Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098
mayorsam@mayorsam.org

Wednesday, November 16, 2005

Ex-Davis Aide Admits to Molesting 2 Boys in 1970s

Damn. Take one morning off and all hell breaks lose. (PS - Get your flu shots. This cold is a bitch) Anyways, rarely do I take the time to single out one moronic commenter, but this story is big and it deserves an explanation. Here's one sample comment...
**** Mayor Sam Cover-up****
Mayor Frank worked with the man in question who molested those children.
Maybe you missed this graph...
The admission from John Robert Stevens, a former high-ranking advisor to Gov. Gray Davis and Assembly speakers Antonio Villaraigosa, Herb Wesson and Fabian Nunez came in a lawsuit accusing the YMCA of Metropolitan Los Angeles of failing to protect two brothers from Stevens' abuse.
He was Antonio's Villaraigosa's Chief of Staff when he was Speaker of the Assembly. The fact that I worked with him is hardly a story compared to that little nugget. He was also Chief of Staff to newly elected Councilman Herb Wesson when he was Speaker.

As for the admission, I'm as shocked as anyone else who read the paper. I had absolutley no idea unti I read the headline. Here's a take from yet another shocked blogger. I'm not alone in this one. You also didn't read this graph...
"Anybody who knows anything about politics in California, particularly in Sacramento, knows this man," said Boucher, who has been friends with Stevens for many years. "He was so vital to the process up there."

11 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Why is this man free and not in jail? What is wrong with our system where we can attack aan innocent black man but let a guilty white man free in the year 2005?

November 16, 2005 8:06 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Mayor Franco

Does this mean all the people he worked with are into the gay thing?

November 16, 2005 8:09 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

8:09 - Unless you're being sarcastic, you're exceedly idiotic.

There's a major difference between pedophelia and homosexuality. The latter is consentual, the former is perverse.

The vast majority of pedophiles are straight men. They sexually abuse children with whom they have access - their own kids, girlfriend's kids, neices, nephews, neighbors etc.

November 16, 2005 10:51 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Once a pedophile always a pedophile. These two are the first ones to come out, surely there are more...

There had to be talk of this, rumors, inuendos...No one listened. What about the backround checks...no one even did one on him. This is sad.

November 16, 2005 11:16 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

What doomsday you are. You act like the pedophiles are going to start coming out like the priests. I've never heard that political aides were pedophiles? Is that some inside secret?

And I agree that 8:09 is an idiot. Of course we all know that pedophilia and being gay have nothing to do with each other. Ludicrous.

November 17, 2005 12:48 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Stevens weilded a lot of power in Sacramento for along time. Makes one wonder what he may have done up there.

That Davis did not run background checks is nothing new; lots of his appointees have checkered pasts and it never bothered him, as long as the monetary checks cleared (if you know what I mean)...

November 17, 2005 4:02 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Pedophiles come in all shapes and sizes, politicians are not excluded. Do you recall Tom Snyder. I heard stories from his hay day. Imagine this, it's all kept hush hush...can't afford to mess things up for DNC.

12:48 Politicians are citizens too & not beyond the law. Commit a Crime then he/she will do the TIME in JAIL. Simple, logical, and right.

November 17, 2005 7:07 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Problem is that background checks only work if someone's been caught. In most cases, pedophiles operate for years before getting caught.

November 17, 2005 10:19 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

10:11's I can tell you want this man in jail JRS. Ponder this for one minute: What secrets can this man divulge from these other politicians? Will the bird sing? Why is he protected heavily by his ex employers, is there more to this. Once the fat lady, in his case, molester sings, he will not shut up.

Think about it. Why would YOU protect a child molester from going to jail? What does he know?

November 17, 2005 10:36 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Honestly, I think it's simpler than the proposed conspiracy. There's a statute of limitations on prosecuting sex offenses. He's probably beyond that period which is why he's offering up the info. This is what happened to many cases against Catholic priests and caused the victims community to go into an uproar.

November 17, 2005 12:43 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Our legal system is screwed up if we have this statue of limitations on sex offenders.

November 17, 2005 1:25 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Advertisement

Advertisement