Los Angeles "Collectivist Clowncil" formally supports Occupy LA (with some advocating violence)
Occupy LA speaker advocating violent solution for the one percent.
As the LA Weekly's "Snarky One in Solidarity" reports from the tent collective where dastardly unionists, democrats and a losing congressional candidate seek to "push their block of interest", the "Los Angeles Collectivist Clowncil" voted 11-0 to officially support the "Reddish Rabble occuping the South Lawn".
While most within the occupied enclave are not supporters of extreme measures to achieve their collective goals, the Drudge Report via Pajama Media did find support for the rants of Occupy LA's version of Maximilien Robespierre, who's statements in support of violence to achieve the goals for the collective, were warmly received.
What is readily apparent in this local incarnation of the anti-Semetic tinged Occupy Wall Street proceedings, is the "shadow moves" to co-op the LA movement by various progressive factions. One person who found common ground was multi-time congressional loser Marci Winograd who's motion before the General Assembly earned this "Snarky observation and retort".
Winograd asked Occupy L.A. to join her and fellow teachers in a protest outside LAUSD Board of Education headquarters. She told the crowd, with all the vigor of an experienced campaigner, that the "massive underfunding of our schools" amid the state's financial crisis is a scheme to "break the schools up and sell them off to corporations." (Aka, charter schools.) The crowd roared.
What a dream come true for United Teachers Los Angeles and the California Teachers Association! Who, let us not forget, have together proved the single biggest obstacle to reforming the dismal K-12 education system in our state.
From Downtown LA,"Capitalism: Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down via Andrew Breitbart"
Check out "Anthony" the SEIU 721 minder.
....... and the occupying rabble, rambles on.
Your thoughts..............
Scott Johnson in CD 14
Labels: Occupy LA
6 Comments:
rose said:
Why quote anything from the Drudge Report? Matt is just a hack who won't come out of the closet.
Poppy said:
For the creative budget --Art -Architecture -Bill Maher -Lockpicking College --Drinks, anyone --Occupy Silver Lake... or just knit away the hours. If it's October, it's Laurel & Hardy Party time... in Silver Lake... how daVine, dahling... http://silverlakedavine.blogspot.com/2011/10/griffith-park-calendar-calendar-events.html
g said:
I DON'T LIKE THE UNION INVOLVEMENT IN OCCUPY BUT THEY ARE ABOUT JOBS SO MAY BE THAT'S THEIR REASON. BUT TO SUGGEST THAT THIS MOVEMENT IS SOME LIBERAL OR TEA PARTY MOVEMENT. FRANKLY ,I DON'T SEE IT. YOU CAN CREATE ANY SPIN YOU WANT BUT THE TRUTH WILL BE SEEN IN THE END SO YOU BETTER BE RIGHT. AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED ANY MOVEMENT THAT UNITES THE PUBLIC AGAINST GOVERNMENT/ CORPORATE RELATIONSHIPS I'M FOR. EVER HERE OF CITIZENS FOR FAIR ELECTIONS PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO REPEAL THIS SUPREME COURT DECISION,A PETITION IS CIRCULATING TO PUT IT ON THE BALLOT. SAME IS TRUE FOR THE DREAM ACT. THEY BOTH ARE WAITING FOR THE PUBLIC TO SIGN ON. IF YOU LOOK THEY EXPLAIN THE LOSS OF GOVERNMENT CONTROL WHICH WILL SHIFT TO CORPORATION CANDIDATES.
Alex Walker said:
For years this web site has been nothing if not a home for muckraking opposition to dubious financial shenanigans in Los Angeles alongside a libertarian view of "social issues" like gay rights. I didn't agree with a lot of your stuff, but I browsed this site often searching for juicy nuggets of real information.
You defended Zuma Dogg who is much more obnoxious than anyone connected with Occupy LA. You gave a shout out to Nachum Shifren when he ran for state senator in my district based on a borderline racist campaign strategy of insulting my neighbors and me every chance he got.
Accordingly, I really do not understand your visceral knee-jerk hostility to Occupy LA with a fusillade of dreary Republican partisan "talking points." Maybe you and your "dittoheads" after all are just people sitting on the sidelines hurling spitballs while waiting for some rich Republicans to tell you what to think!
Poppy said:
~~Alex Walker
I went to an unusual high school, when California schools were top of 50-state heap, and I remember an Economics professor (yes, "professor" --econ) saying in class one day:
"No matter what you think now, by the time you are in middle life most of you will be Republicans; as you age you will become increasingly --conservative."
I thought that was one nutty thing to predict --of people he didn't even know (politically).
But then he also said: "Within one & a half generations [before turn of century] the majority of Americans will be beige --mixed race, half white, half other race" --among many things that stuck with me, long after I've forgotten all the junk I was forced to cram; I've observed to be mostly true in America.
I agree with your comments. When this site began: I learned things --machinations of City Hall, et al revealed nowhere else.
But now there's a frequent "writer"
so lousy, Sloppy, semi-illiterate, --unfamiliar even with "spell-check" married to Ideologue, it's become wing-nut rant site; short of Facts, Evidence of claims.
When a "writer" cannot even spell -use tools -write a grammatically correct sentence, then: the Content becomes suspicious. They don't seem to Get that.
He actually refers to 70-something Governor Brown --as "moonbeam II" --sooo stale. Disappointing....
Guess all of that: why no more long list of Commenters on posts....
Mariscal said:
I think that material support and encouragement by individuals and organizations, even labor, to the Occupy Wall Street movement, is welcomed. However, accepting this material support should not obligate the Occupiers to follow the directions of any organization, at this time. This movement should not allow any one organization to hijack it's natural course of development.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home