Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098
mayorsam@mayorsam.org

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Live Election Coverage

Live streaming Mayor Sam coverage of the election returns (don't cry if we aren't running something every second)

Live election returns from the City Clerk.

Labels:

59 Comments:

Blogger Red Spot in CD 14 said:

Absentees are in.

TAMAR GALATZAN 884
11.23

JOZEF "JOE" THOMAS ESSAVI 135
1.72

CHRISTINE ESSEL 2,289
29.09

MICHAEL MC CUE 182
2.31

PETE SANCHEZ 259
3.29

DAVID "ZUMA DOGG" SALTSBURG 245
3.11

FRANK SHEFTEL 247
3.14

PAUL KREKORIAN 3,093
39.30

MARY BENSON 452
5.74

AUGUSTO BISANI 84
1.07

Now commentary from "Szabo Higby"

September 22, 2009 8:47 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

It's over: Krekorian and Essel. Stick a fork in it.

Huge loss for Galatzan. Big problems for Krekorian.

Krekorian's people were predicting 54% after absentees. Now it apears they could barely get to 39% with absentees and all of the Armenians voting early.

He's got serious problems.

September 22, 2009 8:50 PM  

Anonymous Alfie Noaks said:

Predictable, the Big 3 had the money for the postal ballot mailers. Kreckorinan is guaranteed a place in the run off, too early to tell if E$$el will maintain her 2nd place, Tamar is not as secure as she looks in 3rd as her name recognition should have given her more of an advantage in the postals. Mary Benson could give Tamar a good run for best of the rest.

September 22, 2009 8:53 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:


Another election stolen by Hacopian's shady absentee tactics.

Watch everyone, as Krekorian gets half this much at the polls today.

When will someone investigate this guy?

September 22, 2009 8:54 PM  

Blogger Phil Jennerjahn said:

OMG!! This is a catastrophe!
I learned a painful lesson earlier this year that vote by mail ballots are usually somewhat indicative of the general population vote.
These votes will be about 1/3 of the total.

Krekorian and Essel in the runoff, it looks like.
My worst nightmare.

The numbers will shift somewhat tonight, but don't expect huge shifts in percentages.

CD 2 allowed TWO carpetbaggers to steal this election.

This is very sad.

Cancel my party plans for tonight.

September 22, 2009 9:01 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Yuck. Just yuck.

September 22, 2009 9:03 PM  

Anonymous Alfie Noaks said:

Anyone know where any of the victory parties are?

September 22, 2009 9:07 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

The numbers won't shift much. Congrats to E$$el and Krackwhorian. You've proven once again that the public deserves what they get.

Don't blame the candidates. If you think they're bad, you should see the people who put them there.

September 22, 2009 9:13 PM  

Blogger Red Spot in CD 14 said:

Krekorian's 39% will drop as the count continues.

September 22, 2009 9:14 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I'm staying on the Anybody But Essel bandwagon. She's the worst and has always been at the very bottom for me. Our ideals, principles and politics just don't match up. Her money is just the saddest situation in politics. The ability to buy votes.. because we already KNOW she didn't deserve or earn them.

I should go check the results myself though. What if this is some crazy joke?

Phil, you are so funny that you just figured out that absentee ballot/outcome connection. Haven't you ever worked on a campaign before?

September 22, 2009 9:16 PM  

Anonymous matt dowd said:

Essel will win the run-off.
I said from day one its her and someone.
she'll crush Krekorian. hello councilwoman Essel.

September 22, 2009 9:28 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

You people are pathetic who are whining over paul and chris. You were all for a bunch of minor candidates who didn't stand a chance together taking up enough votes that could have been pooled to one viable candidate, which would be Tamar.. Benson is so not ready for prime time, couldn't influence anyone at city hall, best she could do would be to carry water for her like-minded partymembers. Sanchez is way down there, the other DNews endorsee.

Tamar didn't have any mailers but one, or robocalls, and those of you telling voters she should stay at LAUSD can thank yourselves for paul and chris. Neither of whom have horns, it could've been worse. But maybe there's a last- miinute rush to the polls now shown. (Did Sheftel's potheads forget to vote after all? He's barely ahead of the doggman).

If it's Paul and Chris expect it to get nasty for 3 months, yikes

September 22, 2009 9:33 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

jesus! how long does it take to count a handful of votes? are they doing it by hand with an abicus?

it's almost 2010 people. don't they have some automated vote counter where they can get some totals in less than a few hours?

September 22, 2009 9:33 PM  

Anonymous matt dowd said:

and Tamar Galatzen: you suck.
ur contemptible. you're arrogant and obnoxious. I'd vote a hundred times for Essel before you, because she has real dignity and class.
go home to your husband and lick your wounds.
of all the candidates, your results will hurt the most.
you really thought you were the shizzel. your delusion outstrips all the others five fold.
they were never the top 'three'. but you were. Paul and Chris crushed you like a bug.
now get back to LAUSD and stfu.

September 22, 2009 9:36 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

9:33 is right. You all screwed up! The grassroots could have put Tamar in the runoff but instead spread yourselves way too thin. Enjoy the next FOURTEEN years with Paul or Chris!

Hahahahahahahahahha....

Amateurs.

September 22, 2009 9:37 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

9:33, these are unionized government workers. What the hell do you want?

September 22, 2009 9:37 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Are you out of your freaking minds? Galatzan couldn't have gotten a damn thing done in City Council. At least nothing for us in the community. She is married to the former president (or whatever his title was) of VICA. We the people, are sick of that.

Those of you who got together and backed her (dumbest move ever) are the ones who should feel the pain of your wasted votes.

September 22, 2009 9:46 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

guess Kevin James and Walter Moore don't know diddly squat......

September 22, 2009 9:46 PM  

Anonymous alfie Noaks said:

The next result will be very telling. It really doesn't look very good for LA. Paul Krekorian and Chris E$$el in the run off and given a choice between those two, Paul wins. Strike one for Shallman. Hope he made a ton of money out of E$$el.

September 22, 2009 9:48 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Zuma in 6th place?

Holy shit! Even worse than I had anticipated.

ZD, shut down your blog now. No need to keep it going bro. You're toast.

September 22, 2009 9:50 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Phil, did it really take you a YEAR to learn that "vote by mail ballots are usually somewhat indicative of the general population vote."

How can you run for Congress with it taking a YEAR for you to learn that absentee ballots are a good snapshot of the ultimate outcome?

Seriously dude, are you slightly retarded?

September 22, 2009 9:52 PM  

Anonymous Alfie Noaks said:

Yikes! I was wrong, the latest results show 303 more votes and the overall picture hasn't changed.

September 22, 2009 9:54 PM  

Blogger Red Spot in CD 14 said:

Updated numbers with 300 more votes cast.

TAMAR GALATZAN 961
11.76

JOZEF "JOE" THOMAS ESSAVI 137
1.68

CHRISTINE ESSEL 2,385
29.18

MICHAEL MC CUE 193
2.36

PETE SANCHEZ 266
3.25

DAVID "ZUMA DOGG" SALTSBURG 258
3.16

FRANK SHEFTEL 252
3.08

PAUL KREKORIAN 3,158
38.64

MARY BENSON 473
5.79

AUGUSTO BISANI 90
1.10

Slow night at Piper Tech.

September 22, 2009 9:55 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

CD2, shame, shame, voting for Essel. But, on second thought, you gave the City the ultimate liar, Wendy. So anybody is an improvement.

September 22, 2009 10:00 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

paul wins dec

September 22, 2009 10:01 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Walter, Zuma, good ridance once and for all.

September 22, 2009 10:06 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Kevin James and Walter Moore proved themselves to be total jokes, once and for all. Essel wins by refusing to dignify James' hatemongering show with an appearance and beating their candidate 7:1

September 22, 2009 10:11 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

omg could they count ANY SLOWER?

September 22, 2009 10:24 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Interesting, if you look at those 303 votes,
Tamar got 77 votes (25.42%)
E$$el got 96 votes (31.68%) and
Krekorian 65votes (21.45%)

September 22, 2009 10:30 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Full analysis of those 303 votes, because I'm bored:

GALATZAN 77 25.41%
ESSAVI 2 0.66%
ESSEL 96 31.68%
MC CUE 11 3.63%
SANCHEZ 7 2.31%
DOGG 13 4.29%
SHEFTEL 5 1.65%
KREKORIAN 65 21.45%
BENSON 21 6.93%
BISANI 6 1.98%

September 22, 2009 10:39 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

So wait! 303 people in CD 2 went out to vote today?? That's it?

September 22, 2009 10:40 PM  

Blogger Red Spot in CD 14 said:

Latest Update

TAMAR GALATZAN 1,191
12.62

JOZEF "JOE" THOMAS ESSAVI 173
1.83

CHRISTINE ESSEL 2,771
29.35

MICHAEL MC CUE 219
2.32

PETE SANCHEZ 320
3.39

DAVID "ZUMA DOGG" SALTSBURG 297
3.15

FRANK SHEFTEL 285
3.02

PAUL KREKORIAN 3,495
37.02

MARY BENSON 584
6.19

AUGUSTO BISANI 105
1.11

September 22, 2009 10:46 PM  

Blogger Red Spot in CD 14 said:

"Szabo Higby" speaking live from Krekorian Headquarters.

September 22, 2009 10:52 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

It looks like the top two are the very worst of the candidates, straight from the public's hell.

At least the even-numbered districts- CD-2 among them-will be the next ones for a city wide election, but still so far away.

in cd-14-
Where we need to find a replacement for Jose, too.
"Just Say NO to 'Term #3' for Huizar"

Need to do the post-mortems on this race and work on the next ones; meanwhile don't fade out on Public Comments at City Hall anyone.

September 22, 2009 11:01 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Latest 1,267 votes (Bulletin #3)

GALATZAN 230 18.15%
ESSAVI 36 2.84%
ESSEL 386 30.47%
MC CUE 26 2.05%
SANCHEZ 54 4.26%
DOGG 39 3.08%
SHEFTEL 33 2.60%
KREKORIAN 337 26.60%
BENSON 111 8.76%
BISANI 15 1.18%

E$$el is kicking Krekorian's ass, but will it be enough to wipe out the postal voter advantage?

Tamar is looking stronger, but not strong enough,

Mary Benson is improving percentage wise, but not enough.

It's a Krekorial E$$el run off for sure

September 22, 2009 11:02 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

It's true that of the 3, Tamar's the only one whose percent is rising, Essel's same, Krekorian's falling. The big money two got out the early absentees. The rest of you split your votes so much, did any of you really think the others had a shot? None of the media even covered this as though it doesn't matter.

September 22, 2009 11:06 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Well, the one things that obvious is that if any candidate had worked hard they could have won the race given the turnout. Instead they spent all of their time going to the forums and gossiping on the blogs. With the few people that voted, anyone, even one of the minor 7 could have won if they had walked to most of the houses in the district.

September 22, 2009 11:06 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

The local media has nothing about this, just about Meg Whitman. Running on being a businesswoman, like Essel but mega-big scale. Meg looks awful, flabby and out of shape for a woman with all her wealth. Besides not being photogenic, a campaign like that is physically gruelling, just ask Hillary.

September 22, 2009 11:09 PM  

Blogger Red Spot in CD 14 said:

54% Reporting
TAMAR GALATZAN 1,517 13.36
JOZEF "JOE" THOMAS ESSAVI 239 2.10
*CHRISTINE ESSEL 3,311 29.16
MICHAEL MC CUE 273 2.40
PETE SANCHEZ 397 3.50
DAVID "ZUMA DOGG" SALTSBURG 338 2.98
FRANK SHEFTEL 327 2.88
*PAUL KREKORIAN 3,993 35.17
MARY BENSON 841 7.41
AUGUSTO BISANI 118 1.04

Paul is dropping, Mary and Tamar rising. Essel is a steady vessel.

September 22, 2009 11:14 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

James and John Thomas are right about one thing as they rehash this on air - they're deluded that she can win, but right that she messed up not getting the Republican party which endorsed her to work for her, get out the foot soldiers. Instead, her people like you on this blog who shilled for her denied that she's even a Republican until caught red-handed by the Republican endorsement.

Is it true that Paul's contributions came 80 percent from the Armenian community? That may not hold up when he needs a lot more money. On the other hand, it's no longer him vs a dozen "grassroots" candidates, the whole game of "big vs. little" is over. Now they'll have to get to issues.

September 22, 2009 11:17 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

As some of use tried to explain, the debates counted for nothing. This blog counted for nothing. If all the "grassroots" candidates had gotten behind one of the other 7, it wouldn't have accomplished anything. The 7 minor candidates were unable to make any kind of statement.

You can't just put your name on a ballot and expect that somehow people will know about you, believe in you, and vote for you.

September 22, 2009 11:18 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Bulletin #4 another 1,914 votes

GALATZAN 326 17.03%
ESSAVI 66 3.45%
ESSEL 540 28.31%
MC CUE 54 2.82%
SANCHEZ 77 4.02%
DOGG 41 2.14%
SHEFTEL 42 2.19%
KREKORIAN 498 26.02%
BENSON 257 13.43%
BISANI 13 0.68%

E$$el still beating Krekorian
Big jump for Benson
Slight slump for Tamar

Might as well go to bed, its E$$el & Krekorian in the run off.
Mary Benson might provide some entertainment if she overtakes Tamar, but that's unlikely.

Looks like E$$el's money talked.

September 22, 2009 11:21 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

So many people at every debate, except the Judy Price one she got bashed for, turned them into such a circus and confusion, so little time per candidate, that it made the paid mailers and robocalls of Essel and Paul more important than otherwise.

So now who's going to endorse whom? We saw Essel already courting them.

September 22, 2009 11:23 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Watching the live election coverage leaves me with one question... is $4.99 a good price for Hidden Valley Ranch?

September 22, 2009 11:23 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

It's the curse of Jack Weiss for Tamar Galatzan. She's probably hunkered down in a bunker screaming obscenities at her staffers for ruining her election just like Weiss did at Canters.
It's a huge disappointment for all her supporters at the city attorney's office who were hoping to get hired as field deputies.

September 22, 2009 11:28 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Galatzan will be fine. One of the frontrunners will make a deal to reimburse her in some way in return for her endorsement. The losers are the rest of the also rans (except for Mary Benson) who didn't even get enough votes to be taken seriously.

September 22, 2009 11:33 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Whoever gets Tamar's endorsement wins. Unless she's too ticked off at Shallman's sliming her about the mailer, it will be Essel. But Hakopian attacked her too, so it's likely Essel. She's creeping upto 15% of the vote. Not bad with one mailer, no tv or real money. Her people should have spent more time walking the beat. Scmalzenburg will go with Higby's guy, whether or not paul wants him is another matter.

September 22, 2009 11:34 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

James and Mary are going to gear up for 2 years from now, coming out as Republicans to get the Republican "machine" if they can. She tried to hide her Republican designation and didn't avail herself of it which they think was a mistake.

September 22, 2009 11:41 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Tamar's endorsement doesn't mean that much. The real question about who will win is who turns out the votes in the runoff. No one did that effectively this round. Normally you would think Krekorian would have a better ground campaign because he has been through a lot more of these, but you will notice Essel got more votes on election day, so maybe those types lean her way. Either way, both sides will have to be doing something different because turnout was almost nonexistent.

September 22, 2009 11:43 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Winners
Higby
Krackwhorian
E$$el
Bill who eats at Sizzler

Losers
Tamar
Joe B
Walter Moore
Kevin Brainiac
Zooma

September 22, 2009 11:44 PM  

Blogger Red Spot in CD 14 said:

TOTAL AT POLL BALLOTS 4,961
38.47

TAMAR GALATZAN 1,706 13.30
JOZEF "JOE" THOMAS ESSAVI 271 2.11
CHRISTINE ESSEL 3,715 28.96
MICHAEL MC CUE 301 2.35
PETE SANCHEZ 466 3.63
DAVID "ZUMA DOGG" SALTSBURG 378
2.95
FRANK SHEFTEL 372 2.90
PAUL KREKORIAN 4,454 34.72
MARY BENSON 1,033 8.05
AUGUSTO BISANI 132 1.03

September 22, 2009 11:46 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

These results also show that none of the candidates have a lot of friends in their neighborhood. Usually the first precinct you walk is your home precinct and it's not that hard to get 300 votes from your neighbors turning out to help you (remember these are consolidated precincts) and with turnout this bad, it would have shown up if any candidate had that kind of support.

September 22, 2009 11:46 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Looks like even with Mary's votes, Tamar wouldn't have been able to break the tie.

September 22, 2009 11:55 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Galatzan won't endorse anyone, especially Essel, given that rampant development was her downfall through spousal association. And keep in mind that Krekorian remains an influential Sacramento legislator if he loses.

Essel is toast. The Valiant Seven mustered over 2000 votes and NONE of them will go to Essel.

September 23, 2009 12:04 AM  

Blogger Red Spot in CD 14 said:

It's Final....

TAMAR GALATZAN 1,871 12.94
JOZEF "JOE" THOMAS ESSAVI 306 2.12
** CHRISTINE ESSEL 4,104 28.39
MICHAEL MC CUE 339 2.35
PETE SANCHEZ 699 4.84
DAVID "ZUMA DOGG" SALTSBURG 410 2.84
FRANK SHEFTEL 441 3.05
** PAUL KREKORIAN 4,929 34.10
MARY BENSON 1,198 8.29
AUGUSTO BISANI 158 1.09

The Special Interests win.

September 23, 2009 12:07 AM  

Anonymous the top vote buyers have indictable offenses said:

CITY OF LOS ANGELES
SPECIAL ELECTION COUNCIL DISTRICT 2
ELECTION NIGHT RESULTS (UNOFFICIAL)
SEPTEMBER 22, 2009
Final Bulletin
12:00:03 AM

****** PRECINCTS - REPORTING VOTING AT POLLS *****

TOTAL NUMBER REPORTING PERCENT REPORTING

COUNCIL DISTRICT 2 109 109 100.00

**** TOTAL BALLOTS CAST (Including Vote By Mail) ****
NUMBER REGISTERED BALLOTS CAST PERCENT REPORTING

COUNCIL DISTRICT 2 123,750 14,525 11.74

**** SUMMARY OF BALLOTS CAST ****
BALLOTS CAST PERCENT

TOTAL AT POLL BALLOTS 6,589 45.36
TOTAL VOTE-BY-MAIL BALLOTS 7,936 54.64
GRAND TOTAL OF BALLOTS CAST 14,525 100.00


***** L O S A N G E L E S C I T Y O F F I C E S *****

COUNCIL DISTRICT 2 VOTES PERCENT
TAMAR GALATZAN 1,871 12.94

JOZEF "JOE" THOMAS ESSAVI 306 2.12

CHRISTINE ESSEL 4,104 28.39

MICHAEL MC CUE 339 2.35

PETE SANCHEZ 699 4.84

DAVID "ZUMA DOGG" SALTSBURG 410 2.84

FRANK SHEFTEL 441 3.05

PAUL KREKORIAN 4,929 34.10

MARY BENSON 1,198 8.29

AUGUSTO BISANI 158 1.09

---
Though the corrupted, monied two made the runoff, campaign ethics indictments will follow them (including Galatzan)

Benson will construct a winning coalition from lessons learned all-around and by the also-rans in the little-seven category. Expect Benson to be the winner in the upcoming cd2 contest.

September 23, 2009 1:00 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

441 for Sheftel?!!!!!

Was that Mike Hernandez or Dave Hernandez running his campaign. Oh wait, Mike Hernandez actually got 6,000 votes in lowly CD1 so it couldn't be him.

Throwing yourself in front of the newspapers doesn't mean you can run campaigns. Maybe David was too busy getting stoned at Frank's collective.

441 - that's pitiful.

September 23, 2009 1:28 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

1:00 am = crazy Nuch fanatic, openly threatening Democratic candidates with the VENDETTA MACHINE OF COOLEY AND TROOTANUCH. That Wright guy whose house and life is being turned upside down to determine IF he lives in the district fulltime should sue Cooley for harassment, prosecutorial misconduct, misuse of taxpayer-funded staff of lawyers and private investigators (which he misuses to harass staff and candidates who run against him) and more.

Do you realize that your crazy partisan slams on the Democrats ("including Tamar," so I guess the other 2 are a given) while braying about how your Mary will win next time with your Republican machine, totally gives you away EVEN to the MOST CLUELESS and naive???? Do you know that the Feds are finally investigating you people, now that Cheney's finally gone and hopefully forever?

September 23, 2009 2:35 AM  

Anonymous move on shill, and rejoin your heroic democrat party said:

2:35 just like 2.35% and the rest of you sore, uncooperative losers, your railing is vacuous, empty

nothing there, clickety- click

move on and rejoin your heroic democrat party

they are beckoning

September 23, 2009 5:10 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Advertisement

Advertisement