Mayor Sam Blogger Ballot Picks
In case you were wondering how the Mayor Sam Bloggers are voting on the California Ballot Measures in Tuesday's election here you go.
LIMITS ON PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT. SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF EXISTING BUILDINGS. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
JoeB - Yes
Proposition 17
ALLOWS AUTO INSURANCE COMPANIES TO BASE THEIR PRICES IN PART ON A DRIVER'S HISTORY OF INSURANCE COVERAGE. INITIATIVE STATUTE.
Michael Higby - Yes
Red Spot in CD14 - Yes
Red Spot in CD14 - Yes
Proposition 14
ELECTIONS. INCREASES RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN PRIMARY ELECTIONS.
ELECTIONS. INCREASES RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN PRIMARY ELECTIONS.
JoeB - Yes
Michael Higby - Yes
Red Spot in CD14 - No
Red Spot in CD14 - No
Proposition 15
CALIFORNIA FAIR ELECTIONS ACT.
CALIFORNIA FAIR ELECTIONS ACT.
JoeB - Yes
Michael Higby - No
Red Spot in CD14 - No
Red Spot in CD14 - No
Proposition 16
IMPOSES NEW TWO-THIRDS VOTER APPROVAL REQUIREMENT FOR LOCAL PUBLIC ELECTRICITY PROVIDERS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
IMPOSES NEW TWO-THIRDS VOTER APPROVAL REQUIREMENT FOR LOCAL PUBLIC ELECTRICITY PROVIDERS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
JoeB - No
Michael Higby - Yes
Red Spot in CD14 - Yes
Red Spot in CD14 - Yes
Proposition 17
ALLOWS AUTO INSURANCE COMPANIES TO BASE THEIR PRICES IN PART ON A DRIVER'S HISTORY OF INSURANCE COVERAGE. INITIATIVE STATUTE.
JoeB - No
Michael Higby - Yes
Red Spot in CD14 - Yes
Red Spot in CD14 - Yes
Labels: 2010 california ballot measures
Posted by Michael Higby @ 6/07/2010 09:16:00 PM
8 Comments:
Okay, for all the people who complain that elections are bought and paid for, why would anyone vote no on 15? It's not like it will cost us more given we presently pay for matching funds in existing campaigns. I say it's worth a try to take special interests out of the equation. It won't eliminate their influence, but it sure is a start.
This is for one office and we ought to see what the imapact could be.
Anyone voting no dare not complain next time IBEW pays half a million for their favorite backer.
Regarding 16-that one confuses me. Since it's backed by PG&E, methinks a no vote is warranted (but I'll do a bit more reading on it first).
At least one of you knows what they're talking about!
Jennerjahn is basically conceding the race on his blog. No one says "I'm prepared for the outcome either way" the night before the election!
Phil will get no more than FIVE votes. You heard it here first.
I'm a little confused about MS and Red Spot's Yes on 16 and 17.
I mean, PG&E and Mercury Insurance? Really?
I'm gonna vote against those two.
NO -Prop 13
NO -Prop 14
NO -Prop 15
NO -Prop 16
NO -Prop 17
Party of "NO" at 11:13am
No selections on Measure E?
NO ON MEASURE E.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home