Whistleblower hotline: (213) 785-6098

Wednesday, August 31, 2005

Newest Huizar Endorsement

I can't believe I missed this. Thank you to the always helpful tipster for pointing it out.

Yesterday I posted about the "Ass Clown of the Week" award from the NortheastLA Yahoo Group. Just a few messages down was this little gem...


The focus of my attention...

"I opt for Huizar since he has never had the opportunity to represent CD 14, so we might as well give him a chance. We can always vote him out in four years. . . " -- Freddrick Brito

Name not ring a bell? Here's a refresher.

As our tipster points out,
I wonder if Fraudulent Fred's ("Father Fred") name will go up on Huizar's website in the place where Tony Scudellari's name was just a week ago. There's a "vacancy" needing to be filled.


Anonymous Anonymous said:

Please tell me this guy isn't a watch captian of one of the fake 80 NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH ORGANIZATIONS created under fake councilmember CM?

Whats's their motto, "Watch, but don't tell?"

August 31, 2005 6:44 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This is the guy the Times said wanted to turn over a new leaf? Gone from non-profit scamming to politics..much better fit.

August 31, 2005 6:45 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Can ex-felons even vote in CA?

August 31, 2005 6:46 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:


You can bet they'll be able to under GOVERNOR Villaraigosa and MAYOR Huizar!

August 31, 2005 6:47 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Oh man, you've asked for it now, Mayor F. This guy will be all over the blog like White on Mount Washington.

He'll be sermonizing for days about how HE'S the victim, society is to blame (there are no BAD boys, even when they're 50), and how dare you attack him. JUST GIVE HIM ANOTHER (20th) chance!

Yeesh, I'll be back in a week when his 15 seconds of infamy is up.

August 31, 2005 6:59 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Isn't that Father Sarduci from Saturday Night Live?

August 31, 2005 7:27 AM  

Anonymous anybody but Pachueco! said:

This guy clearly belongs in Pachueco's camp.

- Anybody but Pachueco!

August 31, 2005 8:11 AM  

Blogger Parque Esqueleto said:

Yeah, that endorsement came pretty easily. Fred-o was going to go with Pacheco, but Nick's team caught on to his con pretty early in the game.


August 31, 2005 8:44 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

I think you may have been scammed, as well, Mayor Frank. The "tipster" was probably the phony priest himself. That photo had to come out of his own scrapbook. These pathologicals always like to keep souvenirs of their scams.

August 31, 2005 8:47 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

The mayor must have called in another favor to get Huizar this kind of a boost. Federiqkoe also claimed to be very tight with AV a couple weeks ago. Supposedly, AV applauded him publicly about the time (Fred) pulled out as a candidate for a neighborhood council seat in the Northeast, at least according to another one of his imposter ID's (this time a 35-yr-old USC student reporter instead of a UCLA executive). He called himself "Cypress Park's best hope" on a listserf that deals with L.A. neighborhood council issues.

. . ."as we were talking, a few of his friends happened by and spoke to him. Antonio Villaraigoza was one of them. My first question in my mind was, 'Does Antonio know who this man really is?' So I asked him, 'Antonio, how do you know Fred?' He simply responded, "I know him to be a real asset to our community...." As they hugged good-bye, the man who will be Mayor walked off to meet other friends and to order his coffee. The surprising part is how engaged this guy was to Antonio and they spoke as if they were old friends. So I asked him, how do you know Antonio? He said, 'I don't really know his personally. He just knows me from what I have done to help a lot of people across California. I have known him for a long time since he was in Sacramento."


August 31, 2005 8:53 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Get him a "boost" - was that supposed to be some kind of pun.

August 31, 2005 8:54 AM  

Blogger NO_JUE_JOSE said:

"I don't really know his personally. . . " Yeah. this guy went to LAUSD schools.

Before Huizar, though. You dodged that bullet, Jose.

August 31, 2005 8:59 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

AV will hug anybody under the right circumstances. "Fred" must have had a $100 bill behind his back.

August 31, 2005 9:00 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Why don't you terible people just leave this poor guy alone. He only wants to con people for good now, not evil.

(Come to think of it, he IS Villaraigisa!)

August 31, 2005 9:02 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

It wasn't Milton Bradley?

August 31, 2005 9:03 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

"Forgive me father, for I have lied about starting 80 neighbood watches."

August 31, 2005 9:05 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

8:53 a.m.
For two years, 249,999 constituents and a half dozen neighborhood councils in CD14 couldn't get a meeting with Villaraigosa, but this guy gets a personal audience. I guess that's honor among thieves. AV stole his CM salary for two years, and this guy stole it from all the charities he conned, and then shamed.

August 31, 2005 9:10 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

This must be how pro-abortion AV gets to be able to take communion.

Does the padre do house calls?

August 31, 2005 9:13 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

What an incredible rationale for supporting a candidate.

He should get the job because he's never had it before (AND, we have NO idea if he can handle it).

This is pretty much the same rationale that the NE Progressives's used to announce their endorsement before even meeting any of the other candidates. 1) Who's got the best chance of making it past the primary; 2) Of those, which one ISN'T Pacheco!

August 31, 2005 10:52 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Does Huizar boast the Northeast Progressive Alliance endorsement on his website?

August 31, 2005 11:22 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Yes, he does. And (Ass Clown) Eliot Sekula is on his list...and the Los Angeles School Police is on the list - TWICE

August 31, 2005 11:38 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Can't wait to see how the rabid NELA "progressive"/preservationist throng deals intellectually with letting Huizar, part of the school board that just NUKED the Ambassador, "lead the charge" (his words) in dealing with the future fate of the Southwest Museum.

Try this, Jose... "The site would make a GREAT park-and-ride for the Goldline, once we rip out that nasty 'church-looking' old museum building. Oh and those old-fashioned rock and abode houses that are in the mix somehow, lets ditch those, too.

If he can get AV to stand next to him at the podium when he suggests it, they'll bite.

August 31, 2005 11:48 AM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Democrats such as Huizar contribute and will continue to partake in the neglect of North East Los Angeles.

Republican Voter in NELA
"Yes, we are growing in #'s"

August 31, 2005 12:05 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

Winners and losers for the week.


Steve Afriat- Turning the Pacheco campaign around.

Nick Pahceco- Putting an effective campaign team together.

Chief Bratton- Keeping his diginity under pressure.


Parke Skelton- Lies about Pacheco not working this time.

AV- His Cops beating up ministers.

Eric Hacopian- Finnanical ties to Meruelo exposed.

Jose Huizar- Campaign falling apart.

August 31, 2005 1:16 PM  

Blogger ubrayj02 said:

Sorry about this being off-topic. I am not familiar with this Fake Priest Guy, but I am familiar with NELA.

I am not a long time resident of North-East Los Angeles, but I was surprised to find out how anti-development the zoning is around there. There is a large body of the population that rents, and would probably support more development.

Yet it seems there is a vocal minority of property owners who oppose any sort of development whatsoever.

I know it sounds wtong to talk like this, but what can this community offer to a politician? The residents who have a political voice want the city to dump money into an area that offers little back to the city, or that politician's career.

If some development were allowed, at least concessions could be gotten from developers.

August 31, 2005 3:00 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

The curly-head is right -- there's way too much "defend the barrio against outside interests" thinking around here. Not just homeowners, but they are probably the worst anywhere. This attitude extends to lots of cranky activist types in ELA and NELA.

August 31, 2005 3:06 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

guess the Pacheco guys have too much time on their hands again.

losers for the week?


Parke Skelton- What lies are you talking about?

AV- He is the loser when the LAT is talking about him running for Governor?

Eric Hacopian- What evidence do you have of a "Meruelo" connection?

Jose Huizar- County Fed Endorsement. Any questions?

August 31, 2005 4:09 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

No questions -- you're entitled to your addled perceptions.

August 31, 2005 5:17 PM  

Anonymous Anonymous said:

ANON 4:09 asks,

"Parke Skelton- What lies are you talking about?"

You haven't been around, have you.

August 31, 2005 6:33 PM  

Blogger Phil Krakover said:

Hey, I thought we had lost Mr. 80 Neighborhood Watch Man, but it appears he's back.

For a while, I thought the Pacheco guys were actually working on a campaign and walking precincts, you know, like people do who want to be elected. Not too many votes here.

But it is clear the Pacheco Blogging Team is back in the groove.

Good idea to give them a post where they can actually stay on topic.

Keep it up, Mayor.

September 23, 2005 2:51 AM  

Blogger Benevolent Con said:


The Best is Yet to come!

October 30, 2005 10:52 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home