hurricane Katrina Victims, and defeat the worlds largest corporation Wal Mart.

You can try and "Swift Boat" him all day long but it won't work.

Oh, and by the way... quit saying your "not connected to any campaign" or "refer to this post 'some blogger' made on this thread". In the history of Mayor Sam NOBODY has EVER done that. You have been doing it ever since Jim mopped the floor with Lyn in Van Nuys last week. Now your running scared.

February 15, 2006 11:29 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Alger supporter here.

Here we go again -- slinging mud and blood and whatever disgusting stuff you can grab is really boring. In the 38th AD (in which I am!), we want representation in Sacramento. We want our representative to remember where we are on the map in California and to show up in the District, respond to phone calls and letters and emails, and REPRESENT us. The credibility of the mudslingers on this blog is nil. Wash your mouths out with 20 mule team borax, get out in the real world (away from your computer) and do something positive. Now that would be worth blogging about!

February 15, 2006 11:38 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

You will never find a Hilfenhaus supporter talking about any issues because other than partisan democratic causes she has none.

Hell, how much does she even support unions when she is so ashamed of her union boss husband she won't even use his name?

She thinks people will vote for her because someone else told her to. Then she will let the seat go virtually uncontested.

and she calls herself a good Democrat? Sounds more like a Republican operative to me.

At least Jim Alger stands up for the average person know matter how much the detractors attempt to attack him.

February 15, 2006 12:31 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

As someone in the know I can tell you what Alger is waiting for. His opponent to openly confront his so-called history. Not someone anonymously posting, but an actual candidate because it is a good old fashioned trap. He is going to wait until his opponent believes there is so much smoke, there is fire and then makes the charge directly.

At which time Alger will promptly remove the torch from Lyn's hand and burn her house down. To say what I know would expose me, but this isn't a tact you want to take.

February 15, 2006 12:38 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Alger has an impressive ground operation coming together rather rapidly. He has written off many of the endorsements that I wouldn't have but he has instead focused on an intense ground campaign.

Alger for State Assembly lawn signs and bumper stickers are already beginning to pop up in the North Valley and Santa Clarita. Maybe they're staffers, maybe volunteers or maybe supporters but regardless he is out there when nobody else, including Smyth is.

Endorsements don't win elections, interaction with the people do. Jim Alger is out walking precincts, hanging out at shopping centers and speaking at large events... and he's been doing this for months. See this Santa Clarita Signal Article One man's run at Assembly now his "job"

Jim has been getting "free media" for months and has an well established repor with the voters. Assuming Alger gets no endorsements at all (which is already not possible) he still has the advantage.

That advantage only goes up when the other side attacks him on non-issue nonsense. It merely shows their desperation.

February 15, 2006 12:52 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

February 15, 2006 1:08 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

February 15, 2006 1:11 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Shaw, Hilfenhaus whatever name she chooses to use this week is using attacking Alger to raise her own profile.

She has no issues, no stature in the community and after she is done spending all of her political capital on the Assembly race she will be a distant memory by July.

The unions and everyone else who felt compelled to support Hilfenhaus, Shaw whoever will rally behind Jim Alger on June 7th and kiss his ass raising his status in the party and in public.

Lyn hasn't done her homework. With her so-called spies in his "inner circle" you would think she would know how he thinks, which is to say OUT LOUD. He tells you what he is going to do before he does it and you still don't get it.

Alger is known for amassing large amounts of people out of thin air and the big rumor I hear is that he is planning on self-funding about 100 grand.

Alger is much shrewder than most people give him credit for.

February 15, 2006 1:44 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Why would Steward Waldman care about Jim Alger?

February 15, 2006 1:58 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Good question but he has been shopping some bad stories around about him for a week now.

February 15, 2006 2:12 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Really? What bad stories? Who did he tell? Is Mayor Sam holding on to some info? How do you know?

February 15, 2006 2:42 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

We know and that is all that matters.

February 15, 2006 2:54 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Who the hell are "WE"? Are you the blog gestapo? Or are you Team ALger making stuff up again?

February 15, 2006 3:26 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Um yea... we are a Blog gestapo.

Must be that or maybe just Stewart has a big mouth and told people things that got around.

February 15, 2006 4:08 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

February 15, 2006 4:12 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

February 15, 2006 4:20 PM  

Blogger Matt said:

Wow, I was going to post on here before, but this has really devolved pretty quickly in the last couple of hours.


With 30 posts, I expected one or two questions about Santa Clarita or the ground game. Ah well.

Anyway - if you're wondering where the Santa Clarita number goes to, as I understand it, it forwards to me - one of the few damn fools to actually post with their name on this site.

Re: Clean Money - it's actually incredibly cheap on a per-taxpayer basis (something like $5 a year), and I actually had the opportunity with a handful of other SCV dems to petition the Santa Clarita City Council to adopt it in town last night.

The "only out of pocket" style of funding has been tested in the form of McCain-Feingold (BCRA), and I think, anecdotally, we can say that it's more or less failed in its original intent.

February 15, 2006 4:36 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This is Jim Hilfenhaus posting. What kind of sick individual posts a comment like 4:12 P.M.? Really people grow up and get life.

February 15, 2006 5:02 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Sure, post stuff then deny it while simultaneously drawing attention to it so we can read it again.

You guys are sick over there.

February 15, 2006 5:22 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Maybe if Shaw did something news worthy she would get a blog entry too.

February 15, 2006 9:11 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This guy must have taken lessons from CD14. Anyday now he'll be asking Alger where are the 80 NEIGHBORHOOD WATCHES

February 15, 2006 10:24 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

ummm... If a conviction is "set aside" by definition that person stands no longer convicted.

Your spin gets better every time you try and sell it. Get it through your tiny brain, WE DON'T CARE!

February 15, 2006 10:31 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

February 16, 2006 4:28 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Funny thing, Alger doesn't know who his enemies are. I for one, find it hysterical that his camp assumes it’s the staffers in Greg Smith’s office or the Hilfenhaus family. It’s not. He has bigger enemies then that. Think back a few years Mr. Alger. Think. And, I am sure you’ll figure it out…

“When you take revenge on someone you pay them the highest compliment possible you are saying you affected my life so much that I feel I need to affect yours in the same manner. Revenge is the ultimate hallmark card.”—It’s even more fun to do it with lots of money and in a political arena… Just wait!

February 16, 2006 7:14 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Yes, I am sure blogging on mayor sam anonymously will somehow "exact revenge" on Jim. What you fail to understand is that in the "political arena" less than half of what you say is taken seriously anyway.

When you talk about spending money to do it, you will have to expose yourself or violate campaign finance laws. Upon exposure, motivation becomes clear, which is why you hide behind anonymous.

February 16, 2006 11:06 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Funny thing, I don't know what any of "his camp" thinks because I don't think any of "his camp" has ever said a word about what juvenile moron is posting what today on a blog anonymously.

Sounds to me like your trying to throw people off the track, although I really am not sure how much they give a shit.

Jim has been on here posting under his own name for some time now. Alot of us KNOW him so to throw mud and veiled cryptic threats around won't do much around here.

Even if it did, very few of us are in his district so as mayor sam would say... blog away dum dums.

February 16, 2006 11:18 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

February 16, 2006 12:34 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

February 16, 2006 2:33 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Mayor Sam,

Please stop with all the posts about Jim Alger. Seriously, who cares? This blog is great because it covers the nitty gritty of LA City Hall, not because of some assclown running for an Assembly seat. Start a new blog for Alger or put the content on MS2. It's enough already.

February 16, 2006 5:12 PM  

Blogger Mayor Sam said:

Come on boys

February 16, 2006 5:54 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Sorry, Valleybrat, I am looking for full disclosure. If Alger is going to "Lead by Example" regarding clean money and transparency in endorsements, he can give full disclosure on this issue.

February 17, 2006 5:00 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Not sure what more the man can say, he filled out a form wrong 10 years ago. Ya want to know what color pen he used?

At the end of the day the conviction was set aside by the Superior court, (probably out of the interest of justice because of its ridiculous nature) so I'm not sure what difference it makes for anything other than trying to stir up trouble under the veil of anonymity.

I am sure opponents would love to make something out of an issue Alger disclosed voluntarily when he had no obligation to simply to avoid the fact that they have yet to answer a single question about where they stand on any issue.

This entire thing is nothing more than a Weapon of Mass Distraction by the Hilfenhaus team of 2.

February 17, 2006 10:31 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

you mean 2 1/2... forgot Mitch.

February 17, 2006 7:36 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

We do not know why he was arrested. What he was convicted of. Why the conviction was set aside. Why it was dismissed. And if Mr. Alger was factual innocent, why he did not request a declaration declaring such from the court of jurisdiction. We only have his word.

A blogger can never just take the word of a candidate.

February 17, 2006 7:47 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

plus 1-1/2 you forgot waldman

February 17, 2006 9:08 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

"We do not know why the conviction was set aside. Why it was dismissed."

ummm maybe because it was STUPID to charge a guy for not filling out a form right. As you said in your earlier rants "people don't get convicted of mistakes".. actually they do all the time. Cops go on personal vendettas and routinely "up charge" someone.

The case was dismissed. We don't care about it. The only person who seems to care is YOU. Most of us wouldn't have cared if the case hadn't been dismissed. It was a form 10 years ago, wasn't as if he was knocking over 7-11's last Thursday so GIVE IT A REST.

February 20, 2006 1:05 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

"We only have his word. A blogger can never just take the word of a candidate."

But somehow the non-stop rants of an anonymous poster on Mayor Sam is more reliable?

What is funny is that if it weren't for his "word" you wouldn't have known in the first place! HE IS THE ONE WHO RELEASED THE INFORMATION!

Now, next time you post on here, tell us the other candidates positions on issues we care about. Not some 10 year old who cares story.

February 20, 2006 1:09 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Advertisement

Advertisement