Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098
mayorsam@mayorsam.org

Thursday, November 03, 2005

David Sanchez Joins the Hit-Piece Parade in CD 14

Click on images to enlarge


109 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said:

amen david! people might say he's crazy, but this man has dedicated his life fighting for latino empowerment.

November 03, 2005 11:08 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This is the guy that got 33% of the vote against Gloria Molina in 2002 while spending less than $5000. Although he doesn't have a shot in this campaign, kudos to David for demonstrating the courage that our leaders lack.

Love that comment under Gloria Romero. And he sure nailed Ed Reyes on the head by showing what a pussy he really is.

November 03, 2005 11:09 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This is hilarious. I say we all help out David and print this out and give it to a voter in CD14, or better yet, e-mail it to them.

Now this is East L.A. politics.

November 03, 2005 11:15 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

HEAR THAT, it's the sound of Parke Skelton dropping another anti-Pacheco ad in the mail.

He's claiming Pacheco was behind THIS attack mailer, too. (Sanchez and Pacheco know each other, and sat next to each other at a couple of forums).

MORE SLEAZE FROM PACHECO (that was sarcasm)!

November 03, 2005 11:20 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Speak truth to authority David - just dont expect to be invited to their $1000 campaign fundraising receptions.

Or endorsed...

November 03, 2005 11:21 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

11:20

Yeah Parke would think that. After all, the only smart Mexicans out there are with him already. Except for Nick, of course. According to Parke, Nick will be behind any attacks on Huizar. You should realize Parke, Jose and LAUSD have more than enough enemies out there. David even went to jail to fight them.

Long live the East L.A. 13!

November 03, 2005 11:33 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

David,

What did you want to achieve by this? I'm a republican and despise some democrats, but I would not do this. Why so much hate or do you know more inside information than us. Elaborate.

November 03, 2005 11:33 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

It should be noted that this is the first time, anybody has attacked A PAD in literature.

- historian

November 03, 2005 11:38 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I would suspect David wants to take down the whole Latino political establishment. Latinos have been succesful in getting elected over the past 30 years, but what has changed? Worse crime rate, worse student drop out rate, worse neighorhoods. I think David is trying to do what he has set out to do from the beginning, educate our Latino masses.

November 03, 2005 11:40 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Is A PAD Alex Padilla? Does he really hold the record ethics fine? This should be fodder for Cindy. $79,0000! And they call Nick crooked.

November 03, 2005 11:42 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

11:33

David has been involved since he was 14 years old. I would suspect he knows way more than us. I wonder what other secrets he'll expose out there. Watch out if he makes the runoff.

November 03, 2005 11:44 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hate, 11:33?

Sounds to me like he loves his people more than most of these show pieces, and wants better for the people, not just for the politicians.

Soemtimes it takes akick in the pants to wake people up when they;re sleepewalking down the same wrong road.

November 03, 2005 11:46 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Problem is, with Sanchez' budget, he'll be lucky if 1000 people even see this before next week.

November 03, 2005 11:47 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Email it? Email it to who, the Clintons?

November 03, 2005 11:51 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I am not a Pacheco supporter, and I disagree with Jose Huizar and Parke Skelton. Parke Skelton is a racist pig! Why does this racist pig live in our neighborhood if he hates us?

November 03, 2005 11:52 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Que es un PAD? Gracias.

November 03, 2005 11:53 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I'm helping David. I admire someone taking such a stand on corruption. I'm emailing this to everyone I know and don't know. As long as there is an email address, I'm emailing it.

November 03, 2005 11:57 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This may get him up to a distant third... but probably not!

He's aiming at the right target, anyway -- the guy in second place.

November 03, 2005 12:07 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Every Pacheco lover should e-mail this so that way people will finally begin to understand that we are corrupt and stupid at the same time.

Have fun watching Huizar come in 1st this Tuesday idiots.

November 03, 2005 12:09 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

just like a vendido to take other latinos down. Like a bunch of crabs in a bucket, when one gets ahead theres always one to pull the other one down.

Sanchez should be ashamed of himself acting like white folk

--PicoGirl

November 03, 2005 12:10 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

David,

Was this tactic used to take away votes from Huizar or Pacheco? Was it used so we can throw vegetables at the mayor in the next press conference?

Sick and tired of Villaraigosa corruption

November 03, 2005 12:11 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I saw this guy at a debate.

If he ever did get on city council, the meetings would last 17 hours.

lada, llada, walkout, llada, llada, problems, llada, llada, pontification, llada, llada, walkout, llada, llada, more problems (no solutions), llada, llada, walkout, llada llada.

And that would be on every motion.

November 03, 2005 12:11 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This ad is a bit weird, why would David do this? To help Huizar, think about it. If he puts all Latino politicians in clumped up together, the people might take it another way, then you have....I don't know what the hell to make out of all of this. A complete outsider can probably make a better judgement, I'm at a loss.

November 03, 2005 12:13 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Pico Girl,

Sanchez is not "white folk" and I don't think he ever was too.

Sincerely,
LAUSD moron

November 03, 2005 12:14 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

PicoGirl

Get a clue. David was on the front lines way before any of these politicians ever entered the fray. You talk about crabs, who do you think took David down?

You want to talk about somebody takng Latinos down, take a look at Parke Skelton. And he did this with lies. Get your head out of your ass PicoGirl, maybe then you'll start to see the truth.

November 03, 2005 12:16 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

LIGHT BULB, for anyone not catching the reasoning for the also-rans attacks and participation in this one. For the most part (except De Vera, who actually believes she might come in second - okay, some people believe in the tooth fairy, too), most of these gang-of-eight are positioning themselves to run against the "incumbent" in less than two years.

Anyone other than Pacheco that sneaks into this tiny interim term until 2007 won't be able to get anything done in such a short time, and will be even more vulnerable come the middle of next year when people say (again) "what has the council office done for us...NOTHING". Except this time, the guy in office in CD14 won't be wearing Villaraigosa's teflon underwear.

November 03, 2005 12:17 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

12:13

If I recall correctly, this David piece is an exact replica of a piece sent out by Huizar touting his Latino political endorsements. Why are you at a loss. David just took Parke Skeltons best piece and turned it on him. That's Huizar's whole platform, elect him because he's on "our team." Well that's a corrupt and failing team.

November 03, 2005 12:18 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Sanchez is aiming at Huizar, BECAUSE he's responsible for part of the mess. No brainer, people.

He's been the most powerful elected official at LAUSD for since 2003. The schools aren't fit for cattle, let alone humans.

Who SHOULD he aim at, for a 61 percent drop out rate? Pacheco? Hahn? Roy Romer (who WORKS for the board Huizar ran)?

Place the blame where it belongs. WITH THE ELECTED BOARD that is supposed to be accountable to the people of L.A.

And place the blame on politicians who support him, who have accepted the status quo.

November 03, 2005 12:21 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I want to hear comments from

ATHENA
JOSEPH MAILANDER
PHIL KRACKHEAD
HUIZAR STAFF
PACHECO STAFF
REYES STAFF
VILLARAIGOSA STAFF
-CABBAGE PATCH LISA
-JENNIE THE FROG
-ULYSSES CHEWBACCA
-ANGELA YODA
-JIMMY LITTLEFOOT
-PARKE "Harald the Tyrant" SKELTON
-ATHENA "PARKES DANCING DOG"

WHY SO QUIET?

OH, SI, SI, SI, EL SUPREME F*%$ UP POLITICO FOR THE COUNCIL DISTRICT

MR. "MOLE" ALVIN PARRA

November 03, 2005 12:21 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Yes, Angelenos LOVE their "teams" (when they WIN).

A 61 percent drop out rate means the DODGERS had a better season this year, than LAUSD.

And THEY sucked!

November 03, 2005 12:23 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Yes, A PAD does hold the record. He was surpassed by Jim Hahn....the Cardenas campaign laundering scheme was also part of that Hahn effort.

November 03, 2005 12:27 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

correction, held the record until hahn's associates surpassed APAD

November 03, 2005 12:28 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

It's a shame to see evidence after evidence thrown at my face at how my participation with tax dollars are feeding this corrupt bunch.

Why are my tax dollars so mismanaged?

Don't we pay an average of $9,500 per student in LAUSD for a worthy education. The students, taxpayers, and our future is robbed before our eyes.

61% Drop Out rate. Huizar you don't care about the LAUSD students. You attended private schools, like your staff. You don't care if they never succeed in life, you only care about yourself and political friends.

That is horrible, 61%, I didn't know this, and I'm pissed! Ribet Academa charges less that $9,500 per student, and the students get top notch education. Some private schools, elementary charge less than $3000, some offer scholarships.

Huizar, you belong in Jail, you stole from LAUSD students.

You stole their future.

November 03, 2005 12:29 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Absolutely marvelous NO JUE JOSE. Couldn't have put it better than you.

November 03, 2005 12:31 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Consider yourself benched, turd!

November 03, 2005 12:36 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I think with a 61 percent drop out rate, Sanchez is being generous to say "second" class community. There's some third world countries do better than that at educating their children.

November 03, 2005 12:37 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

And Huizar SAID to us back in Thursday, March 24, 2005
Dropout crisis in L.A.
Situation much worse than reported
Harvard study shows
By Jennifer Radcliffe
L.A. Daily News Staff Writer

"...LAUSD board President Jose Huizar agreed, saying he would ask for a specific dropout-prevention plan to be developed in the next 90 days. "There's no doubt that the current dropout rates are unacceptable," he said.

But, he added: "It's curable. There's no doubt it's preventable. It results from our failure to meet students' need."


90 DAYS HAVE PASSED, NOTHING NEW, IT HAS BEEN WORSE!

November 03, 2005 12:42 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

12:37

Your absolutely right. You know what Cubas number 1 export is right now - DOCTORS. SHit all you want on Castro, but he puts LAUSD to shame, and with a tenth of the budget.

November 03, 2005 12:43 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

From LA City Beat...

So Pacheco is now running as a kind of incumbent; his literature says “re-elect” Nick Pacheco. This cuts two ways: good recognition and bad recognition. “People recognize the name,” says Robert Urteaga, Pacheco’s campaign manager. “They may not like him, but they know him.”

Not the kind of endorsement you want from your campaign manager, but it does have the admirable ring of truth. There’s no denying Pacheco is laboring under the weight of some baggage in this campaign. There was that business in the mayor’s race of 2001, when Pacheco was linked to a sleazy phone hit against Villaraigosa, then running in a mayoral primary against a field of dozens, including Congressman Xavier Becerra.

“Don’t hang up! This is an emergency!” said the woman’s voice, a canned message speed-dialed to the homes of female Democratic voters. It went on to say the call was on behalf of “Gloria Marina” – which sounds like Molina, the wildly popular eastside pol – and that Villaraigosa, as an assemblyman, had opposed legislation targeting child molesters (which he did, but only to vote later for stronger legislation).

Turns out that some of Pacheco’s council staff, on leave to help Becerra’s bid against Villaraigosa, were involved in the matter.

The campaign has a play-by-play document available to counter the claims – the district attorney investigation found no indication Pacheco knew the content of the message before it was launched – but the explanations have an unfortunate when-did-you-stop-beating-your-wife? quality. And some of that residue has stuck to Pacheco.

November 03, 2005 12:43 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Boy I thought David was a wash out. I remember him and the Brown Berets when they took over Catalina Island. I must say, for those old Chicano acitivists, David you've got my and my family's vote. It's good to see that some Chicano activists still have that spark, just like a mecha!

November 03, 2005 12:45 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I DON'T PARTICULARLY THINK MUCH OF MECHA PEOPLE. I WILL VOTE FOR HUIZAR BECAUSE HE WORKS WITH NON MECHA PEOPLE, DEVELOPERS, MY LINE OF WORK. I WANT THE BUSINESS I NEED THE CLOUT.

November 03, 2005 12:51 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

12:43

Read the DA report. The only reason Pacheco is still holding this baggage is because Becerra wasn't MAN enough to accept his responsibilities. Lloyd Montserrat was the Pacheco staffer on leave and he tried to warn Becerra, telling him that Paige, his campaign manager, would resort to dirty tricks and then split town. And that is exactly what she did and Xavier didn't do anything about it. If you look at the L.A. Times stories on this, Becerra was informed on who did the message the day before election day. And yet he still remained silent for almost a month, until the DA caught up with Paige Richardson in New Mexico. Xavier hung Nick out to dry and still hasn't stepped forward - just like a coward.

November 03, 2005 12:51 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

We were at a community meeting and a resident asked Jose when he came to speak who was paying for the signs and was it legal to post on the schools. Jose replied, "LAUSD pays for them and NO its not illegal. There has to be some type of ethic violation I would think.

November 03, 2005 12:54 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

12:51

Are you one of the dozens and dozens of developers from outside CD14 that gave Huizar more than $50,000 total to help "preserve open space" in CD14.

Now THAT is comedy.

November 03, 2005 12:54 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

How come Beceerra's not on the black eye list above; someone give him a pass?

November 03, 2005 12:55 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Becerra did not endorse Jose. He's on the wrong "team"

November 03, 2005 12:59 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I'll pay one penny for a picture of Parke Skelton

What does he look like?

I heard he looks like Clinton but with a bigger red nose.

November 03, 2005 1:00 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Mayor Frank,

Huizar is in bigger trouble. There is a student protest at LAUSD South Gate High School.

"SOUTH GATE - About 500 students took part in a "sit-in" at South Gate High School today to protest overcrowding, a lack of textbooks and other issues, a Los Angeles Unified School District representative said."

ABC7.com

November 03, 2005 1:02 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

12:55

I would think he's not one there because he didn't endorse Huizar. Those on this balck eye piece endorsed Huizar, telling the Latino community to "Elect Jose on Our Team." Those pictures and even the layout are taken directly from one of Parke's pieces.

November 03, 2005 1:05 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

South Gate Students are staging a WALKOUT! Can somebody get David Sanchez over there?

November 03, 2005 1:06 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Does Fabio really have a criminal record? What is it for? Could someone please provide details?

November 03, 2005 1:14 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

1:14

Fabian was charged with assault on at least 3 occasions. In one he pulled a shotgun on somebody, he was charged with assualt with intent to commit great bodily harm. Then his ex-wife charged him with assualt. I guess this is what he has in common with Arnold. These cases are all on file in San Diego County.

November 03, 2005 1:47 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

READ THIS POST ON ANOTHER THREAD.

Someone should ask Jose about Crenshaw High losing its accrediation under his watch. First time in 30 years. IF he couldn't do anything to help fix Crenshaw that had 2 yrs prior knowledge of trouble how the hell could he possibly run a district? He can't.

November 03, 2005 2:13 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

he smuggled chiclets, haters.

November 03, 2005 2:21 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Parke has lots of nerve attacking Nick on "owning" a phone bank. What he does not tell people that he and "AV SPY Hacopian" owned a phone bank together to do all there dirty deeds.

The phone bank was used for the Caruso gutter campaign Hacopian ran in Glendale last year.

November 03, 2005 2:28 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hacopian spied for Villaraigosa took the list of volunteers early on at Pacheco's campaign office and ratted them out. Too bad most volunteers are moles for third parties. They hate both candidates!

November 03, 2005 2:34 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hacopian didn't know much. I bet he coudn't even name the real players in Nick's campaign. Nick learned his lesson when Giarizzo sold him out.

November 03, 2005 2:56 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

LA CITY BEAT-

"Has either campaign targeted Eagle Rock?

ALATORRE-

"José opened up a campaign headquarters close by to my house, and Nick is in Highland Park, so they both recognize it. The real issue is: Is it going to end in a week? [That depends on] who gets the undecided. If they all swing towards José, then José could end it in November. But if it doesn’t, then it’s wide open again, because then you’re going to see everybody covering their rear ends."

November 03, 2005 3:00 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I'm surprised Eric Garcetti isn't crying foul that he was left out of the Latino hit piece. Yes, I still get a chuckle out of the fact that Ol' Eric claims to be Latino.

November 03, 2005 3:06 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Seriously Robert,

Wanna know people don't take your campaign seriosuly?

Because you have supporters that say shit like this ---

Hacopian spied for Villaraigosa took the list of volunteers early on at Pacheco's campaign office and ratted them out. Too bad most volunteers are moles for third parties. They hate both candidates!

Anonymous 2:34pm



Its those type of folks in your office and punching walking precincts for you -- they are the reason why your campaign is a joke.

Its a shock your campaign wasn't negative from day one on Jose -- that was your only chance, but you decided to play the rose-garden strategy. Too bad you are doing it without any rose gardens.

Have fun throwing up tuesday night, all the way to wednesday.

November 03, 2005 3:07 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

3:07

Thanks for displaying your ignorance. You really don't have a clue.

November 03, 2005 3:14 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

ERIC GARCETTI IS A DISGRACE! I WATCHED THE PROGRAM "JUVIE" LAST NIGHT. HOW CAN A MINOR GO TO JAIL FOR 35 YEARS FOR CARRYING A GUN AND NOT HURTING ANYONE, SAY SOME ASSOCIATION WITH GANG.

DAMN! SOME OF OUR HERO POLITICIANS ASSOCIATE WITH DRUG DEALERS AND THEY ARE NOT DOING TIME! GARCETTI, SOME OF THESE KIDS ARE IN THE SYSTEM ROTTING, YOU HELPED KEEP THEM LOCKED. OJ WAS FREED, POOR STREET KID WHO WAS RAPED BY STEP DAD, CAUGHT ON THE STREET IS DOING 15 YEARS, FOR WHAT BEING ON THE STREET?

OUR SYSTEM IS MESSED UP!

http://www.juvies.net/index.html

November 03, 2005 3:16 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

3:07 I wrote that you dimwit! I am not a Pacheco supporter. The lack of intelligence from Huizar supporters is their paranoia thinking everyone not in their team must be Pacheco team. I support Sanchez and so what, you don't like it? Too BAD Huizar ass licker!

November 03, 2005 3:18 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

3:07 I'm a mole and I've been volunteering at Huizar's office since October.

Can you find the mole?

I'm not too far. I don't belong to your favorite opponent Pacheco, I am part of the bigger picture.

Powdered white little donuts today anyone? Sign in please.

November 03, 2005 3:21 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

great strategy - attack all the most popular electeds in the district.

and misspell "pour" while you're at it.

November 03, 2005 3:24 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Gloria Molina is fat and ugly. Romero is fine. Villaraigosa looks smaller.

November 03, 2005 3:28 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Gloria was fine.

November 03, 2005 3:41 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

He walked out the day they had the spelling bee!

November 03, 2005 4:05 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

jen said i gave a good answer

November 03, 2005 4:10 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

3:24 p.m.

If AV is the MOST popular (we keep hearing his hacks say that ad nauseum), and HE only got 9 percent of the city's registered vote when he ran for mayor -- not even double digits -- then maybe attacking isn't such a BAD idea after all.

It only takes a couple percentage points of people who haven't bothered in the past (because they're "all the same") to turnout and unseat a whole regime/team.

I don't think Sanchez was really aiming at the mayor's 9 percent (and falling), or even the 20 percent or so that bothered to show up and vote for anyone, but the 80+ percent that are fed up and staying away, regardless of who runs.

And if you want to spin back that the district turnout was closer to 40 percent - fine; then there's still 60 percent that stayed away, disenchanted, disenfranchised, or just generally pissed off.

November 03, 2005 4:12 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hey 4:12 Anon

If Sanchez was targetting that piece at the 80% that don't vote or haven't risen to the occasion to kick out all the bums. Then essentially he'd have to get that peice to 60,000 voters. Since each piece even on a good day cost a nickel a piece -- not including postage -- 25 cents (bulk rate). Sanchez would've had to spend $20,000 dollars to ensure every voter read his message at least once.

If Sanchez did that he wasted hos money. If he send it to folks that actually vote -- then he wasted his money. If he made more than 100 of these pieces he wasted his money.

Quite frankly, he's just a waste.

November 03, 2005 4:28 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

jen who, what are you talking about?

November 03, 2005 4:29 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

OK Mayor Frank

Where were these pieces mailed to? I haven't seen one original piece.

November 03, 2005 4:44 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

4:12.

Just for the record, because I'm sick of you repeating false information:

The May 2005 election produced 498,729 voters in LA. About a 34% turnout. Villaraigosa received 58.63% of the vote -- which works out to 20% of the total registered voters.

A hell of a lot more than the 14% received by Hahn.

November 03, 2005 4:46 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Blogger "Archie Bunker has a good post"

Yes, I cut and paste it here

9:27 and 11:23

Haven't you guys figured out that Antonio loves conflicts between his friends so it gives common folks like us thinking and believing that he's WORKING. And so that in the end he comes into the scene like Prince Valliant and saves his maiden Los Angeles.

Think of this administration as watching the WWE, you know it's fake but you go along with the story line because it's entertaining

November 03, 2005 4:48 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Are you calling the DNC representative a liar?

It was reported Villaraigosa was voted into office with only 9% voters!

Stop spreading lies, your hero is not all that, he is a crook, but you don't care, you love midget.

Jen loves Tony

November 03, 2005 4:50 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

4:46

I think he was referring to percentage of the population as a whole, not just registered voters. By any count, Antonio got a pathetic amount - certainly a lot less than the percentage for Iraq's new constitution. Let's hear it for Democracy. The lower the turnout the better for consultants like Parke, they are easier to manipulate and Parke gets to take more money home.

November 03, 2005 4:54 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

No, actually, this is what s/he said:

"and HE only got 9 percent of the city's registered vote when he ran for mayor -- not even double digits"

Wrong, wrong and wrong.

November 03, 2005 4:58 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Jen loves Tony?

November 03, 2005 5:01 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

David J. Sánchez used to work for Mayor Sam as chair of Yorty's Youth Advisory Council.

After that he organized school protest walkouts and occupied Catalina Island for a month !

I'd say he is dedicated

November 03, 2005 5:23 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

4:58

Registered voters or non-registered. It still is a pathetic number.

PATHETIC, PATHETIC, PATHETIC!

November 03, 2005 5:24 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Haggle, haggle, haggle. Bunch o' fucking bean counters and statisticians.

So prove THIS wrong with your spinning.

LOUSY turnout in MAY, and getting WORSE every election on the whole. MOST don't care enough to EVEN register.

The winner got the slightly bigger SLIVER of a small and shrinking piece of an overall pie. If you're SO jazzed as to proclaim some massive mandate or vote of confidence because it was 20 percent of REGISTERED voters versus 9 percent of POTENTIAL voters, then have another beer and toast democracy. Crown him king and get stuffed in the process.

Hey, this is Hollywood... so you just premiered your BEST big budget "feature" that cost MILLIONS to produce.

Problem is, TWO-THIRDS of the audience WALKED OUT, didn't even care how it ended, and NOW you're claiming it's a blockbuster HIT, because a simple majority of those that stayed like the ending (so far).

Pretty soon you'll be jazzed when the last three people in the theater give you a standing ovation.

November 03, 2005 5:24 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Who says you have to mail to tens of thousands?

Torres didn't three years ago and people are still screaming about (and misquoting, and blaming the wrong guy) -- for them.

Create enough controversy, and you can tell Uncle Sam to stuff his postage.

November 03, 2005 5:27 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

That's a good point. Look how many comments already here just on this blog, 3-4 times the traffic and posting as the one about Huizar's attack on Pacheco.

He's hitting some nerves.

November 03, 2005 5:34 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Your math is lousy 4:28, probably the worst I've seen here.

You make it sound like there are 60,000 voter households when there are less then 75,000 total households in the whole district. And as several have pointed out, most, maybe even the majority of those don't even have one registered voter in them.

The one's that do... no politico mailer is going to send one to each voter in that home -- it would just piss the people there off to get 3-5 copies of everything, so they just send one with everyone's name on it (Trust me, I've got a ream of wasted slick paper with four names each on it here).

Your numbers are 2-3 times too high for anything close to reality in CD14, which also suggests your political acumen is Parked where the sun don't shine.

Try again. No, better yet, don't.

November 03, 2005 5:53 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Sanchez you are a god! Finally someone points out that Huizar shouldn't be dogcatcher considering the miserable job he has done at LAUSD.

November 03, 2005 7:13 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

RIGHT, 7:05 p.m., and Sanchez is going to mail THIS mailer to the 20K or so NON-latino households in the district??

Whaaa?

Lousy PEOPLE skills trumps lousy math. You lose! Trouble with you number crunchers and BEAN counters IS, you forget there's different kinds of BEANS!!

November 03, 2005 7:19 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

PLEASE, don't buzz back and say it 18K or 27K or 14.5K... the POINT remains, THIS mailing would be a disaster it it went beyond Latino, voter households.

See the FOREST for the fucking trees for once.

November 03, 2005 7:23 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Yup, minus non-Latinos the 60K mail addresses has got to be double or more the target, as stated earlier.

November 03, 2005 7:25 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

LA Weekly endorsement....
But does Huizar have the vision? We admit to falling back on hope here. We’d sure like it better if he stopped trumpeting his good relationship with Villaraigosa, against whom he campaigned in 2003. We picked Villaraigosa then, too, but the vision we were hoping for was kept in check until he became mayor.

November 03, 2005 7:32 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

http://www.dailynews.com/news/ci_3166649

"A separate mailing goes directly after Huizar with complaints about the Los Angeles Unified School

District, where Huizar served as board president.

Some residents of the district are puzzled and disturbed by the attacks on some of their most popular figures.

"As an old, educated, longtime Eastsider, my heart is a little sick because this reminds us just how empty the promises of our leadership have been over the years," wrote one voter.

November 03, 2005 8:55 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

"Author and educator David J. Sanchez is taking on the entire Latino political establishment and opponent Jose Huizar in a pair of mailings sent out last week.

One has black eyes painted on the pictures of officials who have endorsed Huizar - Villaraigosa, Supervisor Gloria Molina, Sheriff Lee Baca and others - and Sanchez blames them for the district's poor conditions.

"A separate mailing goes directly after Huizar with complaints about the Los Angeles Unified School

District, where Huizar served as board president.

Some residents of the district are puzzled and disturbed by the attacks on some of their most popular figures.

"As an old, educated, longtime Eastsider, my heart is a little sick because this reminds us just how empty the promises of our leadership have been over the years," wrote one voter."

November 03, 2005 8:57 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

http://www.lacitybeat.com/article.php?id=2822&IssueNum=126

Signs of Struggle
José Huizar is riding Villaraigosa’s coattails in the city council’s 14th District, but Nick Pacheco has loyalists in East L.A.
~ By BOBBI MURRAY

"“I refuse to let him buy any more signs,” sighs Parke Skelton, the über-campaign manager who launched Villaraigosa into the political stratosphere and who now runs Huizar’s effort. “I hate them,” Skelton says. Opponents inevitably take them down, there’s a challenge to replace them, it’s a big waste of energy, plus they cost three and a half bucks apiece.

And signs don’t win campaigns. Huizar may have fewer than Pacheco, but Huizar is the candidate with the hookup. He’s been endorsed by Mayor Villaraigosa, the political man of the hour, and a slew of elected officials followed suit – like, almost the entire City Council – along with every important labor local, plus community and environmental groups.

That translates into precinct walkers, who ply the street in determined clumps of twos and threes, consulting voter lists and nailing down supporters. The “yeses” will then be visited and phoned all day long on Tuesday, November 8, until they vote – or until 8 p.m., whichever comes first."

"...But name recognition does help him, says Jaime Regalado, executive director of the Edmund G. “Pat” Brown Institute of Public Affairs. “Nick Pacheco is a recognized entity, and José has his work cut out for him.” Regalado says Huizar needs to make himself more visible. “José has all the endorsements and is going to have three times the money, but unless he hits the streets, this is not an election he wins..."

November 03, 2005 9:15 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

"Parke Skelton, who managed Villaraigosa's mayoral campaign and is overseeing Huizar's, said the mayor could be facing a risk.

"This is his backyard and if there is a loss, there will be a perception that there is some weakness there," Skelton said. "Obviously, I don't think that's the case. Antonio Villaraigosa is the most popular elected official in this area. And Huizar is a very good candidate. He's well-known and (has) done a good job in fundraising."

November 03, 2005 9:18 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Naked truth about Fabian Nunez, Californian House Speaker

To:
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher

October 9, 2005

Fabian Nunez, Californian House Speaker, is worse than Judas.

At least, after betraying Jesus Christ, Judas felt guilty and committed suicide, while, being a Catholic as most Mexicans are, Fabian Nunez, like other extreme socialists who feel sympathized and closer to communism cause, which has proved impractical and a disaster through the collapse of Soviet Union, than capitalism, has admired, praised, and defended the communist regime in Vietnam, which has arrested, tortured, and murdered thousands of Catholic priests and practitioners for their strong beliefs in God and religious freedom. For instance, just a few months ago, Fabian Nunez eagerly welcomed and was posed for pictures with Nguyen van An, the head of Vietnamese national assembly, which is nothing but a tool to say yes to any law or decision made by the communist party. He also unsuccessfully tried to prevent Van Tran, the first Vietnamese assemblyman of California to criticize the poor human rights records of communist Vietnam at California State Assembly. While loudly demanding more human rights and protection for illegal immigrants, most of them from Mexico, Fabian Nunez has intentionally ignored and denied the same human rights for poor Vietnamese, especially the Catholics who are usually harassed by Vietnamese communists, who are atheists and have condemned religions as a dangerous type of drugs, which wrongly leads the mass away from class struggles against the rich. In their eyes, all Catholics are spies for Vatican, which still has no normal diplomatic relations with communist Vietnam, like all Protestants are working for the CIA. For instance, Father Nguyen van Ly spent more than 20 years in jail and is now under house arrest for his demanding more religious freedom in Vietnam and asking for the church’s property illegally confiscated by the authority returned. In fact, in 2000, Vietnam communist regime banned the late Pope John Paul II from visiting Vietnam, a country with 8 millions Catholics, for fears that the Pope would spread freedom and human rights values to Vietnam as he did to his homeland Poland, which is a decisive factor leading to the collapse of Soviet Union and the communist system. That is also why the new religious laws issued by the communist regime in 2004 limited all religious activities inside the church and outlawed all of religious activities at home. Another victim of communist oppression is Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez, a Democrat, Catholic, and Mexican American like Fabian Nunez, but unlike him, she has showed sympathized for the sufferings of Vietnamese people and criticized the Vietnam authority for its very poor records on human rights, and thereby has been repeatedly denied visa to Vietnam. It is quite a terrible shame for California to have Fabian Nunez as the House Speaker since he is really a hypocrite and a big liar who does not represent and work for the interests of California and America but for his motherland Mexico and his extreme socialist cause.

garden grove , CA

November 03, 2005 9:32 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:


Man, is it just me or is that Parke Skelton guy arrogant as all get-out? "I refuse to let Huizar buy any more signs?" You got to be kidding me! How are we expected to respect our elected officials when their own consultants treat them like crying children?

By the way, what is the reference to the icelandic sagas all the time? Someone please explain.

November 03, 2005 10:31 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I am starting to think "urteaga" is a Spanish verb for "torpedoed."

Yo urteago.
Vamos a urteager.

That quote in CityBeat is unreal. "Voters may not like Nick Pacheco."

Ouch.

November 03, 2005 10:35 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I understand Ruby de Vera has a hit piece in the mail, as well.

"Men start all the wars -- elect a woman!"

November 03, 2005 11:02 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Yeah, god forbid a campaign manager should be honest, to the media, to people, to supporters, even the candidate.

Drum that guy out of the Slime-launchers Union.

November 04, 2005 12:00 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Great story in today's LA Times by STeve Hymon about "Union Money Puts Huizar in Funding Lead"

City Ethics Commission records indicate that Huizar is the only council candidate that Unite Here supported through independent expenditures this yar. Eight council seats were up for grabs in the srping elections.

Pacheco has raised more money in the 11 ZIP CODES that cover most of the district. (BY THE REAL PEOPLE)

November 04, 2005 6:49 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I don't ever remember a city council election where most of the candidates running go after ONE. All the CD14 candidates are going after Jose with the exception of Heckman who is in space. Even little prom queen Crystal Arceo has her own mailer attacking Jose and its done nicely. Mayor Frank try and get a hold of that one.

November 04, 2005 7:52 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

"I understand Ruby de Vera has a hit piece in the mail, as well.

"Men start all the wars -- elect a woman!" "


I wonder why men start wars, it's because of what's between a woman's legs. She(ha)s a cunt!
(Mayor Frank don't remove because Ruby is a woman and has a cunt, just giving factual information)

November 04, 2005 8:15 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hola Jay

The reference to "Icelandic Sagas" comes from Parke Skelton's fascination in this field. I don't have a picture of Parke, you might find huge similarities with his looks and the tyrants of many Icelandic sagas. He needs to take a bath too, smells.

November 04, 2005 8:37 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Huizar gets bulk of money from unions, lawyers, developers, realtors, builders from outside the district.

Whew, good thing THOSE people never expect any favors in return for their support!

REST EASY, CD14. You're in GOOD hands with "All-Skate."

November 04, 2005 9:47 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

i think its pretty funny how this moron tried doggin' these politicians for failing school, yet he fucks up in using the phrase POUR salt in the wound. what a pendejo

November 05, 2005 1:24 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hey Mr. Anon chilero 1:24

I'd rather have anyone, I mean it, anyone f$%# up on grammar, than an idiot f$%# up a students future, anyday.

You make a big deal on "POUR" you're the moron for not seeing the BIGGER DILEMMA. KIDS ARE DROPPING LIKE FLIES AND YOU FOCUS ON "POUR?"

THIS IS WHAT'S WRONG WITH OUR COMMUNITY, CHEAP SHOTS AND UNFOCUSED INDIVIDUALS BRAINWASHED BY A PRETTY SMILE IN AN EXPENSIVE SUIT.

November 05, 2005 11:35 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I was on my way to Pacheco's office to volunteer, but I saw a Huizar sign and changed my mind!

November 05, 2005 5:54 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

5:54 You're the example of a desperate Huizar supporter. You've been told your icon is losing and don't know what to do.

November 06, 2005 8:45 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

November 09, 2005 10:52 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Advertisement

Advertisement