Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098
mayorsam@mayorsam.org

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

The Showdown in Sherman Oaks



The ten candidates for the open seat on Los Angeles City Council (in District 2) converged at the Sherman Oaks Neighborhood Council meeting at Sherman Oaks Elementary School on Monday night. The evening started out with a humorous note when SONC President Jill Banks Barad was talking about the forum and how the election was being held to replace Wendy Gruel. A man near the front row started applauding aggressively at the mention of Wendys name. Jill paused and asked the man, jokingly.."Oh, are you Wendys brother?" The man responded loudly and very matter-of-factly "I'm glad she's out of the office!" This drew some solid laughs from the crowd and a few nervous giggles from some of the candidates.

The forum was moderated by former Assemblyman Richard Katz. Katz was tough, but fair to the candidates. He brought home a poignant moment when he introduced Ben and Jean Fury, a family that had been burned out of their homes by the Station Fire as it swept through Big Tujunga Canyon. The moment was nearly ruined by Paul Krekorian, who leaped to his feet and started applauding the family... making the other candidates appear almost uncaring or uninterested by their slower reactions. It was a real Drama Queen moment from the professional politician. I hope the voters saw through it.

I won't bother to discuss the candidate intros...all of them gave standard campaign statements as they had at past forums... no new news here. I will break things down by candidate.

MARY BENSON - Mary had some good moments at the forum. When the discussion turned to Neighborhood Councils and how much all the candidates said they cared...Mary said "It's nice to see everyone being so supportive of Neighborhood Councils...but where were they when the Mayor was threatening them with budget cuts?" Mary also talked about the Station Fire tonight and added "If it wasn't for Twitter, hundreds of animals would have burned to death." Mary was at her best during closing statements when she implored the voters "Support me! Don't think a grassroots candidate can't win!"

AUGUSTO BISANI - Augusto had a much better time tonight, as he focused on more local issues. He went on to discuss issues with the Westfield Mall. He said it would be a "big problem" and that he didn't like uncontrolled growth. "It needs to be directed by the community," he said. Augusto also had a funny line about himself as he talked about putting together his campaign flier "at 3 in the morning".
JOE ESSAVI - When Katz asked the candidates about how they would save money in these tough financial times, Joe Essavi unloaded one of the best shots of the night. "We need to ask these job-hopping politicians to pay for all the special elections they create!", he said. The line got a lot of applause. Some of the loudest applause, as you can see, came from Chris Essel, who loved the shot Joe took at Essels main rivals Tamar Galatzan and Paul Krekorian. Tamar seemed to take it well, showing a little embarrassed laughter.

CHRISTINE ESSEL - Chris Essel did reasonably well tonight and didn't make any major missteps. However, she had two young women supporters with her and I sat near them in the back of the room. After Chris would answer questions, those two would be the only two people in the room applauding her. The silence from the others was eerie and unsettling. I don't think Sherman Oaks likes Chris very much. Or maybe they just liked the other candidates better.
TAMAR GALATZAN - Tamar was well-prepared, confident, and aggressive as usual. I liked many of Tamars answers, including one about working together with the Neighborhood Councils. "I can only control my own actions, " she said. I thought it was great and very human to hear a candidate say that she couldn't promise to solve all the worlds problems. I think of all the candidates, Tamar is the one who makes it very clear that she wants to win the most. But will it be enough to overcome Krekorians name-recognition advantage and Chris Essels' carpet-bombing of CD 2 with her glossy campaign literature? Who knows? We will soon find out.

PAUL KREKORIAN - Paul showed his true nature as a professional politician at the forum. He did some world-class butt kissing when talking about moderator Katz and some of the Sherman Oaks neighborhood council members. He also bragged about how much he had done... to change schools... and even to stop speeders! (That last line got a sarcastic laugh from Frank Sheftels manager David Hernandez, who asked "How does he do that?") Paul may have made a misstep and offended some neighborhood council members with his closing statements where he said "This is not the time for amateur politicians! "
(Of course not. As one of the pros... he's been doing such a great job in Sacramento.....)
MICHAEL MCCUE - Michael had used his energy and passion to trounce his opponents in a few of the earlier forums, but tonight he seemed very average. He did have one of the evenings biggest laughs from the voters when he criticized the Mayor and City Council for using outdated methods. "It would behoove us to use 21st Century technology... because we live in the 21st century!," he said. McCue might be given a pass for tonight , because he told me he was saving some of his best ammunition for the SOHA forum on Wednesday.

DAVID SALTSBURG/ZUMA DOGG - David had been sitting at the forum with an upset look on his face for much of the event. He looked especially unhappy with some of the statements made by Chris Essel, Tamar Galatzan and Paul Krekorian... as if he couldn't believe the audacity of the comments. I guess his anger built up until he exploded during the closing comments. He went off on a tirade against Essel, Krekorian and Galatzan that brought cheers from the crowd and squeals of laughter from some. "CHRIS ESSEL IS THE QUEEN OF SPECIAL INTERESTS!!", he erupted. He made another passing mention about Tamar getting in the Mayors 2 million dollar "getaway car" to get on the LAUSD board. He attacked Krekorian and his time in the State Legislature by saying "Krekorian bankrupted the State! He took us there!!". It was , by far, the most interesting part of the evening. David captured the quote of the evening, when, talking about Krekorian, Essel, and Galatzan, he said "talk to them tonight, because once they get an office in City Hall, they will never talk to you again!!"
PETE SANCHEZ - Pete was at his best tonight when we waved his finger at the other candidates and said very calmly "I know more about Neighborhood Councils than all these candidates!" He trumpeted his experience at the grassroots level and said he was ready to take his achievements to the next level at City Council. I really didn't like how Pete refused to answer a question from Katz, but he gave me an explanation later...and we'll get to that in a minute.
FRANK SHEFTEL - Frank didn't say too much different from what he had said at other forums. He ended with his signature line "We recycle trash, not politicians!". In a rather clever move, Frank had brought samples from his candy store...small bags of jellybeans...that were given away. The candy was a big hit...all the bags had been emptied by the end of the forum. Now maybe if Frank can bring about 400 boxes of chocolates to the final SOHA showdown on Wednesday, he just might be calling himself "Councilman Sheftel" in the near future. Voters tend to remember generosity.
***
Overall, the night was very good, and one can see the race is getting more and more heated as we only have one week left until the election. After Tuesday night, there are clearly going to be some hurt feelings and some disappointed candidates.

A few other items about the night...

I really intensely disliked some candidate behavior in a segment in the middle. Moderator Katz was trying to get the candidates to explain where they would make budgetary cuts. He started naming off commissions and asking candidates to raise their hands if they were willing to cut these specific commissions. It was a logical question due to the City Budget crisis.

Amazingly, Katz rattled off name after name and NONE of the candidates raised their hands. It really killed me to see the only Conservative in this race, Joe Essavi, not raising his hand. (I'll have to talk to him about this.) It was a pure horror show for those of us who do not agree with the concept of an ever-expanding government. I knew Krekorian wouldn't be raising his hand, because he likes that type of thing. Eventually Pete Sanchez interrupted Katz and said "I'm not willing to answer any of these questions."
That answer really enraged me, because as I said to David Hernandez "I would be raising my hand on every commission he mentioned." I sought out Pete Sanchez after the forum and asked for an explanation. He told me he doesn't deal in theoreticals in his line of work, and he would have wanted more information before making those types of decisions. He said he would have wanted to know exactly what he was getting for the publics money in each individual case. I have to admit...it was a brilliant answer. Too bad he didn't mention that part when the voters were listening. There are things I don't like about Pete Sanchez --( I think he's a liberal ) -- but I have to admit...sometimes the guy is very impressive.

Mary Benson told me she didn't like some information that was circulating on Mayor Sam about her having been born in Iowa. She stated for the record that she was born in Glendale. She added that her name is a somewhat common name and someone must have made a research error.

Frank Sheftel told me that his campaign staff has personally contacted over 5,000 voters. If this is accurate, I think it puts him far ahead of the other grassroots candidates. Like Michael Higby always says, without a real get-out-the-vote effort, you can't win an election.

WINNER - DAVID SALTSBURG/ZUMA DOGG

David had been somewhat low-key until his explosive tirade at the end. But his outburst showed his true passion and his willingness to cross boundaries to make his point. I think David is getting frustrated with his years of activism at City Hall and his inability to stop bitter rivals like Richard Alarcon. He wants the button in his hand. But simply wanting it badly is not always enough to win.

30 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Once again, thanks for not telling us about this in advance.

Yes, we know your response is going to be "that's not our responsibility even though we are the 'home of L.A. politics.'"

But since you continue to fail to keep the people informed about completely related events (while Joe B. posts stupid "noone" cares comments about dead rock nobodies), I thought it was important to remind the readers that while you try to position yourself as being completely informative, you continue to drop the ball on letting people know about relevant political gatherings within the city where the stakes are very high.

Winner: Misinformation.
Loser: The people.

September 15, 2009 8:21 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

"uninterested."

Phil, where did you go to school? Did you pay attention in English class?

On that point, are you a blog's reporter or are you writing opinion pieces? You jump back & forth between trying to just tell what happened, and then injecting your opinion. You can be one or the other, but when you do both, it is confusing because it blurs wherever it is that your loyalties lie.

Choose one or the other and stick with it.

Finally can you give us an update on how many of the recall signatures that you have? That deadline is closing in fast, and I bet you don't have 24 of the 240,000 valid signatures you need. And I bet you don't have 5 volunteers of the 1250 you said you needed to "just" get 100 signatures each.

September 15, 2009 8:26 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Don't confuse passion with instability. It's a line that Howard Dean crossed and it may have cost him the presidency.

September 15, 2009 8:28 AM  

Blogger Michael Higby said:

Mary Benson has more to worry about than where she was born. Nothing wrong with being from Iowa. She just lost my parents' vote.

September 15, 2009 8:53 AM  

Blogger Michael Higby said:

So besides the homeless Mary hates Iowans. Good. Mary will come in just ahead of Bisani. Even Sunland-Tujunga has abandoned her.

September 15, 2009 8:54 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

8:21/8:26 Go f**k yourself.

Phil, thanks for the great coverage. Great stuff.

September 15, 2009 8:55 AM  

Blogger Michael Higby said:

We're not the calendar of LA politics.

September 15, 2009 9:06 AM  

Blogger Michael Higby said:

Anyway don't you think we've probably had enough forums now?

September 15, 2009 9:07 AM  

Blogger Debbie said:

Phil,

Wow. You go boy! Thanks so much for your coverage... it's helped folks like me who want a viewpoint (other than those of the loser newspapers our city is stuck with), but who can't make all the forums.

Oh, BTW.... TEAM ZUMA!

xoxo

September 15, 2009 9:09 AM  

Blogger Debbie said:

Why does Mary Benson hate Iowa, Mayor Sam?

It makes me cry.

xoxo

September 15, 2009 9:10 AM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

Phil, the reason I was really cranky (not because of the money and backing and insurmountable task of beating the machine politicians...)

BUT BECAUSE I AM SHOCKED AND STUNNED AT THEIR ABILITY TO LIE THROUGH THEIR TEETH, AND SAY ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING WHILE THEY ARE RUNNING.

TAMAR IS THE ABSOLUTE WORST.

SHE ABSOLUTELY MAKES ME WANT TO VOMIT WHEN I LISTEN TO HER CON THE CONSTITUENTS. SHE IS THE WORST OF ALL THREE AND IS THE MOST MANIPULATIVE AND DECEITFUL.

She's cute and adorable and plays the fake "folksy/just like you/i'm a mom" routine. Meanwhile, she rolling in the same circles as Jack Weiss and ran for LAUSD to warm her up and meet everyone to run for Council.

SORRY TAMAR. NO NEED TO OFFER ME A JOB AS YOUR CHIEF OF STAFF AS YOU SAID ON THE RADIO...JOB REJECTED.


ARE YOU PEOPLE KIDDING ME. IF ANYONE THINKS I WOULD BE ABLE TO "GO ALONG" WITH "GO ALONG" GALATZAN, THEN YOU DON'T KNOW A THING ABOUT ZUMA DOGG AND WHAT I STAND FOR AND WHAT I WOULD NEVER GO ALONG WITH...AND THE VILLAR MONEY TAKING, JACK WEISS LOVING, RUN FOR LAUSD TO MEET PEOPLE AND RAISE MONEY FOR COUNCIL ELECTION AND TAKING OFFICE HOLDER ACCOUNT MONEY TO SEND OUT FLIERS DURING AN ELECTION.

Sure Zuma...just go along with that. She's not as bad as Krekorian.

AND PAUL...please just SHUT UP about how much you have done as Assemblyman. DON'T YOU GET IT???

YOU DIDN'T DO A THING EXCEPT FLOUNDER AND WORK WITH KAREN BASS TO SPEND EVERY LAST PENNY NO MATTER WHAT.

And he gets up there and starts speaking as though he should be PROUD.

WHAT I CANNOT TAKE IS NOT THE MONEY AND SHADY CAMPAIGNING...I KNOW THAT'S A GIVEN...IT'S THE SHAMELESS PROMISES AND ABILITY TO JUST MAKE ANY AND EVERY EMPTY EXHORTATION AND THESE SUCKERS OUT THERE WANT TO BELIEVE IT AND THEY THINK THE ANSWER TO THE CITY'S PROBLEMS IS CUTTING YOUR SALARY IN HALF OR PAYING FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION.

GIMMICKS AND PROMISES...THE PEOPLE LOVE THEM!

Vote Zuma Dogg for City Council: I will create new jobs, replenish the general fund, balance the budget, and solve all your problems.

So Krekorian for the ability to say ANYTHING, despite his actual performance, and Tamar for using LAUSD board seat to snooker parents and community members for her CD 2 run to replace Wendy.

September 15, 2009 9:35 AM  

Anonymous David Hernandez said:

Showdown in Sherman Oaks II is tomorrow evening at the Sherman Oaks Homeowners Association. Riverside Dr. & Woodman. Meet n Greet at 6:15PM Forum at 7:15 PM. Dinner is served (usually a very nice one). There is a $6.00 donation to get in and have dinner.

If you would like to attend and can not affort the cost, you can be a guest of Frank Sheftel. You must RSVP to drhassoc@earthlink.net by 4:00PM tomorrow afternoon.

September 15, 2009 10:02 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

There you go again, Jennerjahn. Does it occur to you that Krekorian's stand and applause for the fire victims was heartfelt? Knowing the man, I assure you it was but then I suppose that's hard for you to imagine with your cold heart. And you said nothing about the other candidates "butt kissing" when they lauded the moderator, the SONC, the audience and god know anyone else who might vote. And isn't it illegal for a candidate to offer gifts, even as insignificant as candy and offer to pay for their meal on Wed. at the SOHA Candidate Forum? Smells like an ethics violation to me.

September 15, 2009 10:32 AM  

Blogger Zuma Dogg said:

You know what sickens me. People like Krakorian, Essel and Galatzan are backed by union money, independent expenditure money and special interest money, then people vote for them because they are most "viable" -- THEN WILL COMPLAIN ABOUT THE THINGS THESE PEOPLE WILL BE DOING TO PAY BACK DONORS.

Which way do you think Krekorian will go on any union issue.

It seems the unions are the reason we are broke and also why Hollywood can't operate here.

SO YOU BASE WHO YOU VOTE FOR BASED ON WHO HAS ENOUGH MONEY THAT THEY COLLECTED FROM THE PEOPLE WHO ARE CREATING THE PROBLEM.

Meanwhile, you really wish you could have ZD in the seat, in theory, which is all it will ever be, because people just like to suck up to money power.

AND, I think these debates are MEANINGLESS because the Big 3 get up there and just say ANYTHING and EVERYTHING that sounds good during the campaign.

But like I said at the forum, last night, better have fun talking to these Big 3 now, during these small forums, because once they are elected, they sure as hell won't ever need YOU again, once they are incumbents.

REMEMBER, the reason it's a battle, this time, and the reason there is a chance of Zuma Dogg (grassroots) doing it THIS TIME, is because there is no incumbent, and these phony politicians need you, this time around.

Once in office...SO LONG, SUCKERS!

They'll be perfectly safe and protected and assured a re-election with all the money that helped them get there in the first place.

I HAVE SPOKEN WITH A LOT OF PEOPLE IN THEIR 60's and 70's and they say they have never seen a moment in time like this (this level of outrage against the establishment/status quo) and the mood to throw these bums out!

But YOU want to PUT ONE BACK IN.

Meanwhile, has there ever been a grass roots candidate with the level of name recognition and reputation as "shady-buster" at council, getting to the bottom of things and standing up and blasting it.

NOT SO EASY TO STAND NEXT TO THREE BIG MONEY CANIDATES (INCLUDING LAUSD BOARDMEMBER) AND ASSEMBLYMEMBER AND BLAST THEM TO THEIR FACE.

THERE'S A REASON NO ONE ELSE IN THE ROOM DID THAT.

ALL THE OTHER CANDIDATES TALK ABOUT SAYING THIS STUFF...

BUT WHEN IT CAME TIME TO SAY IT, I SAID IT...THEN ANOTHER CANDIDATE WHO FOLLOWED SAID, "I agree with everything Zuma just said..." AND THEN SPOKE ALL ABOUT THEMSELVES!

(Nice...thanks to the candidate who hid behind my skirt. And to all the other candidates who remained silent on this and let me do the work, while they rode the coatails.

NOT SO EASY TO SPEAK UP!

EASY TO SAY ANYTHING THAT YOU KNOW PEOPLE WANT TO HEAR THOUGH DURING A CAMPAIGN. And go vote for the one you hate least.

AND BELIEVE EVERYTHING THEY SAY!

THEY MEAN IT! THEY LOVE HANGING OUT IN THESE COMMUNITY ROOMS WITH PEOPLE LIKE YOU. I THINK THEY'LL INVITE YOU TO DINNER WITH THEIR SPECIAL INTEREST PALS ONCE IN OFFICE.

September 15, 2009 11:32 AM  

Blogger Michael Higby said:

The bottom line of Zuma Dogg's post is correct: Tamar is a fraud and is going to sell out CD2 like Wendy did.

She's quite frankly a much cuter, saucier, shadier version of Wendy.

Don't buy the hype!

If it by chance it comes down to a run-off (which I don't expect) between Galatzan and Essel I'd back Essel. Yea Essel is the ice queen, Dick Riordan's girl and the tool of downtown development but at least you know what she's about.

Tamar is out there pretending to dis the Mayor and act like she's on the outs with him. Yet the truth is her campaign is run by staffers who work with the Mayor.

September 15, 2009 12:14 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

It’s pathetic that the same individuals who continue to complain about the mayor are the same individuals that voted for him. You got what you voted for.


Brilliant David “Zuma Dogg” Saltsburg

"He went off on a tirade against Essel, Krekorian and Galatzan that brought cheers from the crowd and squeals of laughter from some.

"CHRIS ESSEL IS THE QUEEN OF SPECIAL INTERESTS!!", he erupted.

He made another passing mention about Tamar getting in the Mayors 2million dollar "getaway car" to get on the LAUSD board.

He attacked Krekorian and his time in the State Legislature by saying "Krekorian bankrupted the State! He took us there!!".

The same individuals who complain about the mayor will vote for the “Big 3 Special Interest Group Providers.”


David captured the quote of the evening, when, talking about Krekorian, Essel, and Galatzan, he said "talk to them tonight, because once they get an office in City Hall, they will never talk to you again!!"


Angelenos in Council District 2 need to get out and VOTE on Tuesday, September 22. If you don't vote, you don't count.

Vote for a TRUE REFORMER "David (Zuma Dogg) Saltsburg"

September 15, 2009 12:42 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Frank Sheftel is offering to buy dinner for anyone at the SOHA meeting Wednesday. Doesn't he need to claim that? He can buy one for Zooma!

September 15, 2009 1:43 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I agree Phil - you need to decide if you are a reporter or just giving your opinion. I was at the event last night, and Phil's coverage is NOT accurate.

Essel was a mess. She was not good when she couldn't go with programmed responses.
Bisani?!?! Are you kidding me? Do you not listen to what people say? Do you just see if you are along for the ride by being entertained? This guy is wasting our time. He doesn't answer the question, he just blathers on amusing tangets, and then panders to NCs or other candidates, like Mary Benson.
And let's talk about Benson. Lame night as well.
Essavi, oh make it stop. He talks about things which aren't even marginally possible.
I agree with you on McCue.
Krekorian I got no good response.
Sheftel, I sort of agree on.
Your coverage of Sanchez is clearly unfair - you note it yourself.
He was very intriguing last night.
Zuma is always amazing.
Sad to say Tamar was the strongest (Higby and ZD I know you will be unhappy).

Also, your representation of the moderator is inaccurate. This guy clearly had an agenda. Also, a moderator is not meant to antagonize the panel. He was obviously playing favorites with the whole what would you cut nonsense. Sheftel, Zuma, Sanchez, and McCue were cheated.

Phil, we have come to expect more from you and I was personally disappointed in your coverage.
Phil your recollections of the evening are a mess totally blurred by your obvious bias (you admitted it in the article). It will make me have to look at your coverage differently.

September 15, 2009 1:58 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

@1:58P - For more even coverage of last night's forum check out Village to Village - Paul Hatfield's blog.
I was there last night too.
His description is more in line with what I observed.

Phil, we still love you.

September 15, 2009 2:04 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

158 and 204 = paul hatfield

September 15, 2009 3:06 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Ummm I am 1:58, I didn't even know about Hatfield, until the post after.
Nice conspiracy theory, but no...

September 15, 2009 3:20 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

So Michael. You see Mary as a real threat. S-T will come in big for Mary but you knew that. I still can't believe that a fellow Libertarian supports Jimmy Crack-orian.
Jimmy Crack-orian, and I don't care
Jimmy Crack-orian, and I don't care
Jimmy Crack-orian, and I don't care
His master's gone away!

September 15, 2009 3:25 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

The words "brilliant" and "David Saltsburg" have never before been used together in a sentence in recorded history.

What are you guys smoking?

The man is a fool; a performer with no brain.

Don't get too close; he'll stick his finger in YOUR eye.

September 15, 2009 4:38 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

You are mean spirited MS. On your blog, someone dissed Benson and said she isn't from Ca. but rather from Ohio. She only made a clarification as to where she was born. You made a sick analogy. because only a hand full of people are supporting Tamar so you took the opportunity put a false spin on who is supporting who. Are you that worried that Krekorian will lose?

September 15, 2009 7:49 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

All Phil's recaps sound the same.

September 15, 2009 8:51 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Go Zuma, Go Zuma, Go Zuma. You need this position. Look who the fuck we're going to be stuck with if not.

I will never view ST the same again. Ever. I will never, ever, ever state out loud to a single soul about how awesome they are because I guess I just THOUGHT they were. They aren't.

I will vote for Zuma.

When it comes down to the 3 big losers, one of whom will win, I'm going to have to go with Paul.

Essel's SB 1818 and her dislike of NC's sickens me, Tamar has two jobs already and is a loser at the school board and I pay no attention to her neighborhood prosecutor job. So she doesn't need this and her power trippy desire makes me nervous. I know it's her husband that gives me the willies.

Zuma, Paul, Zuma, Paul, Zuma, Paul.

Although one of my neighborhood council buddies keeps pushing Mary Benson on me and I'm starting to think she sounds pretty good. I'm just concerned she won't shake things up.

September 15, 2009 9:28 PM  

Blogger Phil Jennerjahn said:

Anon@ 1:58

I'm glad you have come to "expect more" out of me because I generally expect a lot out of myself.

I openly admit my bias. I don't want Krekorian, or Essel to win. Not too hot on Tamar, either.

I want Conservatives in power here in Los Angeles in order to reverse the destruction of this city. All the bombed-out ruins of cities in the US...places like Detroit, St. Louis...all have one thing in common. Liberals in charge. Wherever liberals go...misery follows.

My goal is to get more Conservatives elected.
Period.

September 15, 2009 11:26 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Its pathetic and kind of sad to see someone refer to themselves as ZUMA DOGG. Of course David is going to lose, if the best PERSON for the job were to win, then we would have never elected Ronald Reagan, the big W twice, and Ralph Nader and dennis kucinich would have won.

David, your not a rock star.

September 16, 2009 11:22 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I've been to every forum. I'm a supporter of Michael McCue for his activism in environmental issues and fair/transparent and sensible politics. He has been the leader pushing 1)evaluation of infrastructure first before development approved (2) 1/2 off council pay (3) collections sherriff for uncollected debt/dues/taxes, and more.

There is 1 week left. This campaign is NOT over.

Can you write a re-minder piece on WHY it is important to get a grassroots candidate in City Council -- and now is the time.

Nothing wrong with explaining Grassroots 101.

September 16, 2009 3:53 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

It's a no-brainer. Tamar said there would be a school board appointment rather than a special election.

Two-for-one.
Tamar gets on the council, Pugliese gets on the school board.

September 17, 2009 1:26 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Advertisement

Advertisement