Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098
mayorsam@mayorsam.org

Saturday, November 18, 2006

Possible Reason Why Rocky & City Council Rolled Over For $2.7 Million Settlement

Why would City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo withhold those incriminating photos showing Mr. $2.7 Million Dogg Food Man taping down and shaving a fellow fire fighter?

Perhaps Council would have made a different decision. BUT: Maybe they had reason to keep the whole thing under wraps, making it easier for Los Angeles City Council to decide to settle for $2.7 million, and choose NOT to re-open the case for a second look...ZD says, "Let's see how much money the law firm representing the plaintiff contributed to Rocky Delgadillio and Los Angeles City Councilmembers like Bernard Parks and others."

So to repeat, Zuma Dogg (who is extra cranky because of the pain in his hand, palm and wrist/contusion, suffered at the hands of LAPD police brutality) wants to know, "How much money has been contributed to each L.A. City Councilmember who chose to fast-track the settlement and choose not to take a second look, when they easily could have at least done that.

[Sure, now that this is the biggest public outrage in recent history, CC is talking about taking a second look now (with possible Mayoral veto), but their discretionary colors have been revealed.]

ZD
aka: Public Enemy #1 for using words (not brutality) to speak out against City Council fraud, waste and abuse; and that can cause you lifetime physical damage and a diminished quality of life.

Labels:

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Hey Zuma Dog:

Who are you are?

What's the story on the other 9 plus lawsuits against the LAFD?

Who is suing?

Why are they suing?

Keep us posted on all this.

November 18, 2006 6:02 PM  

Blogger mesa custom furnishings said:

or:

1) it's always possible that Pierce's lawyers had an actual case against the LAFD that would have cost the City a whole lot more had this gone to trial.

2) the photos would have been inadmissable in court since they were 16 years old and - more importantly - had nothing to do with the incident in question. sadly, gang, far as I can tell there's no such thing as the "tit-for-tat" rule. nice try, though!

and good luck with that money trail. read much scott turow, dogg?

john mcdonald

November 18, 2006 6:21 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

John.

You're hilarious.

When do you do the 6 o'clock show?


Pierce, hmmmmmmm.
Pierce.......................

November 18, 2006 8:24 PM  

Anonymous westchesterkids.org said:

John MacDonald,
Nice spin but you trying to excuse the inexcuseable. A $2.7 million award is inexcuseable. Weiss thinks it's pocket change put that money could fix quite a few sidewalks and make our streets safer.

November 18, 2006 11:38 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I think the councilmembers were out of their minds. They should have known that "Big Dog" was a 26 year LAFD employee who was also known as "The King of Hazing". There are more pictures of that asshole doing fucked up things to new firefighters than anyone knows about. Why didn't the council see them? Anybody who cries racism on such little proof is a worthless dickhead. Now he's a rich one. I believe in karma. He will be paid back big time and he won't get to spend a dime of that money.

The first time I read that story, I thought it was good that he was paid. The more I found out, the more I hate that man who gives other blacks a really bad name.

November 20, 2006 12:05 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Zuma, if your claiming police brutaliy, have you filed a complaint? Have you initiated an investigation?

Or are you just going to make unsubstantiated charges again?

November 20, 2006 10:51 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Advertisement

Advertisement