Testing Positive, Eric Garcetti Was Always The Wrong Messenger On COVID Safety
By Daniel Guss
@TheGussReport - The news just broke that LA Mayor Eric Garcetti has tested positive for COVID causing lots of I told you so messages given the Mayor's hypocrisy and utterly unscientific claims about his following the science.
Garcetti told one particularly big, bold COVID lie on May 11, 2020, declaring that "the science" said we could walk on the wet sand of a shore, but not lay on the dry sand of its beach.
His quote from the LA Times was "Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti said Monday that he supports reopening the city's beaches for active recreation, with some restrictions. Sitting or tanning in the 'dry areas of sand' would not be a good idea right now, Garcetti said. 'But the wet sand area - if you need to get in there to swim, to surf...that is something I hope we can earn again.'"
The LA Times didn't bother to report, or apparently even ask, what was the source for that "science."
It wasn't the truth.
It wasn't science then.
It isn't science now.
Recently, I did ask Garcetti that question and he untruthfully responded "that was the science at the time," though he would still not identify his source.
A neurotic megalomaniac, as Tucker Carlson pegged him, Garcetti forced upon much of Southern California his ill-considered and restrictive daily mandates with televised lectures reflecting only his personal neuroses rather than actual science.
Most LA media didn't bother to question his veracity despite his long public track record of dishonesty.
Further, Garcetti's hypocrisy was evident early on as he ignored his own mandated mask-wearing, including in highly dense crowds, because his life-long goal is to be seen as Kennedy-esque and deep in thought, which are born solely of his fanciful imagination and delusions of grandeur.
It eventually caught up with him.
Labels: Daniel Guss, eric garcetti, joe biden, LA Times, Los Angeles Times, Mayor Of LA, The Guss Report, Tucker Carlson
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home