Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098

Wednesday, October 03, 2018

Mayor Gar-SOFT-ee's "MyVoiceLA Website" lacks Muscle of Objectivity

As Mayor (and 2020 Presidential Aspirant) Eric "Gar-SOFT-ee", stands with an unsubstantiated accuser of Sexual Assault, he can only express mere "Disappointment" over the lack of staff follow-through, in Giving Voice to those "Discriminated-against" .........., in a CD-14 City Councilman Jose Huizar Workplace (allegedly). 
Speaking up is an incredible act of bravery, for Dr. Ford and anyone with a story. I believe you. 11:36 AM - 27 Sep 2018

** Blogger's Notes: A "Mayoral Disappointment" ........., in Yoga Pants. 

As Mayor Eric Gar-SOFT-ee tours America in search of those who would support a "Presidential Gar-SOFT-ee (in Yoga Pants) in 2020 Campaign", those who merely seek to work at 200 N. Spring Street (and satellite offices city-wide) in a professional environment, free of discrimination, harassment and retaliation ........., have cause for concern.

In the wake of the #MeToo Movement's impact on workplace place conduct, Mayor Eric Gar-SOFT-ee last Spring, order the creation of the "MyVoiceLA Website" for responding to complaints regarding discrimination, along with harassment complaints ........ in a quick and efficient manner.

But as the LA Times notes, the Mayor Gar-SOFT-ee's Cyber-initiative to report workplace misconduct ......... has "follow-up issues".  

Under city law, the personnel department must inform the mayor or the council president when it receives a complaint of discrimination or sexual harassment against an elected L.A. official, and then a panel must be convened to examine the allegations. Whidden said the delay in notifying Wesson occurred because agency staffers did not initially recognize that the complaint targeted an elected official. “It was a very broad complaint that made it difficult to identify a specific charge against a specific person,” he said. 
Hmm. In reading the above quote (in Bold), can we dare ponder whether their was a "pre-determine outcome" being choreographed, that would benefit the "Person of Interest" and his Wife before her first major Campaign Fundraiser, as exampled via this response.

Huizar, for his part, issued a statement Tuesday emphasizing that the complaint is “based solely on alleged discrimination.” “I take this matter seriously and deny discriminating against any current or former staff members, and I look forward to a full, transparent and expeditious resolution,” he said.
Yet, despite the "Person of Interest's" attempt to focus discerning observer's, solely on the alleged discrimination, the Mayor Sam Blog has previously posted a former CD-14 Staffer Statement, that is more specific regarding work place issues meriting objective investigating.

Hi this is an Ex Staffer who used to work for Huizar i contacted u about the behind the scenes in my officeBut i had to get my mind and stress level down before talking about the affair n my boss and all his shady deals and gcp and ab1290 monies being used for golf and tables and fundraisers..I have endured 10 years of traumaAnd i want everyone to know JOSE HUIZAR IS A HORRIBLE BOSS AND SO IS HIS CHIEF OF STAFF who sits quietly and doesnt protect the staff from that monsterI took a stress leave since feb Ended up having to finally quit so i can catch up financially with my vacation check etcAnd JUST LIKE that i gave 10 years and endured all this trauma and stress for huizar to not even acknowledge me or reached outAnyhow my apologies on the early textI just wanted people to know Huizar is a SEXUAL PREDATOR TO THE WOMEN IN THE OFFICE AND swears he is untouchable 

Especially, when aggregated with Huizar's 2005 Pasadena PD Issue ........

Feb 11 Pursuant to Government Code § 6254(f), this information is provided pursuant to your January 21, 2015 public records request:• Suspect: ** Jose Huizar, 1819 N. Alona, Santa Ana (listed in April 29, 2005 and June 14, 2005 reports), and ** Jose Luis Huizar 4903 Calandria Way, Los Angeles (listed in September 8, 2005 and November 2, 2005 reports). No arrests are noted.• Witness (excluding victim): Olivia Jobe, Burke Williams Spa employee (not the victim).• Date, time, and location of incident: April 9, 2005, approximately 9:15 p.m., Burke Williams Spa, 39 Mills Place, Pasadena.• Dates of police reports: April 29, 2005 (original report), June 14, 2005, September 8, 2005, and November 2, 2005 (add reports).• Factual circumstances: The victim, then 28, reported the incident on April 18, 2005. The victim alleged she was giving a massage to the suspect, and the suspect grabbed the victim’s legs during the massage and attempted to pull her toward the massage table. Additionally, at the conclusion of the massage, the suspect grabbed the victim’s leg, arm, and breast.No additional information can be provided to you in accordance with the decision in Haynie v. Superior Court, (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1061, 1072Alicia PattersonRecords Administrator

..........., which should cause Mayor Gar-SOFT-ee (and all objective observers to truly #BelieveSurvivors ........, of a CD-14 City Councilman Jose Huizar Workplace (and beyond)-----Scott Johnson. 

Labels: , , ,


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home