Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098

Friday, September 30, 2005

Politicians Who Spam

Boy Nick Pacheco has pissed off at least one computer user in CD14. We got a hold of this little tidbit in response to a bulk email from the Pacheco forces:

To: Friends@nickpacheco.com
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:00:56 -0400
Subject: [Friends] (no subject)

Why have I been subscribed to this list without my knowledge or consent? Who is Nick Pacheco? Why does he think I am his friend? Do friends spam friends and sign them up for mailing lists without their consent?

Does anyone else wonder how this person got their private e-mail address? Could it have been stolen from the North East LA list? Isn't that a violation of the yahoogroups terms of service?

So is Nick Pacheco a spammer and a thief?

Does everyone else think this is just hunky-dory and I'm the only grinch who thinks this is beyond TACKY.

Now before you cutters and pasters and anti-AV/Huizy forces get your panties in a bunch, I am not doing this cause I support Huizy. I don't live in CD14, but if I did, I'd probably vote for Ruby. But this is a good lesson for all those running - watch the spam!.


Also at LA Voice (no hat tip Mack?).

Mailander Chimes In.

LA Observed


Anonymous Anonymous said:

sorry, i disagree. we get so much spam already, i'm willing to put up with campaign spam because I like to know what all the candidates are up to. good for them if they get my email address from a group list. email is a free or low-cost way to get a message out, and i like the fact that free media like email helps undermine the difference between well-funded machine campaigns and grassroots campaigns.

my recommendation to this whiny northeaster is this: if you don't want to read it, just hit delete!

September 30, 2005 9:48 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

It's probably somebody who supported Nick in the past but like Huizar, Padilla and Reyes, sold their ass to Tony the first chance they got. And it's typical Skelton tactics to try and make this a campaign issue. Given Huizar's lackluster showing, what else has Skelton got? I heard Huizar is telling Nick suporters that Nick's campaign is not going as well as expected - huh? That must be you Huizar looking in the mirror, Nick isn't talking shit about your campaign to your supporters. But then again, you aligned yourself with Tony, proof that you have no idea what a class act is.

September 30, 2005 10:10 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Come on...Councilman Pacheco immediately apologized for what was a software glitch.

The person complaining is a registered voter in CD14 and had given her email address when registering to vote. Therefore it's safe to assume she would be getting email from all the candidates.

What's wrong with being informed?

This is really a non issue.

September 30, 2005 10:20 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Actually, pursuant to the CAN SPAM act, political campaign emails are not classified as SPAM.

What never ceases to amaze me is how many people will write a long diatribe email instead of clicking a link that deletes their email from the system that would take a fraction of the time. Or even better, just deleting the email.

But instead, they would rather bitch and complain. These same people will bitch and complain when a politician does something they don't agree with but actually GETTING INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS, no.... they will have none of it.

September 30, 2005 10:44 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

-u sound lke josph mlnder

-b4 you grmmr bbis strt cryn, im wrtng lke ths on prpse

all of ths is hearsay, you are a moulder Mayor Sam. I can prove your role in the fever of things. Timing has to be right.

September 30, 2005 10:59 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

How many supporters were at Huizar's last event and likewise at Pacheco's?

Anyone know? Good turnout, bad turnout

September 30, 2005 11:00 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Spam is good food; find another term for this.

I'm offended. . .

-- Spam (lunchmeat) lover!

September 30, 2005 11:07 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Call it "Politicians who begin to act like Villaraigosa"

September 30, 2005 11:11 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Mayor Sam, didn't you endorse Pacheco a while back? Now you are supporting Ruby. Are you doin' a Chief Parker and giving the keys to the shop to Joseph Mailander?

September 30, 2005 11:12 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Anon 11:12

His orders were clear from the top today. Support Ruby, have bloggers believe your support, & they will support Ruby too. Votes taken away from Pacheco by this action, and there you have it.

This is done so creatively, its so boring now days. Mayor Sam, Skelton keep in touch, follows direct orders and he gets a blog and money for real estate (deals)

September 30, 2005 11:15 AM  

Anonymous Jim Hahn said:

Mayor Sam, if you really want to talk about spam, Take a good long look in the mirror. The timing of this subtle "If I were to vote, I vote for Ruby" is all reaking of siphoning votes away from Pacheco.

This is all a clever scheme by The Antonio Villaraigosa Team. Why do you think most of the council members are sucking on his "political dick"? Endorsing Huizar who has no credentials. They know he's running for governor and would like to be nice to him NOW so they can jump on his staff. (ie Jack Weiss, Laura Chick, Alex Padilla) or get an endorsement so he or she can be Mayor (Hertzberg, Parks, LaBonge)

To focus attention away from Jose Huizar's LACK of accomplishments. Ruby is just a decoy to siphon votes away from Pacheco.

Think 2000 Presidential Election and Ralph Nader.

Also think of this past mayoral election. Villaraigosa cleverly got his buddies Bitter Bernie Parks and Bob Hertzberg to essentially neutralize my key voting blocs, South LA and SF Valley, forcing those folks who would have vote for me to vote for someone else.
Then when the run-off came those who voted for the other candidate (Hertzberg or Parks) didn't bother to vote in the run-off.

My point is if she's such as good candidate with this kind of background, much like Jim Alger you guys would have but attention to her from the on set!!!

September 30, 2005 11:17 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Mayor Sam,

Are you sure the County workers blocking your garage were actual cty workers?

17th floor interns say otherwise.


September 30, 2005 11:19 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This is a lame post Mayor Sam. One whiny person sending you the e-mail instead of just deleting it. Hey, I know a lot of people that are getting those dumb Huizar support letters that have nothing but lies in them of his accomplishments. They just throw them away. Are you trying to distract AGAIN away from the fact that Sleazy Huizy "insiders" are saying he and Antonio are worried cause he's not looking too good in the communities he speaks at? HELL YES!!!

September 30, 2005 11:26 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Pacheco is spamming because he is being crushed by Huizar in the fundraising race. The filings, just up, show Pacheco having raised $144,447 through 9/24. Huizar has raised $279,288.

Maybe that's why I've received 4 mailers from Jose H. so far and 0 from Nick.

September 30, 2005 11:26 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

What good does it do Huizar to have so much money, if he doesn't have the votes.

Is he offering money for the vote. I'll vote for him if he pays me 50k. He will need a lot more money to pay off all of the CD 14 votes that he needs to win this gig.

September 30, 2005 11:38 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Episode 1 "A Mayor with no solutions"

Villaraigosa QUOTE:
"Folks, we can't just complain about the traffic," Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa told a Palisades Democratic Club gathering last Sunday. "We all have to be part of the solution."

September 30, 2005 11:41 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Episode 2 "The Mayor scolds DWP"

"Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa asked DWP General Manager Ron Deaton to investigate the engineer's "unprofessional" conduct, said Joe Ramallo, the mayor's spokesman."

September 30, 2005 11:48 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Now! Now! Let's be fair, I too have been spammed by Huizar. On numberous occasions I have received unsoliticed campaign emails from " Huizar Newswire Service - September 29, 2005"

September 30, 2005 11:57 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

If Huizar has raised so much money why is he taking my tax dollars in matching funds?

And if Huizar suddenly gets some IE's going for him we know two things, 1) Huizar is bought and paid for, and 2) There are no limits in council races and the city ethics should have the balls to say so.

September 30, 2005 11:59 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Do not vote for el vendido bandido Huizar.

September 30, 2005 12:01 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Episode 1 "Fabian Nunez gets caught!"

"State Assembly Speaker Fabian Núñez returned five donations from fellow Democratic politicians to his campaign against Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's November ballot initiatives, aides said Thursday, after the California Republican Party filed a complaint with campaign finance regulators asserting the contributions exceeded the legal limit"

September 30, 2005 12:04 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Looking through Pacheco's expenditures is a trip too. Virtually everything going for staff and consultants. Virtually nothing going for voter contact.

Pacheco is going to get waxed.

September 30, 2005 12:06 PM  

Blogger NO_JUE_JOSE said:

Huizar's latest mailer is a LAUGH riot!

It talks all about how he has SET LAUSD STRAIGHT in the last 4.5 years! (HUH?) When did THAT happen? Did we go from having 51 percent drop out rates (even higher in HIS school board area), to JUST 50 percent??

Is this like when people chided GOV. Bill Clinton about taking Arkansas from the 50th poorest, dumbest state to the 49th (passing up MISSISSIPPI?), in multiple terms?

PLUS, it BARELY mentions Huizar's actually running for CITY COUNCIL, just goes ON and on and on about LAUSD!

$5 bucks says most people who get that flyer (and don't bother to read down to the bottom line) are now asking "is there ANOTHER school board race coming up?"

(NOPE, there isn't and there WON'T be for another FOUR YEARS!)

September 30, 2005 12:09 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I disagree, everywhere you go in CD14 are Pacheco signs. I drive to my work, Pacheo signs, go to school, pacheco signs, to the market pacheco signs.

He is everywhere and I am happy to see this happen. I have seen Huizar signs in front of Alvin Parra's House and other El Sereno LA32 Neighborhood Council homes. The real people are not as supportive, just the bought out wannabe NC members.

September 30, 2005 12:10 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

12:06 p.m. - "Virtually everything going for staff and consultants. Virtually nothing going for voter contact...."

You obviously don't understand the basis of a grass roots campaign (the kind Pacheco is running, the kind that put him in office in '99 over a better financed opponent supported by West side money people, just like Huizar).

The "contact" in the Pacheco campaign is being handled by volunteers, the people -- reaching out to their own neighbors.

Slicks in the mail between the junk flyers (from the "rich" Huizar campaign), vs. my neighbor telling me Pacheco is a better choice to lead CD14. . . which is more convincing?

ANSWER: Huizar is going to get BIKINI-waxed!

September 30, 2005 12:20 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

All these deals made. Disgusting. I wish I was the fly on AV's deal making room, it would have been interesting to see you bend over.

September 30, 2005 12:20 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Pacheco is running a great campaign. Grass roots campaigning which is effective in cd 14.

Go for it Pacheco, you are doing GREAT!

September 30, 2005 12:21 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Who is running Huizar's volunteer staff? Who is consulting him, other than "SKELETOR"?

September 30, 2005 12:22 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

The rumors at city hall saying cyberlady was a villaraigosa employee.

Mayor Sam, any input, is this true? How many bloggers were from Villaraigosa's staff, I want to know.

September 30, 2005 12:24 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

HEY, where's RUUUUUUBY's money tally?? Nothing listed!

No money, or just not going to report? Is Mailander handling her books. . .

September 30, 2005 12:25 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

WHERE is Huizar getting his money from?

Word-search "ATTORNEY" and find out. He's got twice as much money as Pacheco, but FOUR TIMES as much from LAWYERS!


September 30, 2005 12:28 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

As a candidate, when you buy your voter information data from the county, it has a field for emails, which is included on the voter reg form. It is highly likely this individual put their email on the voter reg form. If you don't like the legal spam or phone calls, you do not have to give this info to the county. That is why its optional !!

September 30, 2005 12:38 PM  

Blogger Mayor Sam said:

Cyberlady = AV Staffer?

Could be. Don't know. As far as AV staffers writing for the blog? Only Parker and at the time he was here, he wasn't working for AV, but helping him.

As far as the commenters, sure probably lots from all campaigns. We know that the cutters and pasters were probably a combination of Hahn folks and AV recall folks.

September 30, 2005 12:42 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

A public service announcement

Important that you say no to drugs
say no to corruption
say no to fabrications
say no to high dropout rate

A vote for Huizar
Is a vote wasted

September 30, 2005 12:49 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

There we go again, the mayor stealing quotes from his own constituents. Doesn't he have any ideas of his own, why steal from voters?

September 30, 2005 12:54 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I had no idea the Peoples Republic of China endorsed Jose Huizar, when did this happen?

September 30, 2005 12:56 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

"Wasted Voters for Huizar!", should be Jose theme....His camp is so desperate for volunteers that they are calling those of us who have told him to his face that we don't intend to vote for him....No amount of money can persuade a TRUE AMERICAN maybe only JOSE's population...and JOSE STOP USING THE LAUSD PARENT LIST TO SOLICIT

September 30, 2005 1:30 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Earlier I stated that I had received 4 mailers from Huizar and 0 from Pacheco. Well we have also been visted at the door by a Huizar volunteer, received a follow up letter, and a couple weeks later a phone call from Huizar himself to see if we had any questions.

Contacts from the Pacheco capaign so far: None. No mail, no visits, no calls. Nothing. The only other candidate to contact my home was someone with a name like Hechman who left a mimeographed flyer on the ground near my front door.

September 30, 2005 1:46 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

...oh, and you know the Pacheco campaign has hit rock-bottom when they start paying thug Art Pulido as a Campaign Consultant.

September 30, 2005 1:54 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Nice try...Art Pulido was responsible for distributing and putting up yard signs.

September 30, 2005 2:07 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Yikes, you got me there. That's a BIG disappointment... ART PULIDO, really??

-- Pacheco supporter (but losing faith rapidly)!

September 30, 2005 2:25 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Art Pulido is a consultant to the Pacheco campaign. He consults on lawn Signs full time. Someone has to deliever on all the requests for lawn signs. One thing you can say about Art he know's the district. Therfore, all requests are filled in a timely manner. Pacheco's campaign is going great!! Poor Jose can't get a steady stream of resident volunteers like Pacheco has. Huizar has gone begging to the same unions that endorsed him, but have not come out to walk for him to please send out some union folks this saturday. Huizar is trying to bill it as a big labor walk in Boyle Heights. Even so i hear the unions aren't breaking down Jose's door with volunteers. You are no AV Jose, that is why you will loose.

September 30, 2005 2:29 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

$1,500 bucks to plant lawn signs?

You got took! Pulido IS a thug. You can do better than that, Nick. It relects very badly on the campaign. Pay someone who doesn't know the district QUITE so well, but doesn't stink up the campaign periphery. There are whole communities in CD14, that if they see Pulido coming with a Pacheco lawn sign will vote the OTHER way (even some leaning towards Nick).

Bad call (please blame that one on the campaign hack who got booted).

September 30, 2005 2:34 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Let's stop spending all this money on mailers, telephoning banking and polls and have a contest between the campaigns on who has the better yard sign distributor.

September 30, 2005 2:41 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Pulido only goes to homes that are Pacheco supporters and specificly requested a lawn sign. There are tons of requests. I think 1500 is cheap for 200 hours worth of work. And it keeps Art busy and away from non identifyed voter contact.

September 30, 2005 2:49 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I also forgot to mention the Pacheco campaign is well aware that lawn signs don't win campaigns. It still is work that someone has to do so why not keep a conterversial figure like Pulido busy with work an ape could do and keep him away from voters.

September 30, 2005 2:53 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Why not send Pulido packing and hire some kids. . . LAUSD drops thousands of uneducated near-thugs out the backdoor every day (and they don't stink up the joint).

September 30, 2005 3:10 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Art Pulido can take his happy idiot self all the way to hell where he belongs.

September 30, 2005 3:16 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

read earlier today on the Blog City Hall site that the Mayor is going to re-hire Lydia Kennard. Is he nuts? Doesn't he know that she's the one the screwed up the airport completely and then took a powder just before the crap hit the fan? Who' he paying off with this one?

Westchester Citizen

September 30, 2005 4:03 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

YOU experience technical difficulties (next thread down), and it's PLEASE STAND BY. . .

Pacheco's campaign experiences "technical difficulties", and you take them to the mat!

Being hypocritical? I think so! And you people are supposed to be "net" savvy!

September 30, 2005 4:05 PM  

Blogger Mack said:

Hey, Sam:

I composed my post this morning after getting the same email you got - and a good half hour *before* reading your site. Sorry, no official hat tip for you, but a friendly howdy - always fun covering the same beat.


September 30, 2005 4:53 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Composed without doing any digging -- FIRST, but MOST incorrect of all.

You must be so proud!

September 30, 2005 5:16 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I got Huizar's mailer, "No-Jue" -- I was impressed, and I AM going to vote for him -- for LAUSD board, again, somehow. . .

September 30, 2005 5:18 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Talk about corruption and control. ON the flyers for Antonio's citywide cleanup next week its states "a school board representative" will be with Mayor. Gee, I wonder who that will be. Too bad not that many neighborhood councils are participating. Word is Antonio is bringing in the UNIONS to help help that way he won't look too badly.

September 30, 2005 5:28 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

2:53 PM If you think lawn signs do not win campaigns, then why did Villaraigosa's thugs trash and took out any Hahn sign in CD 14? Why would he care to send his henchmen

September 30, 2005 5:39 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Come on you bloggers, let's get into real issues. Mayor Sam I thought you were better than that. How pathetic you were waste our time when the issues facing the 14th are so much more important.

We have been without representation for over 2 years now. We were lied to by Tony, he lied to everyone he moved his lips too during his run for the 14th. We could have already had the primary and the special election could have decided who would represent the 14th. But no Tony wouldn't allow that.

He cares so much about the 14th we won't know who will represent us until the end of January 2006. That leaves us without representation for 7 months plus the 2 years he was in office campaigning for Davis and Kerry. He's been busy with everyone but the 14th residents.

He left us without a voice at city hall. That's important. And after reading all these blogs, if Tony is putting out a city mailer stating a school board member will accompany him in participating in the clean up, then that's your story. A miss use of city/public funds. When will you call for the ethlics committe to investigate this?

Mayor Sam, don't let us down, everyone is accountable for their actions...even Tony.

Now if you got the email, I did too, delete it if you choose and let's all grow up and look at the issues.

This is an important race to us who live in the 14th.

September 30, 2005 8:04 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Preach it brother (or sister). . . not to mention that most of his district staff was brought in from outside the area and has a HUGE learning curve. Some still don't know how to SPELL CD14, let along serve it.

September 30, 2005 8:28 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

We all know how to use the delete button.

It gave us a chance to show our support for Nick.

Besides the only thing that get most hits is CD 14.

September 30, 2005 8:52 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Stop calling my home Huizar staff, I don't want you to call!

September 30, 2005 9:29 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Good Article on Villaraigosa by
Robert Greene

...What were you expecting? This is Antonio Villaraigosa. The man loves being mayor. No, that’s not quite right. The man loves being mayor of Los Angeles. He loves being everywhere, all the time. He loves the trappings of office, he loves the people, he loves the attention. He loves the city. He loves tweaking the press (he calls us “trolls,” by the way). He loves crisis and he loves resolution.

You could tell that by the way he rushed over to LAX when that Jet Blue flight with the damaged landing gear was circling. I mean, does the mayor of Los Angeles really have to be there for the landing? But then, why not? The FAA and the airline made a point of not revealing the pilot’s name, pending an investigation. Ah, but this is Villaraigosa’s city. He got a word with the pilot and then told the world his name was Scott Burke, and that he was a cool customer.

Or how about moving his family into the Getty Mansion? He’s the mayor. That’s his house. For 12 years, L.A. was a city where the mayor didn’t much care for the trappings. Now it’s got someone who does, and this jaded town is, if not yet delighted, at least pleasantly amused.

Next week, Villaraigosa’s going to be on The George Lopez Show (playing himself, of course). And, the Korea Times tells us, he’s planning a trip to Asia. And now he’s filling potholes like crazy. Smiling, shaking hands, getting an earful. It’s as if he were county Supervisor Kenny Hahn!...

September 30, 2005 9:37 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Villaraigosa supporter Mike Trujillo cleaned up at the Hold'em table, amassing a mighty stack of chips that he later traded in for 15 raffle tickets. Slightly apologetic for his winnings, Mike explained that he plays poker "four times a week" at clubs around town. We feel so much better.

September 30, 2005 9:59 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Trujillo, did you let Skelton use your password. Researching some old posts, some of Chief Parker's post similiar to Skelton's way of writing. Will you tell?

September 30, 2005 10:01 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

They were big people. Parke and Ace have played little kids before. And that is what these people are, nothing more than little kids with star struck eyes whenever Ace, Antonio and Parke entered the room. I bet some of those Chief Parker posts can be traced to Parke or Ace's computer. Under cross examination, little boy Trujillo will crack and expose all.

September 30, 2005 10:02 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

My opinion,
Trujillo was probably exposed by Skelton, this blog was exposing the negative side of Huizar. Trujillo, who were your other buddies posting under the "Chief" you must have given them your password, and since the Chiefs comments were pretty much controlled, they had to be known to you, people close to you. Otherwise, everyone would have been posting under the "Chief Parker" name. I don't buy the explanation given to media, you are the scapegoat to bigger fish. The bigger fish have talked and you are protecting them. I'm going to call you OLLIE.

September 30, 2005 10:03 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

is it true padilla i sending staff to help pacheco, just in case huizar doesn't win?

can anybody confirm this?

October 01, 2005 1:11 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Somone made a good point earlier, if Ruby D. is such an old hand at this - running council offices, etc, why hasn't she reported any contributions on time yet?

Second reporting period's passed and he $$ still show as ZERO?

Does the "old pro" have something to hide? Maybe she is getting propped up by Villaraogosa's people to split the voting further?

When does Ethics step in when candidates fail to report on time? She's got pictures on her Website of fundraising events.

Mailander and Mayor Sam are championing her now - ask some questions. . .

October 01, 2005 4:06 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Let's look for another subject to blog on with substinence. I agree with the blogger above, this is not an issue. I live in CD 14 and it's true, no representation for over two years. And why wasn't the election called earlier, with the run-off in November? Other areas in LA County are doing that. True, all those votes being taken everyday our city council meets without CD14 without a voice. AV really cares about CD14. NOT. He lied to us when he ran. I voted for him, a mistake I will not repeat ever again. To my face he lied.

Hey, did Ludlow's district have a neutral person appointed from his staff to oversee that district while the community decides who they want to rep them? We didn't. Who did that? I was told the CLA would oversee our district during this time.

AND, if AV has sent out fliers with our money for the clean up pushing a school board member who ends up being a candidate for the 14th it is a violation of ethic and should be looked in to.

I drive downtown every day and our community shows the lack of leadership. It shows the lack of care. But why should AV care, he doesn't live here anymore...

October 01, 2005 8:27 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Lameboy Padilla chose "Gabbage Patch" Lisa Sarno to rep the 14th. Antonio told him to do it and because he is spineless he did. Now 14th has NO representation and a bunch of morons who don't go to meetings, don't communicate with constituents are getting paid with tax dollars. They are all arrogant, disrespectful and hated throughout district. This is Antonio's control.

Yes, fliers going out on citywide cleanup. Guess which school board rep will be with AV at Roosevelt? Sleazy Huizy like a little lap dog.

October 01, 2005 8:45 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Is no one covering the real story here? That is the continual failures of the Nick Pacheco staff.

I live in Eagle Rock and his staff since Day 1 were a bunch of uncaring, low-IQ, idiotic unfriendly morons.

And now we are SHOCKED to find out that one of them sent an e-mail to ALL of their e-mail addresses instead of just the supporters? Do you realize how bad life could be for Nick if someone harsher than this lady had replied to the whole pacck?

Nick has always promised more than he delivered. His campaign staffers were always decent young men and women but then when he gets in office, poof, goodbye, farewell.

And I hear this election he cannot even keep staff. My neighbor volunteers for him, yes, we agree to disagree, and she says she cannot keep up with the musical chairs of "who's in charge?" being played over there.

You can judge a man by the company he keeps. Nick continually surrounds himself by idiots.

October 01, 2005 9:03 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

That's YOUR opinion and we can say the same about Sleazy Huizy. Huizy is using CD14 staffers to do his campaigning and everyone knows. Nick has a record of accomplishments and cared about the community. That's why he always got as good turnout at his meetings. When Antonio disappeared and didn't do his job constituents called Nick during the two years AV was campagning. Again, people who voted for AV are turning to Nick cause they know he's a doer, gets to root of problems and has solutions.

October 01, 2005 9:40 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

To 9:03 a.m.

Robert Urteaga, a trusted and highly competent ex-CD14 staffer (and NO, I'm not him) has been "in charge" of Pacheco's campaign since day one, and still is.

Who's propaganda have you been swallowing.

He started the campaign when it was just a handful of volunteers, some volunteers and consultants have changed -- for the better in the case of the hired hands, `and he is STILL in charge now that a larger groups of volunteers has assembled. I've seen the meetings of volunteers and precinct captains, and the main room of their offices was SRO and the parking lost was triple-parked.

You're way off base, and anyone who reads this blog or ANY online sources about the campaign KNOWS who has been speaking for AND about Pacheco's campaign since the very beginning -- Robert U.

In addition, you NEVER heard the kind of rancor against Pacheco's staff while he was in office that there has been since AV pretended to be the CM in CD14, in fact a LARGE number of community activists in CD14 - especially the Northeast, went so far as to sign and circulate petitions BEGGING Villiaraigosa to keep some of Pacheco's field staff on there, BECAUSE they had done such a good job.

Nothing but praise for Pacheco's staff; nothing but complaints about AV's! That speaks for itself.

You could not BE more wrong.

October 01, 2005 11:46 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:


You can't even pay a Villaraigosa supporter in the NE to praise AV's staff.

There line if "well, AV hasn't been well served by his staff -- but we STILL like him better than Nick."

("Like him better" - not "did a better job.") It was all just a beauty contest to them.

It still is: smile pretty for the camera, Jose!

October 01, 2005 11:49 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

8:27 Anon, you are dead right. CD14 has been used for one purpose only - Antonio Villaraigosa's ambition. And if the voters choose Huizar, Villaraigosa will have succeeded behond his wildest dreams. Better to be lucky than smart!

October 01, 2005 12:11 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

OH MY GOD...Jose is on crack..,Just read his political mailer. He's built schools, let's remind ourselves why we are building new schools. WHY is there overcrowding? We the tax payers can pay for everyone who just happens to come here ill-legally. We can't even have a real census in California. Jose was president of the school board for 2 terms. And he wants to continue his good leadership, well if we just talk about CRENSHAW High School and how the seniors grad certificates are meaningless because the DISTRICT which he was in charge of, didn't follow through with the WASC committee implementing and improving programs and academics is one example of his mis-management of the district. What will he do as CD14 councilmember? What will he forget to follow through on? As important as having seniors have their diplomas deemed worthless, WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO US, WHO HAVE ALREADY BEEN LIED TOO AND LEFT TO FEND FOR OURSELVES...

Building schools, let's talk about that. Have you checked his donor list? Look at it. It's all people, their family members and employees who have business with building schools for the LAUSD. From realitors, to PR firms with speciality in government building, architects, to construction companies.

Let's count the dollars he's received from the everyday people who live in the district. Don't we matter?

Of course we don't, which means all his decisions will be decided by those who don't have to live here.

Let's not go down that path.

AV moved out after he let our neighborhoods go to pot.

And no way will the puppet get control over us. His job at LAUSD is all smoke and mirrors. He accomplished nothing for the students and teachers. Look at the test scores. He hasn't followed through on anything for the students, just for himself. Because if he really cared about the children, our children, then he would have stayed to complete one thing...

How embarassing that ROMER was renewed. I am tired of those egos that are more important then the people they claim to want to represent.

Remember the debate at Roosevelt HS? Jose bombed. No one was happy with his answers...and they let him know and he ran out immediately afterwards.

Please, will you bloggers, write about the real stuff. And how important it is to not let the liar AV choose who we have represent us. That only goes to someone who really cared about his district. And AV didn't, we all know that.

Vote no to AV and anyone who would be a puppet to the liar. AV said it himself "NO I WILL NOT RUN FOR MAYOR, I WANT TO BE YOUR COUNCILMEMBER."

No I will not run for Governor, I want to be your Mayor. Will be next. Then he will have lied to everyone in the city. Maybe then you all will know the truth about AV...

October 01, 2005 12:53 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Yeah, I agree. Let's talk about the real issues. If the flier from the city for the clean up has Jose as the school board candidate accompanying AV on the clean up, isn't that an ethics violation? I mean, especially if he's in the 14th district campaigning?

I might not agree with every candidate running for the seat in CD14, but they do deserve a certain amount of respect for running. And the field should be fair for running for the seat.

October 01, 2005 12:59 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Oh yeah, do you think the parents at CRENSHAW would vote for Jose? I laugh in his face. Good thing he's not running there. Maybe the voters in the 14th are studpid, don't read the newspapers or watch the news.

October 01, 2005 3:38 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I am voting for Nick Pacheco because I already know him and I know he is prone to fucking up. Huizar? I am not interested in getting to know him. For 2 years? No Thanks!

October 01, 2005 6:49 PM  

Anonymous Cheech and Chong said:


A is for Ass.
R is for Rat.
T is for Thug.

P is for Prison.
U is for Ugly.
L is for Loser.
I is for Idiot.
D is for Dumb.
O is for Out to Lunch.

Now Class?
Are you with me?

Here is to your brother and your mother!

Bye Bye Nick Pacheco!!!

October 01, 2005 7:00 PM  

Anonymous GOD said:

At the End of the Day the voters will vote for Nick Pacheco!

Put that in your crack pipe and smoke it Jose!

October 01, 2005 7:03 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:


October 01, 2005 7:47 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

cheech and chong,

WE know who you are. It's sad you are a complete bottom feeder...You use to suck up to Art, but since he knew you were full of s--- you can't stand it. How pathetic you are to go after people working or volunteering for a campaign. That just shows how retarted politically you are.

Our opinion of you is LOSER! You would suck up to anyone who you thought would give you a job. But AV didn't and either will Jose, because he will lose. The jokes on you for being used again...

And Jose you AV might have endorsed you, but he knows your gonna lose, that's why he's moving out.

October 01, 2005 8:26 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

DNC=Damn Near Communist

October 01, 2005 8:34 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

What is the Democratic Party?

-Fail to even comprehend danger of biological islamic jihad against USA.

-Refuse to acknowledge tax cuts stimulate greater activity and greater revenues.

-Tolerant of all religions except Christianity.

-Believe all earnings and profits belong to federal government (and them).

-They devalue human life; created 'right' to murder unborn.

-Slaughtered 25% of Generation X and Y.

-They create laws via corrupt judges, usurp legislative and executive branches.

-Can't be trusted with national defense

-Now seek to homosexualize the civilization.

October 01, 2005 8:50 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Isn't Art Pulido the guy who was working with Miguel Hernandez, the ACORN guy, when they were trying to get a meeting with Huizar to discuss LAUSD's option of eminent domaining 40, 80 or 120 homes. And wasn't Huizar's response, "Why do I need to meet with them?" Of course, Huizar sided with the developer and 120 homes were taken over when it could have only been 40.

And wasn't Pulido the guy helping Huizar in his election?

What's the matter Cheech and Chong, afraid that Pulido will mobilize that South Central community against Huizar? I'm sure they have the goods on Huizar.

October 02, 2005 8:17 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

A note to Nick and Jose, play it on the issues. Let the residents be the real winners in the end.

October 02, 2005 9:46 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Let's not go back to slamming people who are campaigning for one candidate. Speak on the issues. 7:00pm anon is obviously an Antonio person cause they used the same tactics against Hahn people.

Pacheco is a people person. He may not have the money or endorsements Jose has but he does have grass root support from many. Antonio's endorsement is going to hurt Jose and even his inside camp is saying it. AV left major baggage in CD14 and Jose is left holding it. Bad association.

October 02, 2005 10:11 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Just came from Nick's clean-up of the Evergreen walk - since Antonio hadn't touched it for two years. Nick had more people cleaning up that walk - named in honor of Lloyd Montserrat - than Huizar had at his big labor volunteer push. And all of Nick's volunteers will be walking later.

And this after Huizar sent out that emergency volunteer request to all the labor locals. Looks like desperation is taking hold in Huizar's camp.

October 02, 2005 10:13 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

10:13 You sound like an insider. Tell me, if you have knowledge of both camps, which one is doing better?

How many supporters attend Huizar's events v.s. Pacheco's?

Who has the most volunteers? (This is a big indication of real support-the amount of volunteers)

AV had an enormous amount of volunteers and he won. The candidate which cannot produce a good number of volunteers regardless of money and endorsements will lose.

October 02, 2005 11:55 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

For those of you in the know:

Name 5 accomplishments made by each of the CD14 candidates for the CD 14 area? Just 5, no more, no less.

October 02, 2005 3:06 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Five reason for Nick in CD14:

1: His wife
2: His Wife
3: His Wife
4: His Wife
5: Oh yeh His Wife

She's hot. I don't know about his other decisions, but catching and keeping that hotie is one hell of a good move.

Nick your my hero!!!!

October 02, 2005 6:56 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Obviously Nick's got all the right moves...I've met her.

October 02, 2005 10:44 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

No one has ever posted accomplishments of Jose on this blog. All they can say is he has money and endorsements. Jose is using the students as volunteers. Poor kids don't have a clue about anything Jose stands for. They just know he's a board rep and he asked for their help. Use and abuse students. how sad

October 03, 2005 12:10 PM  

Blogger NO_JUE_JOSE said:

Huizar's MOST notable accomplishment!

Bailed from his re-election to school board 10 TIMES faster than even Villaraigosa copped out of being the CD14 councilmember (didn't Jose announce he was running for CD14 the SAME month he was sworn in for a second term at LAUSD). Yeah, yeah, Jose-heads will say "BUT WHAT ABOUT ROCKY D??"

BOY those building contractors that gave Jose ALL that campaign money to buy his influence for their school-building bids must REALLY be pissed.

"Hey Jose', GREAT, you won another term on the board -- let's talk about some building contracts... WHA?? You're going where? How soon?" DAMN, then give back the bri... uh, CONTRIBUTIONS.

Now they'll just call him QUICK DRAW Jose'. . . fastest "release" of responsibilities in the "east".

October 03, 2005 12:53 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Remember LAUSD’s motto “deny, deflect and hide.” Sound familiar Jose?

October 03, 2005 1:29 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

12:10 PM I know you may confuse some short volunteers as students. Some volunteers are adults. Mr. Alvin Parra is short, looks and dresses like a high school student, don't confuse him, he's over 40.

October 03, 2005 4:33 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Pacheco's staff has done an awesome job with lawn signs. I see them everywhere.

October 03, 2005 4:34 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

ANON 4:04

It is not the staff, it the volunteers in the community that support Nick Pacheco.They are placing the lawn signs.

October 03, 2005 5:20 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Thanks for clearing that up, I thought it was the staff. Anyways, then I must congratulate the effort from volunteers who have done an awesome job.

October 03, 2005 6:36 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

The police officers from Hollenbeck and Northeast part of CD14 want Nick. They aren't allowed to come out to endorse on their own but they say they liked the way Nick helped them with issues in the community. He was always accessible unlike Antonio and staff who were never around.

October 03, 2005 8:17 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Any poll numbers available?

October 03, 2005 11:56 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Kevin Roderick wrote an exellent piece on Laura Chick, everyone should read it pronto...

I don't have permission to repaste the entire article so I will put the link here


October 04, 2005 6:49 PM  

Blogger Walter Moore said:

The person who received the e-mail probably provided his e-mail address when he registered to vote. He needs to cool his jets and be glad that the internet permits candidates and voters to communicate directly, thereby bypassing the media.
Walter Moore
L.A.'s Next Mayor

October 04, 2005 11:27 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home