Parke's mutterings continue......, this time about "Pleitez for Congress"
Hey Parke,
You must love the column inches of newsprint being devoted to your latest missives about the upcoming election on May 19.
This latest will invite some slapback.
"I think he's doing a good job of mobilizing a nontraditional base," said Chu campaign consultant Parke Skelton, who said he thinks the likely low turnout would hurt, not help, Pleitez.
"He'll be a factor, but not a huge factor," Skelton said, adding that he believes that Pleitez could draw as many voters from Chu as from Cedillo -- an assessment most others interviewed did not agree with.
That is what Parke had to say in a LA Times story on Pleitez's crusade to upset both State Senator Gil Cedillo and State Board of Equalization member Judy Chu and replace now Labor Secretary Hilda Solis in Congress.
But despite Parke's spin on Pleitez, there is a growing buzz and momentum that is catching the attention of veteran political observers.
Jaime A. Regalado, director of the Pat Brown Institute of Public Affairs at Cal State L.A., said he saw no chance for Pleitez to win. "But the more he can identify himself as a young, smart Latino and appeal to young voters," Regalado said, the more "he becomes a wild card in terms of how he will affect a close race."
And from a republican observer.......
Allan Hoffenblum, a former Republican campaign consultant whose nonpartisan California Target Book tracks legislative races, said the expected low turnout, probably 20% to 25%, on top of the anti-incumbent sentiment afoot in much of the state and nation today, could work well for Pleitez.
"The lower the turnout, the more powerful grass-roots, personal contact campaigning becomes," Hoffenblum said. He stopped short of saying Pleitez could win.
"He's surely making a name for himself," Hoffenblum said. "I'll give him that."
........and with $202,000 to work with, either Chu or Cedillo will suffer on May 19, or maybe both ??
Your thoughts.............
Labels: CA 32, Emanuel Pleitez, Gil Cedillo, Judy Chu, Parke Skelton
11 Comments:
Anonymous said:
pleitez=zumadog; hero to bloggers, zero to the electorate
Bob said:
My thought? Not much as he isn't much different than the other candidates. It's impressive that he was able to raise as much money as he did. He should be able to parlay it into an elective office in the near future. I could dream that 3 Dems could split the enough so that the R can win but that is dreaming. If we were competitive in urban areas that scenario wouldn't be out of the question.
Anonymous said:
Didn't Hacopian work for Parke?
I wonder how many of Pleitez donors also donated to Chu?
Cedillo - or should I say Polanco - you should have done more to help Betty Chu.
Anonymous said:
Red Spot we all know you're getting paid to campaign for Trutanich now it looks like you're also helping Pleitez. He is a yonug, arrogant, screwed up Antonio little kiss ass. He already has bad habits like wanting to be introduced to people before he speaks to you. He' keeps using the word OBAMA when speaking. When he said he was a former staffer for Antonio people booed
Anonymous said:
I don't care.
Red Spot in CD 14 said:
The gig is up.....naught!!
Anonymous said:
Do you mean the jig is up, idiot snot? It is always a riot to read your entries because you still don't have a handle on fourth grade language skills.
Anonymous said:
10:15
If Red Spot meant that the gig - i.e., job - is up, then he wrote correctly. He was being accused of working for Pleitez so his response may have been correct that his job secret was "up."
Yeeeeah that's the ticket, Red Spot was referring to his job status.
Anonymous said:
There is a lot to this story.
Hacopian and Parke are as thick as thieves, they would never do any thing against each other. In fact Parke was the best man at Hacopian's wedding.
Hacopian's role here is all black opps., no way he does this without being asked to this by AV or Parke.
He is the hatchet man in LA politics, when there dirty shit going down you can bet his name will be some how associated with it.
Anonymous said:
Wasn't Hacopian Martin Ludlow's consultant?
Anonymous said:
There hasn't been much reporting on whether the Vietnamese electorate truly are lining up behind Chu. If the Vietnamese are not doing so and thereby stranding Chu with a too-small Chinese and cross-over base, could Andrew Cuomo determine Tuesday's result?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home