Open Thread For Thursday
On this day in 1868 - U.S. presidential election: Republican Ulysses S. Grant is elected to the first of his two terms in a victory over Democrat Horatio Seymour.
On this day in 1896 - U.S. presidential election: Republican William McKinley is elected over Democrat William Jennings Bryan.
On this day in 1908 - U.S. presidential election: Republican William Howard Taft defeats William Jennings Bryan, Democratic candidate in his third and final nomination.
On this day in 1936 - U.S. presidential election, 1936: Franklin D. Roosevelt is reelected to a second term in a landslide victory over Alf Landon.
On this day in 1964 - U.S. presidential election, 1964: Incumbent US President Lyndon B. Johnson defeats Republican challenger Barry Goldwater, Sr with over 60 percent of the popular vote.
On this day in 1992 - U.S. presidential election: Democratic challenger Bill Clinton defeats incumbent Republican George H.W. Bush and independent candidate Ross Perot.
On this day in 1896 - U.S. presidential election: Republican William McKinley is elected over Democrat William Jennings Bryan.
On this day in 1908 - U.S. presidential election: Republican William Howard Taft defeats William Jennings Bryan, Democratic candidate in his third and final nomination.
On this day in 1936 - U.S. presidential election, 1936: Franklin D. Roosevelt is reelected to a second term in a landslide victory over Alf Landon.
On this day in 1964 - U.S. presidential election, 1964: Incumbent US President Lyndon B. Johnson defeats Republican challenger Barry Goldwater, Sr with over 60 percent of the popular vote.
On this day in 1992 - U.S. presidential election: Democratic challenger Bill Clinton defeats incumbent Republican George H.W. Bush and independent candidate Ross Perot.
10 Comments:
Anonymous said:
Dump Zev in 2006
Anonymous said:
Has anyone else noticed the Pacheco campaign has bungled a 30 point lead?
Who is to blame for this?
Is Nick a bad candidate?
I don't think so.
Is Robert Urteaga a campaign mis-manager?
Very likely.
Is Huizar the better candidate?
UH-OH.
See y'all on election day, when all will be answered!
Anonymous said:
Huizar was on the Doug McIntyre show this am, and it's amazing how these mediocre L.A. pols continue to tap dance around how illegal immigration is destroying this city. I know that time was limited, but I'm surprised McIntyre went so easy on him.
Anonymous said:
Someone should ask Jose about Crenshaw High losing its accrediation under his watch. First time in 30 years. IF he couldn't do anything to help fix Crenshaw that had 2 yrs prior knowledge of trouble how the hell could he possibly run a district? He can't.
Anonymous said:
8:34 - I'll say it again, Moron - ask Marguerite LaMotte. She's the elected rep for that district.
8:05 - Not only are these people destroying our City, they're destroying our society and culture. Ve need to schtop dem! Ve need to round zem up, concentrate zem and e-radicate zem!
Does that about sum up your thoughts, mien capitan?
Anonymous said:
8:46, re: your response to 8:34.
GOOD, GOOD, GOOD.
SO the elected reps for the school board ARE responsible with the school results in THEIR district, specifically. THANK YOU.
The assualt on Huizar may now begin. HUGE drop out rates in HIS school district, MUCH higher than the district average, so he MUST be the worst LAUSD board member (following your reason).
(Now see what you've done, and NOW who's the moron).
Jose's gonna be pissed at you...
Anonymous said:
Good one 931
So he must also be responsible for the fact that the high schools in his district are the most crowded.
Anonymous said:
8:46
Same old tired attack. The minute someone even dares discuss the negative impacts of illegal migration, they're immediately called all sorts of names.
Anonymous said:
8"05
Huizar dodged a huge bullet on the radio today. Doug M. didn't find out until after he Huizar was off air that LAUSD school buses were used to transport truant kids from their school to the protests against Bush and Iraq. Taxpayer funds being used to protest a democratic election and for political purposes.
Anonymous said:
8:02 IT is a bogus poll. The poll was paid for, made by, and smudged by Huizar supporters. This has already been noted.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home